[A. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL]
[00:00:07]
THE GROVE CITY. MEANING COMMISSION MEETING. I CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER IF WE CAN START WITH ROLL CALL. MR ROCK. YOU'RE MR FREE. DOESN'T CHAIR OYSTER HERE, MR LINDER. MR TITUS HERE. AND IF YOU JOIN ME FOR A MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER, FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, PLEASE STAND.
REPUBLIC OR WHAT? REFERENCE TO JUST. KATE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO VIEW
[C. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES – July 6, 2021]
THE JULY 6TH MEETING MINUTES IF WE COULD JUST HAVE A MOTION MOVE. WE APPROVED THE MINUTES FROM JULY, 6TH. SECOND BROKE OFF MR FREE. YES. CHAIR. OYSTER YES, MR TITUS. YES, MR ROCK? YES. YEAH. TODAY. WE HAVE EIGHT ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. WHEN YOUR ITEM NUMBERS CALLED IF YOU WOULD STEP UP TO THE PODIUM AND STATE YOUR NAME AS WELL AS YOUR ADDRESS. GIVE ME YOUR HOME ADDRESS, OR IT CAN BE YOUR BUSINESS ADDRESS, WHICHEVER YOU'D LIKE TO DISCLOSED. AND THEN AFTER THAT THE CITY WILL READ THE BACKGROUND INFORMATION. SO FIRST ON THE[1. APPLICATION: Pinnacle Quarry – Lot Split ]
AGENDA IS PINNACLE QUARRY LOT SPLIT. NAME IS JASON FRANCIS. I'M WITHIN MY HOMES. MY ADDRESS IS 11 74 TRAINEES D CIRCLE GREAT CITY. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO SPLIT 22.501 ACRE SERVICE 71.37 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WHITE ROAD IN JACKSON PIKE. PLANNING COMMISSION PREVIOUSLY APPROVED THAT LOT SPLIT FOR THIS PARCEL AT THE MAY 4TH 2021 MEETING. HOWEVER THERE IS ORIGINAL SPLIT WAS NEVER RECORDED. SINCE THE TIME OF APPROVAL, THE DEVELOPMENT AREA HAS BEEN ADJUSTED TO INCLUDE RESERVE G IN SUB AREA B. AND THE PROPOSED SPLIT REVERIE REPRESENTS THE CHANGES IN THIS AREA. PROPOSED SPLIT WILL BE CREATED IN LONDON BOUNDARIES BETWEEN SUB AREAS A AND B OF THE DEVELOPMENT AS OUTLINED IN THE APPROVED ZONING, TEXT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SITE. ASIDE FROM THE INCLUSION OF THE AREAS SHOWN AS RESERVED G ON THE PLANS. STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE PROPOSED SPLIT AS IT WILL SEPARATE THE TWO SUB AREAS FOR THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. AND GENERALLY ALLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED LAYOUT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THEREFORE, AFTER REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION, THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS BY ANY COMMISSION APPROVED, THE LOT SPLIT ESTIMATED. MR FRANCIS. IS THERE ANYTHING ADDITIONAL THAT YOU'D LIKE TO COMMENT ON? AS STAFF INDICATED THIS WAS APPROVED IN MAY, UM IN THE PROCESS OF FINE TUNING OUR ENGINEERING. WE ACTUALLY JUST REALIZED WE HAD A MISTAKE AS I MENTIONED IN MAY, THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THIS PINNACLE QUARRY PROJECT IS BEING BUILT BY JOSEPH MENGELE OVER WORKING ON DEVELOPING IT TOGETHER. AND WE HAD JUST INADVERTENTLY INCLUDED FOUR LOTS ON THE WRONG SIDE. THE LOT SPLIT LINES IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING THE DEEDS PREPARED. UM JUST FIXING THIS UP AND IN FACILITATING THE CORRECT TRANSFER OF LAND. VERY GOOD.THANK YOU. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. HEARING NONE. WE CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH THE MOTION. YOU'RE GONNA MAKE THE MOTION.
WE APPROVED ITEM NUMBER ONE CLINICAL QUARRY LOT SPLIT. MM. CALL MR TITUS? YES. CHAIR OYSTER. YES, MR ROCK? YES, MR FREE. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER TWO LOCAL CANTINA AWNINGS
[2. APPLICATION: Local Cantina Awnings – Certificate of Appropriateness]
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS. MICHAEL MCFARLAND. AMERICAN AUDIENCE SIGN WESTERVILLE, OHIO. THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING APPROVAL OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS TO ALLOW FOR THE ADDITION OF ONYX TO THE BUILDING OF 39 37 BROADWAY. WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION AREA. ADMINISTRATIVE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE AWNINGS WAS DENIED ON JUNE 9TH. AS PROPOSED COLOR IS NOT IN THE APPROVED COLOR PALETTE FOR THOSE STORY PRESERVATION AREA. THIS APPLICATION IS TO APPEAL THE DENIAL. A TOTAL OF FIVE[00:05:03]
AWNINGS ARE PROPOSED TO ALONG THE BUILDINGS, BROADWAY FRONTAGE AND THREE ALONG THE COLUMBUS STREET FRONTAGE. THE PROPOSED ONYX WILL BE FITTED TO THE FRAME OF EACH WINDOW.PROJECT 24 INCHES FROM THE FACE OF THE BUILDING. THE ANNEX WILL USE THE SAME COLOR USED IN THE SIGNAGE AND THE UMBRELLAS ON THE BUILDING. AND A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS WAS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL IN 2018 FOR THE SIGNAGE. WHICH INCLUDED THE SIGNAGE ON THE BUILDING, NOTED, NOTING. PERMITTED DEVIATION TO THE APPROVED HP A COLOR PALETTE TO PERMIT THE ORANGE COLOR USED BY LOCAL CANTINA. SINCE THEY PROPOSED AWNING USE THE SAME COLOR THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY DEEMED APPROPRIATE FOR LOCAL CANTINA SIGNAGE. STAFF BELIEVES THE AWNINGS ARE APPROPRIATE.
THEREFORE AFTER BEING CONSIDERATION, THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMEND PLANNING COMMISSION. MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS HAS SUBMITTED. YEAH. LIKE TO ADD ANYTHING. OKAY. QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. I HAVE JUST ONE AND IT'S JUST TO REINFORCE ITS ALREADY IN THE TEXT HERE, BUT. THE ORANGE COLOR IN THE RENDERING OF THE AUDIENCE DOES NOT QUITE LOOK THE SAME AS THAT SIGN. I THINK I SUBMITTED ACTUAL FABRIC SAMPLE. ACTUAL SIGN OF THE AUDIENCE IS GOING TO MATCH THIS. YOU'RE AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE. IT'S UMBRELLAS? YES, OKAY.
YEAH. WAS ACTUALLY GOING TO ASK SOMETHING SIMILAR AS A SIGN TO ME SHOWS A LITTLE BIT MORE OF A REDDISH ORANGE, MAYBE A SUMMER AND COLOR AND THEN THE RENDERING ON WHAT WE JUST SAW LOOKED A LITTLE LIKE A BRIGHTER ORANGE. SO IT. IT WILL BE MORE OF A NOT NOT SO GREAT NOT SO BRIGHT. IT'S CALLED TUSCAN, AND IT'S MORE OF A MUTED. LITTLE LIGHTER THAN TERRACOTTA, BUT IT'S NOT A WORRY AGENT APPEARS THAT WAY IN THE RENDER. IT'S DIFFERENT, SOMETIMES WITH PICTURES EXACTLY. TECHNOLOGY EXACTLY. IT'S USUALLY WRONG. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSIONS. I REMEMBER WHEN YOU PROVED YOUR SIGN BECAUSE IT FITS YOUR COLORS. TO ME. THIS IS AN AWFUL LOT OF A COLOR THAT'S NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THE DISTRICT. I WISH YOU COULD FOLKS COULD GET SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE. IN THE PALETTE THAT WOULD COMPLEMENT YOUR SIGN. I MEAN, I SEE THAT YOU KNOW YOUR SIGN. IS YOUR LOGO YOUR BRAND, BUT WHEN YOU'RE PUTTING. NOT MUCH ORANGE UP WHEN IT DOESN'T FIT IN THE COLOURS IS WHERE I WISH YOU'D TRIED TO FIND A COLOR THAT WOULD COMPLEMENT ASSIGNED RATHER THAN. NOW WE'VE GOT A TON OF INAPPROPRIATE COLORS GOING DOWN THROUGH THERE. DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO APPEAR AS BRIGHT AS IT DID IN THERE BUT TO WRITE. IT IS A LOT OF TUSCANS UMBRELLA, BUT. THERE'S THEIR BRANDING, AS YOU SAID SO, BUT THE SIGN IS BRANDING THAT OR THE COLOR THE SIGN IS BRANDY, BUT NOT NOT A BIG CAMPUS, I GUESS IS THE PROBLEM. I HAVE WITH IT RIGHT. IT'S JUST THE COLOR. ASSOCIATED WITH LOCAL CANTEEN. WE JUST HAPPEN TO HAVE THAT SWATCH. WE DO HAVE IT IN OUR OFFICE. WE CAN GO AND GET IT IF YOU'D LIKE. UM THERE. UM WE TOOK A SCAN OR A PICTURE OF THAT SWATCH AND INCLUDED A WITH THE MATERIAL SO IT WOULD BE APPROVED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION, AND EVEN FROM THE SKIN, YOU CAN TELL THAT IT IS FAR MORE MUTED COLOR MORE IN LINE WITH WHAT THE SIGN IS, BUT I THINK SEEING IT IN PERSON, AN ACTUAL FABRIC WILL HELP CLARIFY.
THANK YOU FOR THAT. THE OTHER QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. THERE. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. NONE WERE READY FOR A MOTION. I WILL MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER TO THE LOCAL CANTINA AWNINGS CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AS PRESENTED SECOND UH HUH. MR ROCK? YES MR TITUS? NO MR FREE. YES. CHAIR. OYSTER? YES. THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU. NUMBER THREE SEASONS GROVE REZONING. YEAH. MIKE WAGNER, VICE
[3. APPLICATION: Seasons Grove - Rezoning]
[00:10:01]
PRESIDENT OF HOUSING STORY. AND MY NAME IS UNMOVED IN NORTHERN I'M WITH MARIE NORTHERN ARCHITECTS, THE ARCHITECTS. SO HAVE TWO OTHER TEAM MEMBERS. CHRIS FLEMING WITH KORDA ENGINEERING AND BUS FOR ISN'T THAT ANGEL LANDSCAPE? YOUR ADDRESS. EAST 11TH AVENUE. ON THIS OHIO THANK YOU, GEORGE. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REZONE 4.14 ACRES. FROM SEA TO RETAIL, COMMERCIAL AND P U D. C PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL. P U D ARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRESIDENTIAL. A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 76 UNIT AGE RESTRICTED SENIOR LIVING FACILITY WAS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL IN JUNE OF THIS YEAR. THE REZONING PROCESS ESTABLISHES THE STANDARDS FOR THE SITE TO ALLOW FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.PERMITTED USES ON THE SITE INCLUDE MULTI FAMILY DWELLINGS, WHICH WILL BE AGE RESTRICTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HOUSING FOR OLDER PERSONS. EXEMPTIONS OF THE FAIR HOUSING ACT. PERMITTED USES ARE COMPATIBLE WITH OTHER SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES IN THE AREA, INCLUDING LAMPLIGHTER SENIOR VILLAGE TO THE SOUTH AND CREATIVE HOUSING 13 TO THE WEST. STANDARDS IN THE TEXT INCLUDE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS. TO ENSURE COHESIVE DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS IN CHARACTER WITH THE AREA. AS WELL AS TO PROVIDE AN APPROPRIATE TRANSITION FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. DURING THE OHIO HEALTH MESSAGES HOSPITAL CAMPUS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE NORTH. SEVERAL DEVIATIONS FROM KODA REQUESTED IN THE TEXT, INCLUDING REDUCTIONS IN THE NUMBER OF PARKING AND OPEN SPACE, HOWEVER, BECAUSE OF THE AGE RESTRICTED NATURE OF THE PROJECT. BASED ON INFORMATION THE APPLICANT PROVIDED ON OTHER SIMILAR PROJECTS DEVELOPED BY COLUMBUS METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY. STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF GRANTING THE REQUEST OF DEVIATIONS. THE APPLICANT ALSO CONDUCTED A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TO EXAMINE POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO AREA ROADWAYS AND INTERSECTIONS RESULTING FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. WHICH FOUND ITS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT CAUSE A SIGNAL TO BE WARRANTED AT THE INTERSECTION OF LAMPLIGHTER DRIVE AND BUCKEYE PARKWAY. THE ANALYSIS DID, HOWEVER, FIND IT BASED ON MORE PC PREDICTED ANNUAL TRAFFIC GROWTH RATES. A SIGNAL WILL BE WARRANTED BY THE YEAR 2043 WITH OR WITHOUT THE PROPOSED PROJECT BEING DEVELOPED. HOWEVER, STAFF ANTICIPATES BY THAT TIME LAMPLIGHTER DRIVE WILL BE EXTENDED TO CONNECT THE STRING TOWN ROAD AS PER. APPROVED THOROUGH FORMAT TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ACCESS AND CONNECTIVITY IN THE AREA. NOTING THAT THE TEXAS ESTABLISHES STANDARDS THAT WILL ENSURE THAT THE PROJECT BE DEVELOPED IN A MANNER COMPATIBLE WITH BOTH THE EXISTING CHARACTER. AS WELL AS THE FUTURE LAND USE FOR THE AREA OUTLINED IN THE GROVE CITY 2050 COMMUNITY PLAN. AFTER REVIEWING CONSIDERATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS PLENTY COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE REASONING AS SUBMITTED. YOU LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS. TWO. YEAH. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. READY FOR EMOTION.
GOING TO MAKE THE MOTION WE RECOMMEND TO OUR CITY COUNCIL. APPROVAL OF ITEM THREE SEASONS GROVE REASONING. SECOND OH, COOL. YOUR OYSTER? YES MR ROCK. YES, MR FREE? YES, MR TITUS.
THANK YOU. NUMBER FOUR TOAST, SO 2021 EDITION FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. I TOMLIN'S L
[4. APPLICATION: TOSOH 2021 Addition – Final Development Plan]
M A ARCHITECTS, SOME SOME FIVE YARDS STREET SUITE. 3 25. COLUMBUS, OHIO. THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN 11,200 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO THE EXISTING COASTAL BUILDING AT 3600 AGAINST ROBE. THE SITE WAS ORIGINALLY DEVELOPED IN 1991, AND THE FACILITY HAS UNDERGONE FOUR EXPANSION SINCE THEN. MAKING THIS THE PROPOSED MAKING THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE FIFTH. THE PROPOSED EDITION WILL BE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING BETWEEN EXPANSION NUMBER FOUR COMPLETED IN 2019 IN SOUTH PARK PLACE, THE ADDITION WILL BE ONE STORY TOTAL MEASURING 11,002 SQUARE FEET WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 28 FT. THE EXTERIOR WILL BE FINISHED WITH HORIZONTALLY ORIENTED METAL[00:15:03]
PANELS MATCHING THE COLOR BANDS HEIGHT. WINDOW BAND OF THE ADJACENT BUILDING FACADE, PROVIDING CONTINUITY AND UNIFORMITY BETWEEN THE ADDITION IN THE EXISTING BUILDING. SITE FROM MINOR UTILITY LINE RELOCATIONS TO ACCOMMODATE THE BUILDING EXPANSION. NO OTHERS SAY IMPROVEMENTS ARE PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION. THE PROPOSED EXPANSION MEETS THE FUTURE LAND USE RECOMMENDATION IN THE GROUP CITY 2050 COMMUNITY PLANNED FUTURE LAND USING CHARACTER MAN. WILL ALLOW TO ALSO TO EXPAND THEIR OPERATIONS IN GROVE CITY. AND THEREFORE, AFTER REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS PLANNING COMMISSION. RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, ESTIMATED. LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS UNDER THAT THAT COVERS IT. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS ARE PLANNING COMMISSION. WE JUST HAVE A COMMENT THAT IT'S NICE TO SEE A ANCHOR BUSINESS FOR THE CITY OF GREAT CITY CONTINUE TO GROW AND THRIVE. YES, WE'VE BEEN VERY FORTUNATE TO BE INVOLVED WITH TELL SO. THE LAST THREE EDITIONS AND HOPEFULLY MORE ABOUT COMING UP.OTHER. BE ANY NEED IN THE FUTURE FOR ADDITIONAL PARKING AREA FOR POTENTIAL EXTRA EMPLOYEES THAT THIS WILL ENABLE WE ARE IN TALKS WITH TOAST. SO ABOUT DOING, UM, A MASTER PLANNING STUDY THAT WILL LOOK AT THAT AS WELL AS. STORM SEWERS AND. POWER, ETCETERA, ETCETERA, SO TO SORT OF MAP OUT FUTURE EXPANSION. POSSIBILITIES, SO IT'S COMING.
HAS JUST CONCERNED, THE MORE HARD SURFACING WE CREATE WITH ROOFTOPS AND PARKING LOTS MORE.
WE COMPOUND SOME RUNOFF. PERIOD. TAKING THAT INTO CONSIDERATION. ABSOLUTELY. THE OTHER QUESTIONS. THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THERE ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC? WITHOUT WE CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH THE MOTION. YOU'RE ALL IN MOTION THAT WE APPROVED. ITEM NUMBER FOUR TOAST 21 2021 ADDITION. LITTLE PLANT AS A CAREER. AS STATED. SECOND. CALL MR FREE. YES, MR TITUS? YES. CHAIR OYSTER. YES, MR ROCK? YES. THANK YOU. MR LINDSEY L JUST HE WOULD PASS ALONG APPRECIATION TO THE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER ABOUT THE CONTINUED INVESTMENT.
ABSOLUTELY. CITIGROUP CITY. THANK YOU. NUMBER FIVE. OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP. MODULAR
[5. APPLICATION: Our Lady of Perpetual Help Modular Classroom – Certificate of]
CLASSROOMS, CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS. NOW JULIE FREEMAN PRINCIPLE. 37 52 BROADWAY. AND KEVIN RADWAN, SKI FACILITIES DIRECTOR FOR OUR LADY. SAME ADDRESS. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP CATHOLIC SCHOOL IN ORDER TO INSTALL A MODULAR CLASSROOM. THE APPLICANT APPLIED FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS WITH THE BUILDING DIVISION EARLIER THIS YEAR, WHICH WAS DENIED DUE TO THE PROPOSED CLASSROOM BEING PROPOSED FIRST SET TIMEFRAME OF 4 TO 5 YEARS NOT BEING INSTALLED PERMANENTLY. CITY COUNCIL CAN OVERTURN DENIED ADMINISTRATIVE A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS WITH US YOU APPROVAL. THE PROPOSED MODULAR CLASSROOM WILL CONTAIN TWO CLASSROOMS AND BATHROOMS TO ACCOMMODATE ADDITIONAL GENERAL CLASSROOM SPACE AS WELL AS INTERVENTION SPECIALISTS. UM, PROPOSED IS TO BE PLACED 20 FT WEST OF THE CURRENT GYMNASIUM, PARTIALLY ON THE GRASS AND PARTIALLY ON THE PAVEMENT, ENCOMPASSING PORTIONS OF THE THREE OF THREE OF THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES. ADA RAMPANT STAIRCASE ALREADY BE INSTALLED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING TO HAVE STUDENTS AND TEACHERS ENTER OPPOSITE THE PARKING LOT WITH THE RAMP CONNECTING TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK. AND SINCE THE BUILDING WILL BE ADJACENT TO A DRIVE, I'LL IN PARKING SPACES, SIX INCH BALL AIDS. I PROPOSE ON THE CORNERS OF THE BUILDING, STAFFING THESE BOLLARDS TO BE PLACED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE MODULAR NO FURTHER THAN FOUR FT. APART ON CENTER. TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE VIA VEHICULAR IMPACT PROTECTION AND CHAMPION STILL PER STANDARD, DRAWING CGC 81. THE MODULAR BUILDING IS PROPOSED TO HAVE A SESAME COLORED VERTICAL WOOD SIDING ON IT, WHICH IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE HPE A COLOR PALETTE. STEP IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE BUILDING DESIGN AS IT HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR OTHER MODULE. LOWER BUILDINGS ON SCHOOL PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE CITY AND WILL BE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 500 FT.EAST OF BROADWAY NOT VISIBLE FROM THE ROADWAY. THEREFORE AFTER REVIEWING CONSIDERATION, THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS. WITH THE STIPULATION REGARDING BOLLARDS.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADD ANYTHING? JUST THAT WE ARE BRINGING THIS FORWARD WITH THE IDEA THAT THIS
[00:20:07]
IS A TEMPORARY STRUCTURE, BUT AT THIS TIME WE'RE UNDERGOING OUR OWN LONG RANGE PLANNING SO ON THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION, WE PUT THE 45 YEAR TIME FRAME. JUST GIVE US TIME TO GET THAT DEVELOPMENT PLANT PUT TOGETHER. AT THIS TIME. WE ARE LOOKING AT 48 MONTH LEASE ON THE MODULAR, BUT AGAIN, IT COULD BE SOONER THAN THAT. IF OUR DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMES TOGETHER SOONER.YEAH. QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. COMMENT AGAIN THAT I APPRECIATE THE LEADERSHIP AT OUR LADY AND THE GOOD THAT THIS SHOWS WITH THE EXPANSION AND THE NEED FOR MORE SPACE. IT'S A GOOD THING FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND OUR SCHOOL. I DID HAVE A QUESTION ON THE BOLLARD SO HE WANTED TO MAKE SURE YOU WERE OKAY WITH THE CONCEPT OF PUTTING BOLLARDS ALONG THAT FULL WEST WALL. EVERY FOUR FT. YES, THAT'S CERTAINLY SOMETHING TO PROTECT BOTH THE TRAFFIC AS WELL AS THE BUILDING ITSELF. THAT SHOULD NOT BE A SIGNIFICANT ITEM. THIS QUESTION IS MORE FOR STAFF. BUT IN THE LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS WE'VE APPROVED BOTHERED THAT ARE MORE LIKE BIG PLANTERS WOULD THAT ALSO QUALIFY UNDER THE WORDING THAT WE HAVE HERE FOR BOLLARDS? IF THEY SO CHOSE TO DO THAT, UM. SO NOT NECESSARILY THE STANDARD DRAWING IS JUST YOUR STANDARD TYPE OF BOLLARD AND IT IS DESIGNED TO GO BE PUT UNDERNEATH THE GROUND, AND SO THERE'S A PORTION IT MAKES IT. MORE IMPACT RESISTANT TO DO IT THAT WAY. IF THEY WANTED TO ADD SOME PLANTERS IN HIM BETWEEN THEM WERE WELCOME TO DO THAT. WE DIDN'T REQUIRE IT IN THIS CASE TO DO THE EXTRA LANDSCAPING, BUT. MAJOR BOLLARDS. WE HAD PROVED NOVA CAINE WOULD NOT BE THE CODE HERE? NO, OKAY. JUST TO CLARIFY IF. BECAUSE WE HAVE PERMITTED THAT ON OTHER RECENT APPLICATIONS IF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FELT IT APPROPRIATE ARE MORE DESIRABLE YOU COULD MODIFY OUR RECOMMENDED STIPULATION. BECAUSE RIGHT NOW IT DOES SAY THAT IT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER OUR STANDARD DRAWING, WHICH WOULD JUST BE THE TYPICAL BOLLARD IF YOU WANTED TO ADD THE LANGUAGE ALONG THE LINES OF OR VEHICLE RESISTANT OR IMPACT RESISTANT LANDSCAPE PLANTERS. OR OTHER AVENUES DEEMED APPROPRIATE.
THEN THAT COULD CERTAINLY BE CONSIDERED. ANY INTEREST IN THAT OR YOU GOOD WITH JUST THE STANDARD PLANT BOTHER. YEAH THAT MIGHT BE SOMETHING TO LOOK AT. I WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT THE MEASUREMENTS AGAIN TO SEE WHAT THOSE STANDARDS. HOW BIG A PLANNER HOW HEAVY WHETHER THAT WOULD FIT OR WHETHER THAT WOULD RESTRICT TRAFFIC. THAT WOULD BE MY ONLY CONCERNED THE SIX INCH PIPE BOEHLERT, OBVIOUSLY MINIMAL DISTANCE. THAT IT WOULD TAKE INTO THE LOT, BUT CERTAINLY SOMETHING IF THAT, UH, FLEXIBILITY WAS IN, THERE MIGHT BE BENEFICIAL. THEIR QUESTIONS PLANNING COMMISSION. THERE. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. YOU KNOW WE'RE READY FOR MOTION. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION, BUT I'D LIKE TO MODIFY THIS STIPULATION THAT'S PRESENTED TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO USE THOSE OTHER TYPES OF BOLLARDS.
YES. SO JUST PROCEDURALLY. SO YOU'RE MAKING A MOTION TO AMEND THE STIPULATION AND YEAH.
LANGUAGE ON THAT. MAKING EMOTION THAT WILL HAVE A DIFFERENT STIPULATION, THEN IS PRESENTED. THE SCREEN. MM. RIGHT AND SO YOU'RE MENDING THAT STIPULATION YOU COULD.
IT'S UP TO YOU. HOWEVER YOU WANT IT. YOU COULD DO IT AS IF YOU'RE IF YOU WANT TO KEEP WHAT'S IN THERE AND THEN DO OR. THE IMPACT RESISTANT DOLLARS. YOU COULD DO IT THAT I'M SORRY, PLANTERS. RIGHT THEN. SO I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THAT WE APPROVED. AMEND THIS STIPULATION OF MEN THIS STIPULATION. THAT THE BOLLARDS. WILL BE INSTALLED FURTHER REQUIREMENTS OF GROSS CITY, DRAWING C G C 81 OR IMPACT RESISTANT EQUIVALENTS. AND ADDITIONAL BOLLARDS WILL BE PLACED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING PLACE NO FURTHER THAN FOUR PETE FEET APART ON CENTER. SECOND, WE'LL CALL. MR TITUS? YES MR FREE? YES MR ROCK CHEER OYSTER. YES. THEN I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THAT WE APPROVED. SAY THEM. NUMBER FIVE. OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP MODULAR CLASSROOM AS AMENDED, I SAID. COME, MR ROCK. YES, MR FREE?
[00:25:07]
YES. CHAIR OYSTER. YES, MR TITUS? YES? THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER SIX FIRST GARAGE[6. APPLICATION: Burris Garage - Rezoning]
REZONING. WALL 30 83 COLUMBUS STREET. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A REZONING FOR 38 47 BROADWAY FROM C ONE, WHICH IS SERVICE COMMERCIAL. TWO P U D R WHICH IS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL. IN ORDER TO PERMIT DIFFERENT USES ON THE PROPERTY AND CONSTRUCT A DETACHED GARAGE. CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE PRELIMINARY PLAN AT THE JULY 6TH MEETING, WHICH WAS THE FIRST STEP IN THE P U D REZONING PROCESS WITH THE REZONING BEING THE SECOND STEP AND HAVE MOVED FORWARD. IT WILL BE TENTATIVELY ON THE AUGUST 16TH AND SEPTEMBER 20TH CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS. THE NEXT STEP FOLLOWING THAT IS TO SUBMIT A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DO PROPERTIES LOCATION WITHIN THE HISTORICAL PRESERVATION AREA. THIS PROPERTY WAS OWNED TO SEE ONE IN 1975 AS PART OF THE ADOPTION OF THE CURRENT ZONING CODE AND HAS BEEN USED BOTH RESIDENTIAL IAN COMMERCIALLY SINCE THAT TIME, THE SUBMITTED ZONING TEXT INCLUDES USES THAT WOULD TYPICALLY BE PERMITTED IN C ONE OR P. S A, WHICH IS THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRICT. SUCH AS EATING AND DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS. PERSONAL SERVICES, RETAIL AND OFFICES AS WELL AS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. THE TEXT DISCUSSES PROPOSED MATERIALS FOR THE GARAGE ENCOMPASSING COLORS WITHIN THE H B, A COLOR PALETTE IN MATERIALS SUCH AS BRICK, STONE, VINYL AND HARDY PLANK.DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES. DEVIATIONS FROM KODA REQUESTED TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED GARAGE, INCLUDING THE OVERALL SQUARE FOOTAGE, UM, GARAGE, HEIGHT, WALL HEIGHT AND REAR SETBACK. STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE DEVIATIONS AS MANY OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES HAVE DETACHED GARAGES WITH VARYING SIZES AND SETBACKS. AND THE PROPOSED REGULATIONS WILL NOT BE OUT OF CHARACTER WITH OTHER EXISTING STRUCTURES. STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE PROPOSED REZONING AS IT WILL PERMIT THE CURRENT IMPASSE. USAGES OF THE SITE AS WELL. THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN COMMERCIAL SITE, NOTING THAT THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY A VARIETY OF ZONING DISTRICTS THAT ALLOW A MIXTURE OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES. THEREFORE AFTER REVIEWING CONSIDERATION, THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS PLANNING COMMISSION MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO SEE COUNCIL FOR THE REZONING AS SUBMITTED. ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE TO ADD. SO UNLESS THERE'S QUESTIONS, OKAY, THANKS. QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. HAVE A FEW I VOTED AGAINST THIS THE FIRST TIME IT CAME AROUND BECAUSE THERE WAS SUCH SIGNIFICANT DEVIATIONS FROM. CODE THAT WE REQUESTED AND THEY APPEAR TO STILL BE HERE. THE INCREASE OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FROM 14 42. I'M SORRY. 900 IN THE CODE OF 14 40. REALLY DOUBLING AT THE HEIGHT OF THE GARAGE GOING TO 30 FT. AGAIN, MORE THAN DOUBLING IT A SMALL INCREASE IN THE WALL HEIGHT AND. CUTTING THE SETBACK FROM THE PROPERTY LINES. ALMOST IN HALF MORE THAN HALF OF WHAT WAS REQUIRED. SO I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THIS IS WITHIN THE SCOPE. YEAH. APPROPRIATE CHANGE FOR THAT CHARACTER OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND I'LL BE VOTING AGAINST. LIKE TO THINK THE BIRD'S FAMILY. I THINK THIS I COMPLETELY DISAGREE WITH MY COLLEAGUE THAT THIS IS A VERY APPROPRIATE IT FITS THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND WE APPRECIATE THE INVESTMENT FOR OTHER FOLKS THAT LIVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THANK YOU. YEAH I MEAN, IT IS REPLACING AN EXISTING STRUCTURE TRYING TO MAKE IT MORE. VISUALLY APPEALING, UM AND ALSO FIXING A MAJOR FLOODING ISSUE THAT'S HAPPENING IN THE CURRENT GARAGE FACE, SO. THE QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. NOW WE CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH MOTION HERE. I MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE RECOMMEND TO OUR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. ITEM SICK, THE FIRST GARAGE REASON. OKAY? CALL MR ROCK. YES, MR TITUS? YES MR FREE. NO CHAIR. OYSTER? YES.
THANK YOU. NUMBER SEVEN FUEL A PARK, SIBERIA, D AND E PRIMAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. NOON REBECCA,
[7. APPLICATION: Beulah Park Subarea D and E – Final Development Plan]
MONT. WITH THE PLANK LAW FIRM WITH AN OFFICE ADDRESS OF 4, 11 EAST TOWNE STREET. COLUMBUS, OHIO, 43215. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BULA PARK, SUB AREA D AND LAST PORTION OF SUB AREA ET RICHARD, BOTH LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWESTERN[00:30:02]
PORTION OF THE SITE. AND THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS A CONTINUATION FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY HOME LOTS IN SECTION TWO AND EXAMINES ITEMS NOT APPROVED AS PART OF THE SECTION TWO DEVELOPMENT PLAN, INCLUDING THE INDIVIDUAL LOT, LANDSCAPING AND HOME ELEVATIONS. A TOTAL OF 86 SINGLE FAMILY HOME. LOTS ARE INCLUDED WITH THIS PROPOSAL WAS 16 WITHIN SUB AREA E ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MYSTIC WAY ADJACENT TO THE CENTRAL BULA PARK, OPEN SPACE AND 70 LOTS WITHIN SUB AREA D, WHICH IS OFF OF THE PARK STREET EXTENSION. THE HOME DESIGNS MATCH THOSE THAT WERE APPROVED IN 2019 FOR THE OTHER PORTION OF SUB AREA IN THE WEST OF THE CENTRAL OPEN SPACE. THESE INCLUDE HOMES WITH FORESIGHTED ARCHITECTURE AND FRONT PORCHES, AS REQUIRED PER THE BUREAU PARK ZONING TEXT. EACH OF THE HOMES ARE TO HAVE DIFFERENT DESIGN ELEMENTS SUCH AS BRICK OR STONE ACCENTS, SHUTTERS, BAND BOARDS VERTICAL, CITING SHE EXCITING, DIFFERING ROOF DESIGNS DIFFERENT. I'M SORRY WINDOW CLUSTERS, DORMERS AND OTHER ELEMENTS ON EACH SIDE OF THE HOMES. THE MAJORITY OF THE HOME MODELS WILL BE TWO STORIES AND WE'LL MEET THE 1800 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT MEANT AS PER THE ZONING TEXT. FIVE DIFFERENT DEVIATIONS FROM THE ZONING TECH STANDARDS HAVE BEEN REQUESTED, AS OUTLINED IN THE SLIDE DISPLAYED BEFORE YOU AND WITHIN OUR STAFF REPORT, PRIMARILY RELATED TO GARAGE WIDTH AND SETBACKS. STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF ALL PROPOSED DEVIATIONS AS THEY WILL EITHER BE CONSISTENT WITH THOSE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CYBERIA E OR BECAUSE THEY ARE RESULTING FROM LOT WITH APPROVED IN THE VILLA PARK SECTION TWO DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE SITE IS THE FINAL PORTION OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN THE VIEW OF PARK DEVELOPMENT. AND CONTINUING TO ADD TO THE MIX OF RESIDENTIAL USES CURRENTLY AVAILABLE. THE LOTS WERE DESIGNED TO MORE SO CONFORMED WITH THE NEARBY. ALL RIGHT, PLEASE. NEARBY RESIDENTIAL AREAS BEING MORE NARROW IN NATURE BELOW THE MINIMUM WIDTH IN THE CITIES ESTABLISHED ZONING DISTRICTS REQUIRING A P U D R REZONING. ADDITIONALLY STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WILL INTEGRATE WELL INTO THE SURROUNDING AREA AND MEET THE INTENDED CHARACTER OF THE BUREAU. PARK DEVELOPMENT ESTABLISHED IN THE APPROVED ZONING TEXT, THEREFORE, AFTER RIVIAN CONSIDERATION, THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS PLANNING COMMISSION. MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH THE FIVE DEVIATIONS THAT ARE LISTED. YEAH. SO IF I MAY APPROACH THE BENCH, I DO HAVE ONE HAND OUT. I'D LIKE TO SHARE IS THAT ABSOLUTELY THANK YOU.OKAY? AGAIN THIS IS THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SUB AREA D AND HEAD OF SIBERIA E AND P L A PARK. AND THAT IS THE LIST OF DEVIATIONS WE REQUESTED IN THE APPLICATION, ALL OF WHICH APPEAR ON THE SCREEN EXCEPT ONE ON THE FIRST TWO. YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN ABOVE YOU ARE ACTUALLY OUR ITEM ONE TOGETHER COLLECTIVELY. OUR NUMBER FOUR RELATED TO THE ARCHITECTURAL CLARIFICATIONS AS TO WHAT WOULD CONSTITUTE FORESIGHTED ARCHITECTURE WE WOULD LIKE ADDED IF IT'S NOT A DEVIATION, TECHNICALLY, WE WOULD LOVE THAT LANGUAGE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE RESOLUTION ITSELF. SO THAT WOULD CARRY THROUGH AND HAVE CLEAN APPROVALS FOR THE DEVELOPER GOING FORWARD ON WHAT WAS APPROVED. ALSO I WOULD KNOW THAT BACK IN 2019 FOR THE OTHER PORTION OF SUB AREA E THAT WAS APPROVED UNDER A RESOLUTION. MANY OF THESE DEVIATIONS WERE APPROVED. THEN AT THAT SAME TIME, SO, FOR EXAMPLE. A MAXIMUM OF 46% OF THE WIDTH OF THE HOUSE FACADE TO GARAGE TO HOUSE. UM. COMPATIBILITY WAS THE SAME VARIANTS PROVIDED AND APPROVED BACK IN 2019 ALSO THE DEVIATION THAT RELATES TO THE EIGHT INCHES OF EXPOSED CONCRETE BLOCK AND CONCRETE. AS LONG AS IT IS STAMPED WITH A BRICK OR MASONRY DESIGN WAS APPROVED ALREADY FOR SUB AREA, EAT THE OTHER PORTION BACK IN 2019. AND ALSO THAT THIS ALL HOMES SHOULD HAVE THE FORESIGHTED ARCHITECTURE. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME YOU'RE SEEING THE CLARIFICATION OF THE LIST OF THINGS AND ITEM NUMBER FOUR, BUT THAT WAS THE SAME DEVIATION OR CLARIFICATION. PROVIDED AGAIN FOR SUB AREA E IN 2019, SO THREE OF THEM ARE THE SAME AS WHAT WAS ALREADY APPROVED FOR E. AND THEN WE'RE ASKING FOR THE TWO OTHER ONES. THAT'S ITEM NUMBER TWO. BUT JUST THE LAW FOR FRONT OF THE MARK. THIS STREET F HERE. BECAUSE THEY'RE 52 INCH OR FEET IN WITHIN 120 FT IN DEPTH BECAUSE THERE ARE A LITTLE SMALLER THAN THE OTHER WATSON SUB AREA E THAT THEY DON'T HAVE TO HAVE A SIGN LOADED GARAGE, SO THAT IS THE REASON FOR THAT REQUEST. HOWEVER, THE HOME QUALITY CONSTRUCTION WILL BE THE SAME AS ALL OTHER LOTS IN SUB AREA E AND THE PRICE POINT WILL BE THE SAME BECAUSE THOSE LOTS
[00:35:03]
ACTUALLY BACK TO OPEN SPACE. SO THOSE ARE VERY GOOD LOTS EVEN IF THEY'RE A LITTLE BIT SMALLER. AND THEN THE LAST DEVIATION RELATES TO A SET BACK FROM THE GARAGE TO THE PRIMARY BUILDING FACADE, THE CODE OR THE TEXT, NOT THE CODE, THE TEXT CURRENTLY SAYS A TWO FT SETBACK. WE'RE ASKING FOR THAT TO BE 11 FT SETBACK. GARAGE TO BUILDING FACADE, SO THAT IS ALL THE DEVIATIONS AND WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. WHAT IS THE PRICE POINT OF THESE HOMES? THE AVERAGE PRICE POINT IN SIBERIA E, INCLUDING THE LOTS ON STREET F WOULD BE ABOUT 420,000. OTHER CHRISTIANS ARE PLANNING COMMISSION. I'VE GOTTEN A CHANCE TO REVIEW THESE. YES UM, WE HAVE BEEN OVER THEM A FEW TIMES OF MISS MOTT AND HAVE DISCUSSED THEM. MANY OF THEM ARE REPEATED OVER FROM SIBERIA E. THE OTHER SECTION, INCLUDING THE. WITH OF THE GARAGE DOOR, OPENING THE ONE FT SETBACK, AS OPPOSED THE TWO FT. AND THE EXPOSED CONCRETE FOUNDATION, AS SHE WAS TALKING ABOUT THE ONLY NEW ONE IS THE NUMBER FIVE. DO THAT WHICH WE HAVE DISCUSSED WITH HER DO THE WIDTH OF THE LOTS WOULD BE VERY DIFFICULT TO A COMEDY. AND JUST TO CLARIFY THIS EXHIBIT TWO THAT WAS DISTRIBUTED TODAY WAS SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY WITH THE MATERIALS, SO HOPEFULLY THIS DOESN'T LOOK NEW, AND IT IS SOMETHING THAT STAFF HAD REVIEWED BEFORE AND WE'RE COMFORTABLE WITH. MAY WE MAKE A SUGGESTION THAT OUR MOTION, UM POSSIBLY BE CONSIDERED TO JUST ADD THE ITEM FOR ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION LIST INTO A CLARIFICATION SECTION? IN THIS LIST. THAT WAY IT COULD APPEAR IN THE.EVENTUAL RESOLUTION. IF YOU COULD CONSIDER THAT. TALKING ABOUT JUST ADDING BULLET 0.4 OR ADDING THIS WHOLE EXHIBIT. NOT THE WHOLE EXHIBIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR QUESTION. UM ARE ITEM NUMBER FOUR ISN'T MATCHING THE ITEM NUMBER FOUR ON THE SCREEN. SO THE ENTIRETY OF ITEM NUMBER FOUR AND IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE BULLET POINT FORMAT. BUT THE ENTIRETY OF ITEM FOR IF WE CAN ADD THAT AS A CLARIFICATION. AT THE END OF THE LIST. THAT WOULD BE OUR PREFERENCE. I'M AN ALTERNATIVE WAY OF HANDLING. THIS IS, UM POTENTIALLY. REMOVING THESE FIVE SPECIFIC DEVIATIONS AND JUST ADOPTING ESSENTIALLY THIS EXHIBIT AS A STIPULATION. THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH THE FIVE STIPULATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS, AS NOTED IN EXHIBIT. TWO WE COULD AGREE WITH THAT AS WELL. THAT WOULD JUST CONCLUDE MY COMMENT WITH HAVING JUST. IT AGAINST MEASURE BECAUSE OF VARIATIONS FROM CODE. I WOULD SAY THESE ALL APPEAR TO BE MINOR TECHNICAL ISSUES HAVING TO DO WITH LOT SIZES THAT THINGS JUST DON'T QUITE FIT INTO. AND THEY'RE NOT OF A SIGNIFICANT DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED TEXT. WE AGREE. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. HEARING, NONE WERE READY FOR EMOTION. TAKE A CRACK AT IT. SO I HAVE I MOVE THAT WE APPROVED ITEM NUMBER SEVEN VILLA PARK SUB AREA D PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. REPLACING THE FIVE PROPOSED DEVIATIONS IN THE THAT REPORT.
WITH THE. FIVE DEVIATIONS ENUMERATED IN THE APPLICANTS. EXHIBIT NUMBER. TWO SO JUST TO CLARIFY IT'S NOT APPROVED ITS APPROVING THE AMENDMENT. SO THE MOTION WE'RE TAKING NOW IS REPLACING THESE FIVE STIPULATIONS WITH EXHIBIT HERE. I THINK THAT'S THE INTENT OF YOUR MOTION. SECONDS. COOL CHAIR. OYSTER? YES, MR ROCK. YES MR FREE? YES, MR TITUS.
[00:40:06]
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, AND I WILL FURTHER MOVE. WE APPROVED. ITEM NUMBER SEVEN BELOW PARKS OF AREA D AND PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS A MAN. SECOND OKAY? MR ROCK? YES MR TITUS? YES, MR FREE CHAIR, OYSTER. FOR EIGHT. EULA PARK SECTION TWO PLAQUE. REBECCA,[8. APPLICATION: Beulah Park Section 2 - Plat]
MONT. WITH THE PLANK LAW FIRM. YEAH. APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PLAT FOR VIEW. A PARK SECTION TWO IN THE SOUTHWESTERN PORTION OF THE SITE. THIS PLATFORM LOWS, THE APPROVALS OF THE BEAUTIFUL PARK SECTION TWO DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS, WHICH HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY APPROVED, AND IF MOVE FORWARD, IT WILL BE HEARD BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST 16TH IN SEPTEMBER. 6TH. FOR ROADWAYS ARE INCLUDED AS PART OF SECTION TWO, INCLUDING THE EXTENSIONS OF VILLA PARK DRIVE MYSTIC WAY IN PARK STREET. AND THEN ONE NEW ROADWAY. BRODY DRIVE IS PROPOSED IN SIBERIA, D TWO LOOP ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PARK STREET AND WILL PROVIDE A SECONDARY AXIS POINT TO THE FUTURE BROOK PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE FURTHER TO THE SOUTH. AND EACH OF THE RED WAYS MATCHES THE LAYOUT AS APPROVED ON THE BILL, A PARK SECTION TWO DEVELOPMENT PLAN. A TOTAL OF 86 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS OF PROPOSED WITHIN THE TWO SIBERIA'S. THIS INCLUDES THE 16 FINAL LOTS FOR SIBERIA. EE LOCATED ALONG MYSTIC WAY, JUST SOUTH OF THE CITY PARK. AND 70. LOTS IN SUB AREA D LOCATED AROUND THE PARK STREET EXTENSION, EACH LOT MEETS WITH A MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENTS AS PER THE VIEW OF PARK ZONING, TEXT AND SECTION TWO DEVELOPMENT PLAN. TWO RESERVES ARE ALSO PROPOSED BILL TO BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE VILLA PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. THEREFORE AFTER REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION, THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS PLANNING COMMISSION MAKER RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PLAT AS SUBMITTED. LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS HAVE NOTHING MORE TO ADD. THANK YOU.QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. DO YOU ANTICIPATE THE HOME? PLACES TO BE IN THIS PLAN. THIS IS THE SEAMS, SUB AREA D AND PORTION OF SUDBURY ACHIEVE FOR THAT FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN RIGHT BEFORE US, SO IT IS 421,000 WOULD BE THE AVERAGE BUT THERE WOULD BE A RANGE. I THINK THE BOTTOM RANGE IS LIKE 3 85, BUT 4 20 IS THE AVERAGE. OTHER QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. NONE WERE READY FOR MOTION. GONNA MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO OUR CITY COUNCIL ITEM NUMBER EIGHT. VILLA PARK SECTION. TO WHAT. SECOND. I'LL CALL MR ROCK. YES, MR TITUS? YES YOUR OYSTER? YES, MR FREE? YES. THANK YOU. WITH THAT BEING THE LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA OF THE MEETING. SOME THE MEETING IS ADJOURNED. THANK YOU.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.