[A. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL]
[00:00:07]
PLANNING COMMISSION. THEY CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER IF WE COULD START WITH ROLL CALL. MR ROCK.
HERE MR FREE PRESIDENT OYSTER HERE, MR LINDER. MR TITUS HERE. IF YOU JOIN ME IN STANDING FOR A MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER, FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
[C. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES]
ALRIGHT PLANNING COMMISSION HAS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO READ THROUGH THE MEETING MINUTES TO OUR PRIOR TO MEETINGS, WHICH WAS FOR FEBRUARY 8TH. AND THEN ANOTHER MEETING SPECIAL MEETING FOR FEBRUARY. 22ND. I CAN HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THESE. THERE ARE ONLY WE APPROVED THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST TWO MEETINGS. SECOND BROKE UP MR FREE. YES. CHARITY OYSTER. YES MR TITUS.YES, MR ROCK? YES. AND JUST ONE MORE ITEM OF ORDER. ITEM NUMBER SEVEN. WHICH IS AUTUMN GROVE EDITION DEVELOPMENT PLAN HAS ASKED TO POSTPONE SO IF I COULD HAVE A MOTION TO REMOVE ITEM NUMBER SEVEN FROM THE AGENDA TODAY. IF WE REMOVE ITEM NUMBER SEVEN GROVE ADDITION FROM THE AGENDA. WE'LL CALL MR TITUS. YES MR ROCK? YES OYSTER? YES, MR FREE? YES. GREAT THAT LEAVES US WITH EIGHT ITEMS ON THE AGENDA TODAY. AND WHEN YOUR AGENDA ITEM IS CALLED, IF YOU REPRESENTATIVE COULD WALK TO THE PODIUM AND STATE THEIR NAME AS WELL AS THEIR ADDRESS, IT CAN BE YOUR HOME ADDRESS, OR IT CAN BE YOUR BUSINESS ADDRESS, WHICHEVER YOU PREFER. AND THEN AFTER THAT THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SOME BACKGROUND INFORMATION. IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM , BUT YOU'RE NOT THE REPRESENTATIVE. WE JUST ASK WHEN YOU ARE CALLED TO SPEAK. IF YOU WOULD SIGN IN AT THE PODIUM, YOU DON'T HAVE TO DO THAT NOW, BUT RATHER WHEN YOU WALK UP TO THE PODIUM AND THEN WE'LL ASK YOU ALSO STATE YOUR NAME AS WELL AS YOUR ADDRESS. GREAT, SO WE'LL
[1. APPLICATION: Wright Graphic Design – Lot Split]
GET STARTED WITH ITEM NUMBER ONE RIGHT GRAPHIC DESIGN LOT SPLIT. PRESS, RIGHT? ADDRESS IS 60 TO 90 C DRUG DROPS IN YOUR HOME. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO SPLIT 1.9 ACRES FROM A 2.79 ACRE TRACT OF LAND ON SEEDS ROAD CURRENTLY OWNED BY TIGER HOLLY. THE APPLICANT WILL BE PURCHASING THE 1.9 ACRE PIECE PROPOSED TO BE SPLIT WITH THE INTENT TO BUILD A NEW BUILDING FOR THE FUTURE GROWTH. THE RIGHT GRAPHIC DESIGN. AND THE REMAINING 0.89 ACRE PIECE WILL CONTINUE TO BE OWNED BY TIGER POLLY MANUFACTURING AND CAN BE ACCESSED FROM THEIR PROPERTY TO THE EAST ON ENTERPRISE PARKWAY. AFTER REVIEWING THE APPLICATION STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THE LOT SPLIT AS SUBMITTED. WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADD ANYTHING? ALRIGHT. QUESTIONS ARE PLANNING COMMISSION. A HEARING. NOTHING. IS THERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK RIGHT? WE CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH EMOTION. VERY MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER ONE RIGHT GRAPHIC DESIGN LOTS OF BLOOD. A SECOND. RECALL MR TITUS? YES ROYSTER? YES MR ROCK? YES, MR FREE? YES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. AND I'M[2. APPLICATION: Meadow Grove Estates North Section 9 – Plat]
NUMBER TWO MEADOW GROVE ESTATES NORTH SECTION NINE. HELLO. MY NAME IS COREY KHARKOV WITH ROCKFORD HOMES AND 99. PLAYERS PARKWAY, COLUMBUS, OHIO FOR 3 TO 40. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PLAT FOR SECTION NINE OF THE STATES NORTH SUBDIVISION IN WHICH IS LOCATED EAST OF BUCKEYE PARKWAY. THIS PLANT WILL CONTINUE THE FORMALIZATION AND CREATION OF LOTS, RESERVES AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PUBLIC STREETS AS SHOWN ON THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN[00:05:03]
FOR MEADOW GROVE ESTATES APPROVED IN 2000 AND SIX THE PLAN INCLUDES 42 LOTS ONE RESERVE AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR FIVE PUBLIC ROADWAYS, FOUR OF WHICH WILL BE EXTENSIONS OF ROADS STARTED IN PREVIOUS SECTIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION. ALL THE PROPOSED LOTS MEET THE MINIMUM WITH AND THE MINIMUM SIZE AND THE LOT AND ROADWAY CONFIGURATION. MATCHES THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MEDICARE. IF ESTATES NORTH. THEREFORE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT PLANNING COMMISSION MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PLAN, AS SUBMITTED. WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS? BUT I DON'T HAVE ANY COMMENTS. QUESTIONS ARE PLAYING COMMISSION. YOUR NONE. IS THERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK RIGHT? HEARING NONE WERE READY FOR MOTION. HERE. I WOULD MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER TWO MEDICAL GROVE ESTATES NORTH SECTION NINE. FLAT AS SUBMITTED. ROLL CALL, MR ROCK. YES MR TITUS ? YES MR FREE? YES. OYSTER? YES. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER THREE FARMSTEAD SUB AREA[3. APPLICATION: Farmstead Subarea H Phase 3 - Plat]
H. PHASE THREE PLATT. E SMITH WAS CIVIL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS TO 50 WEST TOLD WILSON BRIDGE GROUP. WE'RE GOING TO KNOW HOW THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PLANT FOR SECTION THREE OF FARMSTEADS SIBERIA. H LOCATED WEST OF JACKSON PIKE AND SOUTH OF HAWTHORN PARKWAY. THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FARMSTEAD SUB AREA H WAS APPROVED IN 2000 AND 20 FOLLOWING THE ZONING IN 2000 AND 18 FOR THE LARGER FIRMS TO DEVELOPMENT. THIS PLANT CONTINUES THE CREATION OF LOTS OF RESERVES AND RIGHT AWAY AS APPROVED ON THAT DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE PLAN INCLUDES 17 LOTS ONE RESERVE AND RIGHT AWAY FOR ONE ROADWAY EXTENSION, HONEY FARM WAY AND ONE NEW ROADWAY QUEEN BEE PLACE. MANY EASEMENTS SHOWN WITH ON THIS PLANET HAVE BEEN APPROVED OF PREVIOUS PLATZ FOR FARMSTEAD SUB AREA H. I MEAN , ALL PROPOSED LOTS MEET THE STANDARDS AND CONFIGURATIONS SET ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THEREFORE WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT PLANNING COMMISSION MAKER RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PLAN AS SUBMITTED. ANYTHING THAT YOU'D LIKE TO ADD AT THIS TIME, OKAY? QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. SO ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK I THINK WE CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH EMOTION. THE MOTION. WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO OUR CITY COUNCIL. ITEM THREE. FARMSTEADS AREA H BASE THREE. OKAY? REAL COP CHAIR, OYSTER. YES MR ROCK. YES MR FREE? YES, MR TITUS? YES? THANK YOU. RIGHT NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER FOUR. CHICK FIL A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT.[4. APPLICATION: Chick-fil-A – Development Plan (Amendment)]
HELLO MY NAME IS HOBBS VALLEY FROM INFORMED STUDIO TO 35 EAST MAIN STREET. NORTHVILLE, MICHIGAN. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO RECONFIGURE THE DRIVE THRU AND PARKING LOT FOR THE CHICK FIL A. LOCATED AT 16 96 STRING TOWN ROAD CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CHICK FIL A IN OCTOBER OF 2000 AND FOUR, WHICH IS REGULATED BY THE PDC ZONING TEXT APPROVED PARKWAY CENTER NORTH IN JANUARY OF 2000 AND THREE THE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THE NEED TO RECONFIGURE THE DRIVE THROUGH DUE TO THE NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS AND TO ALLEVIATE PARKING LOT CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE CURRENT SPACES ALONG THE BUILDING AND THE STACKING CARS FOR THE DRIVE THROUGH THE PROPOSAL, RECONFIGURATION WILL INCREASE THE NUMBER OF STACKING LANES FROM 1 TO 2 ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING, AND THE TWO LANES WILL THEN MERGE INTO ONE LANE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING AS VEHICLES MOVE TOWARD THE EXISTING MENU BOARD AND ORDER KIOSK. PAVEMENT MARKINGS WILL HELP DIRECT VEHICLES THROUGH THE DRIVE THROUGH AND WILL BE USED TO DELINEATE THE TWO DRIVE THRU LANES AS WELL AS THE BYPASS LANE AROUND THE SITE. THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS ALSO ALLOW ROOM FOR ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. A NEW EXHIBIT SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT SHOWS ROOM FOR 26 CARS TO STACK AROUND THE BUILDING AND FOR SIX MORE IN AN OVERFLOW AREA ON THE EAST SIDE FOR A TOTAL OF 32 CARS BEFORE SECOND COULD POTENTIALLY INHIBIT CIRCULATION AROUND THE SITE. STAFF BELIEVES THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WILL BE AN IMPROVEMENT OVER EXISTING CONDITIONS BY ADDING A SECOND STACKING LANE AND FORMALIZING THE CIRCULATION ON THE SITE.THEREFORE WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT PLANNING COMMISSION MAKER RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED. WOULD LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS. NO, THANKS.
QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. ONE. NOT AS A STIPULATION, BUT DURING
[00:10:01]
CONSTRUCTION PHASE. IS IT A POTENTIAL TO HAVE SOME ASSISTANCE ON TRAFFIC CONTROL? MAYBE SOME SPECIAL DUTY. LISTENERS YOU'RE RIGHT ON THAT CORNER, AND I DRIVE THROUGH THERE QUITE A BIT GOING HOME DEEPER MYSELF. AND IT'S REALLY IS JAMMED UP THE WAY IT IS, AND I CAN ONLY IMAGINE WITH CONSTRUCTION, SO MAYBE YOUR PEAK HOURS. IF THAT'S SOMETHING YOU'D CONSIDER, I THINK IT BE. HOPE TO ANY OTHER CITIZENS WORKING THEIR WAY THROUGH THE ENTRY POINT. THE TRAINER REDIRECT TRAFFIC SO THAT YOU'RE NOT AS CONGESTED SOMEONE HOLD A GAP SO SOMEONE CAN GET THROUGH IN THOSE DIRECTIONS. I'M JUST APPRECIATE THAT CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. COUPLE OF QUESTIONS, SO THANK YOU FOR ADDRESSING THIS AS WE ALL KNOW, DEPOT. IT'S A MESS. ACCESS ROAD BACK THERE. UM IS THIS SIMILAR TO THE KIND OF STAFFED ARRANGEMENT THAT'S BEING USED NOW? WHERE THE PERSONNEL ARE OUT THERE DIRECTING TRAFFIC. YES, THAT'S CORRECT. SO RIGHT NOW, THE STAFF STILL THEY'RE ACTUALLY TAKING ORDERS ALL THE WAY UP THAT LINE RIGHT NOW. KIND OF WHERE THE DOUBLE STACK IS WHERE THEY WALK ALONG WITH IPADS TAKE ORDERS. THE BIGGEST DIFFERENCE NOW IS THAT WE'LL BE WRAPPING THE TRAFFIC AROUND THE BUILDING SELF RATHER THAN HAVING FOR THE DOUBLE LANES ARE NOW CONTINUING OUT INTO THE GENERAL LOT IN FRONT OF HOME DEPOT AND BLOCKING THAT AREA. THIS WAY. WE TRY TO BRING ALL THE TRAFFIC ON THE CHICK FIL A'S LOT ITSELF. IN THAT WAY, ANY CONGESTION IS LIMITED THERE. THAT'S A GOOD AND WORTHY GOAL. AND I HOPE IT WORKS THAT WAY. YEAH AS OPPOSED TO PEOPLE SITTING ON THAT ACCESS ROAD WAITING TO TURN LEFT IN THERE, BECAUSE THAT'S A REAL IT'S NOT JUST AN INCONVENIENCE, BUT IT'S A HAZARD DANGEROUS PEOPLE. AROUND IT. WHAT ARE YOUR STACKING COUNTS IN THE CURRENT CONFIGURATION COMPARED TO YOUR PROPOSAL. RIGHT NOW. THEY WERE ABOUT MAYBE, LIKE 20 OR SO CARS. THE ADDED BONUS OF THIS IS THE OVERFLOW THAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT EXTRA SIX TO THE EAST OF THE DRIVE THRU LANE, SO CARS WOULD WRAP ALL THE WAY AROUND AND BE ABLE TO STACK THERE. AND THEN DRIVE YOUR CARS PULL FORWARD NORTH OUT OF THE LOT, AND THEN THE NEXT CAR IS ABLE TO TURN TIME THAT GIVES YOU THE ADDITIONAL SIX CARS CONSERVATIVELY. YES, TONIGHT. I HOPE PEOPLE WILL TAKE YOUR LEAD ON THAT ONE, TOO, BUT I THINK THAT'S A BIT THE STRETCH TO THINK THAT THEY WILL ACTUALLY WRAP THE BUILDING AND WILL USE THOSE OVERFLOW SLOTS, AT LEAST NOT WITHOUT DIRECTION. THERE WILL DEFINITELY NEED TO BE DIRECTION AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE PUT IN PLACE BY THE CHIEF FULLY STAFFED DEPENDING ON THE PEAK TIMES TO HELP DIRECT. THAT'S WHY WE'LL ALSO DO THE ADDITIONAL STRIPING AND TRY TO CREATE. THERE'S LIKE ABOUT A TWO FT BUFFER WHERE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE, LIKE WHITE HATCH LINES TO TRY TO KEEP TRAFFIC. AWAY FROM THE DRIVE. THRU TRIED TO DELINEATE WHERE THE CARS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE STACKING AND WHERE THROUGH. TRAFFIC IS SUPPOSED TO GO, AS WELL AS TRYING TO KEEP THEM OFF THE ACTUAL WALKWAY SO THAT PEOPLE CAN STILL ACCESS THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING THE FINAL COMMENT. IS IT WELL, I'LL OFFER IS AS AN OBSERVATION AND A QUESTION TO YOU, BUT IT SEEMS TO ME THAT ONE OF THE CHALLENGES THE SPEED AT WHICH WITH WHICH PEOPLE MOVE THROUGH THE QUARTER KIOSKS AND YOU'RE STILL FOLDING TWO LANES INTO A SINGLE KIOSK. AN AWFUL LOT OF FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS THESE DAYS ARE FEEDING TO ORDER KIOSKS, AND THAT WOULD ARGUABLY DOUBLE THE AMOUNT THE SPEED WITH WHICH PEOPLE CAN GET THROUGH ORDERING AND THERE IS PLENTY OF PARKING ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE LOT FOR THOSE WHO HAVE PLACED THEIR ORDER MIGHT NEED TO WAIT. HAVE YOU CONSIDERED QUITTING IN A SECOND ORDER LANE. BUT THERE'S ACTUALLY RIGHT NOW THEY'RE ABLE TO DO OR AT LEAST WITH THIS ORIENTATION THEY'LL BE ABLE TO HAVE SEPARATE STAFF AND THE STRIKETHROUGH LANE GOING BACK TAKING ORDERS AND I'LL MARK WHAT CAR IT IS COLOR TYPE AND EVERYTHING. AND THEN I EVEN DROVE THROUGH EARLIER TODAY, AND I WAS TOOK MY ORDER AT THE DUMPSTER AND GOT IT ALL THE WAY AT THE VERY SOUTH SIDE OF THE SITE. AT THE MENU BOARD WHERE IT CURRENTLY IS. YOU'VE SEEN STAFF WILL CONTINUE TO TAKE ORDERS ON IPADS OUTSIDE. ITS PEAK HOURS. YES. WHEN IT'S NECESSARY. AND THE REST OF THE TIME WHEN THE STACKING IS MORE MINIMAL AND DOESN'T NEED TO BE DIRECTED AS MUCH THEY'LL STILL BE ABLE TO TAKE IT AT THE SINGLE POINT. ARE THERE ANY PLANS FOR PUTTING IN A SECOND ORDER KIOSK LANE? THERE IS POTENTIAL WITH. PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL TO EVENTUALLY PUT IN A CANOPY TO PROTECT STAFF AND THEN ADDITIONAL, UH, MENU BOARDS AND ORDERING POINTS WHERE THE CURRENT DOUBLE STACK IS SHOWN. UP TO STIPULATION TO DO THAT NOW. CANOPY ITSELF WOULD TAKE.FURTHER COLLABORATION WITHIN CHICK FIL A DESIGN. AND WITHIN THE CITY ITSELF, BUT WE DEFINITELY WANT TO HAVE THAT DONE IN THE FUTURE. FOR NOW, I CAN DEFINITELY HOLDS YOU HAVING
[00:15:04]
DOUBLE STAFF TAKING ORDERS, ESPECIALLY DURING PEAK HOURS THROUGH THE TWO SEPARATE LINES.COMMITTED TO STAFFING THE DOUBLE LANES TO PREVENT TRAFFIC FROM SITTING ON THE ACCESS ROAD BEHIND. THAT'S GREAT THANK YOU. THE QUESTIONS THAT PLANNING COMMISSION. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC. YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK. WE'RE READY FOR MOTION. HERE. I'LL MOVE THAT WE APPROVED. ITEM NUMBER FOUR. THE CHICK FIL A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED. ROLL CALL, MR FREE? YES. MR TITUS. CHAIR. OYSTER. YES, MR ROCK? YES. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU FOR RESOLVED.
IMPORTANT SITUATION. ITEM NUMBER FIVE BEAUTIFUL SAVIOR. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
[5. APPLICATION: Beautiful Savior Evangelical Lutheran Church – Final Development Plan]
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. ROBERT YOU WINS. 2057 93 LOOP NORTH COLUMBUS, OHIO. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TWO BUILDING EDITIONS AND ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR BEAUTIFUL SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH AT 22 13 WHITE ROAD FOLLOWING APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN, THE PROJECT CAN MOVE INTO FINAL SITE ENGINEERING REVIEW AND THE REVIEW OF THEIR BUILDING PERMITS. THE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THAT THE PROPOSED ADDITIONS WILL ADD THREE NEW CLASSROOMS, NEW RESTROOMS AND ENLARGED OUR THANKS AND SUPPORT ROOMS. OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS. INCLUDED IN THE PLANS ARE THE ADDITION OF AN EXTERIOR CANOPY AND PARKING LOT MODIFICATIONS. MATERIALS INDICATE THAT BOTH THE EDITIONS WILL MATCH THE EXISTING FACILITY AND FINISH MATERIALS AND DESIGNED TO BLEND WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. PLANS SHOW LANDSCAPE SCREENING ALONG THE NEW PARKING SPACES ORIENTED TOWARDS THE RESIDENTIAL AREA TO THE SOUTH AND WHITE ROAD TO THE NORTH. HOWEVER THE SELECTED LANDSCAPING DOES NOT MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS TO APPROPRIATELY SCREENED THESE PARKING SPACES AND WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED WITH A CONTINUOUS 36 INCH EVERGREEN HEDGE RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE SPACES.STAFF BELIEVES THE PROPOSED ADDITIONS AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROPRIATE AND IN CHARACTER WITH THE AREA BY UTILIZING MATCHING MATERIALS TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND BY INSTALLING LANDSCAPING IN THE NEW PARKING AREAS AND AROUND THE BUILDING PERIMETER. THEREFORE WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT PLANNING COMMISSION MAKER RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WITH ONE STIPULATION NOTED IN OUR STAFF REPORT. THAT'S ONE QUESTION.
ACTUALLY, IT'S A CLARIFICATION. ON THE. RECOMMENDATIONS FROM ME. DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
INDICATES THEY WANT 36 BUT EVERGREEN HEDGE ARE YOU THINKING? 36 INCH? THAT'S CORRECT IS RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACES. BELIEVE THAT THEY MEAN ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE PARKING SPACES. CORRECT. THE INTENT IS TO SCREEN THE PARKING SPACES FROM THE ROADWAY. SO IT'S THE LENGTH OF THE PARKING. I'LL, I SUPPOSE, OR WHEREVER THOSE PARKING SPACES ARE ADJACENT TO THE ROADWAY. THAT'S WHERE 10 MINUTES. JUST WHEN YOU READ IT, IT COULD MEAN THAT YOU RUN AROUND THE ENTIRE PARKING LOT. THAT'S THAT'S NOT THE INTENT OF IT. A GOOD QUESTION. YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. ANY COMMENTS? NO. QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. HERE THAT WOULD OFFER IT'S WONDERFUL TO SEE ANOTHER CHURCH IN TOWN GROWING AND ABLE TO EXPAND, SO I COMMEND YOU DRIVE BY YOUR BEAUTIFUL LANDS ALMOST EVERY DAY, AND IT'S A MY SON. AND I SAID DISH IN YOUR PROPOSAL. DO HAVE ONE QUESTION IN THE BACK. I COULDN'T REALLY TELL DESERVE HER ANY PLAN TO CONNECT THE TWO DRIVEWAY SPACES TOGETHER. I DON'T EVEN KNOW IF THERE'S ROOM BACK THERE FOR. THERE'S NO PLAN FOR THAT. I KNOW THERE WAS SOME NO MORE DISCUSSION ABOUT TRYING TO DO THAT. BUT I DON'T. OTHER QUESTIONS. I. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS THAT PLANNING CONDITION KIND OF HAD A VERY SIMILAR THOUGHT IS, YOU KNOW YOU COULD ESSENTIALLY HAVE ONE APRON IN CONNECT AROUND THE BACK OF THE BUILDING HAD ONE APRON. OUT REASONABLY MADE KIND OF A LOOP. YES. AND YOUR STUFF THAT MIGHT BE GOOD STUFF, HAVING OPPOSING
[00:20:01]
TRAFFIC AND EACH OF THE TWO APRONS. OF SPACE TO RUN BEHIND THE BACK OF WE WOULD HAVE TO ELIMINATE SEVERAL STRUCTURES THAT DO BIG SOMETHING. TO CONSIDER IT A GOOGLE FLY OVER AND I LOOKED TO ME LIKE IT WAS PRETTY PRETTY TIGHT BACK THERE, SO I DIDN'T THINK THAT WAS FEASIBLE. FOR THE INDUSTRY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. IS THERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK READY FOR EMOTION. THIS TO REALLY WORRY THAT STIPULATION.HERE I MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO OUR CITY COUNCIL APPLICATION. FIVE BEAUTIFUL SAVIOR. LUTHERAN CHURCH FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH THE ONE STIPULATION AND THEN THE INTENT IS THE BUSH IT ROAD TO BLOCK THE PARKING SPACES FROM THE ROAD, NOT GO CLEAR AROUND. BROKE OFF. CHAIR OYSTER. YES MR ROCK. YES MR FREE? YES, MR TITUS? YES? THANK YOU SO MUCH. ITEM NUMBER SIX TOES, SO EXPANSION FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. SOMEONE'S L MANY
[6. APPLICATION: Tosoh Expansion – Final Development Plan]
ARCHITECTS. 775 YARDS STREET. COLUMBUS, OHIO 43212. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN 81,000 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO THE EXISTING TOSA BUILDING AT 3600 GANTZ ROAD. THE SITE WAS ORIGINALLY DEVELOPED IN 1991, AND THE FACILITY HAS UNDERGONE MULTIPLE EXPANSION SINCE WITH THIS NEWEST EXPANSION, ESTIMATED TO CREATE 50 ADDITIONAL JOBS.THE PROPOSED ADDITION WILL BE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING NEXT TO THE EXPANSION COMPLETED IN 2000 AND 13. THE ADDITION WILL MEASURE 760,000. SQUARE FEET WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 62 FT SIX INCHES, WHICH DOES EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT WITHIN THE INDIE ONE DISTRICT. MATERIALS INDICATE THAT THE INCREASED HEIGHT IS NECESSARY DUE TO THE PRESSES AND CRANE NEEDED FOR NEW MANUFACTURING IN THE BUILDING OF VARIANTS WILL BE NEEDED TO BE OBTAINED FROM THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT.
HOWEVER STEP IS SUPPORTIVE OF THIS VARIANCE, NOTING THE INDUSTRIAL CONTEXT OF THE AREA AND THE FACT THAT THE ADDITION IS DESIGNED TO MATCH MATERIALS AND ARCHITECTURE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. MATERIALS ALSO STATE THAT ANY ROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNITS WILL BE FULLY SCREENED BY THE BUILDING PARAPET. OTHER SIDE. IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE RECONFIGURING CURB CUTS AND ADDING A NEW DRIVE ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE TO ACCESS THE REAR OF THE NEW EDITION. STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE PROPOSED SITE MODIFICATIONS AND BUILDING EDITION, INCLUDING THE NOTED VARIANTS FOR BUILDING HEIGHT AS THE EDITION IS DESIGNED TO BE COMPATIBLE TO THE EXISTING BUILDING ARCHITECTURE AND ITS INTERIOR TO AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT NOT VISIBLE FROM ANY RESIDENTIAL AREA. THEREFORE WE ARE RECOMMENDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AS SUBMITTED. THE ONES OUT. WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS? DON'T HAPPENING, DAD. QUESTIONS PLANNING COMMISSION. AT A QUESTION IN THAT THIS IS A COMPLETELY FREE STANDING BUILDING. NOW. THIS IS IN ADDITION THERE ON THE EAST IF YOU LOOK AT THAT PLAN DOWN AT THE I WAS JUST CONFUSED BY THE DOT DOTTED LINES. SO THAT'S NOT A PARKING LOT THERE. THAT'S THE BUILDING THE DASHES BUILDING. IS THERE ANY PLAN TO INCREASE PARKING ON THE PROPERTY? TO ACCOMMODATE THE ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES. NOT AT THIS TIME. I THINK, UM, THE FULL THINK IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN IN THE TEXT. THE FULL ADDED, UH, ANTICIPATE. I THINK 50 NEW JOBS WHEN THEY'RE FULLY UM, BUILT OUT, BUT I DON'T THINK THAT'S GOING TO BE, UH, DAY ONE. I DO HAVE SOME REPRESENT INTERESTS FROM US OUT HERE IF YOU WANT TO. FURTHER EXPLORE THAT. QUESTION I WAS JUST WANTING TO KNOW IF THIS INCLUDED. I MEAN, WE WILL BE WORKING ON MASTER PLANNING FOR THE WHOLE FACILITY. IN THE COMING MONTHS FOR FUTURE EDITIONS. AT THIS POINT? NO, I DIDN'T PARKING. OTHER QUESTIONS AND PLANNING COMMISSION. OR ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK. ME. READY FOR
[00:25:01]
MOTION. HERE I'LL MOVE. WE MOVE APPROVED ITEM NUMBER SIX TOAST. SO AS SOMEBODY PRESS BUILDING ADDITION, DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS SUBMITTED. BROKE UP, MR TITUS? YES, TRUE OYSTER? YES MR ROCK, MR FREE? YES. THANK YOU SO MUCH. ITEM NUMBER EIGHT SHARP HOME PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN.[8. APPLICATION: Sharp Home – Preliminary Development Plan (Part 1 of 2)]
BUT SURELY STARTED LIKE TO NOTE THAT THE APPLICANT WILLIAM SHARPE IS JOINING US VIA WEBEX TODAY. SO MR SHARP YOU SHOULD BE . YOU SHOULD HAVE THE ABILITY TO UNMUTE YOURSELF. IF YOU WISH TO STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS CAN HEAR ME, BUT I CANNOT HEAR YOU GUYS. WE CAN HEAR YOU NOW. CAN YOU HEAR US? NO.
YOU LIKE ME TO PROCEED. THE. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A NEW RESIDENTS AT THE CORNER OF SUNSHINE PARK PLACE AND FRANKLIN STREET ON WHILE RESULTING THE PROPERTY TO A P U. D THIS PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE REZONED PTR TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE HOMELESS, PROPOSED NOTING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF CODE AS WELL AS THE POTENTIAL FOR A SECONDARY DWELLING UNIT IN THE FUTURE. THE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE REZONING PROCESS FOR A P U D DISTRICT PER CITY CODE LOT ZONE ARE TWO RESIDENTIAL ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A 30 FT FRONT SETBACK AT 25 FT.
REAR SENT BACK YES, WE CAN HEAR YOU, MR SHARP. ARE YOU ABLE TO CHAT WITH HIM AND JUST LET LIKE? I AM HIM. I DON'T KNOW.
HERE. I WOULD MOVE THAT WE REORDER THE AGENDA TO PLACE ITEM NUMBER EIGHT AT THE END OF THE AGENDA AND HOPE THAT MR SHARP CAN AND STAFF CAN WORK OUT THE TECHNICAL PROBLEMS. SECOND OKAY? MR ROCK. MR TITUS. MR FREE? YES. OYSTER? YES. KIM IF YOU DON'T MIND IF YOU COULD JUST MAYBE I AM HIM AND LET HIM KNOW THAT WE'VE MOVED HIM AND HOPEFULLY HELP WILL BE ABLE TO.
WE WILL SEND THE MESSAGE CONNECTION, TERRY. THANK YOU. RIGHT? MOVING FORWARD ITEM
[9. APPLICATION: Village at Scioto Meadows – Development Plan (Amendment)]
NUMBER NINE VILLAGE AT SIERRA MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT. CAME UP YOUR BOX. 991 PROTEST OHIO. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE VILLAGES. THAT'S IOTA MEADOWS TO CONSTRUCT 64 RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN 16 BUILDINGS ON THE VACANT PORTION UPON VIEW DRIVE NORTH. ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING SPIOTTA MEADOWS CONDOMINIUM COMMUNITY. THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN INCLUDED THE SAME NUMBER OF BUILDINGS AND UNITS AS PROPOSED WITH THIS APPLICATION. HOWEVER THIS PORTION OF THE SITE WAS NOT BUILT AT THE TIME THE EXISTING CONDOMINIUMS WERE CONSTRUCTED AND HAS SINCE BEEN SOLD TO A SEPARATE ENTITY. WHILE THE PROPERTY HAS SINCE BEEN SOLD THE PUDU ZONING ON THE SITE AS WELL AS THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN DO REMAIN VALID. THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS SHOWED BUILDINGS 38 THROUGH 41 TO HAVE REAR LOADED GARAGES OFF OF POND VIEW DRIVE, HOWEVER, MOST UPON VIEW DRIVERS ON THE EXISTING CONDOMINIUM PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS. PROPERTY. BECAUSE THE APPLICANT WAS UNABLE TO REACH AN AGREEMENT WITH THE SIROTA MEADOWS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION. THE AMENDMENT PROPOSES TO ROTATE THESE FOUR BUILDINGS TO HAVE THEIR GARAGES[00:30:02]
ACCESS FROM LAKEVIEW DRIVE. WHILE THE BUILDING ARCHITECTURE WOULD MATCH THE EXISTING STRUCTURES. STAFF DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT FLIPPING THE ORIENTATION OF THESE BUILDINGS IS APPROPRIATE TO MAINTAIN THE CHARACTER ESTABLISHED WITH THE EXISTING VILLAGE. IT'S IOTA MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT. ADDITIONALLY BECAUSE AN AGREEMENT REGARDING ACCESS WAS NOT ABLE TO BE REACHED. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO INSTALL BALDERDASH ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE STREETS TO RESTRICT ACCESS TO THE EXISTING PRIVATELY OWNED ROADWAYS. STAFF IS NOT SUPPORTIVE OF THE LACK OF CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE NEW DEVELOPMENT AND THE EXISTING VILLAGE. IT'S IOTA MEADOWS CONDOS, IN ADDITION TO SAFETY CONCERNS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS THAT GROVE CITY 2050 COMMUNITY PLAN ENCOURAGES NEIGHBORHOODS TO BE WELL CONNECTED BY STREET AND TRAILS. WHILE THE MAJORITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL REMAIN UNCHANGED FROM THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS OF FLIPPING THE BUILDING ORIENTATION OF THOSE FOUR STRUCTURES AND BLOCKING ACCESS ACROSS ROADWAYS IS COUNTER TO THE INTENDED CHARACTER ESTABLISHED WITH THE P U. D. IN THE ACCESS MODIFICATIONS IS ALSO COUNTER TO THE 2050 PRINCIPLE REGARDING CONNECTIVITY. THEREFORE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT PLANNING COMMISSION MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF DISAPPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT ESTIMATED. WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS? I CERTAINLY WOULD OKAY. NOT TO BE THE TROUBLE, CHILD, BUT I GUESS WE ARE TODAY. MY CLIENT PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY AFTER WE HAD MET WITH THE EXISTING ASSOCIATION AND IF ANY OF YOU WERE ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION PRIOR WHEN REDWOOD CAME THROUGH, THEY HAD COME THROUGH AND MADE IN THE AGREEMENT WITH THE PROBLEM ASSOCIATION THAT THERE IS THERE NOW TO DO A WHOLE NEW DEVELOPMENT WITH A TOTALLY DIFFERENT DESIGN. UM THAT DIDN'T WORK OUT AND SO THE PROPERTY WAS THEN LATER SOLD TO MY CLIENT. WHEN WE FIRST PURCHASED THE PROPERTY, WE CAME IN AND TALKED TO STAFF INSTEAD IF WE CAME IN AND DID EXACTLY WHAT WAS APPROVED OF HIS DEVELOPMENT, SAME NUMBER OF BUILDINGS, SAME DESIGN, SAME ROAD ACCESS EVERYTHING. WHAT? WHAT'S THE PROCESS? AND THEY SAID, GREAT. NO ONE'S WANTED TO DO THAT. THERE IS NO PROCESS EXCEPT GETTING YOUR CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS COMPLETED, FINALIZED AND BUILDING DEVELOPMENT. SO WE WERE VERY EXCITED WE HAD MET WITH THE ASSOCIATION HAD WORKED OUT AN AGREEMENT TO SHARE THE COSTS OF STREET MAINTENANCE IS TO HAVE NO BOLLARDS, OF COURSE, AND ALSO NOT TO FLIP BUILDINGS BECAUSE WE WOULD HAVE ACCESS THROUGH ALL THE STREETS. IT WASN'T UNTIL AFTER WE PURCHASED THE PROPERTY AND HAD ABOUT THREE RENDITIONS OF THE FINAL AGREEMENT THAT WE WERE TOLD BY THE ASSOCIATIONS ATTORNEY THAT THEY NO LONGER WANTED TO SHARE ACCESS AND THEY WANTED US NOT TO BE ABLE TO GO INTO THEIR PROPERTY AND THEY THEREFORE WE COULD NOT USE POND VIEW TO ACCESS OUR PROPERTY OR ANY OF THE OTHER STREETS. IN ADDITION TO THAT, THERE WAS SOME EASEMENTS THAT WE WERE GOING TO NATURALLY HAVE FOR UTILITIES, AND THEY SAID THEY DID NOT WANT US TO HAVE THOSE EITHER WE HAD OFFERED TO SHARE AND THEY DISAGREED. SO THE ONLY THING WE COULD THINK TO DO WAS TO GO IN. KEEP EVERYTHING THE SAME EXCEPT ROTATE THE FOUR UNITS THAT HAD ACCESS OFF FONDUE, WHICH IS PART OF THE PRIVATE STREET. THEY HAVE. AND HAVE ACCESS FROM OUR OWN INTERIOR. WE ALREADY HAVE A SINCE THEY'RE ME AGAIN. SEVEN. I'M SORRY. ARE WE ABLE TO POSSIBLY MUTE THEM? YES, THEY WERE. THEY ARE MUTED. YES, THANK YOU. MM AND WE WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO SHARE BUT WE CAN'T. SO I DO BELIEVE THAT THEY HAVE AN ATTORNEY HERE TO SPEAK. AND I'D LIKE TO HEAR WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY, BECAUSE WE ARE SORT OF AT A HARD POSITION HERE OF NOT BEING ABLE TO DEVELOP PROPERTY THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO DEVELOP IN ACCORDANCE WITH YOUR PLANS.THANK YOU. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. QUESTIONS, BUT I'D LIKE TO HOLD THEM UNTIL AFTER RIGHT HERE. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? YES. PLEASE PROCEED. MAN. MY NAME IS ROBIN, STRONG ATTORNEY WITH WILLIAMS AND STROM HERE IN COLUMBUS, OHIO. ADDRESSES TO MIRONOVA PLACE SUITE 3 80 ZIP CODE IS 43215. I REPRESENT THE VILLAGE OUTSIDE THE MEADOWS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, SO I DO NOT REPRESENT ANY INDIVIDUAL HOMEOWNERS REPRESENT THE ASSOCIATION THROUGH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS A WHOLE. I DID MEET WITH THEM BRIEFLY THIS AFTERNOON. DISCUSSED THE LATEST PLANNING. UH THE LATEST AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN. CONCERNS STILL EXIST ABOUT DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY. WHICH IS ESSENTIALLY BEHIND THE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, AS YOU PROBABLY ARE AWARE INITIALLY, IT WAS INTENDED TO BE THE ADDITIONAL PROPERTY OF THE CONDOMINIUM TIME PASSED. ANY
[00:35:01]
STATUTORY TIME LIMITS. THEY ALL RAN. UM AT THIS POINT, IF EVEN SOMEBODY BOUGHT THE PROPERTY TO DEVELOP IT AS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION THAT WOULD JOIN THE EXISTING ASSOCIATION. WE WOULD NEED 100% OF THE OWNERS, SO ESSENTIALLY, THAT'S PROBABLY NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN. I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS AN APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT, NOT CONDOMINIUMS. UM AND SO THE CONCERNS STILL EXIST WITH THE ASSOCIATION AS TO USE OF THE ROADWAYS. THERE ARE NO EXISTING EASEMENTS. AND I THINK MAYBE THAT MIGHT BE A BIT OF A DEBATE BETWEEN MS CLAYMAN MYSELF. BUT MY POINT OF VIEW IS FROM A LEGAL STANDPOINT, EVERYTHING I'VE SEEN THE DECLARATION DOES NOT PROVIDE EASEMENT RIGHTS THROUGH THE ASSOCIATION'S PROPERTY, WHICH WOULD BE THE CONDOMINIUM PROPERTY. THE ROADWAYS, THE GRASSY AREAS THOSE EASEMENTS ARE RESERVED FOR, UM THIS SUCCESSOR CLEARANCE OR THOSE WHO WOULD BE ACTUALLY DEVELOPING THE ADDITION ADDITIONAL PROPERTY AS A SUCCESSOR DEVELOPER. THERE'S NO ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS WITH THE OWNER OF THE VACANT LAND TO DO THAT FROM THE FROM THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPERS. AND THERE'S NOTHING IN THE DECLARATION THAT WOULD PROVIDE THOSE EASEMENT RIGHTS. SO NO EASEMENT RIGHTS TO THE ROADWAYS. THE ONLY EASEMENT RIGHTS THAT I SEE THAT ACTUALLY DO EXIST. AND I THINK, MISS CREAM AND I AGREE ON IS THE STORM AND THE SEWER DRAINAGE. THOSE EASEMENTS DO EXIST. THOSE EASEMENTS WERE ALREADY IN PLACE.WHEN THIS WHOLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THIS AREA WAS CONTEMPLATED. MM HMM. AS TO THE HISTORY THERE WAS WORK ON AN AGREEMENT. WE WEREN'T ABLE TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT. UM AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW. THE ASSOCIATION OPPOSES THIS DEVELOPMENT FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS. ONE I'LL GO THROUGH THESE AND THEN I KNOW THAT SOME OF THE INDIVIDUAL HOMEOWNERS WANT TO SPEAK AS WELL. BUT UM, TRAFFIC CONCERNS ABOUT I KNOW THE ONE ROADWAY. I THINK IT'S WEST RIVER ROAD IS ACTUALLY OWNED BY THE OWNER OF THE VACANT LAND. THEY WOULD HAVE THAT ONE ROADWAY TO USE GOING IN AND OUT OF THE VACANT LAND DEVELOPMENT. BUT WHAT'S TO STOP THOSE CARS OR THE RESIDENTS OF THE APARTMENTS? FROM GOING IN THROUGH THE ASSOCIATION'S ROADWAYS. ALSO DELIVERY TRUCKS THAT DON'T NECESSARILY KNOW WHERE THEY'RE GOING CROSSING INTO THE CONDOMINIUM PROPERTY VERSUS GOING STRAIGHT BACK INTO THE APARTMENTS. JUST GENERAL WEAR AND TEAR ON THE ROADWAYS OF THE ASSOCIATION IN GENERAL, UM WITH ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL USE, UM PEDESTRIAN ISSUES. HOW ARE THE PEDESTRIANS FROM THE APARTMENT? APARTMENTS SUPPOSED TO BE, YOU KNOW, STOPPED FROM COMING ONTO THE CONDOMINIUM PROPERTY, WHICH POSES A LIABILITY FOR THE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ESPECIALLY GIVEN THAT THERE'S A POND. WHICH THERE'S ALREADY SOME LIABILITY THERE, AS IT IS, IF WE ADD ADDITIONAL PERSONS COMING ONTO THE PROPERTY THAT POSES ADDITIONAL RISKS FOR THE ASSOCIATION, UM, JUST GENERAL TRESPASSING CONCERNS. AND ONE OF THE BIG CONCERNS AND I DO NOT HAVE ANY DATA TO BACK THIS UP. TODAY IS JUST THE APARTMENTS VERSUS AN OWNER OCCUPIED COMMUNITY. UM RESIDENTS ARE WORRIED ABOUT PROPERTY VALUES AND HOW THOSE APARTMENTS ARE GOING TO AFFECT OWNER, OCCUPIED CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OR CONDOMINIUM UNITS, MARKET VALUES IN THE LONG RUN. BECAUSE THERE'S CONSIDERATION JUST DOING CONDOS AND INSTEAD OF DOING APARTMENTS ON THIS PROPERTY, I MEAN, WHAT WHAT? WITH THE NEW OWNERS. I MEAN, WAS THAT EVER CONSIDERED? THE OWNER OR DEVELOPER OF THIS PROPERTY WISHES TO HAVE APARTMENTS. THEY DO A LOT OF APARTMENT DEVELOPMENTS. THEY THINK THEY'LL OBVIOUSLY BE HIGH END APARTMENTS. THAT'S USUALLY WHAT THEY DO, BECAUSE THEY WILL BE THE EXACT SAME. TYPE OF UNITS THAT ARE THERE NOW AND AS ROBIN STATED. EVEN IF IT WAS KIND OF MINIMIZED. IT COULD NOT BE JOINED WITH OR PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. SO THE EXISTING CONDOMINIUM I THINK THAT'S ONE OF THE BIG FLAGS THAT FOLKS ARE CONCERNED WHETHER HAVING APARTMENTS BEHIND HIM INSTEAD OF CONDOS. I MEAN, HOW DOES THE ASSOCIATION FULL OF THIS WAS REALLY THOUGHT TO BE CONDOS. WOULD THAT BE SOMETHING THAT HE THINKS WOULD CONSIDER? I MEAN, COULD LOOK GOOD. THEY WORK SOMETHING OUT WITH THAT. I MAY WE HAVE ATTEMPTED TO WORK. A LOT OF THINGS OUT, OFFERED A LOT OF MONEY TO SHARE AND EXPENSES, ALL TYPES OF THINGS, BUT IT WAS DETERMINED THAT BY THE BORDER SOMEONE THAT THEY DID NOT WANT US TO BASICALLY BE A PART OF THEIR COMMUNITY. I WOULD LIKE TO SAY, THOUGH WHAT'S INTERESTING TO ME IS ALL OF THE UNIT OWNERS IN THE ASSOCIATION PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY WITH THE KNOWLEDGE THAT THIS PLAN WOULD BE DEVELOPED. WHETHER IT WAS CONDOS OR NOT, THAT THOSE YOUR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. APPROVAL BY THE CITY IS TO BE ABLE TO BUILD THESE UNITS. THEY'RE NOT REQUIRED TO BE CONDOS. THEY COULD BE MULTI FAMILY SO THEY BOUGHT WITH THAT KNOWLEDGE. YOU SEE, THEY'RE CONCERNED. I MEAN, I MEAN, IF THESE WERE CONDOS, I THINK THAT WOULD BE COMPLETELY
[00:40:03]
DIFFERENT. YOU KNOW, DISCUSSION HERE. I MEAN, IF I MEAN, IT'S AMAZING. HOW DOES THE ASSOCIATION LOOK AT THAT? I MEAN, MAN. WHAT HAS THAT BEEN TALKED ABOUT IT ALL. I MEAN, I DON'T AGREE WITH MS CLINTON'S POINT ON THAT. I THINK THAT THE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS BOUGHT WITH THE EXPECTATION THAT ACTUALLY THAT ADDITIONAL PROPERTY WOULD BE DEVELOPED INTO CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND MADE A PART OF VILLAGE ETCETERA MEADOWS CONDOMINIUM. I CAN NOTHING IS 100% BUT I WOULD PUT GOOD MONEY ON THE FACT THAT A LOT OF THESE RESIDENTS ARE DISAPPOINTED TO FIND OUT THAT 241 THAT IT HASN'T BEEN DEVELOPED OR ISN'T GOING TO BE DEVELOPED INTO CONDOMINIUMS AT THIS TIME. AND TWO. THEY'RE DISAPPOINTED THAT IT WASN'T FINISHED TO BE DEVELOPED IN THE FIRST PLACE AS PLANNED, BECAUSE WHEN THEY BOUGHT IN, THEY'VE GOT A DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. THEY GOT A COPY OF THE DECLARATION, WHICH CONTEMPLATES ALL OF THAT BEING DEVELOPED AS CONDOMINIUMS AT SOME POINT BUT THIS ISN'T A UNIQUE SITUATION WHERE SOMEBODY STARTED SOMEWHERE ELSE COMPLETED. IT HAPPENS. CORRECT. THANK YOU. THE QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. MY COMMENT IS KIND OF TWO FOLD CLEARLY SEE THE RESIDENTS DESIRE TO HAVE CONDOMINIUMS THERE. THAT WAS WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY PLANTED AND THERE'S AN EXPECTATION TO FOLLOW THROUGH ON THAT. IT'S ALSO OBVIOUS THAT THIS COULD BE OBSTRUCTIONIST ON THE PART OF THE CURRENT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION WANTING TO BLOCK ANY AND ALL DEVELOPMENT BACK THERE. UM, BY PREVENTING YOU KNOW ANYTHING GOING IN AND PRESERVING THE NATURAL SPACE THAT'S BACK THERE, SO IT'S A VERY DIFFICULT SITUATION. AND I WOULDN'T KNOWLEDGE LIKE TO REMIND EVERYBODY THAT WE ARE NEIGHBORS , AND WE NEED TO WORK TOGETHER TO FIND SOLUTIONS TO THESE KINDS OF PROBLEMS. UM AT THIS POINT, I COULD NOT APPROVE OR RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL. THIS IMAGE THIS PROPOSAL AND I WOULD MY DIRECTION WOULD BE TO GET BACK TOGETHER AND FIND A SOLUTION TO THE IMPASSE, PERHAPS USING STAFF AS A AS AN INTERMEDIARY TO HELP NEGOTIATE. THERE. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK YEAH. PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM AND I'LL JUST RESTATE. UM WHEN YOU DO IF YOU COULD WRITE YOUR NAME. FIRST AND LAST NAME AND THEN ALSO STATE YOUR NAME AS WELL AS YOUR ADDRESS, AND, UM, FOR ANYONE WHO ISN'T THE REPRESENTATIVE. THERE IS A TIME LIMIT OF THREE MINUTES. MY NAME IS ROBIN COOK. I LIVE AT 679 POND VIEW DRIVE. I VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED AS I SAID TO MR LOGAN IN AN EMAIL. APARTMENTS BACK THERE. THERE WILL BE NO WAY TO KEEP THAT ONE END UNIT THAT IT'S A CORNER OF POND VIEW DRIVE, AND I GUESS WEST RIVER AND LAKE VIEW. THERE'S NO WAY TO KEEP THOSE PEOPLE OUT OF OUR POND. THEY WILL HAVE HOW DO YOU? HOW WOULD YOU STOP THAT? THIS. CONDIMENT WHEN I BOUGHT MY UNIT THERE 16 YEARS AGO, I BOUGHT A NEW BUILD OWNER OCCUPIED CONDOMINIUM I BOUGHT INTO A NEW BUILD OWNER OCCUPIED CONDOMINIUM COMMUNITY. I HAVE NOT OPPOSED AT ALL TO FINISHING THAT DEVELOPMENT IN OWNER OCCUPIED CONDOMINIUMS, BUT I AM VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED TO APARTMENTS BACK THERE. THEY'RE MORE TRANSIENT FOLKS OR IN AN APARTMENT. THERE'S NO ACCESS TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION. THEY'RE NOT A PART OF US. THEY'RE NOT PAYING FOR OUR STREETS. THEY'RE NOT PAYING FOR A POND. AND I DON'T KNOW WHERE ALL THIS MONEY CAME FROM. BECAUSE WE WERE TOLD AS MANY AS MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY THAT NO MONEY WAS OFFERED AT ANY TIME THAT IT WAS BEING JAMMED DOWN OUR THROATS. AND THAT WE WERE BULLIED AND THREATENED. AND THAT'S WHY WE HAVE AN ATTORNEY. SO THIS IS NOT GOOD FOR GROWTH CITY AND IT'S CERTAINLY IS NOT GOOD FOR THE VILLAGES. TOYOTA MEADOWS. I'VE ALSO HEARD THAT THEY'RE PLANNING ON CALLING THEIR APARTMENT COMPLEX VILLAGE. IT'S IOTA MEADOWS. THEY'RE NOT PART OF US. THEY SHOULDN'T BE CALLED THE SAME THING. THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH US. THEY SHOULD STAY OFF OF OUR STREETS AND OUT OF OUR PROPERTY THAT WE PAY FOR PERSONAL. THE CITY OF GROWTH. CITY DOES NOT SWEEP OUR STREETS OR POWER, SNOW OR ANYTHING ELSE . WE PAY FOR THAT OUT OF OUR POCKETS, AND THIS APARTMENT COMPLEX IS NOT GOOD FOR THIS CITY. THANK YOU. ABSOLUTELY. YES, IF YOU'D LIKE TO APPROACH.[00:45:38]
HI. MY NAME IS TERESA MORRIGAN. I LIVE AT 659 POND VIEW DRIVE GROVE CITY. AH YES, I AM AN OWNER OF A CONDO ON POND VIEW DRIVE. UM. IT'S A LOVELY NEIGHBORHOOD. I BOUGHT KNOWING THAT CONDOS WE'RE GOING TO BE EVENTUALLY FINISHED AND BUILT IN THE SPACE BEHIND US, WHICH HAS BEEN OPEN SINCE I'VE LIVED THERE. 12 YEARS. UM I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH CONDOS THAT ARE OTHER PEOPLE THAT OWN THEIR PROPERTY. BUILDING IN THAT SPACE . WE KNEW IT WAS COMING. WE KNEW IT WAS GOING TO BE CONDOS. WE HAD ASSUMED IT WOULD BE CONDOS AND THAT THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE THERE WOULD BE PART OF OUR COMMUNITY. BE PART OF OUR. YOU KNOW OUR LITTLE GROUP THERE AND WE WOULD CONTINUE ON THE WAY IT HAS BEEN, UM. I ALSO OPPOSE HAVING APARTMENTS. IT'S NOT WHAT THAT COMMUNITY IS BUILT FOR. I UNDERSTAND THAT WE DO WITHIN OUR GROUP. HAVE AN OCCASION HAD LEASED OR RENTED UNITS, BUT THE PERCENTAGE HAS BEEN VERY LOW. I DON'T WANT MY PROPERTY VALUES TO GO DOWN BECAUSE NOW WE HAVE 64. APARTMENTS. MIXED IN WITH OUR PRIVATELY OWNED UNITS. UH, UPON VIEW. AND I THREES IN THEY WANTED THOSE BUILDINGS. THE DRIVEWAYS TURNED AS BECAUSE WHEN POND VIEW WAS DEVELOPED IS TOO NARROW FOR, UM, PARKING ON THAT STREET. TO HAVE MORE GARAGES EXITING ON THERE WOULD BE A PARKING IN NIGHTMARE FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES OR ANY KIND OF VEHICLES IN, UH I NEED TO GET DOWN THAT ROAD. UM IT NEEDS TO BE. CONDOS. THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. SO ANYONE ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC? YES.MM HMM. MICHAEL STEVENS. I'M A RESIDENT ON SIX AND THREE OR FOUR. RIVERVIEW LOOP GROVE CITY, OHIO. IN THE VILLAGE OF SINA MEADOWS CONDOS. I'VE. I'M CURRENTLY A BOARD MEMBER ON THE TREASURER ON OUR CONDO BOARD AND WAS PREVIOUSLY THE PRESIDENT ON THE CONDO BOARD. I WAS.
PERSONALLY THERE AT THE MEETING WITH COUGHLIN ORIGINALLY AND I WANT TO JUST STATE THE RECORD STRAIGHT. THAT NUMBER ONE THERE WAS NEVER AN AGREEMENT. IN ORDER FOR US TO HAVE AN AGREEMENT.
AFTER THAT MEETING, WE WOULD HAVE TO MEET AS A BOARD AND WE HAVE TO TAKE A VOTE ON IT. AND IT WOULD HAVE TO BE PART OF OUR OFFICIAL RECORD IN ORDER TO HAVE AN AGREEMENT. WHEN THEY LEFT.
THESE CAME BACK AND SAID, OH, WELL, WHEN WE LEFT THERE, WE HAD A VERBAL AGREEMENT, WHICH WE DID NOT ALL THE STUFF SOUNDED GOOD. WE NEEDED TO GO OVER THE PIECES AND PARTS OF IT. AND THEN TRY TO FIGURE IT OUT. WE WENT ALONG AND WE STARTED. GOING BACK AND FORTH WITH DIFFERENT IDEAS ON. LIKE WHAT? THE ROADS WITH THE DRAINAGE TRAFFIC THINGS LIKE THAT. AND PROGRESSIVELY, THINGS GOT WORSE AND WORSE AND WORSE AND WORSE, THE WHERE IT WAS BASICALLY. IT WAS THE IT WAS THE FEELING THAT BASICALLY THEY WERE COMING IN AND SAYING THIS IS WHAT WE GOT. AND YOU'RE GOING TO TAKE IT. IT'S BASICALLY WE WERE GETTING FULLY. WE HAD THINGS THAT WERE SENT TO US THAT WE'RE SAYING THAT WE HAVE TO REMOVE OUR WATER LINES AND THINGS LIKE THAT. OR WE'RE GOING TO BEGIN.
WORKING ON A SITE. THAT AND YOU NEED TO DO THIS. THEN WHEN WE GO AND START CHECKING ON IT, THAT'S NOT TRUE. SO IT'S KIND OF LIKE GOING TO SCHOOL WHEN YOU'RE A LITTLE KID, AND YOU'RE GOING TO
[00:50:04]
SCHOOL. YOU GOT YOUR LUNCHBOX AND SOMEBODY COMES ALONG AND SAYS, HEY, GIVE ME YOUR LUNCH BOX. IT'S LIKE, WELL, NO. WELL, OKAY. WE'RE A BIG COMPANY. WE'VE GOT LOTS OF MONEY. WE CAN PRETTY MUCH DO WHAT WE WANT. WE'RE SMALL COMMUNITY. WE DON'T HAVE A LOT OF MONEY. BUT WE'RE FIGHTING FOR EVERY DOLLAR. WE CAN TO KEEP OUR COMMUNITY RUNNING AND LOOKING GOOD AS WE CAN. WE'VE GOT 104 UNITS. THAT WERE THERE AS CONDOS AND WE'RE EXPECTING CONDOS. AND. HAVE THIS HAPPEN TO US AT THIS POINT. IS. I WANT TO MAKE THE STRAIGHT. I HAVE NO PROBLEM OF LIKE TO WORK WITH YOU. BUT I DON'T RESPOND WELL TO BEING BULLIED. AND THAT'S WHEN WE JUST CUT IT OFF. UM. AS FAR AS THE TRESPASSING ON THE PROPERTY. I HAVE NO IDEA HOW WE'RE GOING TO DO THAT. I'VE GOT A BOARD MEMBER THERE. I'VE HAD TO RUN OFF PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY. NO IDEA WHERE THEY WHERE THEY LIVE. COMING IN AND TRESPASSING ON THE POND. I'VE ACTUALLY HAD A GUY PULLING A KNIFE ON ME OUT THERE. THAT'S WHY NOW I WALK AROUND THE COMPLEX AND I CARRY A GUN WITH ME AND MY CCW. SO I'M ALWAYS ARMED BOMBER OUT THERE BECAUSE I NEVER KNOW WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. AND NOW THEY HAVE A WHOLE BUNCH OF OTHER PEOPLE COMING INTO THE COMMUNITY THAT GUARANTEE YOU'RE GOING TO BE TRESPASSING WHEN YOU WALK OUT THERE, AND YOU TOLD THE GUY HEY , YOU CAN'T BE FISHING IN A POND. YOU'RE NOT PART OF YOUR NOT PART OF OUR PROPERTY. THEY GO FROM THE ASPECT OF WHO ARE YOU TO TELL ME NOW? THIS. I LIVE HERE. I HAVE PEOPLE IN THE OUTSIDE COMMUNITY COMING IN HERE AND FISHING ON OUR POND AND SAID I LIVE HERE. I SHOULD BE ABLE TO USE IT. WELL, NO, THIS IS PRIVATE PROPERTY. RESPECTFULLY YOU 15 SECONDS. NO PROBLEM. I'LL JUST GO AHEAD AND FINISH IT UP WITH THEIR I THINK I'VE GIVEN YOU ENOUGH TO THINK ABOUT AND THEIR ATTORNEY WOULD THINK ABOUT AS WELL. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OR ANYONE ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WISH YES. AND CANDY. I WILL GIVE YOU A MOMENT TO SPEAK AGAIN AT THE END. YES, BOTH OF YOU. IF YOU LIKE. HI MY NAME IS JEFF BLOOM, AND I LIVE AT 63 72 SLEEPING MEADOW BOULEVARD EAST, SO I'M A RESIDENT OF THE VILLAGE IS IDLE MEADOWS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION I'VE BOUGHT THERE THREE YEARS AGO AND MOVED IN. WITH MY FAMILY AND ALSO A TEACHER AT CENTRAL CROSSING HIGH SCHOOL, SO I'M HAPPY TO TEACH AND LIVE HERE IN GROVE CITY, AND SOMEONE REPLACES WONDERFUL PLACE TO LIVE. UM I JUST WANTED TO ADD MAYBE A LITTLE BIT OF PERSPECTIVE OF SOMEONE MORE RECENT CONDO OWNER COMING IN AND KNOWING KIND OF SOME OF THE FISCAL STATE OF OUR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, KNOWING THAT THERE ARE SOME IMPROVEMENTS THAT STILL NEED TO BE MADE IN CAPITAL. PLANS THAT WERE KIND OF LIKE WORKING TOWARDS THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION HAS BEEN SELF GOVERNED FOR MANY, MANY YEARS AND NOW IS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF ONYX REALTY, WHO.THERE'S MANY PROPERTIES, I THINK, ALONG WITH PINNACLE, UM, CLOSE TO CLOSE TO US THERE. UM AND SO I THINK THERE IS A POSITIVE STEP FORWARD FOR US OF MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE AS OUR CONDO ASSOCIATIONS BUILDING ON THAT CAPITAL FUND AND BEING ABLE TO KIND OF BASICALLY BALANCE OUR BUDGET AND MAKE SURE THAT OUR OUR ASSOCIATION IS IN GOOD ORDER WITH WORKING STREETS AND REPLACED ROOFS AND ALL THOSE TYPES OF THINGS AND I THINK I CAN SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE THAT I'VE TALKED TO IN THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION THAT JUST HAVE CONCERNS OF THE FISCAL IMPACT THAT THIS WOULD BRING WITH THE BIG USE OF ROADS AND SEWERS AND THE KIND OF FINALIZING OF CONSTRUCTION, BUT THERE WAS ORIGINALLY FROM A FROM A DIFFERENCE, YOU KNOW, CONDO ASSOCIATION, SO I COMPLETELY EMPATHIZE THAT ANY ANY NEW PERSON. BUYING A PIECE OF LAND THAT THIS IS KIND OF DEFINITELY DIFFICULT SITUATION, BUT I KNOW THAT THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION HAS BEEN VERY, VERY CAREFUL TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE NOT OVERCHARGING THEIR HOENER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION FEES IN ORDER TO BE AS AS FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE AS POSSIBLE, BUT THERE IS A FISCAL IMPACT THAT THIS WILL HAVE FOR OUR HOMEOWNERS. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IT WISHES TO SPEAK?
[00:55:19]
MANY CHRIS STEPHENSON. I HAD ORIGINALLY SENT AN EMAIL TO YOU. MR LOGAN HAS EVOLVED. YOU KNOW THAT INFORMATION? I JUST WANT TO STRESS AGAIN THAT I'VE BEEN THERE SINCE 2000 AND FIVE. THE BUILDER WAS STILL THERE. WE APPROVE PLANS FORM TO BUILD MORE THAT TIME, BUT IT'S ALWAYS BEEN CONDOS. HOME OWNER OCCUPIED CONDOS, AND THAT'S BEEN VERY IMPORTANT AND STRESSED. OVER THE YEARS, MANY TIMES ABOUT HOMEOWNER UM IT'S A WHOLE DIFFERENT CLASS OF PEOPLE THAT WILL BE MOVING IN. UM I ASSUME THAT THERE ARE TWO BEDROOMS THAT WILL COME BACK IN THERE. SO MAYBE MORE FAMILIES. MAYBE NOT. I DON'T KNOW. BUT WE'VE. PUT A LOT OF MONEY INTO OUR STREETS, ETCETERA, AND WE ALL PAY FOR THAT, AS YOU ARE FULLY AWARE. BUT TO HAVE SOMEONE COME IN AND START USING OUR ROADS. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE MORE EXPENSES. EVEN IF WE CLOSE IT OFF. PEOPLE ARE GOING TO COME IN BY ACCIDENT, SO WE'RE STILL GOING TO HAVE THAT INCREASED TRAFFIC.ON OUR PERSONALLY MAINTAINED ROADS. IT'S GOING TO BE A HUGE EXPENSE FOR US. I DON'T SEE THE POINT OF HAVING A NOOSE. UM APARTMENTS. COME COMPLEX, COME IN AND SAY, OH, WELL, WE'VE GOT ALL THIS WHEN YOU BANKRUPT THE HOMEOWNERS THAT ARE ALREADY THERE, BECAUSE IF WE DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO MAINTAIN EVERYTHING . THEN WE WON'T HAVE AN ASSOCIATION ANYMORE, AND OUR ARMS WILL BE WORTH NOTHING. THAT'S NOT BENEFICIAL TO ANYBODY. SO IF SOMETHING IS APPROVED, I WOULD MUCH PREFER THAT THE OWNER OCCUPIED. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I BELIEVE THAT WAS THE LAST HAND THAT I SAW. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE? YES.
HI GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS JEFF PARKER. I LIVE AT 63 40 LAKEVIEW DRIVE. JUST A VERY BRIEF COMMENT AND IS REALLY ABOUT THE ROADS. SO I WAS REALLY HAPPY ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF AGO THAT WE HAD SOMEONE COME IN TO PAY TO PAVE THE ROADS OR AT LEAST A SPRAY SOMETHING LIKE BLACKTOP ON THE ROADS. NO, I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH THAT COST. I IMAGINE IT WAS A LOT OF MONEY.
WHAT I CAN SAY NOW AND REALLY HASN'T BEEN ADDRESSED. IF YOU WERE TO DRIVE THROUGH, YOU CAN SEE THAT THE CRUMBLING ASPHALT THAT WAS ALREADY UNDERNEATH THIS SPRAY. WELL, THAT'S WAS KIND OF IMMEDIATELY CRUMBLING. BUT YOU ALSO SEE WHERE THAT BLACKTOP THAT WAS SPRAYED. THERE IS ALREADY COMING UP IN DIFFERENT PLACES, SO I THINK THAT I'M JUST TRYING TO HIGHLIGHT IF YOU HAVE EVEN MORE CARS COMING THROUGH. THEN AND YOU BEAR THE COST OF REPAINTING THE ROAD OR TRYING TO MAYBE HAVE ACTUALLY STREET GRADE ASPHALT, WHICH I IMAGINE IS SOMETHING WE COULDN'T AFFORD THAT COULD ACTUALLY HOLD UP. TWO MORE TRAFFIC SO I DON'T UNDERSTAND ALL THE, UM AGREEMENTS OR LACK OF AGREEMENTS IN TERMS OF HELPING TO FUND THE ROADS, BUT I WOULD THINK MOST DEFINITELY IF THERE WAS ANYTHING THAT WOULD GO THROUGH APARTMENTS OR CONDOS EITHER WAY. THERE'S GOT TO BE SOME SORT OF FAIR COST SHARE WITH MAKING SURE THE ROADS ARE UP BECAUSE A YEAR AND A HALF LATER THEY'RE ALREADY KIND OF OKAY, KIND OF COMING APART A LITTLE BIT SO JUST TO BE THE MAIN THING I WANTED TO SAY ABOUT OUR BUDGET KIND OF THESE ARE VERY, VERY REASONABLE. MM NOT THAT EVERYBODY PAYS THEM. EVEN THEN. UNFORTUNATELY, AS FAR AS I KNOW, BUT THEY WOULD HAVE TO GO UP A LOT MORE TO TRY TO OFFSET THE ROOTS. OKAY. THANKS SO MUCH. THANK YOU. YES.
AFTERNOON MY NAME IS STEPHEN OWEN. I'M THE CURRENT BOARD PRESIDENT OF THE VILLAGE IN SIERRA MEADOWS. WHEN COUGHLIN CAME AND ADDRESSED US AS A BOARD. INITIALLY MIKE AND I ARE THE ONLY ONE STILL ON THE CURRENT ARE ON THE ON THE BOARD. RIGHT NOW WE HAVE A COMPLETELY TOTALLY DIFFERENT BOARD. I'M UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT WHENEVER IMPASSE THERE MIGHT HAVE BEEN BEFOREHAND, I THINK THAT WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO REACH SOME SORT OF AN AGREEMENT. I
[01:00:03]
MEAN, I PERSONALLY I'D LOVE TO SEE THE LAND DEVELOPED. UM BUT NOW APARTMENTS. I AGREE WITH WHAT EVERYBODY IS SAYING IN REGARDS TO THAT. EVEN IF WERE POSSIBLE TO GET THE 100.APPROVAL FROM ALL THE CURRENT OWNERS OF THE VILLAGES. YOUR MEADOWS WOULD BE NICE TO BRING THEM INTO THE ASSOCIATION. THAT WOULD BE IDEAL. AND THEN WE HAVE AN EXTRA 64 UNITS WHERE WE COULD GENERATE MORE REVENUE FOR THE ASSOCIATION AND THEN BE ABLE TO DO THEIR INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE DONE TO. I JUST ENDED. ALSO I AGREE WITH THE WORD WE ALSO SAYING IN REGARDS TO I DON'T LIKE THE FACT THAT THEY'RE BEING CALLED BY THE SAME NAME THAT WE'RE BEING CALLED. IT'S NOT A FINAL DEVELOPMENT. IT'S COMPLETELY SEPARATE ENTITY. CALL VILLAGERS SUMO'S CONDOMINIUM CALLING COFFIN APARTMENTS OR SOMETHING, BECAUSE WHEN SOMEBODY LOOKS AT THAT, JUST EVEN FROM A BOOK, HE COULD BE HEARD ACCOUNTINGS SITUATION. IT'S IT CAN BE CONFUSING FOR THE BANKS OR DELIVERIES OR ANYTHING ELSE LIKE THAT. MORNING. I'D CALL THEM BY A DIFFERENT NAME. I THINK THAT THERE'S A WAY THAT WE COULD PROBABLY REACH THE SORT OF AGREEMENT BUT I DON'T THINK THAT SPEAKING FOR THE BOARD, I DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO BE BEING APARTMENTS SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME, AND I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. RIGHT IT SOUNDS LIKE, UM LOTS OF LOTS OF DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN , AND I'M HEARING A LOT OF THE SAME SIR, JUST TO GIVE A LITTLE BIT OF A EVERY CAPITAL THAT SOUNDS LIKE CONDOS ARE DEFINITELY SOMETHING THAT HEARING FROM THE PUBLIC. HUSBAND BROUGHT UP AS WELL AS THE NAME OF THE. VELA PRINT. SO WITH THAT , CONNIE IF YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT FIND ME. UM, FIRST I WANT TO START BY SAYING THAT I UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE LIVING IN A CONDOMINIUM WOULD SAY I DON'T WANT TO HAVE SOMETHING OTHER THAN A CONDOMINIUM. I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE LIVED IN A CONDOMINIUM MYSELF BEFORE. BUT I WANT TO SAY BASICALLY ALSO THAT ZONING HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CONDOMINIUMS OWNERSHIP, SO THAT IS SOMETHING SEPARATE AND APART FROM WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT HERE TODAY, THE PROPERTIES ALREADY ZONED FOR THESE UNITS. AS I KNOW THIS PLANNING COMMISSION THOSE IN THAT FEELING OF NOT WANTING THESE APARTMENTS AS COMPARATIVE CONDOS IS SOMETHING THAT CAN BE ADDRESSED BETWEEN THE PARTIES. HOPEFULLY UNFORTUNATELY, SOONER THAN LATER, THEY CUT US OFF FROM ANY COMMUNICATIONS. SO THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE WE HAD, AS A DEVELOPER WAS TO SAY, WELL, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND DEVELOP THE PROPERTY AS PLANNED, BUT BECAUSE WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE ACCESS WE NEED TO FLIP BUILDINGS. AT THE FORUM. PINEVIEW NOT BECAUSE OF PARKING AS WAS SAID, BUT BECAUSE OF ACCESS TO THE GARAGE. IF I MAY GO BACK TO. I WAS VERY EXCITED TO SEE THIS GENTLEMAN BECAUSE I DID WORK WITH THEM. AND I GUESS I DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENS AND I HAVE TO SAY IT AS I'VE GOTTEN OLDER. I'VE DECIDED I'M NOT GOING TO PRETEND THINGS DON'T HAPPEN. BUT I GUESS WHAT I NEVER UNDERSTAND IS THE SINCERITY ELEMENT IS USUALLY TAKEN OUT AT MEETINGS LIKE THIS.
THERE WAS NEVER ANY THREATENING THINGS. I PULLED THIS OUT JUST BECAUSE I WANTED TO MAKE SURE I WAS CLEAR. WE PROBABLY WENT THROUGH FOUR RENDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT. NEVER SIGNED IT AS HE SAID THAT IS CORRECT, BUT WE OBVIOUSLY HAD ENOUGH BELIEF IN THE GOODWILL BEHIND EVERYONE.
BECAUSE THE AGREEMENT WAS BASICALLY THEY TOLD US WHAT WE WANTED. AND WE AGREED TO IT. THE WOMAN MENTIONED. WE DON'T WANT PEOPLE PARKING ON PINEVIEW. SO THEY SWITCHED GARAGES. WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY IDEA SWITCHING GARAGES IN THE AGREEMENT ITSELF, AND THERE WAS AN AGREEMENT THAT WE WOULD NOT HAVE ANYBODY IN OUR DEVELOPMENT PARKING ON POND VIEW. IN REGARD TO THE POND.
THEY SAID. HEY YOU HAVE TO UPGRADE THE POND BECAUSE IT'S IN BAD SHAPE, SO THE AGREEMENT STATED THAT WE WERE GOING TO UPGRADE THE COST OF POND AT OUR SCHOOL COSTS. AFTER THAT WE WOULD BE PARTICIPATING IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THE POND AND PARTICIPATION BY ONE THIRD OF ALL THE COSTS EVERY YEAR. IN ADDITION, THEY SAID, IF YOU'RE GOING TO USE OUR ROADS WE WANT TO BE. WE'VE GOT AN IDEA. NOW WE'RE GOING TO BE PUTTING A NEW GATES. AND WE'RE GOING TO BE PUTTING IN NEW PAVEMENT AS THIS GENTLEMAN SAID. IT'S NOT IN GOOD CONDITION, SO WE AGREED TO PAY OUR SHARE OF THAT BY PAYING A THIRD OR MORE AND PARTICIPATING IN ALL THE GATE COSTS EVERYTHING. THE IDEA WAS TO BE A PART OF A COMMUNITY AND AS THE TIME WENT ON, THEY WANTED US NOT TO BE PART. SO, BASICALLY, WE'VE COME TO THIS. WE'VE COME TO A PLACE WHERE UNITS THAT COULD HAVE PEOPLE THAT WALK AND TALK AND SEE EACH OTHER. AS YOUR AS YOUR PLAN SAYS, SHOULD HAS BEEN BASICALLY SAID HOW CAN WE WALL YOU OFF SO YOU DON'T COME NEAR US? OUR GOAL WOULD BE TO TAKE OUT THE BULLARD'S. WE DON'T WANT THEM. JUST DON'T IF YOU DON'T WANT US TO DRIVE THROUGH YOUR PROPERTY WILL GIVE INSTRUCTIONS OR WILL HAVE PUSH DOWN BULLARD'S. OUR GOAL IS DEFINITELY NOT TO WALK AWAY AND NOT DEVELOP THE PROPERTY AS IT WAS PLANNED. UM, IF NEED BE, WILL REMOVE THE FOUR BUILDINGS AND PROCEED JUST AS THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS DESIGNED
[01:05:04]
INTO OUR APARTMENTS AND PROCEED THAT WAY WITHOUT BOLLARDS. BUT WHAT I'M TRYING TO EXPLAIN TO THIS COMMISSION IS THAT THE GOAL WAS TO BUILD IT AND TO WORK WITH THEM. THEY HAVE DECIDED NOT TO WORK WITH US. WE DID NOT DECIDE. AND WE NEVER PUSHED ANYTHING DOWN ANYONE'S THROAT. WE NEVER DID. WE KEPT COMMUNICATING AND WENT BACK AND FORTH AND BACK AND FORTH. THE OPTIONS WERE ALWAYS THERE TO WORK MORE TOGETHER. THEY DECIDED NOT TO. UM AND YOUR DECISION IF YOU'RE GOING TO RECOMMEND DISAPPROVAL, THAT WHAT WE'RE STUCK WITH IS, I THINK VERIFY IF I'M INCORRECT, BUT WE COULD REMOVE THE BOLLARDS REMOVED BEFORE A BUILDING SINCE THEY WOULDN'T HAVE ACCESS AND BUILD OUR DEVELOPMENT AS ITS PLAN. IS THAT CORRECT? IF THE BOLLARDS WERE NOT PROPOSED, AND THE BUILDING ORIENTATION WAS NOT SWAPPED, THEN THAT WOULD BE PER THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN.AND YOU WOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEVELOP THAT. YES, THAT'S WHAT I NEEDED TO UNDERSTAND. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. QUESTION FURTHER QUESTIONS. THE PLANNING COMMISSION I'M JUST A COUPLE OF OTHER COMMENTS. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE WORD APARTMENT DOES NOT APPEAR IN THIS AGREEMENT THAT WE'RE DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT. AND AS CONNIE SAID, THIS IS NOT A ZONING. ISSUE I ALSO FIND IT DISTASTEFUL TO REFER TO ONE TYPE OF BUILDING UNIT OR THE RENTER'S THEREOF, AS SOME SORT OF OTHER CLASS FROM THE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS STRUCTURE , SO WE HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THAT THESE ARE OUR NEIGHBORS. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WHETHER THEY HAPPEN TO BE APARTMENT RENTERS OR CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. THE BUILDINGS THAT AND NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS THAT ARE PROPOSED OR THE SAME AS IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN BEFORE UM THE REAL STICKING POINT ARE THE BOLLARDS AND THAT ARE BLOCKING ACCESS TO THE ROAD AND THE ORIENTATION OF THE UNITS. SO I THINK THAT GIVES GREAT URGENCY TO BOTH SIDES OF THIS. TO COME TO A MEETING BECAUSE IT IS IT IS LIKELY THAT THE DEVELOPER COULD TAKE THOSE STEPS AND PROCEED WITHOUT HAVING TO COME THROUGH HERE. SO I WOULD ENCOURAGE THAT. AS AS MY FINAL. UM, COMMENTS THERE. SO I WOULD ASK THE APPLICANT DO YOU WISH US TO VOTE ON THIS TODAY? OR YOU ASKING TO HAVE IT? WITHDRAWN. IN REALITY, I GUESS I COULD SAY I WANT YOU TO VOTE I BELIEVE YOU'LL VOTE IT DOWN AND RECOMMENDATION CONNECT. IF WE CAN REMEDY IT WITHOUT IN GOING BACK. THEY HAVEN'T. I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S A CHANCE THAT WE WILL COME TO AN AGREEMENT BECAUSE WE'VE TRIED AND THEY'VE NOT BEEN LIKELY TO ALLOW US TO COME THROUGH THEIR PROPERTY. SO UM, I THINK I WOULD LIKE YOU TO VOTE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND WE'RE READY FOR EMOTION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION BUT GIVE A WORD OF EXPLANATION. FIRST OUR GUIDELINES ASKED THAT WE MAKE MOTIONS IN THE AFFIRMATIVE. EVEN IF WE ARE GOING TO VOTE AGAINST IT, SO I'M NOT GOING TO READ THE MOTION OR THE RECOMMENDATION AS IT WAS WRITTEN, GOING TO PROPOSE A FRESH ONE. SO I WOULD PROPOSE.
THAT WE HAVE PROVED ITEM NUMBER NINE VILLAGES. TOYOTA MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED. THINKING. BROKEN. MR FRANK? NO MR TITUS ROYSTER. NO, MR ROCK. THANK YOU. RIGHT,
[8. APPLICATION: Sharp Home – Preliminary Development Plan (Part 2 of 2)]
CIRCLING BACK AROUND. ITEM NUMBER EIGHT. SHARP HOME PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN.WE'LL SEE IF WE'RE ABLE TO GET A BETTER CONNECTION THIS TIME. BECAUSE YOU GUYS SEE AND HEAR ME FIND THIS TIME. YES, WE CAN. CAN YOU HEAR US? YES I'M SO HAPPY, WONDERFUL. ALL RIGHT. IF YOU WOULD JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS, PLEASE. MY NAME IS WILLIAM SHARP. MY CURRENT ADDRESS IS 40 16 ARE VIEWED AS AVENUE GROVE CITY, OHIO. I'M KIND OF IN BETWEEN PLACES
[01:10:01]
BECAUSE I'M TRYING TO BUILD A HOME. I RESIDE. THERE ARE 36 18 GREEN AVENUE. THANK YOU. AS WAS NOTED THIS APPLICATION IS A REQUEST TO REZONE THE SITE TO P UT ARE TO CONSTRUCT A NEW RESIDENT AT THE CORNER OF FRANKLIN STREET AND SUNSHINE PARK. PLACE OF THE PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE REZONED P U T R TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS HOME BECAUSE I'M NOTING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF CODE AS WELL AS THE POTENTIAL FOR A SECONDARY DWELLING UNIT IN THE FUTURE. THIS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN WOULD BE THE FIRST STEP IN THE REZONING PROCESS FOR THE P U D DISTRICT PER CODE REQUIREMENTS. A LOT ZONED R TWO, AS THE SITE CURRENTLY IS, IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A 30 FT FRONT SET BACK 25 FT REAR SETBACK AND SIX FT SIDE SETBACK. AS A SUBJECT PERSONAL IS A CORNER LOT. IT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO HAVE THE 30 FT FRONT SETBACK FROM BOTH FRANKLIN STREET AND SUNSHINE PARK PLACE THAT PROVIDED MATERIAL STATE THAT THE FRONT OF THE HOME WOULD BE SET BACK. 22 FT FROM SUNSHINE PARK PLACE. AND THE GARAGE FRONTAGE ALONG FRANKLIN STREET WOULD BE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 24 FT FROM FRANKLIN STREET.NOTING THAT THERE ARE SOME DISCREPANCIES IN THE SUBMITTED PLANS THAT THE SETBACKS WILL NEED TO BE FINALIZED DURING THE CREATION OF THE ZONING TEXT FOR THE SITE. BUT THAT STAFF IS GENERALLY SUPPORTIVE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING PLACEMENT AS IT WOULD ALIGN WITH THE SETBACKS OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS ALONG FRANKLIN STREET AND SUNSHINE PARK PLACE. THE PROPOSED HOME IS TO BE TWO STORIES WITH 1998 SQUARE FEET OF LIVING SPACE AND THE 721 SQUARE FOOT ATTACHED GARAGE THE HOUSE AT FRONT ON SUNSHINE PARK PLACE AND HAVE A GARAGE ACCESS FROM FRANKLIN STREET. BASED ON THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE 33 FT 4.5 INCHES AT THE PEAK OF THE ROOF, FINISHED WITH WHITE VERTICAL BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING AND A BLACK STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF. STAMP HAS CONCERNS WITH THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE HOME AND ITS COMPATIBILITY WITH THE EXISTING ARCHITECTURE AND CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD, NOTING THAT THE SURROUNDING HOMES ARE PRIMARILY 1 TO 1.5 STORIES, THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED HOME COMBINED WITH THE LACK OF ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS TO BREAK UP THE MESSING CREATE A STRUCTURE THAT STAFF DOES NOT BELIEVE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. ADDITIONALLY STAFF DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT THE GARAGE FRONTING ON FRANKLIN STREET IS APPROPRIATE, NOTING THAT THE DIMENSIONS OF THE LOT AND IT'S CONFIGURED TO FEATURE FRANKLIN STREET AS THE PRIMARY FRONTAGE AND VERY FEW HOMES ON FRANKLIN STREET FEATURE. FRONT LOADED ATTACHED GARAGES.
MATERIALS DO ALSO STATE THAT AT THIS TIME, THE PROPOSED HOME WOULD CONSIST OF THREE BEDROOMS AND THREE BATHROOMS. PLAN SHEETS ALSO SHOW A LIVING ROOM AND THE KITCHEN ON EACH FLOOR OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE. IF THE INTENT IS FOR THE APPLICANT TO HAVE TWO SEPARATE DWELLING UNITS IN THE FUTURE, THIS WILL NEED TO BE REFLECTED IN THE ZONING TEXT IS IT WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED UNDER THE CURRENT ARTIST ZONING. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO BE. OUR STAFF WOULD BE SUPPORTIVE OF PERMITTING TWO UNITS ON THE PROPERTY WITH THE EXPECTATION THAT THE STRUCTURE BE DESIGNED WITH THE APPEARANCE OF A SINGLE FAMILY HOME IN CHARACTER WITH OTHER RESIDENCES ON FRANKLIN STREET. NOTING THESE ARCHITECTURAL CONCERNS TO BE FURTHER ADDRESSED IN THE PD'S OWNING TEXT TO ENSURE AN APPROPRIATE STRUCTURE BASED ON THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA AND TO ENSURE A HIGH QUALITY DEVELOPMENT IN LINE WITH THE GOALS FOR ALL INFILL DEVELOPMENT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH THE TWO STIPULATIONS NOTED IN OUR STAFF REPORT. THE APPLICANT LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS AT THIS TIME. UM JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS. MY UM MY ORIGINAL PLAN. I WORKED ON THE HOUSE PLAN FOR ONE YEAR. UM I GOT THE IDEA FROM THE GREEN TONE. THAT'S HISTORICAL HOME. I LOVED IT. I THINK GUYS DID AMAZING JOB RESTORING IT TO ITS ORIGINAL GLORY. UM NOT A FAN OF, UM PORCHES OR ANY PROTRUSIONS ON HOMES BECAUSE THEY CAUSE LEAKS.
UM I DID WALK DOWN THE STREET MANY, MANY TIMES OVER THE TWO YEARS OF OWNING THE PROPERTY. UM THERE IS TWO HOMES ON THE CORNER OF OLIVE. UM ONE IS ON THE OTHER END OF THE BLOCK FOR ME, UM THE HOUSE FACES OLIVE IN THE GARAGE FACES FRANKLIN RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM IT. THE HOUSE FACES ALL OF THE GARAGE FACES FRANKLIN. THAT'S WHERE I GOT MY DIMENSIONS FROM. THAT'S WHERE I GOT MY IDEA FROM. I WANT TO, UM , YOU KNOW, ESPECIALLY ONE ONCE ON THE OTHER END OF THE BLOCK. I WANT MY GARAGE TO, YOU KNOW, FACE FRANKLIN, LIKE BOTH OTHER CORNER LOTS AND I WANT MY HOME TO FACE SUNSHINE STREET AS THEY'RE TWO HUMPS FACE, OLIVE, UM, TO FOLLOW SUIT. THAT ONLY
[01:15:04]
MAKES SENSE. UM YES. UM THE HOUSE IS ROUGHLY 33 FT. TALL. BUT ACROSS THE STREET IS A TWO STORY ON FRANKLIN. I THINK IT SHOWS THAT A GREAT MY LOT ELEVATION IT'S WITH A TRAIN SET IS ABOUT FOUR. FT. UM. SHORTER THAN, UM, A LOT THAT'S ACROSS THE STREET ON FRANKLIN. UM SO WHEN MY HOME IS BUILT, THE ROOF HEIGHT WILL BE ALMOST IDENTICAL . IT'S NOT A TAD LOWER. UM THERE'S MODERN FARMHOUSE IS GOING UP THEIR TIMELESS THERE'S ONE BEING BUILT ON THE PARK STREET, UH, WHICH IS AS STRONG RICKEL DISTRICT WHICH I WAS REALLY SURPRISED THAT THAT HELP WENT THROUGH, BUT I LOVE IT. IT'S BEAUTIFUL. IT'S ALMOST IDENTICAL TO MY HOME EITHER THAN IT HAS A VERY SMALL FRONT PORCH . AND THAT'S A HIP ROOF AND MINDSET STRAIGHT GABLE AND THAT STORE DISTRICT. ALSO THERE'S ONE THAT JUST WAS BUILT AND VILLA PARK, WHICH IS BEAUTIFUL. UM I JUST WANT TO, YOU KNOW, MAKE A NICE HOME. UM, FOR, UH, MYSELF AND. MY SMALL FAMILY, AND I'VE GOT TO FOSTER PARENTS. AND I WANT THEM TO BE ABLE TO COME AND STAY WITH ME. THEY'RE IN THEIR SEVENTIES. UM, IT IS GOING TO BE ALL ONE HOME. UM, BUT THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO CLIMB STEPS. AND REASON FOR THE GARAGE. THAT YOU'RE WONDERING WHY IT'S SO BIG. IT WILL BE ACTUALLY TWO CAR GARAGE BECAUSE I DID MAKE UP PASSAGEWAY INTO THE OTHER UNIT. I LIKE SETTING IN THE GARAGE AND WATCHING THE WEARING WHEN I'M NOT TEACHING SCHOOL, NORTON LIKE I AM TODAY.SO THAT'S ABOUT ALL I GOT TO SAY. I JUST WANT TO BUILD MY HOME. IT'S IT'LL BE BEAUTIFUL.
THANK YOU. QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. LIKE TO GET A LITTLE CLARIFICATION ON THE EASTERN EDGE OF THAT PROPERTY. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S A BLACKTOP DRIVEWAY. THAT ABUTS THE HOME THERE. YES IS THAT PART OF THIS PARCEL OR DOES THAT BELONG TO THAT THAT LONG HOME ALONG THAT EASTERN EDGE? TOBIAS IS ACTUALLY MY NEIGHBOR AND I HAD THE LOT. HAD A SURVEYOR COME OUT AND FIND THE PENS. MY UH, GREAT QUESTION . MY LOT IS THREE INCHES FROM HIS HOME. SO WHOEVER OWNED THE HOME BEFORE TOBIAS, UM THEY JUST DECIDED TO PAVE ON MY PROPERTY. UM SO WHAT I'M GONNA DO IS I'M GOING TO TEAR UP THAT PAYMENT BECAUSE IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO ME TO HAVE A LOT OF GRASS IF YOU TAKE AN ACRE GRASS AND OPEN. DON'T TAKE TOO MUCH YOUR TIME. BUT IF YOU TAKE ONE ACRE GRASS COMPARED TO ONE ACRE OF TREES. ONE ACRES OF TREES PUTS OFF ENOUGH OXYGEN FOR 18 TO 30 PEOPLE ONE ACRE GRASP. IT'S OFTEN ENOUGH OXYGEN FOR 70 PEOPLE. SO WHAT I'M GONNA DO IS MY SUPER CONNECTION WILL BE IN HIS DRIVEWAY. HE'S GOING TO PUT NEW PAPERS IN HIS DRIVEWAY AND HAVE RIPPED UP AT THE SAME TIME THAT I TEAR OUT THE PAYMENT. I'M GOING TO GIVE HIM A THREE FT EASEMENT. ONE TRY SIT IN THE LETTER. AND UM, YOU WILL BE ABLE TO GET AROUND THE SIDE OF HIS HOUSE AND I'LL BE ABLE TO GET SEWER SO THAT WILL BE ALL GONE AND IT WILL ALL BE GRASS. THE OTHER COMMENTS I WOULD HAVE IS THAT, UM DISAPPEARS, ALBEIT FOR VERY GOOD AND WORTHY REASONS TO BE A DUAL DWELLING OR A DUPLEX WITH A FULLY EQUIPPED UPSTAIRS AND A FULLY EQUIPPED FIRST FLOOR. INCLUDING KITCHENS. I FIND THEM TO BE OUT OF CHARACTER WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD. AND VIOLATES THE GROVE CITY. 2050 PRINCIPLE NUMBER TWO AS WELL AS THEIR ZONING SETBACKS ARE IN OPPOSITION TO APPROVAL. SO I WILL NOT BE VOTING IN FAVOR OF THIS PROPOSAL. OTHER QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. FOR ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. TO SHARE IF I WOULD. I LIKE YOUR DESIGN LIKE WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO, BUT I HAVE THE SAME CONCERNS AS TO ME . IT LOOKS LIKE A DUPLEX, AND IT'S GOING TO BE A DUPLEX THAT I HAVE THE SAME CONCERN. WELL THAT IS MY NOT MY ATTENTION. UM I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO SAY. UM I JUST WANT TO PLACE FOR MY FOSTER PARENTS THAT CAN'T CLIMB STEPS SO UM, WHATEVER YOU GUYS NEED ME
[01:20:04]
TO DO IF I NEED TO GO THROUGH REZONING IF YOU GUYS SMELL THAT WAY. I CAN, UM UM, I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW, THOUGH, HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT THE REST OF THE PHONE BECAUSE I'VE BEEN TO A COUPLE MEETINGS AT YOU KNOW YOUR PLACE THERE FOR A CITY? UM, WHICH I COULD WALK TO IT. I LIVE IT. 40 16 ARE BEAUTIES, WHICH CURRENTLY HAS A HOME AND THEN A GARAGE AND THEN ABOVE THE GARAGE, WHICH IT'S A PD. YOU ARE JUST LIKE MINE, AND IT DOES HAVE A KITCHEN. DOES HAVE A BEDROOM, AND IT DOES HAVE A FRONT ROOM AND EVERYTHING THAT I'M GOING TO HAVE, UM SO I DON'T KNOW HOW ONE WAS APPROVED IN ONE CAN'T BUT I DON'T KNOW. I'M JUST A LITTLE GUY FROM PORTSMOUTH, OHIO. SO.BUT THE REST OF MY HOME, UM DO YOU GUYS LIKE IT? I MEAN, HOW DO YOU FEEL? BECAUSE I REALLY WORKED A YEAR, YOU KNOW, REALLY WORKED HARD. OR TWO YEAR ON THE HOUSE AND I REALLY WANT TO BUILD IT. THAT'S ALL I CAN SAY. MR SHORT, I LIKE THE OVERALL STYLE OF THE HOME YOU'VE PUT TOGETHER? YES. THE SIDE FACING FRANKLIN STREET. UM HOWEVER, THE FRONT ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS I THINK WOULD NEED UM, POSSIBLY REWORKED TO SOME EXTENT, BECAUSE IT DOES . IT'S SUCH A LARGE BUILDING.
THAT UM, IT'S IT SHOWS THE MASS, SO MAYBE SOMETHING TO BREAK THAT UP. UM BUT AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW, I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO VOTE FOR IT. BUT I DO APPRECIATE YOU LOOKING TO DO THIS. IT'S I THINK I THINK YOU'RE GETTING THERE. I THINK IT MAYBE IT'S JUST MM. A LITTLE. STILL NEEDS A LITTLE BIT OF WORK. WOULD YOU LIKE AN AWNING OVER THE DOOR? I MEAN, WHAT? THAT WHAT THAT WORK. I MEAN, I SPENT A YEAR AND A LOT OF MONEY WITH AN ARCHITECT DOING THIS, SO I WOULD KIND OF LIKED, YOU KNOW, KNOW EXACTLY. YEAH AND I'M I'M NOT PREPARED TO GIVE YOU THE EXACT DETAILS JUST BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE THEM. I MEAN, YOU'RE YOU KNOW, I WOULDN'T WANT TO MESS UP WITH YOUR PLANS, BUT, UM I THINK THAT JUST, YOU KNOW SOME SOME TYPE OF DETAILS TO BREAK UP THE MASSIVENESS OF THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING. IT'S A LARGE BUILDING. AND MAYBE THAT'S YOU KNOW, MAYBE I DON'T KNOW. UM JUST THE COMPATIBILITY WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD THE SIZE OF IT. IS RATHER, IT'S RATHER LARGER THAN THE OTHER HOMES AND WITH THE SETBACK AS WELL, UM, THAT'S THAT'S WHERE I'M COMING FROM, BUT DEFINITELY WHAT WHAT CATCHES MY EYE INITIALLY IS, IS THE FRONT ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS.
BASHAR BY WOULD SUGGEST THAT STAFF HAS GIVEN SOME INDICATION IN THE REPORT THAT THE HOMES IN THE AREA ARE SINGLE STORY OR STORY AND A HALF YOU ALSO HAVE THE GOOD FORTUNE. I'LL BE AT ONE NOT NOT WANTING TO USE ALL THAT GREEN SPACE TO THE EAST SIDE. THERE IS STILL AMPLE ROOM THERE THAT YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD AND BUILD A HOME THAT COULD ACCOMMODATE YOUR IN LAWS AND STILL STAY WITHIN THE STORY AND A HALF APPROACH. THAT IS SPECIAL TO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. I DO REALIZE THAT INFILL IS VERY DIFFICULT TO DO WITH ALL THE ZONING THAT HAS TO COMPLY WITH AND I COMMEND YOU FOR TRYING I WOULD JUST AND SAY IT NEEDS A LITTLE MORE WORK. RIGHT ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION OR ANY OTHER COMMENTS? JUST LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT, BUT I APPRECIATE THE YOUR SIZABLE INVESTMENT. SO CLOSE TO HER DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY. AND HE'S GOT, YOU KNOW SOMEWHAT OF A MIX OF SOME INDUSTRIAL TYPE STUFF THAT'S RATHER CLOSE TO YOU, AND I JUST THINK IT'S NICE INTENT TO END SOME ADDITIONAL NEW INFILL. ON EMPTY LOTS, ESPECIALLY SO CLOSE TO OUR TOWN CENTER. THAT. THANK YOU. WELL, I REALLY APPRECIATE THAT, BECAUSE THAT'S THE FIRST POSITIVE THING THAT I'VE HEARD FROM ANYBODY IN THE TWO MONTH PROCESS, SO THAT MAKES ME FEEL GOOD BECAUSE I REALLY WORKED HARD FOR THE PLAYING ON THIS HOME FOR A YEAR. ALL RIGHT WITH THAT, I THINK ALREADY FOR EMOTION. THANK YOU.
[01:25:01]
RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FOR THE HARPOON. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAS APPLICATION NUMBER EIGHT. STIPULATIONS WEREN'T WITH THE TWO STIPULATIONS. THANK YOU SECOND.BROKE UP CHAIR OYSTER. NO MR ROCK. YES MR FREE. NO, MR TITUS. GREAT SO, MR SHORT, YOU HAVE TO, UM, THIS WILL STILL GO TO CITY COUNCIL, SO YOU'LL BE ABLE TO PRESENT TO THEM IN TWO WEEKS.
THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU. WITH THAT BEING THE LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA. AND I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE MEETING. MHM. WORLD CUP, MR ROCK. GOING. TO MR MR FREE. CHAIR. OYSTER? YES. MR TYPE OF
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.