[A. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL]
[00:00:04]
WELY PLANNING COMMISSION. LIKE TO START THE MEETING. WITHDRAWAL CALL. MR ROCK HERE, MR. FREE CHAIR. OYSTER HERE, MR LINDER, MR TITUS. JOIN ME IN STANDING FOR A MOMENT OF SILENCE, FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
[C. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES – March 8, 2022]
OKAY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WAS PROVIDED WITH MEETING MINUTES FROM MARCH EIGHT. I COULD GET A MOTION FOR THOSE MINUTES. THERE. I MOVE. WE APPROVED THE MEETING MINUTES FROM MARCH. 8TH. YOUR UNCLE. MR LINDER, MR FREE. ROYSTER? YES, MR TITUS. WE HAVE THREE ITEMS ON THE AGENDA TODAY.WHEN YOUR ITEM IS CALLED IF YOU COULD JUST WALK UP TO THE PODIUM AND STATE YOUR NAME AS WELL AS YOUR ADDRESS. IT CAN BE YOUR BUSINESS OR YOUR HOME ADDRESS. AND THEN AFTER THAT THE CITY
[1. APPLICATION: Farmstead Phase 5A - Plat]
WILL PROVIDE SOME BACKGROUND. APPLICATION NUMBER ONE FARMSTEAD. PHASE FIVE A PLAT. UM HAIDAR WAS CUZ OLD WILSON BRIDGE ROAD. THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PLANT FOR FARMSTEAD PHASE A LOCATED WEST OF JACKSON PIKE IN NORTH OF HAWTHORN PARKWAY. A PLANT FOR FARMSTEAD. PHASE FIVE WAS PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED BY PLANNING COMMISSION IN FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR AND DID RECEIVE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. HOWEVER THE APPLICANT CHOSE TO WITHDRAW THE ITEM PRIOR TO COUNCIL APPROVAL AND TO DIVIDE THE AREA INTO TWO SUB PHASES.THE PROPOSED PLAN INCLUDES THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED PHASE FIVE, WHICH INCLUDES 25 LOTS ONE RESERVE AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE EXTENSION OF TWO EXISTING ROADWAYS, HONEY FARM WEIGHT AND LAVENDER FIELD. AND ONE NEW ROADWAY MORNING BIRD COURT. THE LOT RESERVE AND RIGHT OF WAY CONFIGURATION MATCH THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED PLATFORM SECTION FIVE. ASIDE FROM THE ADDITION OF TWO SMALL EASEMENTS FOR CB US ON MORNING BIRD COURT THEREFORE, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT PLANNING COMMISSION MAKER RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PLATTE ESTIMATED. ANYTHING THAT YOU'D LIKE TO ADD? OH, NOTHING. QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. I HAVE ONE OF THE RESERVE L. IS GOING TO EVENTUALLY HAVE A BIKE PATH THROUGH IT. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING IS TRAIL, OKAY? JUST IN REVIEWING IT. I GUESS THE PROPER WAYS TO ANESTHETIZE RELATION. ON THE. OWNERSHIP TRANSFER OF RESERVED L GOING INTO THE CITY BUT MAINTAINED BY THE H O A. IN THAT WAY. CITIZENS THAT AREN'T MEMBERS OF THAT H L A CAN STILL TRAVERSE THROUGH THE BIKE PATH. STATED CORRECTLY. IT CERTAINLY COULD. I WOULD NOTE THAT THE TRAIL WAS ALREADY PLANTED IN AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ACCESS ALREADY, SO IF THE INTENT OF THE STIPULATION IS TO ENSURE PUBLIC ACCESS FOR THE TRAIL THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN HANDLED IN A PREVIOUS PHASE. BUT IF THE OWNERSHIP OF THE RESERVE IN ITS ENTIRETY IS THE DESIRE TO BE OWNED BY THE CITY, BUT AIMED BY THEIR OWN MAINTAINED BY THE H O. A. THAT WOULD NEED TO BE A STIPULATION BECAUSE, AS IT CURRENTLY IS PROPOSED, IT WOULD BE A CHOKE A OWNED AND MAINTAINED. MOVING INTO THE CITY . IT TAKES THE PROPERTY TAX BURDEN OFF OF THAT PARCEL. OFFER THE AGE OF EIGHT IS RESPONSIBILITIES FROM ETERNITY AS IS PART OF THE CITY. THIS.
CORRECT THIS RESERVE DOES ALSO ACT AS AN EXTENSION OF PREVIOUS RESERVES IN FARMSTEAD, WHICH I BELIEVE THOSE WERE ALSO OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE H O A SO THERE COULD LEAD TO SOME POTENTIAL CONFUSION ABOUT WHERE THAT DIVIDE AND OWNERSHIP OCCURS BETWEEN THE PHASES OF THE FARMS TO DEVELOPMENT. WE'RE BEST AT LEAST WAY THAT OTHER ONES ARE ALREADY DEVELOPMENT IN THE FUTURE. WE COULD YES. THERE TO THE CITY OWNERSHIP? YES, AND THERE WILL BE FUTURE PHASES OF
[00:05:04]
FARMSTEAD THAT ARE MORE SEPARATED AND CONTINUATION OF AN EXISTING EASEMENT OR RESERVES, SO THAT MIGHT BE AN EASIER PLACE TO INSTALL THAT. S WILL JUST ADDRESS IT IN THE NEXT RESERVED PARCEL THAT COMES A LOT OF THOSE LIKE THEY'RE SEPARATED. ACTUALLY CELEBRATIONS COMING UP WELL, TOO, SO OKAY, QUESTIONS ANSWERED. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION? IS THERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. CARING, NONE READY FOR EMOTION. MAKE EMOTIONAL APPROVAL. CITY COUNCIL DR. NUMBER ONE IS SUBMITTED.SECOND. UNCLE MR TITUS? YES, MR LINDER? YES? CHARITY OYSTER? YES MR ROCK. YES, MR FREE? YES.
THANK YOU. APPLICATION NUMBER TWO SHARED AND DENTAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
[2. APPLICATION: Sheridan Dental – Development Plan]
IF YOU JUST STATE YOUR NAME AS WELL AS YOUR ADDRESS. MY NAME IS KEVIN MULLINAX. I'M A DESIGN ARCHITECT WITH THE ARCHITECTS. MY ADDRESS. OUR COMPANY ADDRESS IS 7 75 YARDS STREET AND GRAND VIARD. COMMANDERS. AND THIS IS FOR THE SHARED INTO DENTAL OFFICE. UM DR SHERIDAN AND COREY SHERIDAN SOON TO BE A DENTIST AS WELL, UM, LONGTIME RESIDENTS OF GROUP CITY AND THEY HAVE THEIR DENTAL OFFICE HERE ARE EAGERLY ANTICIPATING A NEW BUILDING FOR THEIR. PRACTICE AND THEY HAVE PURCHASED THIS LOT BETWEEN THE MCDONALD'S AND THE BURGER KING OVER ON BROADWAY. AND THEY'RE THEY'RE LOOKING TO BUILD A PLUS YOUR MINUS 5800 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING, AND THEY'RE HOPING THAT THIS BUILDING IS A REAL SIGNATURE PIECE FOR GROWTH CITY. THEY WANTED TO BE HAVE REALLY NICE LIGHTING AND TO HAVE MODERN MATERIALS AND JUST BE SOMETHING IN THE COMMUNITY COMMUNITY CAN BE PROUD OF AS WELL AS THEM, AND THEY'RE SUPER EXCITED ABOUT THAT ABOUT THE PROJECT. WELL, ALRIGHT, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OF YOUR QUESTIONS AND DETAIL ABOUT WHATEVER YOU'D LIKE ME TO DISCUSS. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THE CITY IS GOING TO PROVIDE A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND. BUT THAT WAS THAT WAS GREAT INFORMATION. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A NEW OFFICE BUILDING FOR SHARED AND DENTAL ON THE EAST SIDE OF BROADWAY SOUTH OF PARLIAMENT DRIVE. THIS PARCEL WAS CREATED AFTER A LOT SPLIT, APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN 2000 AND 13, WHICH ALSO RESULTED IN A COMMITMENT TO CREATE EASEMENTS OVER A NUMBER OF THE ACCESS DRIVES ON THE SITE. PRIMARY ACCESS TO THIS SITE WILL BE FROM THE EXISTING DRIVE ALONG THE NORTH EDGE OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS CURRENTLY USED BY MCDONALD'S FOR ACCESS OFF OF BROADWAY, RIGHT IN ONLY CUT IS ALSO PROPOSED OFF OF BROADWAY.HOWEVER THE APPLICANT HAS MADE STAFF AWARE OF THEIR DESIRE TO OBTAIN A SHARED ACCESS EASEMENT TO CONNECT THE PROPOSED PARKING LOT WITH THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH. TO IMPROVE AREA CONNECTIVITY AND TO UTILIZE THE EXISTING CURVE CUT IN PLACE, UM, ARE IN PLACE OF INSTALLING THE PROPOSED RIGHT IN IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF CURB CUTS ALONG BROADWAY STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT IF THIS CONNECTION WITH THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH IS MADE THAT THE PROPOSED RIGHT IN ACCESS POINT BE REMOVED. THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 5800 SQUARE FEET IN AREA 21 FT. NINE INCHES IN HEIGHT, AT ITS TALLEST POINT, FINISHED PRIMARILY WITH FIBER CEMENT SIDING, TEXTURE TO APPEAR AS WOOD AND STONE VENEER. ALUMINUM COMPOSITE PANELS ARE USED FOR ACCENT AS WELL AS LARGE WINDOWS ON ALL ELEVATIONS. STAFF BELIEVES THAT PROPOSED BUILDING FITS THE DESIRED CHARACTER AND FUTURE LAND USE IN THE AREA AND WILL ALLOW FOREIGN ESTABLISHED GROWTH CITY BUSINESS TO EXPAND WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. THEREFORE WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT PLANNING COMMISSION MAKER RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL UM, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WITH THE ONE STIPULATION NOTED REGARDING THE ACCESS POINT ON BROADWAY. MR MALONE X WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS ABOUT SUMS IT UP AS AS WAS SO ELOQUENTLY STATED. WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE BASICALLY HAVE THE EASEMENT WITH THE OWNER TO THE SOUTH. IT'S BEEN A LONG PROCESS TRYING TO GET THAT EASEMENT IN PLACE. SO WE HOPE THAT THAT HAPPENS DURING THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT PERMIT APPROVAL STAGE SO THAT WE CAN JUMP IN DOING THAT. BUT ON THE OFF CHANCE THAT THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN. WE RECOGNIZE THAT THERE'S A LOT OF TRAFFIC ON BROADWAY, BUT LOCATION OF MONUMENTS SIGNAGE, ESPECIALLY FOR PEOPLE COMING SOUTH ON BROADWAY. UM IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO KNOW THAT THE MCDONALD'S DRIVE THRU LANE IS ACTUALLY THE ENTRANCE TO THE DENTIST OFFICE, AND SO PEOPLE ARE LIABLE TO GO PAST THE BUILDING AND HAVE TO TURN AROUND AND COME BACK. SO WE'RE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT A WAY TO BASICALLY MITIGATE THAT POSSIBILITY. SO OUR HOPE IS THAT ON THE NEXT MONTH OR SO WE'LL HAVE AN
[00:10:02]
EASEMENT TO THE SOUTH. AND, YEAH, IT WILL BE. TO BE GOOD AT THAT POINT. QUESTIONS REGARDING THAT. I AM A COUPLE. IS IT OUR TURN? I HAVE A COUPLE OF COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS FIRST OFF. IT'S A GOOD LOOKING BUILDING, AND THAT SHOULD BE A VERY NICE IMPROVEMENT TO THE OVERALL. I'M LOOKING FEEL OF THAT PART OF BROADWAY AND SO PLEASED TO SEE THIS LOOKS LIKE A GREAT THING. ALSO FOR A GOOD LONG TERM FAMILY AND BUSINESS FOR GROUPS CITY WELL DONE. THANK YOU. UM WHAT'S THE VISION FOR THE GREEN SPACE IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE BUILDING ITSELF.OKAY UM, THE SHERIDAN'S ARE PLANNING TO POTENTIALLY BUILD A SECOND BUILDING THAT THEY WILL BE SENT TO TENANTS, MORE MEDICAL OFFICE OR SIMILAR USES TO WHAT THEY HAVE CURRENTLY ON THE SITE.
BUT DUE OBVIOUSLY TO CURRENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND OTHER ISSUES. THEY'RE GOING TO HOLD OFF A FEW YEARS AND MAKING THAT DETERMINATION, SO THE LONG TERM PLAN MIGHT BE TO HAVE A SIMILAR SIZED BUILDING ADJACENT TO IT WITH A COURTYARD. AND THEN EXTEND THE PARKING LOT TO THE SOUTH. AND THEN RIP TO LEASE THAT OUT, ALTERNATIVELY, DEPENDING ON MARKET CONDITIONS, IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO SPLIT THE LOT AND SELL THAT TO SOMEBODY WHO WOULD BUILD A SIMILAR BUILDING WHEN SIMILAR STYLE. IN WHICH CASE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE NEW PARKING AREA. AND THE TIMING OF THE RIGHT END TURN IF THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN DURING CONSTRUCTION, IF YOU IF YOU GET THE EASEMENT, AND YOU'RE NOT ABLE TO WORK OUT. THE SHARED THESE MEN ON THIS WITH THE SOUTH PROPERTY. IS IT POSSIBLE THAT LATER DOWN THE ROAD THAT GETS WORKED OUT AND YOU ACTUALLY TAKE OUT THE RIGHT END? OH, YES, HE'S ABSOLUTELY OKAY. THAT'S A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. THAT WOULD BE THAT WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE. JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND THE WORDING THAT'S BEEN PROPOSED FOR THE APPROVAL. THE QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. RIGHT? IS THERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. I MIGHT BOTH SO 18 94 CREEKS CROSSING COURT. I CALLED DR SHERIDAN THIS MORNING, ACTUALLY, BECAUSE I HAD A PROBLEM WITH MY TOOTH. YOU GOT ME IN RIGHT AWAY, AND IT'S THAT TYPE OF SERVICE THAT MAKES THIS AN EXCITING BUSINESS AND TO SEE A BUSINESS THAT'S BEEN IN GROSS CITY FOR AS LONG AS HE HAS. REINVESTING IN THE CITY SAYS A LOT, AND I CAN'T THANK HIM ENOUGH AND JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT I'M IN SUPPORT OF THIS. WE DO? THANK YOU FOR YOUR INVESTMENT THAT YOU'RE ABOUT TO MAKE AND FOR EVERYTHING THAT YOU'VE DONE OVER THE YEARS AND DEFINITELY FOR HELPING MIKE WITH HIS TOOTH TODAY. YEAH. ALL RIGHT . IS THERE ANYONE ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? HEARING, NONE WERE READY FOR EMOTION. HERE I MAKE THE MOTION. WE RECOMMEND OUR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. APPLICATION TO SHARING AND DENTAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, BUT THE ONE STIPULATION SECOND. BROKE OH, MR ROCK? YES, MR TITUS. MR LINDER. MR FREE? YES. OYSTER? YES. THANK YOU. APPLICATION NUMBER THREE. AUTUMN
[3. APPLICATION: Autumn Grove Addition – Development Plan]
GROOVE EDITION DEVELOPMENT PLAN. AFTERNOON REBECCA MOTT WITH A BLANK LAW FIRM OFFICE ADDRESS OF 4, 11, EAST TOWNE STREET. COLUMBUS, OHIO, 43215. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE AUTUMN GROVE EDITION, LOCATED WEST OF THE EXISTING AUTUMN GROUP SUBDIVISION NORTH OF WRENCH ROAD. CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE AUTUMN GROVE EDITION IN SEPTEMBER OF 2000 AND FOUR. HOWEVER THIS PLAN EXPIRED AFTER THE PROJECT WAS NOT STARTED WITHIN ONE YEAR FROM THE APPROVAL DATE. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE 69 NEW LOTS TO RESERVES AND TWO NEW ROADWAYS. IN ADDITION TO THE EXTENSION OF ROADWAYS FROM THE EXISTING AUTUMN GROWTH DEVELOPMENT, ALL PROPOSED LOTS MEET THE STANDARDS OF THE R ONE DISTRICT, INCLUDING MINIMUM LOT WITH AND MINIMUM LOT SIZE. PLANS INCLUDE TO OPEN SPACE RESERVES, BOTH FEATURING TRAILS TO ACTIVATE THE SPACE AND PROVIDE AMENITIES TO RESIDENTS. MATERIALS ALSO SHOW THE APPLICANTS INTEND TO CONTINUE THE PROPOSED TRAIL THROUGH THE RESERVES FRONTING ON WRENCH AND EXISTING IN THE EXISTING AUTUMN GROWTH SUBDIVISION. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT WHILE DETAILS WERE SUBMITTED FOR INDIVIDUAL LOT PLANTINGS, A LANDSCAPE PLAN WAS NOT SUBMITTED FOR RESERVE AREAS , INCLUDING THE POND AND PLANTINGS ALONG RANCH ROAD. TO SCREEN THE REAR A LOT 63 TO 69. THE APPLICANT INDICATED THAT DUE[00:15:03]
TO THE GREETING UTILITIES AND OTHER CONDITIONS NOT FULLY ESTABLISHED TO ALLOW FOR APPROPRIATELY ESCAPE PLANNING. THAT THE LANDSCAPING WILL BE PROVIDED DURING THE FINAL ENGINEERING PHASE. FOR PROPOSED HOME ELEVATIONS WERE SUBMITTED WITH SQUARE FOOTAGE IS RANGING FROM 2700 TO 4400 SQUARE FEET, WITH OPTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL BEDROOMS, FLEX SPACES AND GARAGE DOORS. EACH ELEVATION HAS OPTIONS OF ASSAD MATERIALS, INCLUDING BRICK AND CITING AND ARE GENERALLY IN CHARACTER WITH THE EXISTING ELEVATIONS FOUND IN THE REST OF THE AUTUMN GROVE DEVELOPMENT, THEREFORE, AFTER REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT PLANNING COMMISSION MAKER RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WITH THE THREE STIPULATIONS NOTED RELATED TO LANDSCAPING. THE SMART WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADD ANYTHING? NO THE STUFF REPORT IS WELL DONE. THERE'S NOTHING MORE THAN I'D LIKE TO ADD. AT THIS TIME. WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. WHAT'S THE PROPOSED PRICE POINT ON THEIR HOMES? OF THAT INFORMATION, THOUGH I APOLOGIZE. THEY LOOK TO BE RATHER LARGE. BUT I'M PLEASED WITH THAT. THE QUESTION ABOUT ACCESS TO POND AND RESERVED BE THERE APPEARS TO BE A TRAIL AROUND THE POND, AND THERE'S ALSO A TRAIL ALONG THE ROAD. BUT I DON'T SEE AN ACCESS THROUGH THOSE HOMES FROM THE ROAD TRAIL, TOO. THE POND, RIGHT? SO. THE PATH AND THE CONNECTIVITY THROUGHOUT ALL OF AUTUMN GROVE SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING THE ADDITION WHICH IS THIS SECTION HERE? SO THIS BLUE PROPOSED PATH IS WITH THE ADDITION THAT IS SUBJECT OF THE APPLICATION BEFORE YOU'VE HEARD FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THIS RED PATH ALONG WRENCH ROAD HAS NOT YET BEEN CONSTRUCTED OR INSTALLED, BUT WE ARE PROPOSING TO INSTALL AND CONSTRUCT THAT PATH AS WELL THROUGH THE FORMALLY APPROVED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN UM, BUILD OUT PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISIONS, SO WE WILL PUT THIS REDPATH IN AS WELL AS THE BLUE. THE THERE'S NOBODY REALLY CROSSED THESE LOTS TO GET TO THIS PATH IN THIS POND AREA IN THIS RESERVE BECAUSE THESE LOT OWNERS WOULD ON THESE LOTS AND IT WOULD BE LIKE AN EASEMENT THREW THEIR LOT THAT THE H O A WOULD HAVE TO MAINTAIN AND CONTROL. THE OTHER CONNECTIONS THROUGHOUT THE SUBDIVISION IS THE EXISTING PATH THE GREEN THAT'S ALREADY INSTALLED AND THAT IS ALSO ANOTHER DETENTION POND WITH THE PATH SURROUNDING IT. AND THEN IT GOES OUT INTO THE ROADWAY, PUBLIC SIDEWALKS THAT ARE ATTACHED TO THE PUBLIC ROADWAYS, WHICH DOES OFFER CONNECTIVITY IF THEY FOLLOW ALONG THE SIDEWALK TO THE REST OF THE GREEN EXISTING PATH. SO THERE IS CONNECTIVITY AND THEN THE PROPOSED RED CONNECTS TO THE GREEN EXISTING, BUT THIS WILL ALL BE BUILT OUT DURING THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS AND ENGINEERING PHASES. THIS SPACE FOR THIS PHASE EDITION HERE BECAUSE THIS IS PART OF OUR COMMITMENT THAT WE HAVE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AS OUR PROPOSED PATH CONNECTION. TREATS IN THAT RED SECTION. DO THEY EXIST NOW? IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING . ALL OF THIS IS BUILT UP. WE HAVE AN AERIAL VIEW HERE WITH HOMES ACTUALLY BUILT AND OVERLAID ON THIS AERIAL MAP. IT'S REALLY LIGHT. BUT I BELIEVE ALL OF THESE ROADS AND IN ANY HOME YOU SEE IN AN AERIAL HAS BEEN BUILT IS CONSTRUCTED. THIS IS THE NEW FACE THIS EDITION HERE. OKAY SO IF SOMEONE WANTED TO GET TO THAT POND FROM THE TRAIL ON THE ROAD, THEY'D HAVE TO TAKE THE ROAD OVER AND ACROSS TO GET BACK TO RIGHT. THEY WOULD TAKE THIS SIDEWALK DOWN AND THEN BEYOND THIS PATH, TAKE THE SIDEWALK AROUND THE CALLED A SACK, AND THEN THEY TAKE THIS SIDEWALK DOWN TO GET TO THE PATH ALONG THIS MAIN ROUTE WRENCH ROAD. MY SUSPICION IS THEY WILL ALSO USE THE BACKYARDS TO GET THROUGH THEIR BACKYARDS OF THE LOTS. JUST CROSS IT PEDESTRIAN FOR AN EASEMENT EARN ACCESS IN THERE SOMEWHERE. UM, IT MIGHT.ALLEVIATE THAT PROBLEM A LITTLE BIT, OR AT LEAST MAKE IT AN OFFICIAL PLACED WE DON'T HAVE A DEVELOPMENT TEXT FOR THIS PART OF THE SUBDIVISION BECAUSE THIS IS NOT A PLAN DISTRICT. THIS IS AN R ONE'S OWN DISTRICT, AND WE CAN ACTUALLY DO THESE 69. LOTS WITHIN THIS ARE ONE ZONING. SO THERE'S NO TEXT TO LIKE DICTATE CERTAIN OTHER RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS IF YOU WILL. HOWEVER MAYBE THROUGH SIGNAGE OR FENCING OR LANDSCAPING. BUT FIRST WE CAN STOP PEOPLE FROM TRAVERSING THROUGH PEOPLE'S BACKYARDS THAT WOULD BE TRESPASSED IN THAT LOT . HONOR WOULD NOT APPRECIATE THAT BECAUSE THEY'D HAVE LIABILITY THAT WOULD INCREASE WITH THAT HAPPENING. I THINK WITH FINANCE DIRECTION, LANDSCAPING SCREENING, WE CAN CONTROL THAT. SO THAT'S WHAT WE'LL ATTEMPT TO DO. OTHER QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. WHAT IS THE SIZE OF
[00:20:12]
THE STREAM CORRIDOR? LOOKS LIKE YOU HAVE THE STREAM CORRIDOR THAT GOES EAST AND WEST. YEAH IS THAT MUCH OF THE STREAMS SEE THEIR STAFF TRES. ANYBODY AWARE OF THAT IS, I'M NOT AWARE OF THE WIDTH OF IT. BUT THERE IS AN ESTABLISHED FLOODPLAIN IN THE EXISTING AUTUMN GROVE DEVELOPMENT AND THE APPLICANT IS WORKING ON A FLOOD STUDY CURRENTLY TO DETERMINE THE BOUNDARIES OF THE FLOODPLAIN ON THEIR PROPERTY. CORRECT SO WE HAD PLANS THAT WERE SUBMITTED THAT SHOW THIS AS OPEN SPACE. I THINK IT'S CALLED BROWN RUN IS THE CREEK NAME AND THERE'S A WE NEED TO DO A BETTER CALCULATION OF OPEN SPACE. WE THINK IT'S FOR ACRES. I BELIEVE STAFF CALCULATES HIGHER AT 7.54. DEPENDING UPON WHAT AREAS CAN BE USED FOR CALCULATION OF, YOU KNOW, OPEN SPACE, SO WE MEET AND EXCEED THE MINIMUM THRESHOLD. BUT THERE'S A LITTLE DISCREPANCY ABOUT HOW MUCH OPEN SPACES PROVIDED DETERMINED ON FLOODPLAIN AND WHAT THAT CREEK IS, BUT THAT IS UNDERWAY BY OUR ENGINEERING STAFF. IS THAT MAINTAIN THE POINT. THIS IS A PARTED BY THE H O A. THEN THE STREAM CORRIDOR. THE H AWAY WOULD MAINTAIN ALL OF THE RESERVE AREAS OF THIS SUBDIVISION AS PLANTED SO AUTUMN GROVE HAS RESERVED A AND B ALREADY PLANTED SO THAT WOULD BE PART OF THE OAS OWNERSHIP, RESPONSIBILITY AND MAINTENANCE.I WOULD ASSUME THAT WE WILL REPLY THAT WE ALL HAVE TO DO A PLATFORM THIS SECTION AND IT WILL INCLUDE THAT THE H AWAY WILL MAINTAIN AND CONTROL THESE PORTIONS OF THE RESERVES THAT ARE IN THIS EDITION. I DON'T KNOW, THOUGH ABOUT THE CREEK ITSELF, WHETHER IT'S UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF LIKE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEER OR SOME PERMITTED STREAM THROUGH A FEDERAL AGENCY . BUT WHATEVER THAT IS, WE WILL PRESERVE IT AND NOT BE CROSSING IT AND WILL NOT BE IMPACTING IT IN ANY WAY. WE WOULDN'T WANT TO GO THROUGH THAT. YOU KNOW ALL OF THAT. MAINTENANCE OF IT OR. AS IT CURRENTLY STANDS. WE HAVE NOT ESTABLISHED WHO WOULD BE OWNING OR MAINTAINING THESE OPEN SPACES. WE THAT GENERALLY ISN'T ESTABLISHED UNTIL THE PLAT. WE CAN CERTAINLY HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, IT WOULD JUST NOT BE FORMALIZED UNTIL THE NEXT PHASE OF THE PLANNING TO BE CONSISTENT AGAIN, UM, SORT OF SIMILAR TO OUR DISCUSSION IN FARMSTEAD. THIS IS SORT OF ACTING AS AN EXTENSION OF THE AUTUMN GROVE DEVELOPMENT. AND ALL OF THE RESERVES WITHIN AUTUMN GROVE ARE CURRENTLY OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE H O A. SO I WOULD, UM BUT AGAIN, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD BE DISCUSSING IN FORMALIZING AT THE PLATTE TO STAY THE COURSE. YES. TO FINISH OUT UNDER. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK THREE. HEARING NONE MOVED DOWN MOTION. HERE. I'LL MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER THREE, THE PART OF AUTUMN GROVE EDITION DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH THE THREE STIPULATIONS NOTED. REAL COLD. CHAIR OYSTER. YES MR ROCK. YES MR FREE? YES, TITUS? YES, MR LINDER. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. AND WITH THAT, BEING THE LAST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA, THE
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.