[A. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL]
[00:00:07]
AFTERNOON. RATHER, IT'S 1 30. AND I CALLED TO ORDER THE GROVE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. WE COULD START WITH A ROLL CALL. MR ROCK. MR FREE HERE, ROYSTER HERE. MR LINDA HERE. MR TUNG. AND IF YOU JOIN ME IN STANDING FOR A MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER, FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
HURRY. THIS MORNING. WE HAVE SOMETHING SPECIAL AND I SEE THE SWEARING IN OF JIM ROCK. HE'S GOING TO SERVE ANOTHER FOUR YEAR TERM FOR US. SURPRISE. HE'S RAISE YOUR HAND AND REPEAT AFTER ME. I JIM ROCK CAMERA SUDDENLY SWEAR. SWEAR THAT I WILL SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION. OF THE UNITED STATES AND OF THE STATE OF OHIO. OR PILES AND WILL BE THE LOSS THEREOF. AND THAT I WILL, BUT I WILL IN ALL RESPECTS. OBSERVE THE PROVISION. OF THE CHARTER AND ORDINANCES. OF THE CITY. AND WILL FAITHFULLY DISCHARGE FAITHFULLY DISCHARGE THE DUTIES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER. UPON WHICH I'M ABOUT TO ENTER FALL. THANK YOU. RACHAEL ATIONS, JIM AND THANK YOU FOR AGREEING TO SERVE ANOTHER FOUR YEARS. RIGHT THE PLANNING
[C. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES]
COMMISSION HAS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE MEETING MINUTES FROM DECEMBER.7TH. JUST LIKE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH EMOTION. I MAKE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. IN A SECOND, PLEASE. BROKE OFF. MR ROCK. MR FREED? YES. CHAIR. OYSTER? YES. MR LINDA? YES. RIGHT AND I'D LIKE TO MAKE AN A MOTION WITH THE AGENDA TODAY TO SWAP THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA LIKE TO SWAP ITEMS NUMBER FOUR AND FIVE. SO THAT NUMBER FIVE, WHICH IS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT WILL BE IN IN THE ORDER OF NUMBER FOUR NOW. BROKE OFF. MR ROCK? YES MR FREED? YES CHAIR. OYSTER. MR LUNDER? YES. AND TODAY WE HAVE A COUPLE ORGANIZATIONAL ITEMS WHERE WE WILL BE ELECTING YOUR
[D. ORGANIZATIONAL ITEMS]
CHAIR AS WELL AS OUR VICE CHAIR. SO LET'S START WITH THE CHAIR. ARE THERE ANY NOMINATIONS? SURE DIDN'T NOMINATE MISS JULIE OYSTER CHAIR? SECOND. THANK YOU. ANY DISCUSSION. OKAY? REAL CALL.MR ROCK. MR FREE? YES. CHAIR OYSTER. YES, MR LEONARD? YES. QE CHAIR. ARE THERE ANY NOMINATION? GEREMEK NOMINATION OF MR DAVID FREED FOR VICE CHAIR. OKAY? ROLL CALL. MR ROCK? YES. MR FRANK CHAIR. OYSTER? YES, MR LONDON? YES. AND MOVING FORWARD. TO OUR BYLAW REVIEW. THANK YOU. CHAIR
[E. BYLAWS REVIEW]
OYSTER. AS PART OF OUR MEETING TODAY, WE WANTED TO JUST ADDRESS A QUICK CLEAN UP FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION BY LAWS AND RULES AND REGULATIONS TO ENSURE THAT IT REFLECTS THE CHARTER AMENDMENT. THAT WAS VOTED ON IN 2000 AND 17. REALLY THE ONLY CHANGE TO THE BYLAWS WOULD BE[00:05:03]
THAT IT REMOVES THE MAYOR AS A PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER AND THE PROPOSED CHANGES UP ON THE BOARD. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION? OR ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WHICH IS TO SPEAK. COMING FORWARD WITH EMOTION. I WOULD MOVE THAT WE APPROVED. CHANGES TO THE BYLAWS AS AS PRESENTED. BROKEN. MR ROCK. MR FREE? YES. CHAIR. OYSTER? YES, MR LINDER? YES. NOW ONTO OUR AGENDA. WE HAVE FIVE ITEMS TODAY ON OUR AGENDA. AND WHEN YOUR ITEM IS CALLED, IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT IF YOU COULD JUST STEP UP TO THE PODIUM AND STATE YOUR NAME AS WELL AS YOUR ADDRESS, IT CAN BE YOUR HOME ADDRESS OR CAN BE YOUR BUSINESS ADDRESS. WHICHEVER YOU LIKE. AND THEN AFTER YOU STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS, THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SOME BACKGROUND. ITEM[1. APPLICATION: Beulah Park Subarea H – Lot Split]
NUMBER ONE PULA PARK SUB AREA H LOT SPLIT. MY NAME IS REBECCA MOTT WITH THE PLANK LAW FIRM WITH AN OFFICE ADDRESS OF 4, 11 EAST TOWNE STREET. COLUMBUS, OHIO. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO SPLIT 10.26 ACRES FROM A 23.86 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AND SUB AREA H OF ULA PARK OR THE BILL PLACE APARTMENTS FOR FINANCING PURPOSES. THE CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED 10.26 ACRE TRACT TO BE SPLIT WILL BE DEVELOPED FOR THE 2000 AND 18 DEVELOPMENT PLAN . HOWEVER IN THE EVENT THE TWO PARCELS ARE NOT COMBINED IN THE FUTURE. THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED A DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS, WHICH COVERS SITE UTILITIES, ACCESS AND STORMWATER MAINTENANCE BETWEEN THE TWO PARCELS. THE VILLA PARK ZONING TEXT REQUIRES A 15 FT MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK AND BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTED ON THE LOT CREATED BY THE SPLIT WOULD NOT MEET THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT. HOWEVER AN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AT THE B C. A. TO REDUCE THE SIDE HERE AND SET BACK FROM 15 TO 6 FT TO KEEP BUILDING PLACEMENT ON THE SITE IN LINE WITH THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN. FOR THE SITE. THEREFORE WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THE LOT SPLIT WITH THE ONE STIPULATION REGARDING THE NEED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE B. C. A. THIS IS NOT WHAT YOU LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS. I'M JUST HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. QUESTION FOR STAFF HAPPENS IF THEY'D BE EASIER DOESN'T APPROVE OF THE VARIOUS SYRIANS. IF THIS LOT SPLIT IS APPROVED CONTINGENT UPON THAT STIPULATION, THEN THE LOT SPLIT WOULD JUST NOT BE EFFECTIVE SO IT COULD NOT BE RECORDED. SO THEN, AT THAT POINT, THE APPLICANT WOULD HAVE THE CHOICE TO EITHER RECONFIGURE THE PROPOSED LOT SPLIT. OR POTENTIALLY DO A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO RECONFIGURE THE BUILDING LAYOUT. WE AGREE WITH THE CONDITION. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. THE PLANNING COMMISSION. TURNING ON FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? WE'RE READY FOR MOTION. AND I MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. CITY COUNCIL FOR I REMEMBER ONE LOT SPLITS WITH THE ONE STIPULATION HAS NOTED A SECOND. ROLL CALL. GENERAL OYSTER? YES, MR ROCK. YES MR LINDER? YES, MR FREE? YES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OKAY ITEM NUMBER TWO. PINNACLE COREY, SECTION[2. APPLICATION: Pinnacle Quarry Section 3 – Plat]
THREE PLATZ. THE APPLICANT PRESENT OR PERHAPS ONLINE. HELLO MIKE REEVES WITH KIM LANGHORNE ASSOCIATES. 7965 NORTH HIGH STREET SUITE. 200. COLUMBUS, OHIO. HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF MAYBE Q. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PLANT FOR SECTION THREE OF PINNACLE COREY TO CREATE LOTS, 4 38 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, AS WELL AS FIVE RESERVES AND UTILITY EASEMENTS. THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SUBDIVISION WAS APPROVED IN 2000 AND 20. AFTER THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE ENGINEERING PLANS ARE REVIEWED AND PHASES WITH THE PLANTS FOLLOWING TO CREATE THE LOTS AS WELL AS RIGHT AWAY AND EASEMENTS AS SHOWN CONCEPTUALLY ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. IN ADDITION TO THE 38 LOTS. THE PROPOSED PLAN CONTAINS ACREAGE FOR FIVE RESERVES, WHICH INCLUDES A 10.6 ACRE RESERVE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY AS A PUBLIC PARK. PROPOSED LOTS MEET THE MINIMUM WITH PERLA ZONING[00:10:01]
TEXT AND THE LOT AND THE LOT AND ROADWAY AND RESERVE LAYOUT MATCH THAT ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THEREFORE WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT PLANNING COMMISSION MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PLAN, AS SUBMITTED. WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS? APPRECIATE THE REPORT FROM MISS SHIELDS AND HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. FOR ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. HEARING THEM WE CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH THE MOTION. I WOULD MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER TWO COOL QUARRY SECTION THREE PLUS SECOND MICHAEL. MR LINDER? YES MR ROCK? YES, MR FREE CHAIR. OYSTER? YES. THANK YOU. THE ITEM NUMBER THREE FARMSTEAD. WHAT ARE SORRY FARMSTEAD FACE FIVE PLATT. JIM[3. APPLICATION: Farmstead Phase 5 - Plat]
HIGHTOWER WITH CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, CONSULTING START. CONSULTANTS.UM 2 50 WHISTLES WEST. SORRY, WEST BRIDGE. SORRY. 2 15, THE WORST OWN WILSON BRIDGE ROAD.
ANY QUESTIONS? THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PLANT FOR FARMSTEAD. PHASE FIVE.
LOCATED ON FIVE ACRES OF BOTH ARE AM I APOLOGIZE, 30 ACRES AT BOTH IN NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN PORTIONS OF THE SITE. CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FARMSTEAD IN MARCH OF 2019, AND THIS PLANT WILL FORMALIZE RIGHTS OF WAY AND PARCELS SHOWN ON THAT APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE PLAN INCLUDES 50 LOTS TO RESERVES AND TO ROADWAY EXTENSIONS, INCLUDING A NEW ROADWAY MORNING BIRD COURT , WHICH WILL CONNECT EXISTING LAVENDER FIELDS AND HONEY FARMS WAY THE LOT AND RIGHT AWAY CONFIGURATIONS MATCH THAT ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
THEREFORE, WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT PLANNING COMMISSION MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PLAT AS SUBMITTED. FOR ANYTHING THAT YOU'D LIKE TO ADD. NOTHING FOR ME NOW. QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. OR ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK.
GREAT MOVE FORWARD WITH MOTION. HERE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. THE CITY COUNCIL FOR I HAVE NUMBER THREE ESTIMATED. BROKE UP. CHAIR OYSTER. YES, MR ROCK. MR FREE.
YES, MR LEONARD? YES? VERY MUCH. GREAT ITEM NUMBER FOUR. COLUMBUS POWER SPORTS SPECIAL USE PERMIT.
[4. APPLICATION: Columbus Powersports – Final Development Plan]
MY NAME IS PATRICK MELTON AT 16 53. EXCUSE ME THE BENGALS PEPPER LAST NIGHT. I BELIEVE HE'S GONE . 16 53 HARD DRIVE. GROVE CITY, OHIO, 43123. THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO SELL AND SERVICE MOTOR VEHICLES LIMITED TO NEW GOLF CARTS, SCOOTERS AND ZERO TURNOVERS AT A NEW FACILITY ON HOME ROAD SOUTH OF TURNBERRY COURT. A DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION WAS ALSO SUBMITTED WITH A SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION TO REVIEW THE SITE DESIGN AND BUILDING TO HOUSE THE PROPOSED USE. THE APPLICANT HAS STATED THAT THEY TYPICALLY ONLY SERVICE 1 TO 2 ITEMS A MONTH AND AT NO POINT ARE THE CARTS OR MOWERS STORED OUTSIDE. THEY FURTHER CLARIFIED THAT REPAIR WORK TAKES PLACE ONLY INSIDE AND THAT THE STRUCTURE AND THEN IT DOES NOT REQUIRE THE USE OF ANY NOISY TOOLS OR PROCESSES. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE INFREQUENCY OF REPAIRS ANTICIPATED BY THE APPLICANT AS WELL AS THE TYPE OF MAINTENANCE REQUIRED FOR THE GOLF CARTS AND LAWNMOWERS, AS WELL AS THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER THAT WILL BE MAINTAINED FROM THE RESIDENTIAL AREA TO THE EAST WILL ENSURE THAT THIS USE DOES NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT AREA PROPERTIES. THEREFORE WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT PLANNING COMMISSION MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT AS SUBMITTED. WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS? NO, THANKS. OKAY. QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. HEARING NONE. IS THERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK? THEY CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH EMOTION. HERE. I'LL MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER FOUR COLUMBUS POWER SPORT. ESPECIALLY USE PERMIT AS SUBMITTED. BECCA. BROKE HOME. MR FREE. YES MR LENDER. YES. CHAIR. OYSTER. YES, MR ROCK. AGAIN.[00:15:08]
VERY WELCOME. DON'T YOU DON'T HAVE TO LEAVE, OKAY? THEN LASTLY , ON THE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FIVE[5. APPLICATION: Columbus Powersports – Special Use Permit]
COLUMBUS POWER SPORTS FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. AND THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT THE NEW BUILDING ON HOME ROAD FOR COLUMBUS. POWER SPORTS. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN WILL REVIEW THE SITE DESIGN FOR CONFORMANCE WITH CODE AS WELL AS BUILDING ARCHITECTURE TO ENSURE THE DEVELOPMENT IS APPROPRIATE AND IN CHARACTER WITH THE AREA. FOLLOWING THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, THE APPLICANT WILL SUBMIT FOR DETAILED SITE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW. THE SITE HAS BEEN DESIGNED AROUND NATURAL FEATURES ON THE SITE, INCLUDING FLOODPLAIN AND ON THE EXISTING TREE STANDS. THE BUILDING WILL BE SENT BACK APPROXIMATELY 30 TO 32 FT FROM HOME ROAD AND THE PROPOSED PARKING LOT WILL BE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING, WRAPPING AROUND TO THE BACK OF THE BUILDING. WITH 18 PARKING SPACES AND ONE LOADING SPACE. MATERIALS SHOW THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE EXISTING VEGETATION ALONG THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE IS TO BE PRESERVED , WHILE STAFF BELIEVES THAT THIS VEGETATION WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE SCREENING FROM THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREA, THE MAJORITY OF THE YEAR THERE IS THE POTENTIAL FOR HEADLIGHT GLARE ONTO THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES IN THE WINTER. UM BECAUSE OF THIS STUFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT A 36 INCH HEAD ROBY INSTALLED ALONG THE ENTIRE EAST SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT TO REDUCE ANY POTENTIAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREA. THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS APPROXIMATELY 11,000 SQUARE FEET IN AREA AND 26 FT. IN HEIGHT, THE INTERIOR SPACE WILL HAVE OFFICES, A SHOWROOM AND WAREHOUSE SPACE FOR STORING AND REPAIRING GOLF CARTS AND THE MOWERS. THE EXTERIOR WILL HAVE A COMBINATION OF THREE FINISHES, LIMESTONE OFFICE AND STEAL AND THE HOME ROAD FRONTAGE ELEVATION WILL BE FINISHED WITH APPROXIMATELY 39% MASONRY, 14% ETHOS AND 35% STEEL WITH WINDOWS AND SOFFIT TAKING THE REMAINDER. STAFF IS NOT SUPPORTIVE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING ARCHITECTURE AS IT DOES NOT MEET THE CHARACTER OF OTHER AREAS, STRUCTURES GIVEN THE STRUCTURE'S LOCATION IN THE CITY'S NORTHERN GATEWAY STAFF BELIEVES THAT ASSAD SHOULD UTILIZE SIMILAR MATERIALS AND PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION IS OTHER BUILDINGS IN THE GATEWAY, WHERE VISIBLE FROM HOME ROAD. WHICH INCLUDES HIGHER PERCENTAGES OF MASONRY ETHOS, AND THE WINDOWS ARE GLASS STOREFRONTS. NOTING THESE CONCERNS AS WELL AS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED OUTSTANDING ITEMS, INCLUDING LANDSCAPE SCREENING AND OTHER ISSUES, NOTED IN OUR STAFF REPORTS, SUCH AS PARKING LOT LIGHTING FIXTURES STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT PLANNING COMMISSION MAKER RECOMMENDATION OF DISAPPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL. FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS SUBMITTED. WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE SOME COMMENTS? SURE UM, SO WHEN I STARTED THIS PROJECT, I REALLY WANTED TO DO MY DUE DILIGENCE BEFORE I GOT WAY INVOLVED AS I HAVE. TO THIS POINT. IT'S BEEN A LONG JOURNEY . I FEEL LIKE THE DAILY GRIND. SO I WENT AND SPOKE WITH SOME PEOPLE AT THE CITY TO SEE YOU KNOW WHAT I'M LOOKING TO DO IF IT WOULD ACTUALLY WORK IN THAT AREA. I SPECIFICALLY SAID, YOU KNOW, IF YOU GUYS ARE LOOKING FOR ME TO BUILD OR BE HELD UP HELD TO THE SAME STANDARDS AS THE POINT SHOOT POINT BLANK BUILDING OR THE MARCOS PIZZA BUILDING NEXT DOOR THEN, UNFORTUNATELY, I WILL HAVE TO PASS ON THIS ON THIS LAND AND LOOK ELSEWHERE BECAUSE IT WON'T WORK FOR WHAT I'M TRYING TO DO IT JUST BE OVER MY BUDGET FOR THIS TYPE OF PROJECT BECAUSE, AFTER ALL, I'M BUILDING A GOLF CART STORE AND I DON'T HAVE $3 MILLION TO PUT INTO A GOLF CART STORE. THAT BEING SAID THE STRUCTURE THAT WE'RE BUILDING I THINK IS AMAZING. I THINK IT LOOKS AWESOME TO $1.5 MILLION WE'RE GOING TO HAVE INTO THIS STRUCTURE. UM BONING COSTS ARE SUPER SUPER HIGH RIGHT NOW IS EVERYBODY KNOWS SELF MAYBE MY MONEY WOULD HAVE WENT A LOT FURTHER. HAD IT BEEN TWO YEARS AGO, EVEN BUT I'VE REALLY STRETCHED THE DESIGN ON EVERY TIME I GO BACK TO ASK YOU STILL DON'T LIKE IT? WHAT ELSE DO I NEED TO DO? THEY WOULD LET ME KNOW WHAT ELSE THEY WOULD SUGGEST, AND I FELT LIKE EACH TIME FOR DIFFERENT TIMES, BY THE WAY, EACH TIME COSTS ME MONEY. UM I WENT ABOVE AND BEYOND WHAT THEY WERE ASKING. AND EACH TIME I GOT TO KNOW AND SO THEN I FINALLY SAID, WELL, WHAT'S THE WHAT'S THE MAIN PROBLEM WITH THE BUILDING THAT YOU DON'T LIKE? AND IT WAS TOO MUCH EXPOSED STEEL AND I SAID, WELL, HOW MUCH EXPOSED STEEL ARE WE? DOWN TO NOW? I THINK IT WAS LIKE 33% ON THE BUILDING VISIBLE FROM THE ROAD ON ALL SIDES. AND I SAID, WELL, THAT'S A LOW PORTION OF THE BUILDING. AND I SAID, I DON'T THINK IT STILL LOOKS BAD AT ALL. I THINK IT COMPLEMENTS EVERYTHING SO WELL ON THE BUILDING. IT'S A VERY MODERN LOOKING BUILDING. UM AND I SAID WELL, I DON'T WANT TO KEEP DOING THIS BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO KEEP DOING THIS. WHAT IS THE GOAL? WHAT PERCENTAGE DO I NEED TO BE AT ON THE STEEL TO GET THIS APPROVED? THE ANSWER WAS, I DON'T KNOW. WE JUST GOT TO KEEP TRYING. AND SO I STOPPED THERE AND JUST SAID I THIS IS AS FAR AS I CAN GO LIKE I THINK THE[00:20:05]
BUILDING LOOKS AMAZING. YOU KNOW , I'VE EXHAUSTED MY RESOURCES TO REALLY CREATE A BUILDING HERE IN GROVE CITY. THAT IS NOT AN EYESORE. UM, THAT WILL BE A GREAT BUSINESS. I THINK THE PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY WILL LIKE HAVING THIS BUSINESS HERE AND NOBODY'S GOING TO LOOK AT THAT BUILDING AND THINK IT'S NICE. WE'RE ON OUR COMMUNITY WHATSOEVER. I THINK ANYONE CAN LOOK AT THAT PICTURE UP THERE AND IF MAYBE THEY DISAGREE WITH ME, BUT I THINK IT'S AMAZING LOOKING BUILDING, SO THAT'S WHERE I STAND ON IT. AND I WOULD LIKE OTHER PEOPLE TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT AND LET ME KNOW IF THEY AGREE OR DISAGREE. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS THE FOR SELF. PORTION OF THE PROPERTY WHERE MARSH RUN IS. IS. DOES THIS PRECLUDE ANY USE OF THAT AREA WILL REMAIN AS IT IS IN IT AS A TREED AREA. CORRECT YEAH, THAT'S IT'S LIKE A WETLANDS DOWN THERE AND SO WE WOULDN'T BE MOVING ANY DIRT OR TOUCHING THAT AREA AT ALL. SECOND QUESTION IS THE PICTURE WE HAVE ON THE SCREEN NOW HAS WINDOWS. WHICH GIVES THE ILLUSION OF THE SECOND FLOOR. BUT IT'S NOT A IT'S NOT A NEW STORY. IT'S TO MAKE THE ILLUSION OF A SECOND FLOOR TO MAKE THE BUILDING LOOK NICER TO, UM, TAKE AWAY FROM YOU KNOW SOME OF THIS DEAL THAT'S ON THE BUILDING TO BREAK IT UP. TO PRESENT IT, MAKE IT NICER PRESENTATION. UM EVENTUALLY, YOU KNOW THE BUILDING USED. WE MIGHT BUILD A SECOND FLOOR DOWN THE ROAD, BUT IT'S NOT IN THE PLANS CURRENTLY. SESSION AND FOR STAFF. HOW DO HOW DO WE BACK AND BUILD A SECOND FLOOR AFTER APPROVING SINGLE FOR SINGLE STORY STRUCTURE. REALLY OVER APPROVING WITH THIS IS THE EXTERIOR APPEARANCE OF THE BUILDING. SO IF THERE WERE TO BE INTERIOR MODIFICATIONS TO MAKE IT A TWO STORY STRUCTURE THAT WOULD BE ALL THROUGH THE BUILDING DIVISION. BECAUSE REALLY ALL WE'RE LOOKING AT RIGHT NOW. IT'S JUST THE EXTERIOR. THE PLAN SHEETS THAT ARE ATTACHED TO THIS . DON'T MATCH THIS PICTURE. THEY DON'T SHOW THE WIND. ARE WE. VOTING ON WHAT WE SEE ON THE SCREEN HERE FOR THE PLAN SHEETS THAT ARE ON THE WEBS. AND I CAN CALLED WHEN. THE ONE THAT'S ON THE SCREEN IS MY FINAL RENDERING . THAT'S THE ONE WITH THE MOST AMOUNT OF STONE AS YOU CAN SEE ALL ALONG THE TOP WHERE THE CORALS ARE. YOU SEE STONE BEHIND THAT AS WELL. MM SO YEAH, THAT'S THAT'S THE FINAL RENDERING IS THE ONE UP ON THE SCREEN. THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF BACK AND FORTH AS AS THE APPLICANT ALLUDED TO SO IT YOU KNOW, AT ONE POINT THERE HAVE BEEN OTHER ELEVATIONS POSTED. BUT WHEN THE PACKETS WERE SUBMITTED ON FRIDAY OR DISTRIBUTED THIS, THIS WAS THE ELEVATION. THANK YOU. AND YOU SEE THE ONE UP ON THE SCREEN OR DO THEY NEED TO PASS THIS AROUND? THAT WE HAVE. OKAY.OKAY. THANK YOU. YEAH. I JUST HAVE A QUESTION FOR THIS CITY. IS THERE A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE LOOKING IF IT'S IT APPEARS TO BE THEN 33% STEEL. SO THEN THE REST WOULD BE. 67% IF A SANDSTONE AND WINDOWS. CORRECT AS PROPOSED. APPROXIMATELY 14% IS IF IT'S REALLY JUST THAT BAND THAT GOES BETWEEN THE WINDOWS. UM AND IF I COULD CLARIFY EARLY ON IN THE PROCESS, YOU KNOW WE DID TALK A LOT ABOUT ARCHITECTURE, AND I CERTAINLY NEVER INTENDED TO LEAD THE APPLICANT DOWN THE WRONG PATH OR TO MAKE YOU SPEND MONEY THAT YOU KNOW WAS NOT YOU KNOW NOT NEEDED. WE PROVIDED EXAMPLES OF OTHER STEEL BUILDINGS THAT HAD BEEN APPROVED, BUT ALL OF THOSE WERE SENT WITH A NOTE THAT THOSE WERE IN INDUSTRIAL AREAS AND THAT THIS SITE IS AT A GATEWAY TO THE COMMUNITY, SO THERE ARE CERTAIN EXPECTATIONS FOR BUILDINGS IN THIS AREA. WE ALSO COMPILED A VERY SPECIFIC SPREADSHEET. OF SHOWING THE MATERIAL BREAKDOWN FOR ALL OTHER BUILDINGS AT THE GATEWAY TO THE COMMUNITY. SO ON TURNBERRY, THE DOLLAR GENERAL IN THE AREA AND TO BE CLEAR IT WAS NEVER SAID THAT THIS WOULD BE HELD TO THE SAME REQUIREMENTS AS SHOOT POINT BLANK OR TURNED VERY RETAIL STORE REALLY ARE CONCERNED WITH THE MATERIAL BREAKDOWN IS FOR THE FRONTAGE ON HOME ROAD WHERE THIS IS PRESIDENT OR VISIBLE FROM A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. SO YOU KNOW, THE CURRENTLY THE REAR ELEVATION IS ALL STEEL, AND WE'RE PERFECTLY COMFORTABLE WITH THAT. WE'VE NEVER STATED OTHERWISE THAT THIS HAS TO HAVE FOUR CITED ARCHITECTURE. SO IN TERMS OF THE SPECIFIC UM YOU KNOW, PERCENTAGE OF CERTAIN MATERIALS. REALLY? WE WERE JUST TRYING TO REDUCE THE PERCENTAGE OF THE STEEL NOT SAYING THAT YOU COULD NOT HAVE ANY STEEL BUT ALSO NOTING THAT NONE OF THE OTHER BUILDINGS AT THE NORTHERN GATEWAY TO THE COMMUNITY HAVE ANY EXPOSED DEAL. SO IF YOU'RE
[00:25:04]
TRYING TO GET A SPECIFIC PERCENTAGE, YOU KNOW, MAYBE IT'S AT THE STEEL AND THE ETHOS PERCENTAGE OR SWAPPED BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE CLOSER IN LINE TO WHAT OTHER AREA BUILDINGS HAVE.AND AS I SEE IT, THAT WOULD BE ON TWO SIDES OF THE BUILDING AS BOTH WOULD BE FRONTING RIGHT.
OKAY OKAY. I'M SORRY, GOD. NO, I WAS JUST LOOKING FOR THE CLARIFICATION. UM. MHM HAVE YOU SOUNDS LIKE YOU'VE HAD LENGTHY CONVERSATIONS. HAVE YOU TALKED ABOUT THAT? YEAH. YEAH THE BUILDINGS THAT WERE SENT TO ME LIKE WHEN WE HAVE THIS CONVERSATION, AND I TOLD HER YOU KNOW, I CAN SHOW YOU WHERE IT STARTED. THE WORDS ENDED UP NOW WE'RE LEAPS AND BOUNDS. YOU KNOW , FURTHER THAN WHERE IT WAS. ORIGINALLY THE STEEL BUILDINGS THAT WERE SENT TO ME WERE EXAMPLES OF BUILDINGS THAT WERE , UM STEEL BUILDINGS THAT WERE DRESSED UP AND WE'VE GONE WAY ABOVE AND BEYOND DRESSING THIS BUILDING UP WAY MORE THAN THOSE BUILDINGS IF I SHOWED YOU THOSE IN MY LIFE, AND I DON'T HAVE A BIG SHEET THAT WERE EMAILED TO ME. AND SO THERE VERY WELL COULD HAVE BEEN A MISCOMMUNICATION BECAUSE IT WASN'T MY UNDERSTANDING AT ALL THAT I HAVE TO GO EVEN THIS FAR FOR THAT LOCATION. UM YOU KNOW, I'M BUILDING A GOLF CART SHOP. AND THAT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE A GOLF CART SHOP. I THINK ANYBODY ON I DON'T KNOW I COULD BE WRONG.
IT'S MY OPINION. I THINK THE BUILDING LOOKS AMAZING. I REALLY DO. HAVING A LITTLE STEEL EXPOSED 33% I DON'T THINK TAKES AWAY FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF THAT BUILDING. THERE'S A BUILDING DOWN ON HOOVER AND 6 65 THAT'S GOING UP RIGHT NOW, AND IT HAS A LARGE PORTION OF ALUMINUM CITING OR WOOD PLANK CITING I DON'T KNOW. IT LOOKS JUST LIKE STEEL. YOU WOULDN'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE UNLESS YOU WENT UP AND TAPPED ON IT. UM SO I DON'T KNOW WHY THERE'S SORT OF A BAD STIGMA VERSUS STEEL AND SHIP SHIP LAP OR WOOD OR VITAL, EXCITING. WITH IT ALL. BRING BROKEN UP LIKE THAT IN THE AMOUNT OF MASSIVE STONE LIMESTONE I HAVE ON THAT BUILDING. I COULDN'T ASK FOR A BETTER LEAD DESIGN BUILDING, IN MY OPINION, SO I AGREE 100.
THANK YOU VERY, VERY NICELY DONE. I APPRECIATE THAT. AND SO JUST TO REITERATE AS WELL, THE, UM THE SIGHTING. YOU MENTIONED DOES LOOK LIKE WOOD PLANK CITING DECIDING ON THE BUILDING THAT YOU'RE BUILDING. WELL THE STEEL HAS LIKE THE NATURAL UNDULATIONS IN THE STEEL, SO IT DOES LOOK LIKE IT'S WOOD WITH LIKE OUTSET , SCHIPPLOCK. I THINK IT'S WHAT IT'S CALLED. I'M NOT A I'M NOT A CONTRACTOR. BUT YEAH, SO TO ME WHEN I LOOK AT IT FROM THE OUTSIDE, UNLESS YOU WALK UP AND TAP ON IT, YOU DON'T REALLY KNOW IT'S STEEL OR VINYL SIDING OR OR WOULD SO. I MEAN, IF WE'RE BUILDING BUILDINGS AROUND GROUP CITY THAT HAVE WOULD. A BIG PORTION OF THE BUILDING. WHAT'S WRONG WITH HAVING SOME STEEL EXPOSED 33% ON THE ENTIRE BUILDING? BROKEN UP THE WAY IT IS? I THINK IT LOOKS LOOKS EXCELLENT IN MY OPINION. THAT'S AS FAR AS I CAN GO. I'M JUST TO THE POINT WHERE I'M BUILDING A GOLF CART SHOP. SO YOU KNOW, $1.5 MILLION PROJECT IS MORE THAN I ORIGINALLY PLANNED. TO SPEND ON THIS PROJECT. AND I JUST THOUGHT DEVELOPING THIS. I WANTED TO DEVELOP IT IN MY HOME HOME COMMUNITY AND I LIVE IN PINNACLE LOVE GROVE CITY HAVE LIVED HERE FOR 15 YEARS LIKE MY KIDS GO TO GROW CITY SO I'M JUST A SMALL BUSINESS THAT ARE TRYING TO START A BUSINESS AND GROWTH CITY. I'M DOING THE BEST I CAN. THANK YOU FOR THINKING OF GROUPS CITY FOR YOUR BUSINESS. MOMENT. I COULD ASK ONE OTHER QUESTION. KIND OF ASIDE FROM THE ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING, THE HEDGEROW AND THE LIGHTING FIXTURES. UM ARE YOU AMENABLE TO TALKING WITH THE CITY FOR THOSE TWO ITEMS? QUESTIONS ARE PLAYING. I WOULD JUST MAKE THE COMMENT. IT IS A GOOD LOOKING BUILDING. I LOVED THE USE OF THE LIMESTONE ON IT. UM BUT I AM SUPPORTIVE OF STAFFS INDICATION THAT THE STEEL SHOULD BE OFFICE OR OR DRESSED UP YET SOME MORE. IT SEEMS TO ME LIKE A SMALL REACH, ESPECIALLY IN 1.5 ALREADY. I DON'T THINK IT'S THAT HUGE OF THE CHANGE THAT TO BRING THIS BUILDING UP TO WHAT WE ALL ASPIRE FOR OUR COMMUNITY. A COUPLE $100,000. AND WHEN YOU'RE ALREADY A COUPLE 100,000 OVER BUDGET IT'S A BIG REACH. JUST YOU KNOW, THINKING OF IDEAS. I KNOW ONE OF WE TALKED ABOUT FS ADDITIONAL OFFICE. I THINK ADDITIONAL WINDOWS WAS ALSO MENTIONED AS A POTENTIAL I'M NOT SURE IF THAT'S QUITE AS YOU KNOW WHEN WE WHEN WE'RE TALKING ECONOMICS, OKAY, IT'S DEFINITELY NOT AS UH, COSTLY TO ADD MORE WINDOWS. UM. THAT BEING SAID,
[00:30:09]
YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT IN THE BEST AREA. THERE ARE SOME AREAS AROUND THERE THAT YOU KNOW, POTENTIAL BREAK IN. AND WITH THE MERCHANDISE THAT I HAVE INDOORS . I DON'T WANT TO PUT A LOT OF WINDOWS AROUND THE WHOLE FRONT STRUCTURE AND ON THE BOTTOM LEVEL. UM BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY MORE WINDOWS, THE MORE. SUSCEPTIBLE YOU MIGHT BE TO BREAK IN AND HAVING TO FIX WINDOWS AND SUCH, UM, BECAUSE THAT AREA RIGHT THERE. YES, IT'S NOT BAD, BUT I'M JUST SAYING, YOU KNOW. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ARE PLAYING COMMISSION. HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF, YOU KNOW, MAYBE TRYING TO GET A MIDDLE GROUND OR SOMETHING. THE WEST SIDE IS UP AGAINST THE RAVINE ARE FRONT AND OBVIOUSLY, THAT'S STEEL. LOOKING AT THE EAST SIDE. IS THERE ANY CHANCE SOME OF THAT LIMESTONE ON THE EAST SIDE? CAN BE PUT OVER ONTO THE FRONT TO GET THE FRONTAGE PERCEIVES A LITTLE GREATER ALONG. TRUE FRIENDS OF THE BUILDING. I MEAN, HE'S GOT SOME GOING DOWN THE SIDE. ON THE EAST SIDE. BUT AGAIN, THAT'S GOT A BIG TREE THING GOING DOWN THE PROPERTY LINE, WHICH HE'S LEAVING IN PLACE. AND THE SPEED ON THAT ROAD, I THINK IS 35 MILE AN HOUR ROAD. 35 MILES AN HOUR COMING TO TRAFFIC LIGHTS AND INTERSECTIONS, PROBABLY NOT TAKING A HARD GLANCE. DECIDED BUILDING TO SEE WHAT IS PERCENTAGES OF WINDOWS AND STONE AND STEEL ARE BUT LEBRON, I UNDERSTAND IS THE LONGER PORTION OF THE BUILDING. WHAT? 1 50. I THINK THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT. YES, YES. SO AND THAT IS A SHORTER SIDE AND HIS BIG ENTRANCE ON THE CORNER WITH ALL STAY IN PLACE, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT THAT GIVES YOU APPOINTED VISION ON IT, YOU KNOW? IF THAT WOULD HELP. THE PERCENTAGES MIGHT KEEP YOUR COST IN LINE. TO MOVE SOME OF THAT LIMESTONE THAT'S ON THE EAST SIDE. THE TRUTH FRONTAGE OF THE BUILDING AND. WELL WHAT STAFF LIKE OF A COMPROMISE. I THINK THAT'S PERFECTLY IN LINE WITH WHAT WE'VE BEEN. WE'VE BEEN COMMUNICATING THAT IT'S ALL BASED, REALLY OUR CONCERN OF THE PERCENTAGE AND MATERIAL BREAKDOWN IS WHERE VISIBLE FROM A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. AND I THINK YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. COMMISSIONER ROCK THAT YOU KNOW THAT BACK CORNER, GIVEN THE PRESERVING THE EXISTING TREE LINE THAT IT REALLY WOULD NOT BE AS VISIBLE FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. OUR MAIN FOCUS REALLY HAS BEEN ON THAT HOME ROAD FRONTAGE. SO THE NORTHERN FACE OF THAT BUILDING. I DON'T KNOW HOW WE PUT THAT INTO WORDS STIPULATION THAT SURE. SOMEBODY WANT HELP. BUT IF YOU'RE GOOD WITH THAT, I MEAN I JUST SOLD COMPROMISES AND IT IS A GOOD LOOKING BUILDING. THIS COULD MAKE IT EVEN A LITTLE BETTER ON THE FRONT. SO TAKE SOME OF THE STONE ANY OF US FROM THE SIDE. WE'RE ACTUALLY LOOKING AT RIGHT HERE. WHICH WOULD BE THE PARKING LOT SIDE. YES I'D PROBABLY ONLY THE STONE AND ADD THAT TO THE FRONT TO THE FRONT. YEAH AND THAT MIGHT GET YOU UP PASTURE CANOPIES. TROY EASILY OR MAYBE EVEN TO THE BOTTOM OF THE TOP WINDOWS. WILL FOR SURE. YEAH, YEAH. YOU KNOW, JUST HOW WE CAN DO SOME REDESIGNING WITH THE FRONT OFFICE PERCENTAGES SAYING BUT JUST INCREASED. WHATEVER THAT SQUARE FOOTAGE OF STONE IS TO THE FRONT. IF THAT GETS US MORE IN LINE. I THINK THAT'S CERTAINLY SOMETHING THAT COULD BE INTRODUCED AS A STIPULATION OF WHETHER IT BE A THIRD OF THAT STONE WATER TABLE THAT THE MASONRY BE SHIFTED TO THE NORTHERN. IT SOUNDS LIKE THERE'S STILL A LITTLE BIT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT HOW MUCH EMPHASIS BEYOND THAT HOME ROAD FRONTAGE THAT IS ONLY IF YOU ARE, IF YOU'RE CONSIDERING PUTTING, ADDRESSING A STIPULATION FOR CHANGES TO THE BUILDING ARCHITECTURE THAT WE SHOULD PROBABLY COME TO A DETERMINATION ON THAT AS WELL.OKAY. THE STIPULATION NEED TO WORK WITH THE CITY. FOR WE'RE CERTAINLY WELCOME TO HIM. AND NOW THAT WE'VE GOTTEN THIS INPUT FROM PLANNING COMMISSION, WE'RE CERTAINLY HAPPY TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT MORE. WE CAN TRY AND GET IT DONE PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL, BECAUSE I KNOW THAT YOU ARE ON A TIGHT TIMELINE. YOU KNOW, WE'VE GONE BACK AND FORTH AND ASKED TWO THINGS TO BE POSTPONED TO TRY AND GIVE US MORE TIME TO WORK OUT THESE OUTSTANDING ISSUES, BUT WE'RE ALSO GOING TO BE RESPECTFUL OF THE APPLICANTS TIMEFRAME THAT HE'S TRYING TO WORK WITH HIM. SO WE'RE CERTAINLY YOU KNOW, AGREEABLE TO WORKING WITH THE APPLICANT TO TRY AND MAKE SOME CHANGES PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL. ESPECIALLY AS PERMIT DOES REQUIRE TO READING. SO WE DO
[00:35:03]
HAVE SOME TIME THAT WE CAN WORK WITH THE APPLICANT IF EFFORTS WANT TO WORK WITH US, AND WE HAVE THIS CONVERSATION. WE CAN'M THE PRIOR APPLICATION ITEM IS A SPECIALIST AS TWO READINGS. SO BY THE TIME THAT HITS THE FINAL READING FOR A COUNCIL, WE CAN HAVE THE DEVELOPMENT AND CATCH UP WITH IT. HUMAN UP. IN THE PAST. ONE ESPECIALLY USED PERMIT WENT THROUGH. I'M SAYING WE HAVE TIME TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT. THE GOALS THAT GET TESTED LINEUP SO. YEAH I LIKE TO BE, BUT JUST ADD A STIPULATION SO THAT CAN UPON THE TIME. PRETTY CLEAR THAT THEY WERE SAYING THAT ALL OF THIS STEEL ON THE HOME WROTE FACADE. WILL BE REPLACED WITH. ENOUGH SQUARE FOOT OF LIMESTONE THERE TO DO THAT. I THINK WE COULD PROBABLY GET UP. SO BEYOND THE ON THE WHOLE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION. CAMP. THE ELEVATION COULD BE. I THINK THE STEEL ON THE BUILDING ACTUALLY ACCENTS EVERYTHING NICELY. I THINK TAKING IT AWAY MAKES IT LOOK WORSE, BUT THAT'S MY POINT.COMPLETELY TAKING IT AWAY. THERE SHOULD BE ENOUGH STONE FROM THE SIDE THAT DEFINITELY GET UP TO THE GREAT BAND GOING AROUND. YEAH CANOPIES FOR SURE, PHIL. THIS AREA ALL THE WAY HERE WITH STOMACH. UNSURE HOW THAT ADDRESSES STAFF'S CONCERNS. THE FRONT, WHICH. THIS IS APPROACH.
WE'LL HAVE 66. A PIE. GOING. TO BECAUSE THAT'S 175 FT SIDE. PROBABLY 50 PLUS STONE. TIMES SIX FT. SO YEAH, IF I HAD TO ADD A LITTLE BIT. THAT'S YOU KNOW, I WAS A LITTLE BIT MORE. YEAH RIGHT. IF WE TOOK THE I THINK IT'S SEVEN FT OF STONE ON THAT SIDE SEVEN. YOU'RE RIGHT. IT'S SEVEN. SO IF YOU TAKE IT DOWN TO THREE AND THEN PULL OUT OF THE WINDOW SILL. MAYBE TAKE THE REST OF THAT REMAIN IN THE FRONT UP TO THE EAVIS LINE. YEAH, RIGHT. DO AWAY WITH THIS BAND IN HERE THAT'LL BE STUNTING AND EVEN US UP TO HERE, JUST. NOW I ALSO JUST ADD FOR MY EARLIER COMMENTS . I WASN'T REALLY GIVING MY PERSONAL OPINION I WAS DRAWING FROM. THE GROSS CITY 2050 ANALYSIS THAT SHOWS. TWO OF THE FINDINGS NOT MEANT DUE TO THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BUILDING . SO THAT'S THAT'S WHERE I'M DRAWING MY GUIDANCE FROM. WE DO HAVE THERE'S ONE OTHER OPTION IF PLANNING COMMISSION IS NOT COMFORTABLE SETTING A CERTAIN STIPULATION. WEEK WE COULD CALL A SPECIAL MEETING IN TWO WEEKS. WE TIME IT OUT SO THAT THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN WOULD THEN HIT CITY COUNCIL AT THE SECOND READING OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT. UM AGAIN. JUST SO THEN YOU CAN GIVE US YOUR FEEDBACK. AND WE CAN TAKE THAT TO THE APPLICANT AND TRY AND COME TO TWO AGREEMENT. I WOULD BE MUCH MORE COMFORTABLE AT THAT. I'D LOVE TO SEE THE CITIES. THERE'S A STAFF BE ABLE TO SAY THAT THEY'VE GOT THIS WORKED OUT. HAVE A RENDERING THAT IS CURE IT FOR WHAT WOULD BE DONE. AND I THINK THAT WILL MAKE THE PROCESS A LOT EASIER FOR COUNCIL DOWN.
THIS WOULD ALSO NOT ULTIMATELY DELAY YOUR PROJECT AT ALL. BECAUSE I'M REALLY YOU COULD NOT PROCEED UNTIL THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SO THE USE OF THE PROPERTY IS SO THEN TO BE RESPECTFUL TO YOUR TIME, KNOWING THAT YOU HAVE A TIME FRAME THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO WORK WITH THEM.
IF WE CAN CALL THAT SPECIAL MEETING WE CAN TRY AND KEEP YOU ON THE SAME TIMELINE. GREAT.
THAT SEEMED GOOD. YEAH, IT DOES. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME AT ALL ON ANYTHING ELSE. NOPE.
THANK YOU FOR ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I WOULD MAKE A MOTION THAT WE POSTPONED. AGENDA. ITEM NUMBER FIVE. THE. COLUMBUS POWER SPORTS SPORTS FINAL DEVELOPMENT. FOR RECONSIDERATION THAT A SPECIAL MEETING WITHIN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS. AGAIN. GIRL CALLED MR LINDER? YES. MR FRANK. GENERAL EASTER? YES. MR ROCK? YES. ALL
[00:40:14]
RIGHT WITH THAT BEING OUR LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA OF