[Ordinance C-44-21 Approve the Rezoning of 3847 Broadway from C-1 (service commercial) to PUD-R (planned unit development - residential) w/text. First reading.]

38 47 BROADWAY FROM C ONE P. U. D. R WITH ZONING TEXT. THIS ORDINANCE SAYS FIRST READING

[00:10:01]

THIS IS WE'RE PRESUMING CHANGES IS REQUIRED TO SIT IN THE. CLERK'S OFFICE FOR 30 DAYS FOR COMMENTS. SECOND REGION PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE ON SEPTEMBER 20TH. ORDINANCE SEE 45 21 AN

[Ordinance C-45-21 Approve the Rezoning of 4.14 acres located at 1185 Lamplighter Dr. from CF & PUD-R to PUD-R w/text. First reading.]

ORDINANCE FOR THE REZONING OF 41.4 ACRES LOCATED 11 85 LAMPLIGHTER DRIVE FROM C F AND P D R TWO P U D R ZONING TEXT THIS ORDINANCE SAYS FIRST READING FOR THE SAME REASON IS GOING TO SET FOR 30 DAYS. SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE ON SEPTEMBER 20TH.

[Resolution CR-42-21 Approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of Awnings to Local Cantina located at 3937 Broadway in the Historical Preservation Area.]

RESOLUTION CR 42 21. A RESOLUTION IMPROVES OUR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF AUDIENCE TO LOCAL CANTINA, LOCATED AT 39 37 BROADWAY.

HISTORICAL PRESERVATION AREA. ON AUGUST 3RD. THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE AUDIENCE TO LOCAL CANTINA LOCATED AT 39 37 BROADWAY WITH A DEVIATION OF THE HISTORICAL PRESERVATION AREA COLOR CHART HAS SUBMITTED ON THERE. MR ROSS, COULD YOU TELL US ABOUT THE. HP, A HISTORICAL PRESERVATION AREA COLOR CHART. YES. UH THERE WAS A COLOR CHART PERMITTED OR APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL. I THINK SOMETIME BACK IN THE EARLY TWO THOUSANDS THAT WAS BASED ON LIKE THE PRATT AND LAMBERT HISTORICAL DEEMED. APPROPRIATE COLORS FOR THE FIRST HISTORICAL AREAS. WHEN MY STAFF REVIEWED IT. WE LOOKED AT WHAT COUNSEL PROVE BACK INTO 2018, WHERE THEY PROVE THE ORANGE COLOR THE ORANGE SIGN FOR LOCAL CANTINA, AND SINCE IT WAS DEEMED APPROPRIATE THAT TIME. STAFF SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION THROUGH THE PLAYING COMMISSION PROCESS. AND DURING PLAYING COMMISSION. THERE WAS A LOT OF SAME CONVERSATIONS WE HAD DURING CAUCUS. IN TERMS OF WHAT SHADE OF ORANGE. IT WAS THE APPLICANT AT THAT TIME. STAY THAT IT WOULD BE THE SAME SHADE ORANGE AS WHAT WE SEE ON THE SIGN. HOPEFULLY THE IMPLICATIONS HERE TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES AS WELL. AT PLAYING COMMISSION. IT WAS VOTED 3 TO 1 FOR REQUISITION APPROVAL. THE DISSENTING MEMBER OF PLAYING COMMISSION FELT THERE WAS TOO MUCH USE OF THE ORANGE. FOR THE TOWN CENTER AREA FOR THAT TYPE OF DEVIATION. 74 STAFF LOOKED AT IT. WE SAW THAT COUNCIL DEEMED TO BE APPROPRIATE BACK IN 2018. WE FELT THAT ONCE YOU PROVE IT, OR ONCE YOU DEMON TO BE APPROPRIATE, IT'S HARD TO TAKE IT BACK. WITH 2018. THERE WAS NO. KIND OF TIRED DO YOU NOTING THAT WAS ONLY AS THE ACCENT COLOR IS DEEMED INAPPROPRIATE COLOR BACK IN 2018? THREE QUESTIONS MIGHT HAVE HAVE A COUPLE BEFORE I TURN IT OVER TO COUNCIL ON HERE. UM. WE HAVE AN ORANGE ON THAT PALLET, BUT IT'S NOT THIS ORANGE CORRECT. AND TO BE FAIR, THERE'S ONLY AT THIS POINT. THERE'S ONLY ONE. TRUE COLOR PALETTE THAT RESIDES IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. WE'VE GONE THROUGH AND WE'VE DONE THE CALCULATIONS IN TERMS OF THE DIFFERENT MIXES, AND THEN WE CAN GET CLOSE TO IT. BUT. YOU SCAN TODAY THAT SKEINS WHEN WE DIFFERENTLY FROM WHAT'S ORIGINAL. HAVE WE DEVIATED? UM BEFORE THIS, UM, IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE TOM CENTER HISTORICAL DISTRICT, AS FAR AS COLOR GOES. AND HAS IT BEEN ONCE TWICE OR IS IT NUMEROUS TIMES NUMEROUS TIMES, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, IT COULD BE ACCENT HERE AND THERE. I CAN'T SAY IS THAT AT THIS LEVEL OR SKILL. BUT AT THE SAME TIME, I'M NOT SURE THAT IS A FACTOR IN DECISION BECAUSE ONCE IT'S INAPPROPRIATE AND STAFFS MIND IS DETERMINED TO BE APPROPRIATE. ONE LAST QUESTION WHERE THE UMBRELLAS PART OF A. RESOLUTION TO ALLOW THE COLOR ALONG WITH THE SIGNS. THAT I'M ASSUMING IT WOULD BUY ME TO GO BACK AND CHECK MY RECORDS BECAUSE SOMETHING OF THAT MAGNITUDE COULD POSSIBLY GO ADMINISTRATIVE THROUGH THE BUILDING VISION OR IT COULD HAVE BEEN KICKED THE CITY COUNCIL ON THAT. I NEED TO GO BACK AND LOOK AT THAT ONE. MM. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FROM MR ROGERS BEFORE I ASK IS THE PRACTITIONERS PETITIONERS HERE? YES, JUST LIKE YOUR I SAY THAT'S A SO I'M JUST TRYING TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND THAT'S A DIFFERENT ORANGE AND IN THE SIGN RIGHT, IT'S UP. DURING THE PLANE COMMISSIONED, THE PETITIONER SAID IT WOULD BE THE SAME SHADE OF ORANGE EVEN THOUGH THAT LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE WANTS TO PRINT OUT, IT DEPENDS ON THE PRINTER OF THE COLOR. SO. IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE CLOSE TO THE SAME COLOR BECAUSE IT'S ARE IDENTICAL. IT'S NOT EVEN CLUBS ON THIS DRAWING, RIGHT? YEAH. OKAY? THE PETITIONER HERE THIS EVENING. YOU STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. MONICA MCFARLAND, UM. SOME PUNK AMERICAN INDIAN AND SIGNED 16 COLLEGE VIEW, MR WILL OHIO.

OKAY? UM QUESTIONS FOR THE PETITIONER. I COULD GO ON THIS ONE. MR SO HOW DID IS IT TO GET

[00:15:09]

BACK TO ABOUT THE WITH THE SIGN COLORS? I'M SORRY. LIKE. HOW DIFFICULT IS IT TO GET THE ORANGE THAT'S BEING SHOWN THIS JUST LIKE? TO MATCH THAT OF THE SIGN. THIS IS NOT A REALLY GOOD AT, UM. DEPICTION OF THE COLOR. IT'S AN ACTUAL, SOME BELLA COLOR THAT THERE'S IT'S ALMOST IDENTICAL TO THE SIGN. THIS IS JUST, UH. COMPUTER GENERATED RENDITION, WHICH IS USUALLY THE COLOR IS QUITE OFF. THERE WAS A SAMPLE THAT WOULD SUBMITTED. NO, I DID NOT VERY MUCH LEFT ME. THIS IS NOT THE COLOR. THAT RIGHT ORANGE? NO, IT'S NOT. IF YOU LOOK AT THE UMBRELLA. IT'S MORE OF THAT COLOR, SO IT'S MUCH MORE MUTED THAN THAT. BASICALLY IT PULLS THE SIGN IN THE NUMBER OF, UM EVERYTHING TOGETHER. EXCUSE. ONE OTHER COMMENT. THAT KIND OF SHOCKING YES, ONE OF THE THINGS WE'VE BRUSSELS WITH OVER THE YEARS. MANY YEARS. UH ARE THE AWNINGS PERIOD? IN THE ORIGINAL WORK OF THE THOMPSON AND DESIGN GROUP, WHICH WAS BACK TO FRANK ELMER.

I'M WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BE PART OF THE MOTIF. PERIOD. IF THERE WAS A BUILDING THAT WAS IN 1920 HAD AN AWNING. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE ENCOURAGE HAVING NAUGHTY DOG. SOME OF THAT HAS NOT HAPPENED, BUT. IN THE SPIRIT OF WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO CAPTURE, AS WELL AS THE COLOUR IS A MOTIF OF HAVING OUR ON MANY BUILDINGS. WE CAN'T SO THAT'S ANOTHER SIDE. THANKS, MR MAYOR. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? MR SHOCKEY? YES YES, YES. SO I HAVE NO ISSUE WITH AWNING. I AM HUNG UP ON THE COLOR. UM AND I. TALKED ABOUT THIS AT THE TIME THAT WE LOOKED AT THE SIGN. IT'S NOT REALLY THAT ANY OF IT IS THAT OBJECTIONABLE IN MY MIND, IT IS REALLY THAT, UM, WE HAVE A SET OF STANDARDS THAT WE PUT FORWARD AND. IN THE HISTORICAL PRESERVATION AREA. WE WANT YOU TO ADHERE TO THE COLOR PALETTE AND, UM, AND THERE ARE TWO PIECES OF THAT DISCUSSION FOR ME, ONE OF WHICH IS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREAS. UH, THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY THAT I HAVE SEEN THIS KIND OF DEVELOPMENT. BE DONE VERY WELL. THERE IS A SET OF STANDARDS AND THEY ARE ADHERE TO ONE AND NUMBER TWO. I THINK THAT, UM IT'S A VERY DIFFICULT POSITION TO BE IN WITH. OTHER BUSINESSES THAT WE SAY, UM, FOR ONE GROUP OF GROUP OF BUSINESSES. HERE'S THE COLORS THAT YOU'RE ALLOWED TO USE, AND THEY FOLLOW THE RULES TO THE LETTER. AND PUT UP THERE ON NG. AND THEN THE NEXT THING YOU KNOW, THEY SEE THAT SOMEBODY HAS A SET OF BOMBINGS THAT IS NOT ON THE COLOR PALETTE AT ALL. AND THEN THEY WONDER. HOW IS IT THAT THAT HAS CHANGED SO. IN MY MIND IF WE WANT TO CHANGE THE RULE, WE SHOULD CHANGE THE RULE. OTHERWISE WE SHOULD APPLY UNIFORMLY. SO THAT IS MY ONLY GRIEVANCE. I WILL SAY. I JUST RECENTLY HAD DINNER. RIGHT INSIDE WITH NO AWNING AND WAS BAKING, SO AWNINGS ARE GREAT. I'M JUST MOSTLY HUNG UP ON THE COLOR AND AGAIN THE PRECEDENT THAT IT SETS. IN TERMS OF IF WE IF WE WANT TO HAVE A CODE, WHY DON'T WE STICK TO IT AND APPLY IT THE SAME FOR EVERY BUSINESS. YEAH. ANYONE ELSE? RESOLUTIONS HAS READING PUBLIC HEARING AND MOVED IT TO BE APPROVED. RIGHT? MR SLADE BALL? YES. MRS. HELP? NO. MR HOME. YES. MR BARRY? YES. YOU'RE SHOCKING. NO. RIGHT? THAT'S THE REASON I VOTED. NO SO FOLKS UNDERSTAND IS BECAUSE I BELIEVE THAT WE NEED IF WE HAVE. STANDARDS ON HERE. WE SHOULD BE DOING THOSE STANDARDS SO UNDER MR BERRY. AND THE REASON I ONLY VOTED YES IS BECAUSE WE HAD ALREADY ACCEPTED IT. SIGN AND THE SIGN. OKAY, UNDERSTANDING HERE. RIGHT? RESOLUTIONS HERE, 43

[Resolution CR-43-21 Approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a modular classroom for Our Lady of Perpetual Help located at 3752 Broadway.]

WILL, UH, DASH 21 RESOLUTION CHANGED TO APPROVE THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A MODULAR CLASSROOM FOR OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP LOCATED AT 37 52 BROADWAY. ON AUGUST 3RD PLANNING COMMISSION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE INSTALLATION ON THERE, AND WITH ONE STIPULATION. AND WE HAVE THAT STIPULATION FOR THE SCREEN BY CHANCE. IT'S ABOUT BULLARD'S. UM. ABOUT THE

[00:20:04]

INSTALLATION OF BULLARD'S THAT WE A TALK ABOUT MAKING SURE THAT BUILDINGS ARE SAFE FROM TRAFFIC AND IMPACT RESISTANT AND NO FURTHER THAN FOUR FT. SO THAT A CAR OR OR TRUCK CANNOT GET THROUGH THERE ON THERE. SO UM, ANY COMMENT FROM THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT? OKAY COMING FROM THE PETITIONER, UM. MM. FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. HAVE BEEN RADWANSKA, FACILITIES DIRECTOR FOR OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP.

37 30 BROADWAY CHARACTER REDLAWSK, EIGHT. ACCEPT THE STIPULATION. JUST TO GIVE YOU SOME INFORMATION MIGHT ANSWER SOME OF YOUR QUESTIONS AS FAR AS THE THIS MODULAR. THE LATENESS FOR APPLYING FOR THIS IS BASED ON AN IAN'S GRANT, WHICH IS THE EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOR NON PUBLIC SCHOOLS. SO ALL OF THIS CAME THROUGH THE GOVERNMENT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO US LATE, SO THAT'S THE REASON WHY WE'RE WE ARE LATE TO THE TABLE TO GET THIS MOVING. ABSOLUTELY. THE OTHER ONE OF THE ITEMS IS IT IS CLASSROOM AND BRANCHES SPECIALIST AS, UH, MISHAL STATED. THE EXTERIOR FINISH IS WITHIN THE PRATT AND LAMBERT COLORS THAT ARE APPROVED BY THE CITY. SO IT DOES FIT INTO THAT. THAT WAS IN THE APPROPRIATENESS PERMIT. THE LIFESPAN 4 TO 5 YEARS AS A TEMPORARY SPACE IS OUR INTENT AS WE ARE IN A PLANNING PROCESS TIES IN WELL WITH THE GROVE CITY 2050 STUDY. JUST TRYING TO SEE WHERE WE'RE GOING. CERTAINLY AN INCREASE IN STUDENTS. AND I WANT TO PROVE TO THANK THE PLANNING COMMISSION. SO ACTUALLY IN THE LANGUAGE THAT WAS PUT IN WITH THE BOWLER TO ACTUALLY WENT AHEAD AND CHANGED IT THAT IT CAN BE AN EQUIVALENT. OF THE SIX INCH PIPE BULLARD SO YOU'LL SEE THAT LANGUAGE IN THERE WHICH I THINK IS GREAT FOR THE IDEA THAT WE DON'T HAVE A LARGE YELLOW PIPE EVERY FOUR FT. SO I WANT TO THANK PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THINKING THAT AS WELL. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL. RESOLUTION SAID IT'S READING PUBLIC HEARING AND MOVED TO BE APPROVED. SECOND. MRS HELP? YES MR HOLT? YES MR BERRY? YEAH SHOCKEY? YES, MR SLADE. BALL? YES. MM. ALRIGHT RESOLUTIONS HERE. 44 20 RUN THE RESOLUTION APPROVED THE

[Resolution CR-44-21 Approve the Development Plan for Tosoh Addition located at 3600 Gantz Rd.]

DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TOAST. SO, UH, AUDITION LOCATED AT 3600 GANTZ GROW ON AUGUST. 3RD FUNDING COMMISSION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS SUBMITTED. ON THEIR. UM ANYTHING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. BRIEFLY. IT'S 11,000 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION.

THIS IS THE FOURTH OR FIFTH EDITION, AND WE WERE VERY EXCITED TO SEE THEM CONTINUE TO INVEST IN OUR COMMUNITY AND GROW. SO WITH THAT AGAIN, STIRRING QUESTIONS MIGHT HAVE.

UM COMES FROM THE PETITIONER. UM, MR SCHAEFFER. OR ANYTHING. OKAY? GET YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE M SCHAEFER OF THE EVENT. SORRY I LIVE IN POWELL, OHIO. I DON'T LIVE IN BOURG SITTING 3600 GANTZ ROAD IS WHERE I WORK. HI MAY I JUST WANT TO THANKS, COUNSEL, MR MAYOR. READY. SO AS YOU WOULD SAY THAT THIS IS OUR FIFTH EDITION THAT WE'RE APPLYING FOR. WE'VE BEEN TOGETHER AS BUSINESS PARTNERS SINCE 1988. SO WE'RE 31 YEARS AND WHEN I SAY BUSINESS PARTNERS, I MEAN THAT. WE'RE VERY PROUD AS A COMPANY OF THE LONGEVITY OF OUR EMPLOYEES. THINK ALL OF YOU GET CREDIT FOR BECAUSE YOU'VE CREATED A COMMUNITY HERE THAT UNDERSTANDS THAT NEED IN BUSINESS AND THE REVENUE THAT GOES WITH IT. ALSO THE DESIRE OF THE RESIDENTS TO CONTINUE TO HAVE HOMETOWN FEELING HAVE RAISED THEIR CHILDREN HERE. THEY WANT THEIR CHILDREN'S CHILDREN TO BE RAISED HERE. WHAT THAT TRANSLATES TO IS OUR EMPLOYEES DON'T WANT TO LEAVE GROUPS. WE'RE THRILLED. YOU CAN FIND AN EMPLOYEE IN GROVE CITY THAT WANTS TO WORK IN ONE OF OUR COMPANIES, SO I DO. THANK ALL OF YOU FOR THAT. I'M VERY PROUD TO SAY THAT 96 OF THE EMPLOYEES WORKING IN THE BUILDING HAVE THE SAME ZIP CODE. AS THE BUILDING. SO WE'RE VERY PROUD OF. IN TERMS OF THIS EDITION, UM M AND A ARCHITECTS THOMAS HERE YOU CAN TALK ABOUT THAT THEY'VE BEEN INVOLVED WITH US FOR 31 YEARS OR SILLY CONSTRUCTION WILL DO THE CONSTRUCTION. AND THEY DID THE FIRST BUILDING. CHRIS CONVERSE, TALK TO HIM AND HIS FAMILY HAS BEEN INVOLVED SINCE THE FIRST ONE SO YOU CAN SEE WE VERY MUCH BELIEVE IN THE LONG TERM. THE JAPANESE OWN COMPANY. LONG TERM IS NOT 3 TO 5 YEARS. IT'S 30 TO 50 AND BEYOND. COMMITTED TO THESE BUSINESSES, THIS

[00:25:02]

PARTICULAR BUSINESSES IN THE BIOSCIENCE ARENA, IT'LL SERVE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES IN HIGH PURITY, LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY. ON TOP OF THAT, JUST A LITTLE TEASER FOR THE FUTURES WERE WORKING ON A PLAN BECAUSE WE NEED MORE CAPACITY FOR SEMICONDUCTOR BUSINESS AS WELL. WITHOUT I JUST WANNA SAY THANK YOU. AND BEFORE WE TAKE GENTLEMAN'S COMMENT, I REMEMBER WITH GREAT KIDS ARE STARTING VERY SPECIAL MELODIES, BUT ALSO IT WAS OVER HERE IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, AND THEN IT WAS PREDOMINANTLY SPORTING BEFORE SO ABOUT THE BUSINESS. THAT'S CORRECT, AND I WAS NOT PRIVY TO DID NOT WORK AT THE COMPANY AND HE WAS THERE. BUT I CERTAINLY KNOW THE NAME HIS LEGACY, SO IT'S BEEN AS I'VE SAID TO OTHERS WE CAME TO GROVE CITY TO BUY A BUSINESS. STAYED IN GROVE CITY, BECAUSE COME OUR HOME. AND WE REALLY DO BELIEVE THAT WE BELIEVE IN THIS COMMUNITY AND WE INTEND TO STICK. THANK YOU. WE LOVE HAVING YOU HERE.

GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. ZILLOW FROM EMMA ARCHITECTS 775 YARDS STREET, COLUMBUS, 43212. QUESTIONS FOR MR LAZO. HIMSELF. YEAH. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU. YES, MR MAYOR, I JUST WANT TO MAKE A ADDITIONAL COMMENT BESIDES WHAT MR SCHAEFER SAID, UH, THIS IS A TEXTBOOK. I MEAN, WE GET A LOT OF GRIEF ABOUT TAX ABATEMENTS.

TOSA WAS A TEXTBOOK OF HOW YOU CAN. USE TAX ABATEMENTS THE SCIARRA AREA. TO FOSTER CONTINUED PRESENCE AND CONTINUED GROWTH. WHEN THE TOAST SO HAD A CHOICE OF STAYING HERE AND GROW CITY AND MOVE INTO ANOTHER SUBURB. IT WAS A LOT OF WORK TO BE A THINGS WORKED OUT AND THE TAX ABATEMENT WITH ONE OF THE KEY. ELEMENTS IN THAT IN THAT DECISION, SO WHEN THEY BUILD THIS NEW ADDITION, YOU GET 10 MORE YEARS ON THE ADDITION, SO IT REALLY IS ONE OF THOSE THINGS. IT'S A TEXTBOOK OF HOW SCIARRA HAS. LOT OF COMPANY HERE KEPT IT HERE AND GET WE'RE GETTING THE BENEFIT OF IT. HI TECH COMPANY OF DEATH. OKAY? ANY COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL. RESOLUTION SAID THE READING PUBLIC HEARING TO MOVE WOULD BE APPROVED. OKAY? MR HALL. YES, MR GARY? YES? YOUR SHOT KEY? YES, SLAVE. OH YES. THIS IS HELP. YES. NUMBER FIVE IS DONE. WORKING ON NUMBER SIX EDITION. SOUNDS GOOD. THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN. ALL RIGHT, MOVING ON RESOLUTION SIERRA 45 21 A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE

[Resolution CR-45-21 Approve the Development Plan for Beulah Park, Subarea D and a portion of Subarea E.]

DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BUELL APART SO VERY D AND PORTIONS OF E AUGUST 3RD PLANNING COMMISSION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT, PLAYING WITH ONE STIPULATION.

IN THERE. DO WE HAVE THE STIPULATION ON THEIR, UM, THEIR DEVIATIONS IN THE ZONING TEXT ON THEIR OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT TO RUN THERE. WHICH IS ATTACHED TO YOUR. YEAR OF BURBAGE FOR THIS RESOLUTION FOR COUNCIL. THEY'RE CALLING THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. EXPLAIN WHAT'S GOING ON HERE. DO WE EXPLAIN, STARTING WITH THE PROJECT OR YOU WANT TO START WHERE WE LOVE TO? CAUCUS WITH OUR OR OTHER WELL, ACTUALLY YOUR NAVIGATION UM. LET ME GET WHAT? I TALKED ABOUT CAUCUS FOR A MINUTE WHEN YOU CAN REACT TO IT ON THEIR, UH. YOU KNOW, I DO THIS. I'VE DONE THIS FOR FOUR YEARS ON HERE AND HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN IT A DIFFERENT PARTS, AND WHEN? WHEN I CAME TO THIS, AND I STARTED LOOKING AT IT AND WE GET OUR WE GET OUR INFORMATION ON THURSDAY WHEN WE PICK IT UP. SO I WENT TO THE ZONING. IT IS ONLY IN TEXT, WHICH IS RIGHT HERE. I'M HERE AND I HAVE A AT HOME ON THERE. BUT THEN I STARTED LOOKING AT THE EXEMPTIONS FOR THE. DEVIATIONS I SHOULD SAY AND STARTED LOOKING FOR MY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TRYING TO LOOK ONLINE AND SEE IF I COULD FIND IT THERE AND WHAT WAS IN THE INFORMATION FROM THE MM. THE STAFF REPORT AND THINGS LIKE THAT, AND WHERE I'M HAVING PROBLEM IS AND THEN I STATED THIS IN IN CAUCUS. I FIND IT HARD TO GO TO 234 PLACES TO FIND THAT INFORMATION. YEAH. UNTIL I GOT THE LETTER FOR THE EMAIL TODAY FROM MR SMITH, WHICH I THINK.

THAT STATED WHAT THE INFORMATION WAS IN, THE STAFF REPORTED JUST SAID, WHICH AND I'M JUST PARAPHRASING THIS THAT IT WAS ALLOWED, UH, IN THE. DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CHANGE THE ZONING TEXT, AND I THINK I'M PARAPHRASING THAT CORRECTLY DEVIATE FROM THE SO. I THOUGHT,

[00:30:04]

WELL, WHAT IS THE ACTUAL WORDING ON THERE SO THAT I UNDERSTOOD IT ON THERE, AND I DIDN'T HAVE THAT IN FRONT OF ME. AND BECAUSE I WENT TO RESEARCH I COULDN'T FIND IT AND I GOT A LITTLE FRUSTRATED. AS YOU COULD TELL, AND CAUCUS TODAY ON THERE, SO. HERE'S WHERE HERE'S WHAT I'M HAVING PROBLEMS WHEN WE WHEN COUNCIL SEES THIS AND THEY JUST SEE.

SECTION ONE ON HERE, AND THEN THEY GO TO, UM EXHIBIT. TWO AND THERE'S NOT A LOT OF INFORMATION HERE IF I HADN'T CALLED YOU ON THE PHONE, I WOULDN'T HAVE KNOWN WHAT WINDOW MILLIONS WERE. WATER TABLE. THERE. UM YEAH. THERE ARE SOME OTHER THINGS THAT I WASN'T FAMILIAR WITH THAT WERE ALLOWED IN THE FORK. ARCHITECTURE AND I KNOW WHEN WE ORIGINALLY DID ALL OF THIS WORK FOR VIEW OF THE PARK. THAT THERE WAS A LOT OF INFORMATION THAT WAS LIKE, OKAY, THIS IS WHAT WE NEED TO HAVE HERE. AND NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN WE'RE STARTING TO SEE HIT A ROAD A LITTLE BIT BECAUSE OF THE. PRODUCT THAT THE BUILDER HAS TO OFFER OR WHATEVER THE CASE MAY BE. FOR EXAMPLE, THE SETBACKS ON THE GARAGE IT'S ONLY ONE FT DIFFERENCE ON THERE. GOING THROUGH THAT. THE FORESIGHTED ARCHITECTURE. I THINK THAT WAS PROBABLY SOMEWHAT A LITTLE BIT NEBULOUS SON THERE WHEN WE DID THE. THE PART OF ON THERE, BUT NOW THAT MAYBE THIS WOULD HELP US ON THERE. THERE WAS THE SIDE LOADED GARAGES AND I KNEW THAT WAS AN IMPORTANT ASPECT WHEN WE DID THIS PARTS OF, UH, THIS SUB AREAS AND BUELLER ABOUT THEIR INSIDE LOADED GARAGES. IN IT AND THE PERCENTAGE ON THE GARAGE GOING 1% DIFFERENCE ON THERE IS NOT. THAT'S NOTHING TO REALLY ON THERE. BUT TO ME, THERE'S JUST SOME OF THE OTHER THINGS THAT WE'RE DOING, WHO SAID. WE'RE GOING. WE'RE BACKTRACKING A LITTLE BIT TONIGHT, AND I'M JUST CONCERNED ABOUT IT. NO. GO AHEAD TO FLOOR IS YOURS. OKAY, JUST TO START WITH. IT'S ALWAYS A CHALLENGE TO GET THE LOVE THE ZONING TEXT TO MATCH UP WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING PROCESS. THAT'S EVEN MORE SO CHALLENGING, WARM, TALKING ABOUT LARGER SITES LIKE PINNACLE OR LEGAL LIFE. IT'S VERY, VERY CHALLENGING. WHAT WE. DID PRIOR TO 2013 WAS TO HAVE. ZOOMING TEXT AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TEXT, SO WE GOT TWO SEPARATE DOCUMENTS FLOATING OUT THERE AS THESE BIGGER PROJECTS WENT ON, YOU WOULD HAVE TO GO BACK AND TOUCH BOTH HIS DOCUMENTS. SO IF YOU GO BACK LOOK AT THE COUNCIL LEGISLATION THROUGH THOSE YEARS.

YOU'LL BE SEEING FOUR OR FIVE AMENDMENTS TO BOTH. THERE'S ONLY TEXT AS WELL. THE DEVELOPMENT SENIORS TEXT SO IN 2015, WE REALLY MADE A CONCERTED EFFORT TO PUT EVERYTHING INTO ZOOMING TEXT. WITH THIS CLAUSE ABOUT DEVIATION KNOWING FULL WELL THAT ANY TIME WE DEVIATE FROM THE ZONING TAX IT WOULD NOT BE WOULD BE KNOWS THIS WOULD NOT BE ANY DIFFERENT THAN. IF WE DID A DEVELOPED CENTER TEXT AFTER TO THE ZONING AND TEXT THAT PASSED AND THIS IS KIND OF PLEASE ARE STAYING WITH ME, BUT THIS IS A LOT OF JARGON HERE, UM. SO WHAT WE TRY TO DO IS ACTUALLY TO STREAMLINE AND MAKE IT LESS TAXING TO GO BACK AND CHECK THE RECORDS OVER THE YEARS, SO WE FELT THE BEST WAY TO DO THAT WAS TO INCORPORATE INTO HIS SONY ONE. ZONING TAX FOR ALL THE ALL THE REGULATIONS FOR PROJECT WITH THE ENCLAVE LIKE SAID BEFORE OF ALLOWING FOR DEVIATIONS APPROVED BY PLAYING CUSHMAN CITY COUNCIL.

MOVING ON TO THIS PROJECT IN NOVEMBER. I THINK OF 21,020 COUNCIL PASSED THE FIRST DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SUB AREA E. TODAY YOU'RE ACTING ON THE SECOND HALF OF SEVERE E. AND DURING THAT. COUNCIL PROCESS. THERE WAS ALSO DEVIATIONS RAISED AT THAT TIME OF PART OF THAT PROJECT. IT JUST SO HAPPENS THAT A LOT OF DEVIATIONS WERE MORE IN OUR FAVOR IF YOU WILL TO MAKE A LARGER LOT SIZE. SO A LOT OF TIMES WE DO. THESE DEVIATIONS THAT GOES IS NOT ONE WAY OR THE OTHER IS NOT ALWAYS THE BENEFIT OF DEVELOPERS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN.

THE CITY IS MORE OF A. ALL RIGHT. WE DRAFTED THIS DOCUMENT. THAT IS TO BE, UH, KIND OF A LONG ENCOMPASSING AND IT'S ALWAYS IMPOSSIBLE TO DRAFT SOMETHING. WITH THE SITE THAT SIZE TO BE ALL INCOMES. THAT'S WHAT WE PUT THAT PHRASE IN THERE. ON THIS SITE, IN PARTICULAR, TALKING MORE ABOUT THE THAN THE 60% REQUIREMENT. FOR FRONT LITTLE GARAGES OR 6% REQUIREMENT ON SIDE AND RULE OVER ROGERS. IF YOU RECALL WHEN WE BROUGHT THIS ZONING TAX, A COUNCIL THERE WAS A LOT OF CHANGES BACK AND FORTH AT THE COUNCIL MEAN THAT THE ZONING TEXT WAS APPROVED. WE ACTUALLY WENT THROUGH INTO THE RED LINE REVIEW OF THE DOCUMENTS. SO WE WENT PAGE BY PAGE LOOKING AT THE STRIKES OUT STROKE OUT AT THAT MEETING, COUNCIL

[00:35:04]

ELIMINATED SUB AREA E TWO BRING IT UP BECAUSE SOME VERY YOU TWO IS DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF. 15 16.

LOTS OF WE'RE LOOKING ON MISSED. I THINK IT'S MISTY PLANE. SO WHEN A COUNCIL REMOVED THAT STIPULATION INADVERTENTLY SUBJECTED TO THESE 16 LOTS TO THIS ADDITIONAL 60 FT 60% REQUIREMENT THAT I'M NOT SURE THE DEVELOPER. CONTEMPLATED AT THAT TIME, SO I MEAN, IT COULD BE SHAME ON THEM. SHANE FOR US, NOT CATCHING IT. THERE'S A NUMBER OF FINGERS THAT YOU POINT AT EACH OTHER, UM, BUT SAYING THAT WE KNEW THE INTENT OF THE SUDBURY WAS TO HAVE ORIGINALLY TO HAVE. RELOADED HOUSES ON THE PART THAT COUNTS AND THAT LIKE WHEN WE TOOK THAT AWAY WE FELT WE CAN SUPPORT. THE LOSS OF ESSENTIAL B 33 HOUSES THAT WE HAVE TO BE CONVERTED FROM FRONT AND LOADED HOUSES, FRONT AND LOADED UNITS TO SIDE UNIT. SO REALLY, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THREE. LOTS THAT WE'D BE LOOKING TO CHANGE AND AT THIS POINT THE GAME. THE DEVELOPER HAS PUT IN TIME AND MONEY INTO ENGINEERING PLAN, SO.

AND JERRY PLANES HAVE BEEN APPROVED FOR SANITARY. SO RIGHT NOW, I THINK 90% OF CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE FOR SANITARY SO WITHOUT YOU HAVE LATERALS COMING OFF FOR SERVICING THESE DIFFERENT LOTS, AND IF WE GO THROUGH AND CHANGE. WHAT WE'RE ASKING A DEVELOPER TO DO AT THIS POINT. WE'RE ASKING TO GO BACK AND RE LOOK AT THE ENGINEERING OF IT. AND REALLY, WE'RE LOOKING AT CARRYING A GOOD PIPE. SO. I WANNA MAKE SURE COUNCILS FULLY AWARE OF THAT, AND THEN WITH RESPECT TO THE FORESIGHTED ARCHITECTURE STAFF ASKED THE DEVELOPER TO LOOK AT WHAT WE DID FOR MIDDLE GROUP OF STATES NORTH AS KIND OF BASIS BECAUSE WE REALLY LIKED FROM THE STATS PERSPECTIVE. THE ARCHITECTURE REQUIREMENTS OF MENTAL GROUP STATES NORTH SO I'M SURE IT'S A BLEND OF THAT DEVELOPMENT AS WELL AS PINNACLE. BUT AGAIN, NOTHING CAN BE ALL ENCOMPASSING. SO WE STILL HAVE. THE OLD CARDIAC DOWN THERE SO THAT WE CAN KIND OF CHANGE AS NECESSARY BASED OFF THE CONDITION WE'RE SEEING. SO UH, IF SOMEONE SOMETHING'S PROPOSE THAT WE DON'T LIKE OR DON'T THINK WE COULD SUPPORT. WILL DEFINITELY BE BROUGHT BACK TO COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION. SO WITH THAT I CAN HOPEFULLY THAT ADDRESSES LAWYER CONCERNS. QUESTIONS FROM COUNSEL FOR MR ROGERS. HAVE ONE. IS THIS GOING TO BE WHAT WE'RE USING IN ALL THE REST OF THE ZONING TEXT? THIS KIND OF PHRASING SO THEY COULD USE. WE'VE USED THAT LANGUAGE SINCE 2015 AND LOVER OUR ZONING TAX, BUT NOT ALL OF.

HATE TO USE THE WORD ALL BUT I WILL SAY OVER 90% OF OKAY. OKAY, IT DEPENDS ON THE SIZE OF THE PROJECT IS A SIMPLE. WE'RE USING P D PROJECT OR BEAUTY, UM, ZOOMING TEXT TO ADDRESS SOMETHING ON BROADWAY MORE LIKELY WOULDN'T HAVE THAT IN THERE. BUT FOR THE LARGER MORE OF THE PROFESSIONAL IF YOU WILL TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL, WE WOULD INSERT THAT LANGUAGE. MM. MR SHOCKING? YES, MADAM PRESIDENT, SO I THINK. TWO PIECES TO THIS DISCUSSION, AND ONE OF THEM IS THAT THE PARAGRAPH THAT WE HAVE ADDRESSED THAT APPEARED IN THE ZONING TEXT ORIGINALLY OBVIOUSLY. THAT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT WE CALLED OUT AT THAT TIME, SOMETHING THAT IF IT IS OBJECTIONABLE TO US, WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY GOING FORWARD TO RAISE THOSE ISSUES, SO THAT'S ONE SETTING THAT ASIDE. THE SECOND PIECE FOR ME IS LIKE JUST BECAUSE I DON'T I DON'T WANT TO SAY THAT YOU WERE OVERLY WORDY. BUT CAN YOU LIKE WALK ME THROUGH LIKE THEY'RE HER? THAT THESE BULLET POINT CHANGES THAT I THINK ARE A LITTLE BIT MORE GENEROUS THAN THE THAN WHAT? DEFENDING THE ZONING TEXT AND SO IN MY NOTES IF I'M INTERPRETING THIS ALL CORRECTLY. UH, JUST OVER THE PERCENTAGE SET IS THE SIZE OF THE GARAGE DOOR. TO THE FACADE. YES. UM NO SIDE LOADED GARAGES VERSUS HAVING A PERCENTAGE OF SIDE LOADED GARAGES. RIGHT. THAT GOES BACK TO WHEN COUNSELOR WHEN THE CITY ELIMINATED SUBURB E TWO. THAT'S WHEN THAT REALLY SUBJECTED THE DEVELOPER TO THAT CLAUSE. THEY DIDN'T MEET THE 6% REQUIREMENT ALONG THE NORTH SOUTH ROAD OF. FORGIVE THEM THAT WERE APOLOGIZES. IT'S EITHER MR CLEAN OR LATE, GLACIAL WAY WANTED TO BUT DURING THE LOTS WEST OF THE PARK, THEY MET THAT 6% REQUIREMENT. AND THEN, UM, THE SECTION THAT TALKS ABOUT NO EXPOSED. CONCRETE BLOCK OR POURED CONCRETE. NOW THIS IS SAYING THAT. IT'S ONLY IF IT'S MORE THAN EIGHT INCHES. IS IT OBJECTIONABLE? CORRECT? MADAM PRESIDENT IF I MIGHT INTERJECT THAT'S IN THE ORIGINAL TO THAT WAS THAT WAS IN THE ORIGINAL BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH, THAT

[00:40:02]

IT DIDN'T ONE APPLY TO HOMES THAT HAD NO BASEMENTS. OKAY, SLABS. THAT'S THE REASON WHY.

OKAY AND THEN THE GARAGE DOOR OPENINGS. SETBACK IS ONE FT INSTEAD OF TWO FT, ALTHOUGH I DO NOTICE THAT THE IMAGES THAT YOU'VE SHOWN IT LOOKS LIKE YOU'RE DOING LIKE A PILLAR RIGHT? PORCH AREA KIND OF AS TO COMPENSATE IF THAT'S WHAT I'M OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE LOOKED AT IT WAS KIND OF TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE DISTANCE FROM THE RIGHT AWAY. PEOPLE WILL BE AT THE LANDSCAPE. THE PERIMETER LINES GETTING REQUIRED BY CODE FOR EACH UNIT. WE THOUGHT IT WAS KIND OF NEGLIGIBLE. FOR ONE FT. DIFFERENT DIFFERENCE. THANK YOU. THE OTHER QUESTIONS FROM MR RUSH BEFORE I CALLED THIS MONTH. WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO STITCH YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE? THANK YOU. MY NAME IS REBECCA MOTT WITH THE PLANK LAW FIRM WITH AN OFFICE ADDRESS OF 4, 11 EAST TOWNE STREET. COLUMBUS OHIO. AS YOU KNOW, WE ARE ONLY HERE FOR SUB AREA D AND A PORTION OF SUB AREA IAN VILLA PARK. THE OTHER PORTION OF SUB AREA. HE WAS ALREADY APPROVED AND THAT WAS APPROVED IN 2019, AND ALSO IN 2020, THE SECTION TWO WHICH INVOLVED THE ROADWAYS, AND THE LAYOUT OF THESE LOTS, WAS ALSO APPROVED. SO WE'RE KIND OF STUCK WITH THE WAY THE LOTS ARE LAID OUT AND THE ROADS ARE SITUATED. AND ALSO THESE DEVIATIONS ARE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WAS APPROVED FOR THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE OTHER PERSON OF EAT. AND THE OTHER PERSON. WE CAN'T SEE IT OVER HERE.

THIS IS REALLY FOR 86 TOTAL LOTS 70 OF THOSE LOTS ARE IN SUB AREA D. AND 16 ARE IN SUDBURY EAST. SO THAT'S ALL WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. FOR. E IS 16 MONTHS TOTAL. NOW THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND THESE LOTS WILL MEET NEARLY ALL OF THE ITEMS OF THE ZONING TEXT AND AGAIN, WE'RE MAKING MINOR DEVIATIONS AS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WAS APPROVED FOR SUB AREA IN THE PAST. WHEN YOU LOOK AT YOUR EXHIBIT TO LIST OF DEVIATIONS. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THOSE ITEMS WAS APPROVED IN THE PREVIOUS FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SIBERIA EXCEPT NUMBER TWO.

THE REASON WE CANNOT DO SIDE LOADED GARAGE. FOR THESE PARTICULAR 16 LOTS, WHICH BY THE WAY, THE OTHER LOTS IN SUB AREA ALONG STREET OF WILL HAVE AT LEAST 60% SIDE LOADED BRANCHES. BUT WE CANNOT DO THAT ON THE ISLAMISTS BECAUSE THEY'RE A LITTLE BIT SMALLER.

THERE ARE 52 FT IN WIDTH AND 120 FT IN DEPTH, BUT THEY DO BACK UP TO OPEN SPACE. SO THEIR PRIME LOTS AND THE AVERAGE PRICE POINT OF THESE LOTS WILL BE THE SAME. AS ALL THE OTHER LOTS IN SUB AREA EAST, SO IT'S NOT A LESSER QUALITY CONSTRUCTION. THESE ARE VERY DESIRABLE LOTS HAVING BACKING UP TO AN OPEN SPACE OR PARKLAND. AND THERE ARE BUYERS THAT CERTAINLY DO NOT WANT TO SIDE LOADED CRUNCH SO THESE LOTS WOULD BE IDEAL FOR THOSE FIRES. IN TERMS OF THE FORESIGHTED ARCHITECTURE. THOSE BULLET POINTS LIST IS REALLY JUST TO HELP CLARIFY WHAT WE MEAN BY FORESIGHTED ELEVATION ARCHITECTURE, WHICH WAS ALREADY APPROVED. AS PART OF SUB AREA E IN THE PAST, BUT WE'RE JUST ADDING CLARIFICATION AS TO WHAT THAT MEANS, SO IT'S EASILY INTERPRETED. SO AGAIN THE REST OF THESE THE GARAGE DOOR OPENINGS THE PUBLIC STREETS. WE HAVE THAT APPROVED FROM 45% FOR THOUGHT OF THE GARAGE SPACE TO THE WHOLE BUILDING STRUCTURE BESIDE IN THE PAST AND SIBERIA E THE EXPOSED. BASICALLY BLOCK OR CONCRETE POURED CONCRETE THAT WAS ALSO APPROVED IN SIBERIA. E FOR THE OTHER PORTION, BUT IT MUST BE STAMPED WITH A BRICK DESIGN. SOME SORT OF MASONRY DESIGN AND WE HAVE AGREED TO THAT AGAIN. THE LAST ONE, SECTION FIVE FOR YOUR LIST OF DEVIATIONS. THIS IS JUST A STEP BACK OF THE GARAGE FACADE FROM THE BUILDING FACADE, AND IT DOES STATE TWO FT IN THE ZONING TEXT CURRENTLY. AND WE'RE ASKING FOR THE ONE FT, WHICH IS AGAIN CONSISTENT WITH THE PREVIOUS APPROVALS FOR SUB AREA EAT, SO I WOULD DEFINITELY WANT TO ASK THAT YOU CONSIDER.

IT'S ONLY THESE 16 LOTS ALONG THE PORTION OF ST STUFF THAT CAN'T MEET THE SIDE LOADED GARAGE REQUIREMENT, BUT ALL OF THE OTHER LOTS IN SUB AREA ALONG THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY

[00:45:04]

UP STREET OF WILL. COMPLY AND WE'RE NOT HERE FOR THOSE LOTS. THEY'VE BEEN APPROVED. SO UNLESS YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, THAT'S ALL I HOPE. QUESTIONS FOR MS MARTIN. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND, UH, THAT'S WITHOUT ALL THIS EXPLANATION THIS EVENING.

THIS WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND. AND I'VE GOT MY CHART OUT HERE. I'VE GOT THAT ALL SORTS OF STUFF, AND THEY STILL WAS HAVING TROUBLE WITH IT. SO THANK YOU FOR EXPLAINING IT VERY NICELY. I WAS VERY FRUSTRATED WITH UP PROCESS TONIGHT. THINK COUNCIL HEARD THAT APOLOGIZE. OKAY? RESOLUTIONS HAS READING PUBLIC HEARING AND MOVEMENT BE APPROVED. OKAY? YOU'RE VERY YES. SHOT KEY. NOW THAT I UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, YES. YOUR SLAVE ALL? YES THIS IS HOW YES PUT YOUR HOPE. YES. THANK YOU, MADAM PRESIDENT. THAT'S ALL I HAVE FOR THE LAND'S AGENDA TONIGHT. THANK YOU, MR SHOT KEY. ON TO

[Ordinance C-46-21 Expand the Designated Outdoor Refreshment Area under the same regulations as set forth in Ordinance C-17-19 & C-16-20. First reading.]

SAFETY WITH MR SLAVE OFF. THANK YOU, MADAM PRESIDENT. I HAVE ONE ORDINANCE TODAY WE'RE BEEN C 46 21. IT IS NOT BETTER THAN LIKE THIS TO EXPAND THE DESIGNATED OUTDOOR REFRESHMENT AREA OR DORA AND IS COMMONLY UNDERSTOOD UNDER THE SAME REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH AN ORDINANCE C 17, 19 AND C 16 20. THIS IS A FIRST READING THE SECOND HEARING. SECOND READING IN PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SEPTEMBER 7TH, MR FLAMBEAU. MR PERRY WILL. WILL THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES BE NOTIFIED TAMMY OF THIS THEY WILL NOT. NOT BY. UM, A SPECIAL NOTICE. NOTICES WILL BE ON OUR WEBSITE AND THEN. IN THE LOBBY, SO BUT WE DON'T SEND OUT SOMETHING SPECIFIC TO EACH CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY UNDER LIKE WE DO FOR REZONING. AND THAT WAS ALL I HAD THIS EVEN MEMBERS. THANK YOU, MR PLAY BALL. MR BERRY SERVICE. AND

[Resolution CR-46-21 Intent to Appropriate Property and Easements for the Demorest Road Corridor Reconstruction and related improvements for the public purpose of making or repairing a public road.]

PRESIDENTS HAVE RESOLUTION CR 46 21 INTENT TO APPROPRIATE PROPERTY AND EASEMENTS FOR DEMOS ROAD CORRIDOR RECONSTRUCTION. MR SMITH? YES SIR. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AS YOU KNOW, WE ARE MAKING IMPROVEMENTS TO DENVER STRODE IN THE INTERSECTION OF DEM, ARRESTING GROUP CITY ROAD ALL THE WAY UP TO ALONG THE NEW, UH MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE. WE HAVE 32 PROPERTY OWNERS THAT ARE IN THAT CORRIDOR THAT ARE IMPACTED BY THIS PROJECT. PROBABLY SIX OF THEM ARE FRANKLY US THE TOWNSHIP IN THE SCHOOL SO WE DON'T COUNT THOSE SO WE HAVE ABOUT 26 OTHER PROPERTIES. WE HAVE HAD ALL THE WORK APPRAISED AND WE ARE NOW NEGOTIATING WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS TO GET THESE MATTERS RESOLVED. HAVE PROBABLY SPOKEN WITH A THIRD OF THEM PERSONALLY, AND WE'VE DONE VERY WELL. MOST PEOPLE SEEM VERY EXCITED ABOUT THE PROJECT, WHICH REALLY JUST NEGOTIATING. WHAT IS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE? THE THING THAT'S A LITTLE BIT UNIQUE ABOUT THIS IS. MOST OF WHAT WE'RE BUYING ALMOST ON EVERY PROPERTY IS WHAT'S CALLED P R O, WHICH IS PRESENT ROAD OCCUPIED. BEING AN ODOR DEVELOPMENT. PEOPLE OWNED TO THE CENTER OF THE ROAD. MOST PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE THEY ACTUALLY OWN THAT THEY WOULD LOOK AT IT AND SAY, WELL, IT AIN'T MINE. BUT IT IS SO A LOT OF WHAT WE'RE BUYING HERE IS ACTUALLY P R O AND WHAT WORK? REALLY BUYING. IN ADDITION TO THAT IS FAIRLY SMALL AND THE APPRAISALS REFLECT THAT. I MEAN, MOST OF THEM ARE FAIRLY SMALL. WE'VE REACHED AN AGREEMENT. I THINK AT THIS POINT IN TIME WITH FIVE OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS DEFINITIVELY, UM THEY'LL BE SIGNING THE DOCUMENT SHORTLY. ALL THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION ALLOWS US TO DO IS MOVE FORWARD WITH THE NEXT PIECE. UM. WHEN IT COMES TO RAILWAY PROJECTS. FRANKLY, WE DON'T NEED ALL THE HOME RUNNERS TO SIGN OFF ON THIS PROJECT. WE CAN STILL GO BUILD THIS PROJECT. IN ORDER TO DO SO. WE HAVE TO PUT A DEPOSIT ON FILE WITH THE COURT SO THEY CAN GET THEIR MONEY ANYTIME THEY WANT, AND THEY CAN STILL FIGHT AND ARGUE. HEY WE WANT MORE MONEY ON THIS, AND THAT'S WHAT MOST PEOPLE HAVE ASKED FOR. LIKE I SAID, THE RESPONSE I'VE GONE FROM PROPERTY OWNERS HAS BEEN OVERWHELMINGLY IN SUPPORT OF THE PROJECT. JUST HOW MUCH DOES THE LAND WORTH? YOU KNOW, WE'RE AFFECTING A TREE HERE. HOW MUCH IS THE TREE WORTH? I HAVE A TODAY WAS A LILAC BUSH. HOW MUCH IS A LILAC BUSH WORTH? UM WE HAD TWO LIGHTS. AT FIGURING ALL THAT OUT, SO THIS JUST ALLOWS US TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE NEXT STEP IN THE PROCESS NOW. WE HOPE THAT ULTIMATELY WE DO NOT HAVE TO FILE TO TAKE ANYBODY'S PROPERTY. BUT. WE ARE GOING TO BUILD THE ROAD. I MEAN, WE FUNDED IT. IT'S OBVIOUSLY A GREAT IMPROVEMENT FOR THE AREA. AND THIS WE'RE IF WE WERE UNABLE TO REACH. YOU KNOW,

[00:50:07]

WE'RE THROUGH NEGOTIATION. AGREEING WITH THE PROPERTY OF THIS WOULD ALLOW US TO TAKE THE NEXT STEP. WHICH WOULD BE TO FILE IN COURT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE PROJECT WITHOUT FINALISING THE NEGOTIATIONS. IF THAT MAKES SENSE. AND HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MR SMITH. THIS RESOLUTION HAS HAD ITS READING IN PUBLIC HEARING AND I'M MOVING BE APPROVED. MHM. SHARKEY YES, MR SLATE BALL? YES HIS HELP? YES HOLD.

YES. VERY YES. THANK YOU, MR BARRY AND FINALLY, MR HOLT WITH FINANCE. THANK YOU. ORDINANCE C

[Ordinance C-42-21 Appropriate $10,000.00 from the Senior Nutrition Fund for Current Expenses. First reading.]

42 21 APPROPRIATE 10,000 FROM THE SENIOR NUTRITION FUND FOR CURRENT EXPENSES. THIS ORDINANCE HAS HAD ITS SECOND READING IN PUBLIC HEARING AND I MOVE IT BE APPROVED. OKAY? ESPECIALLY BOB. YES. THIS IS HELP. YES MR WHOLE. YES MR BERRY? YES, IT'S A SHOCKING YES. MR HALL. GOOD. UH THE STRONG WORD APPROPRIATE $10,000. WHAT THIS MEANS, AS WE RAISED THAT MUCH. THROUGH ACTIVITIES AND WE GO THE MONEY OVER. WE'RE GIVING THE MONEY FOLLOWING IT INTO THE BUILDING WHEELS PROGRAM, SO IT'S A MATTER OF TECHNICAL MOVE THAT YOU HAVE TO HAVE AN APPROPRIATED. ONCE IT'S COLLECTED. THANK YOU. YEP. ORDINANCE C 47 21 APPROPRIATE

[Ordinance C-47-21 Appropriate $5,193,000.00 from the SR665 Tax Increment Equivalent Fund for the Current Expense of Refunding Real Estate Receipts. First reading.]

5,193,000 FROM ST ROUND 6 65. IF FOR RE FUNDING REAL ESTATE RECEIPTS. ORDINANCE HAS HAD HIS FIRST READING. SECOND READING IN PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE 97. ORDINANCE, SEE 48 21 AUTHORIZE.

[Ordinance C-48-21 Authorize the City Administrator to enter into Agreements with Utility Inc. for Body Worn Cameras for the Division of Police. First reading.]

YEAH. USING THE CIA TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT WITH UTILITY INC FOR BODY CAMERAS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. ONE SEC. THE ADMINISTRATORS. SO AUTHORIZED CITY ADMINISTRATOR INGREDIENT ONE. INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH UTILITY AIN'T FOR BODY CAMERAS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.

ALRIGHT THIS ORDINANCE SAID ITS FIRST READING SECOND READING IN PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE 97.

[Resolution CR-47-21 Approve the Settlement with the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain participants for their role in the Opioid Crisis.]

RESOLUTION CR 47 21. APPROVE THIS SETTLEMENT WITH PHARMACEUTICAL SUPPLY CHAIN PARTICIPANTS FOR THE OPIOID CRISIS. AND THIS IS A RATHER COMPLEX ISSUE. AND MR SMITH HAS AGREED TO OVERVIEW THAT FOREST. THANK YOU, SIR. AS YOU KNOW, THERE HAS BEEN MANY LAWSUITS ACROSS THE COUNTRY WITH THE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES IN TERMS OF THE ROLE THAT THEY HAVE PLAYED IN. THE OPIOID CRISIS, MOSTLY WITH THE PAIN PILLS. WHAT HAPPENED IS OHIO JOINED ONE OF THE CLASS ACTION SUITS AND THIS IS AGAINST THE. MIDDLE PLAN OR MIDDLE PEOPLE WHO DISTRIBUTED THE PILLS AND WHAT THEY WHAT WE HAVE. AND I'VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS NOW FOR ABOUT A YEAR ATTENDING MEETINGS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY WITH. MR BARROSO AND THE MAYOR'S REQUEST TO KIND OF FOLLOW THIS ALONG IS. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF OHIO HAS TAKEN THE LEAD ON THIS AND WE HAVE ALL BEEN FOLLOWING ALONG AND ACTIVELY PARTICIPATING IN DISCUSSIONS. WE'RE AT THE POINT NOW WHERE? THE PHARMACEUTICAL SUPPLY CHAIN PARTICIPANTS HAVE AGREED TO SETTLE THE SETTLEMENT OF MOUNTAIN. I'M SURE SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE HEARD THIS ON THE RADIO. MAYBE LAST WEEK IS IN THE 825 MILLION RANGE. NOW THE QUESTION IS. WELL WHAT DOES THAT MEAN FOR US? UM THE REALITY IS THAT THE MONEY IS GOING TO GO INTO A BUNCH OF DIFFERENT POTS. ALL OF THEM USED TO FIGHT THE EFFECTS OF THE OPIOID CRISIS. WE WILL GET DIRECT PAYMENTS SOMEWHERE IN THE RANGE OF 105 TO 150,000, DEPENDING ON WHICH SPREADSHEET I LOOK AT, AND IT KEEPS CHANGING. IT SEEMS LIKE EVERY FIVE SECONDS. ON THE STATE WILL GET A PORTION OF THE MONEY AND THEN A BIG CHUNK OF THE MONEY WILL GO INTO A PART. THAT, FRANKLY, ANY MUNICIPALITY CAN PULL OUT OF TO FUND. OPIOID RELATED ISSUES, AND YOU'D HAVE TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION. THERE'S GOING TO BE A BOARD TO REVIEW THEM. UM. YOU KNOW, WITH OUR PARTICIPATION IN THIS, Y&-PY ACTIVE WITH IT. AND WE DO BELIEVE THAT THIS SETTLEMENT IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CITY. I MEAN, FRANKLY, WE THIS

[00:55:02]

IS IN A FIGHT THAT WE COULD FIND OURSELVES AND WE BELIEVE THAT THIS IS THE BEST RESOLUTION THAT WE'RE GOING TO SEE. I MEAN, ISN'T PERFECT. NO IT'S NEVER PERFECT, BUT WE BELIEVE THAT. APPROVING THIS SETTLEMENT WOULD BE IN OUR BEST INTEREST. I BELIEVE IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, INITIALLY, THE DEADLINE FOR FILING THIS WAS THE 13TH. IS WHAT THEY TOLD EVERYONE IS REALLY THE 20TH. AND I BELIEVE AT THIS POINT WE HAVEN'T THERE'S ENOUGH FOLKS WHO HAVE VOTED FOR THIS THAT THE SETTLEMENT IS GOING TO MOVE FORWARD AND PRETTY CERTAIN OF THAT. BUT WE BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD WE DO RECOMMEND THAT YOU APPROVE THIS SETTLE. I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. MR SMITH. ANY QUESTIONS? ANYONE? ALRIGHT THIS RESOLUTIONS AND IT'S READING IN PUBLIC HEARING AND I MOVE IT BE APPROVED. THIS IS HELP. YES, MR HOLT. YES, VERY YES. YOUR SHOT KEY. YOUR SLAVE OFF? YES. THANK YOU. RESOLUTION C R 48 21

[Resolution CR-48-21 Accept a Donation of Windscreens for the Babbert Way Pickleball Courts & thank the Grove City Pickleball Club and Morin Services Heating & Cooling.]

EXCEPT DONATION OF WINDSCREENS FOR THE PICKLE BALL COURTS AND THANK GROUP CITY PICKLE BALL CLUB AND MORE IN SERVICES, HEATING AND COOLING. ANYBODY HERE FROM? TONIGHT. I WAS JUST CURIOUS. NO. RIGHT? ACCEPTED. THIS RESOLUTION IS THAT IT READING IN PUBLIC HEARING AND I MOVE AND BE APPROVED SECOND MR HOLT. YES, MR BARRY? YES MR SHOT KEY. YES, MR SCHWEBEL.

THIS IS HELP. YES. I BELIEVE. CONRAD IS AVAILABLE TO JUST TOUCH ON THAT FOR THE PUBLIC.

MHM. YEAH. UM, YEAH, I JUST I WAS JUST GONNA ADD TO THOSE, UH, IF ANYONE HAD ANY QUESTIONS THAT, UM THEY'RE STILL LOOKING AT FOR THE RIGHT SCREENS, SO THEY HAVE NOT ACTUALLY BEEN DONATED AS OF YET, BUT WHEN THEY DO COME IN, WE WANTED TO HAVE THEIR RESOLUTION READY TO GO SO. RIGHT. THANK YOU, MR CONRAD. ALL THANK YOU. THAT'S ALL I HAVE WAS HELP. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR HOLDER. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE REACHED THE END OF OUR FORMAL AGENDA. AND AT

[Call for New Business]

THIS TIME IF THERE IS ANY NEW BUSINESS TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF COUNSEL, PLEASE DO SO. I THINK I HAVE ONE PERSON SIGNED UP AND I. WE WON'T DO THAT ONE PERSON, BUT I WANT JUST RECOGNIZED BOY SCOUT TROOP 16 FROM IMMACULATE CONCEPTION IN CLINTONVILLE, AND I'M PUTTING YOU ON NOTICE THAT I WANT ONE REPRESENTATIVE TO COME UP AND TALK WITH US AND TELL US WHY YOU'RE HERE THIS EVENING. SO I'LL WE'LL HAVE OUR ONE SPEAKER BUT I HAVE SIGNED UP.

SO SIT TIGHT, BUT I DIDN'T I DIDN'T WANT TO CATCH YOU UNAWARE. SO THIS IS YOUR HEADS UP? WELCOME IT'S A PLEASURE TO HAVE YOU WITH US THIS EVENING. AND I THINK ON MY LIST IF I HAVEN'T LOST IT, UH, KATHY THEIR SONG. I DON'T WANT TO BUTCHER YOUR LAST NAME. CORRECT ME. MY NAME IS CATHOLIC. ME, MAN? YES. STEAMING OVER HERE. MY NAME IS KATHY MEYERS, SONY.

I LIVE AT 2048 MICHELLE DRIVE IN THE SUBDIVISION COMMONLY KNOWN KILLER FARM EAST. JUST A BRIEF BACKGROUND FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO MAY NOT BE FAMILIAR WITH COLOUR FARM EAST. THIS SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED WEST OF 71. SOUTH OF STRING TOWN ROAD EAST OF MCDOWELL, IN NORTH OF WHITE ROAD. THERE'S APPROXIMATELY A 10 ACRE TRACT SITUATED ON WHITE ROAD. THAT ABUTS KELLER FARM EAST. THERE'S A STREET IN COLOUR FARM EAST. IT'S CALLED JODI DRIVE. AND JODIE DRIVE. DEAD ENDS INTO THIS 10 ACRE TRUCK. WHITE ROAD. I WAS RECENTLY TOLD BY A MEMBER OF CITY COUNCIL. PART OF THIS 10 ACRE TRICK. JODI DRIVE DEAD ENDS INTO HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR APARTMENTS. THIS CONFUSED ME. SO I DID SOME RESEARCH. AND I FOUND THAT THIS 10 ACRE TRACT IS CURRENTLY IN THE TOWNSHIP. AND ZONE SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL. CALLED SHANE FARNSWORTH AT THE TOWNSHIP. AND ASKED HIM TO CLARIFY THE TERM SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL. AND WAS TOLD IT MEANS SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING. IF THIS PROPERTY WERE TO BE ANNEXED.

THE CITY OF GROWTH CITY. THE PROPERTY WOULD INITIALLY. BE GIVEN THE MOST COMPARABLES E AS

[01:00:05]

CURRENTLY DESIGNATED BY THE TOWNSHIP. THAT IS SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. GROSS CITY 2050 PLAN.

CODES THIS AREA THIS 10 ACRE TRACK. AS PARKS OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION. APARTMENTS FALL UNDERNEATH THEIR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. OR UNDER PARKS, OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION. BECAUSE GROVE CITY RECENTLY APPROVED A RELIEF APARTMENTS. WHICH ABUTS KELLER, FARMING EAST. HOME OWNERS. ANXIOUS UPON HEARING THE WORD APARTMENTS. THEREFORE, MY QUESTION YES. MY APARTMENT'S WHY THAT WORD. IF THE CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE WHAT'S DISCUSSING. APARTMENTS IN REGARD TO FUTURE LAND USE. THEM IS, IN FACT. CONTRARY TO THE GROUP CITY 2050 PLANT. WHICH CODES THE AREA PARKS OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION. THEN, SURE. I CAN ANSWER THAT. THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL. ABSOLUTELY NO. THERE'S THE DEPARTMENTS ARE NOT PLAYING FOR THAT AREA. I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT RUMOR GOT STARTED, BUT IT'S ABSOLUTELY FALSE. OKAY? AND WE MET. WE HAVE MET WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER. AND WE'VE ADVISED THAT PERSON THAT. IT HAS TO COME INTO THE CITY HAS TO GO THROUGH THE WHOLE ZONING, RESULTING AND THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. SO THERE'S NOTHING NOTHING APPROVED NUMBER ONE, AND SECONDLY, THAT DISCUSSION ABOUT APARTMENTS. WAS ZERO NOT OKAY? THAT WORD APARTMENTS WAS NOT A CONVERSATION BETWEEN YOU AND ME. CHAIRMAN. I UNDERSTAND.

SO WITH REGARD TO I WANTED TO DO SOME RESEARCH BECAUSE WHAT HAD HAPPENED. WITH THE ARAB LEAF APARTMENTS. MHM AND I DO UNDERSTAND, RIGHT THAT CURRENTLY IT'S NOT EVEN PART OF GROUPS RIGHT? AND I ALSO UNDERSTAND. ANNEXATION. LIKE A SIX MONTH. AND I ALSO REALIZE DURING THAT TIME THERE IS ALSO CAN BE REZONING APPLICATION MADE SO AGAIN. PEOPLE HOMEOWNERS IN COLOR FARMERS USE. ANY TIME THE WORD APARTMENT COMES UP IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.