[A. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL]
[00:00:04]
GOOD WELCOME TO GROW. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER WE'LL START WITH ROLL CALL MR ROCK. HERE. MR FRANK HERE. CHAIR OYSTER HERE, MR LINDER. MR TITUS. AND IF YOU JOIN ME BY STANDING FOR A MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER, FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE
[B. MOMENT OF SILENCE AND PLEDGE]
OF ALLEGIANCE.WE HAVE ONE ITEM ON THE AGENDA. SO UM, WHEN WE CALL THE AGENDA OF THE REPRESENTATIVE COULD JUST STOP OFF AND STATE YOUR NAME AS WELL AS YOUR ADDRESS, AND THEN AFTER THAT THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SOME BACKGROUND. RIGHT ITEM NUMBER ONE. THE SHOTS OF YOU WOULD DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
[1. APPLICATION: The Shoppes at Beulah – Development Plan]
THE APPLIQUE. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SHOPS AT VILLA PARK, LOCATED IN BILL PARK SUB AREA AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND COLUMBUS STREET. THE REZONING FOR BELLA PARK WAS APPROVED IN 2000 AND 18. AND THIS LOT WAS SPLIT FROM A LARGER LOT OF SUB AREA A IN 2021. POST BUILDING IS 15 1500 SQUARE FEET WITH FOUR TENANT SPACES AND OUTDOOR PATIOS. THE OUTDOOR PATIOS WILL REQUIRE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. WHEN THEY ARE FULLY DESIGNED. THE SITE WILL HAVE ACCESS OFF OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. FULL ACCESS. AND WRITE AND WRITE OUT ACCESS OFF OF COLUMBUS STREET. THE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THAT THE SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. MEDIAN WILL BE MODIFIED AND REMOVED TO ALLOW FOR THE FULL ACCESS AT THEIR EXPENSE. THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL HAVE SECTIONS OF FLAT AND GABLE ROOF LINES. THE EXTERIOR FACADE WILL CONSIST OF BRICK VERTICAL BOARD AND BATTEN, SIDING, WINDOWS AND STOREFRONT. PRIMARY COLORS WILL CONSIST OF TAN BROWN CYPRUS. AND ALABASTER.THE BUILDING. THE BUILDING SITE WILL BE LANDSCAPED WITH A VARIETY OF TREES, SHRUBS AND OTHER PLANTINGS. A NUMBER OF MODIFICATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZONING TEXT REVIEW APART. TREES ALONG SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE 2.5 INCH INCH CALIPER HEDGES ALONG THE SOUTHWEST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE THREE FT. IN HEIGHT WHEN INSTALLED. AND A CONTINUOUS SCREENING OF 80% WILL BE REQUIRED. ALONG THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS. DUMPSTER SCREENING WILL BE REQUIRED ALONG THREE SIDES PER SECTION 11, 36 08 AND IRRIGATION PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED FOR 75 TO 100% OF THE PROPERTY. AND ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE STRUCTURE. UPON HIS PROPOSED IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER NEAR THE SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND COLUMBUS STREET INTERSECTIONS.
THE CLIENT WILL HAVE A COMBINATION OF TREES, SHRUBS AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES AS WELL AS STONE OUTCROPPING AND ENHANCE SHORELINE PROTECTION THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A CHAIR.
ONE POD FOR GROVE CITY STORMWATER DESIGN DESIGNED MANUAL SEATING AREA WILL BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE POND. DUE TO THE LOCATION OF THE POND. A REINFORCED FENCE WILL BE REQUIRED BETWEEN THE POND AND THE DRIVE. I'LL PER GROVE CITY STANDARD DRAWINGS. A NUMBER OF DEVIATIONS ARE REQUESTED TO THE STORMWATER DESIGN MANDO FOR THE POND. FIRST IS THE REQUEST TO REMOVE THE WALKWAY AROUND THE POND. THE NEXT DEVIATION IS TO THE DEPTH REQUIREMENT TO REDUCE
[00:05:02]
THE MINIMUM DEPTH FROM 10 FT TO EIGHT FT. AND THE FINAL DEVIATION IS TO THE SLOPE OF THE POND STAFF BELIEVES THAT THESE DEVIATIONS WILL HELP CREATE A MORE AESTHETIC DESIGN COMMERCIAL AREA AND AS A BACKGROUND. FOR THE ENTRANCE FEATURE TO THE LARGER BUELLER PARK SUBDIVISION.THE EU DE ANALYSIS, UM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS. AS WELL AS THE GROWTH CITY 2050 ANALYSIS FOR PROJECT MEETS ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS. AFTER REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION. THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS PLANNING COMMISSION MAKER RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH THE FALLING NINE STIPULATIONS. HAVE YOU HAD A MOMENT TO REVIEW THE NINE STIPULATIONS WE HAVE. MAY WE ADD A FEW POINTS AND HIGHLIGHTS ABOUT THIS PROJECT LUTELY GREAT THE DEVELOPERS VERY EXCITED TO PRESENT THE SHOPS THAT VIOLA THIS IS THE FIRST RETAIL COMMERCIAL SITE THEIR SUB AREA, A IT'S THE RED PIECE, THE 12 ACRES THAT IS AT THE COLUMBUS STREET AND THEN I THINK THAT'S TREATY OVER THERE. I DON'T KNOW THE NAME OF THAT STREET BUT THE 12 ACRES. THIS IS A PORTION OF THAT WESTERN OR I'M SORRY, EASTERNMOST PART OF THE 12 ACRES. THERE WILL BE AT LEAST FOUR DIFFERENT GENERAL RETAIL TENANT SPACES AND RESTAURANTS.
THERE WILL BE A PATIO OUT FRONT ALONG THE INTERSECTION OF COLUMBUS STREET AND SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. AND THEN I'LL VERY LARGE PATIO. IN THE BACK THAT'S ENCLOSED WITH WITHIN THE BUILDINGS L SHAPE THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE IS APPROXIMATELY 15,132 SQUARE FEET. THERE WILL BE THE FIRST FULL CURB CUT ACCESS OFF OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD THAT WILL BE SHARED WITH THE LOT TO THE WEST WHEN THAT LOT IS SPLIT OFF. THERE ARE ALSO BE AN ACCESS POINT TO AND FROM COLUMBUS STREET WITH A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM COLUMBUS STREET AND ACROSS WALK INTO THE BUILDING SIDEWALKS AND THE BUILDING PATIO SURROUNDING THE BUILDING. THE SITE WILL BE LANDSCAPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND WE ACTUALLY HAVE ALREADY UPDATED THAT PLAN TO MATCH THE LANDSCAPING STANDARDS THAT STAFF HAS RAISED WITH US AS PART OF THE LANDSCAPING STIPULATIONS. THERE WILL BE A WHITE OPAQUE FENCE INSTALLED ALONG THE STUFF . SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE OF SUB AREA EIGHT, A BUFFER IN SCREEN THE RESIDENTIAL USES AND LOTS TO THE SOUTH. THE BUILDING'S ARCHITECTURE IS HIGH QUALITY MATERIALS, AND YOU DIDN'T MODERN COLORS THAT ARE REALLY BEAUTIFUL AND MATCH THE CHARACTER OF THE BUDDHA PARK DEVELOPMENT. WITH THE MOST PROMINENT FACADE VIEWED IN FRONT OF YOU ON THE SCREEN THAT WILL BE FACING COLUMBUS STREET THAT IS THE MOST PROMINENT OF THE STREETS FOR THE ENTRANCE FEATURE. WE WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THE NUMBERS STIPULATION NUMBER NINE RELATED TO IRRIGATION. THAT IS THE FINAL STIPULATION RAISED ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM STAFF. THE ZONING TEXT, WHICH WAS ADOPTED IN 2018 IS THE SET OF ZONING REGULATIONS FOR BILL O PARK, INCLUDING SIBERIA A AND APPLICABLE TO THE SHOPS AT PULA. THE PROPERTY IS OWNED P U. D C AND THAT IS ALSO AGAIN PART OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENT. THE ZONING TEXT PREVAILS IN THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE ZONING CODE AND THE ZONING TEXT. IN THE SUNNI TEXT PROVIDES THAT ENTRANCE FEATURES AND SIGNAGE MUST BE IRRIGATED, AND THAT IS NOT AN ISSUE WILL DO THAT. UM, STUFF STIPULATION AT NINE, THOUGH, REGARDING 75% TO 100% OF THE PROPERTY BEING IRRIGATED. IT DOESN'T MENTION GREEN SPACE. IT JUST SAYS PROPERTY, AND THAT'S A PRETTY ONEROUS STANDARD WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE PROPERTY ITSELF. UM THAT ACTUAL SECTION IS PULLED FROM ZONING CODE SECTION 11 36 POINT. OH, 982 FOR RETAIL, COMMERCIAL AND SHOPPING CENTER USE DISTRICTS. NOW, EVEN THOUGH WE'RE RETAIL AND SHOPPING CENTER USE THAT IS NOT ARIZONA CLASSIFICATION. WE ARE ZONED UDC. IN IN THE P U. D DISTRICT OF THE ZONING CODE THAT IS UNDER SECTION 11 36 9, A ONE FOR A P U D DISTRICTS, WHICH JUST STATES LIGHTING AND IRRIGATION SHOULD BE INCLUDED. AND WE HAVE IRRIGATED THE SITE. WE ARE IRRIGATING ALL OF THE FRONTAGE AREAS. ALONG SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD , SO IT DOESN'T QUITE MEET THE 75% TO 100% WE DO THINK THAT'S AN ONEROUS STANDARD THAT DOES NOT APPLY TO OUR PROPERTY AND, OF COURSE, THE ZONING TEXT IS THE REGULATING TEXT FOR THE PROPERTY. UM WE WOULD LIKE TO REMOVE THAT STIPULATION, IF YOU WOULD BE SO IF YOU COULD CONSIDER THAT AND WE DON'T THINK THAT PROVISION APPLIES ANYWAY. SO THAT IS OUR FIRST REQUESTS RELATED TO STIPULATION NINE. I
[00:10:06]
ALSO WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST AN ADDITIONAL STIPULATION. IF YOU COULD CONSIDER ON THIS WOULD BE NUMBER 10. I CAN READ THIS INTO THE RECORD, BUT I ALSO HAVE PROVIDED IT TO STOP IN WRITING.IN CASE YOU WANT TO SEE IT IN WRITING, AND I ALSO HAVE IT IN FRONT OF ME THAT I CAN PASS OUT TO EACH OF YOU. BUT IT WOULD BE REGARDING THE COLUMBUS STREET ACCESS. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE FOLLOWING APPLICANTS SHALL SUBMIT TRAFFIC ACCESS SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION PROVIDING FOR A PROPOSED FULL CURB CUT ACCESS POINT TO AND FROM THE WESTERN PORTION OF SIBERIA A FOR THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING THE SHOPS THAT VIOLA TO AND FROM COLUMBUS STREET FOR THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND CITY SERVICES DIRECTOR AND ENGINEERING REVIEW PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN. IF THE CITY DEPARTMENTS DO NOT APPROVE OF THE FULL CURB CUT ACCESS POINT, AS DESCRIBED HERE IN BASED ON THE TRAFFIC ACCESS SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED AND SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT. THEN THE SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED BASED ON A RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT CURB CUT ACCESS, AS SHOWN. UM SO WE HAVE SHOWN ON OUR PLANS ARE RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT. THAT IS BEFORE YOU BUT WE HAVE MADE THAT MISTAKE. WE BELIEVE IT IS JUSTIFIED AND WARRANTED THAT THE CURB CUT ACCESS BE PROVIDED HERE. AND WE WILL PROVIDE THAT DOCUMENTATION . UM YOU KNOW, AFTER THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND HOPEFULLY AFTER THIS RECOMMENDATION BEFORE IT IS ENGINEERED AND APPROVED THROUGH THE SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND IF IT IS JUSTIFIED BY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, UM EXPERTS AND DOCUMENTATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THAT DONE AS A OBVIOUSLY AS A MODIFICATION AT THE SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROCESS TIME. SO THAT IS OUR REQUEST. WE DO BELIEVE IT'S MINOR, NOT MAJOR. HERE'S WHY. THAT ACCESS POINT WOULD NOT AFFECT. LET ME SHOW YOU THE SITE PLAN. OKAY? SO IT'S SHOWN AS A RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT. THAT CHANGE IS MINOR BECAUSE THE ACCESS IN THE DR ISLES AND THE PARKING WILL THE PARKING THE DR ISLES, THE LANDSCAPING THE BUILDING CONFIGURATIONS AND LAY OUT THE LANDSCAPING? THE POND? NONE OF THAT WOULD CHANGE. SO YOU ARE SEEING THE ENTIRE PACKAGE BEFORE YOU FOR THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. IN THE ACCESS IS JUST THE PORTION THE APRON RIGHT THERE AT COLUMBUS STREET. WE DO BELIEVE IT'S MINOR. WE BELIEVE IT'S AN ENGINEERING ISSUE AND THAT IT CAN WAIT UNTIL SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN. AND WE HOPE YOU AGREE. WE ALSO WOULD AGREE TO BREAK THE MEDIAN AT THE COLUMBUS STREET INTERSECTION THERE TO ACCOMMODATE THE FULL CURB CUT, WE THINK ALSO IN TALKING WITH OUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER. WHO IS PRELIMINARILY GETTING INVOLVED WITH THE STUDY ON THIS THAT IF IT WOULD WORK TO REMAIN A RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT, YOU WOULD SEE TRAFFIC. TURNING RIGHT GOING DOWN THE ROWS. I THINK IT'S AVENUE ROSE AVENUE AND, UH GO THROUGH THE RESIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THE PARK AND THEN HEAD NORTH TO SOUTH WEST BOULEVARD. SO THAT IS THE JUSTIFICATION FOR IT. WE ALSO BELIEVE THAT IS OUR PROMINENT ROAD ENTRANCE INTO THE SHOPS THAT BELA AND IT SHOULD BE A FULL CURVED CUT. UM SO THAT IS OUR REQUEST. WE'RE HOPEFUL THAT YOU COULD CONSIDER THE CHANGES TO STIPULATION NINE. IN THE ADDITION OF STIPULATION, 10 WE ARE HERE WITH HER FULL TEAM IN THE DEVELOPER TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. YEAH AND IF WE COULD GET A COPY OF THE YEAH, THE NUMBER 10. LANGUAGE. MY NAME IS PAT KELLY. I'M THE MANAGING PARTNER OF THE OWNERSHIP ENTITY, BP RETAIL OZY AND ALSO DEVELOPER OF BEAUTIFUL PARKS. I ALSO WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU ALL FOR HOLDING A SPECIAL MEETING. I WONDER LITTLE CONTEXT TO THE COLUMBUS STREET.
FOR ACCESS CURVE CUT. COLUMBUS STREET AND SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. NO SIGNAL. I AND SO. THAT'S A IMPORTANT CRITERIA AND ACT ACCESSIBILITY TO RETAILS CRITICAL, ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL.
AND SO WITH THAT CURB CUT YOU HAVE A GREAT TRAFFIC PATTERN THAT ENTAILS. ALLOWS PATRONS TO EXIT AND YOU LIES. THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL. SO THAT THAT'S A VERY IMPORTANT AND, AS REBECCA SAID, MY FEAR IS THEY TURN RIGHT. THEY'RE GONNA TURN RIGHT ON ROSE LANE, AND THEY'RE GOING TO TURN
[00:15:02]
RIGHT ON CASSIDY AVENUE. AND THOSE ARE BOTH RESIDENTIAL. STREETS, AND IT WOULD BE VERY BAD FOR THE CITY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT BEING FUELED PART SO I JUST WANTED TO ADD THAT LITTLE BATH PANEL ALSO TO MENTION THAT OUR ARCHITECT IS HERE FOR ARCHITECTS HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ON THE BUILDING. WHICH IS DESIGNED AS FORESIGHTED ARCHITECTURE. AND WE HAVE OUR SITE ENGINEER HERE AS WELL. THE POND THAT YOU SEE AT THE CORNER. WAS RELOCATED. AT THE REQUEST OF STAFF. BECAUSE OF THE PA GRAFFITI ALL FLOWS THAT WAY SO IT'S NOT NECESSARILY OUR STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE TO HAVE THE POND RIGHT AT THAT SIGNIFICANT INTERSECTION. BUT I THINK IT CAN WORK AS AN AMENITY. BEEN WELDED ESCAPED, AND, UM. AND WORK WELL , WITH THE WITH THE DRAINAGE JUST WELL, SO I JUST WANTED TO ADD THAT AND WE'RE ALL HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU.I'M CURIOUS IF THE CITY HAS ANY COMMENTS BEFORE WE ASK FOR QUESTIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. I COULD PROVIDE A RESPONSE TO THE DISCUSSION ON THE TWO STIPULATION MODIFICATIONS. MS MARTIN, I HAVE DISCUSSED BOTH OF THEM PRIOR TO THIS MEETING REGARDING THE IRRIGATION STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE STIPULATION SHOULD STAND. THE ZONING TEXT STATES THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING CODE SHALL APPLY ONLY TO THE EXTENT NOT OTHERWISE ADDRESSED IN THE ZONING TEXT AND NOWHERE IN THE ZONING TEXT. DOES IT SAY THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE TO PROVIDE LANDSCAPING AND ONLY AT THOSE, UM, ENTRANCE FEATURES. THERE'S NOTHING THAT SAYS IT'S REDUCED OR WHATNOT FOR THE REST OF THE SITE. THE OTHER ITEM REGARDING THAT IS THE NOTE THAT, UM, THE OHIO HEALTH DEVELOPMENT ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLUMBUS STREET WITH INDIA PARKS ARE VERY A ALSO DID COMPLY WITH THAT ZONING REGULATIONS. SO THIS WOULD BE JUST TREATING THIS DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENTLY WITH HOW WE HAD TREATED THE OTHER SO VERY A DEVELOPMENT. REGARDING THE RIGHT AND RIGHT OUT ACCESS. UM STAFF HAS ALSO DISCUSSED THIS WITH THE APPLICANT DUE TO THE TIMING OF THIS REQUEST, AND I KNOW IT. IT'S BEEN ADDRESSED AND PRESENTED AS A MINOR MODIFICATION, BUT STAFF BELIEVES THERE ARE LARGER IMPLICATIONS TO THIS MODIFICATION. THE MEDIAN AH! THE AMENDMENT TO THE MEDIAN WOULD ESSENTIALLY BE AN AMENDMENT TO AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BEAUTIFUL PARK ROADWAY PHASE ONE, WHICH STAFF DOES NOT BELIEVE WE SHOULD HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO APPROVE THAT THROUGH THE SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROCESS THAT IS MORE OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL FOR A CONSTRUCTION LEVEL DOCUMENT AND THIS MODIFICATION WOULD ESSENTIALLY BE AN AMENDMENT TO AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL. SO, UM WE ARE NOT COMFORTABLE PROCEEDING WITH THAT STIPULATION, AS PROPOSED, OUR RESPONSE WOULD BE TO BASICALLY WAIT ON THAT ITEM AND THEN GIVE US TIME TO REVIEW WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED. WE CAN LOOK AT IT IN TERMS OF A DRIVEWAY SPACING TO ENSURE THAT IT IS SAFE TO HAVE FULL ACCESS AT THAT POINT. UM AND THAT COULD BE HANDLED THROUGH A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE GENERALLY, STAFF IS VERY SUPPORTIVE OF THIS PROJECT. WE THINK IT WILL BE A VERY NICE ADDITION TO THE COMMUNITY. WE'RE EXCITED ABOUT IT, BUT WE'RE JUST NOT COMFORTABLE PROCEEDING WITH A MODIFICATION TO THAT ACCESS POINT AT THIS TIME. ME ADDRESS.
OH SORRY. CAN YOU BE CLEAR? THEN IS IT THE TECHNICALITIES OF WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY IN THIS PLACE THAT HAS YOUR CONCERNED WHERE DO YOU HAVE A LEGITIMATE CONCERN WITH THIS? THE SPACING OF THAT THAT FULL INTERSECTION, I WOULD SAY BOTH JUST BECAUSE TYPICALLY , THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD REVIEW AS PART OF THE REVIEW PROCESS. OUR ENGINEERS WOULD LOOK AT IT. YOU KNOW AGAIN FROM A TECHNICAL DISTANCE STANDPOINT, ALSO THE CHARACTER OF IT OF REMOVING THAT MEDIA.
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN TO THE ENTRANCE OF ULA PARK AND JUST BECAUSE WE HAVE NOT REALLY HAD TIME TO CONSIDER ALL OF THOSE ASPECTS IN ADDITION TO THE MORE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS SIDE OF IT IS WHY WE'RE NOT COMFORTABLE PROCEEDING. ME. I ADDRESS THOSE POINTS FOR SPICE STAFF. UM, RELATED TO THE IRRIGATION. THE ZONING CODE SECTION THAT STAFF IS RELYING ON THAT'S YOUR NUMBER. 9 75% TO 100% OF THE PROPERTY TO BE IRRIGATED THAT IS ACTUALLY FOUND IN A SECTION OF YOUR CODE THAT'S RELATED TO RETAIL USES SHOPPING CENTER USES THAT ARE ZONED FOR A STREET RETAIL COMMERCIAL LIKE A C TWO, FOR EXAMPLE. THAT'S A STREET ZONING CLASSIFICATION, WHICH WE ARE NOT. WE ARE A PURE D AND UNDER THE CODE, EVEN THE PUY DE SECTION THAT I DID CITE TWO HAS A DEFINITE REQUIREMENT FOR IRRIGATION. IT SAYS LIGHTING AND IRRIGATION SHALL BE PROVIDED,
[00:20:04]
BUT IT'S MORE GENERAL IN OUR ZONING TEXT ACTUALLY TRUMPS THE CODE, EVEN IN THE TEXT SAYS THAT WE NEED TO IRRIGATE ALL ENTRANCE FEATURES AND SIGNAGE WITHIN BULLA PARK, WHICH WE ARE GOING TO DO. NO QUESTION IN HALF. AND WITH RELATES AS IT RELATES TO SHOPS THAT BULLA WE ARE IRRIGATING THE ENTIRE FRONTAGE OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND IT'S A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF IRRIGATION AND IT EXCEEDS THE ZONING TEXT. AND WE THINK THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED, AND IT EXCEEDS THE ZONING CODES STANDARDS SO WE'RE MEETING YOUR ZONING TEXT AND EXCEEDING BOTH THE CODE AND TEXT. WE DON'T THINK THE PROVISION THAT THEY'RE RAISING APPLIES TO THIS PROPERTY. YES, SIR. CLARIFIED. YOU'RE SAYING CAN NOT MEETING THE COMMERCIAL. CORRECT. CORRECT TALKING ABOUT A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORRECT. SO A NORMAL PERSON LOOKING AT THIS MIGHT EXPECT THAT WE WOULD MEET THE COMMERCIAL CODE, REGARDLESS OF WHICH SECTION TRUMP'S, WHICH SECTION WE THE CODE ADDRESSES P . U. D S ZONE PROPERTIES DIFFERENTLY THAN RETAIL, COMMERCIAL AND SHOPPING CENTER. DISTRICTS AND SO IT'S THE SHOPPING CENTER AND THE COMMERCIAL ZONED PROPERTIES THAT HAVE TO COMPLY. BUT IT'S THE PUY DE ZONE PROPERTIES THAT JUST HAVING MORE GENERAL STANDARD. LIGHTING AND IRRIGATION SHALL BE PROVIDED. THAT'S WHAT WE ARE APPEALING DC EVEN THOUGH OUR USE IS RETAIL. WE ARE ZONED BEAUTY. SO THAT IS THE CORRECT LEGAL INTERPRETATION OF THE CODE IN TERMS OF WHICH ONE APPLIES. RELATED TO THE ROADWAYS. WE AGREE WITH STAFF, THERE IS ALREADY AN APPROVED ROADWAYS. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PARK THAT WILL NEED TO BE AMENDED. WE AGREED SO THAT WOULD HAVE TO FOLLOW IF WE CHANGE THIS ACCESS POINT TO COLUMBUS STREET, WE WILL HAVE TO FILE THAT IN THE FUTURE. WE'RE NOT TRYING TO GET AWAY WITH NOT FILING WHAT IS REQUIRED TO BE AMENDED. WE WILL AMEND THAT AND YOU'VE HEARD US.WE'RE GOING TO GIVE THE STAFF YOUR ENGINEER AT THE CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. ANYONE THAT WANTS TO SEE CITY SERVICES DIRECTOR BE TRAFFIC ENGINEERS STUDY AND SUPPORTS FOR THIS NEW ACCESS CHANGE. WE DO BELIEVE IT'S NOT AFFECTING AT ALL THE PROPERTY THE SITE AS YOU SEE IT ON THE PLANS. IT WILL AFFECT THE MEDIA. IT WILL AFFECT TRAFFIC. IT MIGHT INVOLVE US SPENDING MORE MONEY TO IMPROVE THE ACTUAL COLUMBUS STREET WITH TURNING LANE IMPROVEMENTS IF WARRANTED.
SO WE'RE RAISING SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY COULD COST US MORE MONEY AND FOR SURE, IT'S GOING TO COST US MONEY TO BREAK YOUR MEDIAN AND REPLACE IT AND IMPROVE IT. SO UM, AGAIN, IT COULD CAUSE A TURN LANE. ISSUED TO BE IMPROVED, WHICH IS ON OUR DIME, AND WE WANT IT TO BE CORRECT AND RIGHT, AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE ASKING FOR THAT TO BE, UM YOU KNOW SOMETHING THAT WE CAN HANDLE THROUGH THE ENGINEERING PROCESS. AFTER THIS MATTER IS HEARD THROUGH BOTH PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL AND JUST BE PART OF ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BY ALL OF YOUR CITY DEPARTMENTS, AND IT CAN'T HAPPEN UNLESS EVERYONE AGREES. AND APPROVES. WE'RE CONFIDENT WE CAN GET THERE WITH THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERS IN YOUR STUFF, AND WE'LL WORK WITH THEM AS WE ALWAYS DO. ASKING QUESTIONS. IS THE WORD TURN LEG? YES PROPOSING ONE RIGHT IN AND A STRAIGHT OR LEFT OUT AND THE RIGHT OUT. WHERE ARE YOU PROPOSING? JUST TWO LANES. I WAS SUGGESTING FULL CURB CUTS. SO, UM RIGHT IN AND THEN I THINK IT'S A LEFT AND RIGHT. LEFT AND RIGHT OUT. I THINK I DON'T KNOW FOR SURE WHAT EXACTLY IT WOULD ENTAIL, BUT IN ONE OUT FROM BASICALLY THE FACADE OF THE BUILDING ALL THE WAY TO THE STREET. SO MY CONCERN WOULD BE THAT THAT INTERSECTION IS VERY CLOSE. TO SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. IT IS LIKELY TO BACK UP AND STACK AND IF IT DOES, THEN PEOPLE WON'T BE ABLE TO GET OUT TO THE RIGHT EITHER, RIGHT? THAT'S WHY WE HAVE SUGGESTED WE MAY HAVE TO PUT IN SOME TURN LANES, SO SAY THE MEDIAN IS REMOVED IN A LEFT TURN LANE. TO TURN LEFT ON THE SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD IS NEEDED IN JUSTIFIED . WE WILL PROVIDE THAT IF THAT'S WARRANTED UNDER THE TRAFFIC ACCESS STUDY FOR THIS, WE WOULD PROVIDE IT AND WHATEVER IS GOING TO BE NEEDED, WE WOULD PROVIDE IT BECAUSE THIS IS THE MAIN ENTRANCE INTO SHOPS THAT BOOLA AND WE BELIEVE IT NEEDS TO BE FULL CURB CUT AND THAT AVOIDS THAT TRAFFIC RUNNING THROUGH RIGHT IN AND THEN RIGHT BACK IN INTO THE RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT OF ULA. ADDING UNNECESSARY TRAFFIC THROUGH THE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION THAT THOSE PEOPLE WHO PURCHASED LOTS MAY NOT HAVE EXPECTED. WE WILL NOT DO ANYTHING WITHOUT THE CITY'S APPROVAL AND THEIR ENGINEERING APPROVAL OF THE TRAFFIC ACCESS, AND IT WILL MAY REQUIRE TURNING LANE IMPROVEMENTS. THAT'S AVOID STACKING. WE WILL ALSO NOT CREATE AN UNSAFE CONDITION AND
[00:25:02]
THEY'LL LOOK AT THE ALIGNMENTS OF THE EXISTING INTERSECTION IN THE DISTANCE BETWEEN ANY OTHER CURB CUTS SOUTH IN THE LET US KNOW IF IT'S SAFE, OR DOES IT POSE A CONDITION OR PROBLEM HERE? LET US KNOW. AND IF IT DOES, WE JUST REVERT BACK TO THIS PLAN HAS SHOWN TO YOU ACCORDING TO THE LANGUAGE I PROVIDED IN THE STIPULATION SO WE WOULD BE BOUND TO EITHER PROVIDE THIS AS SHOWN. OR WE ADJUST THAT FOR CURB CUT. THAT'S IT. THOSE ARE THE ONLY TWO ALTERNATIVES. THERE'S NO SURPRISES. BASKET. QUESTION OF LEGAL. DO YOU HAVE ANY GUIDANCE FOR HOW ADDING AMENDMENT 10. WOULD IMPACT THE OTHER DEVELOPMENT PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN PASSED. NO I MEAN, I THINK MY SMART WAS CORRECT TO SAY THAT SHE'LL HAVE TO COME BACK.PRESUMING SHE'S REPRESENTATIVE ON THE ON THE OTHER PLAN WILL HAVE TO COME BACK FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THAT. BECAUSE PASSING THIS STIPULATION WOULD EFFECT CHANGE THAT FINAL. UM AND I THINK FRANKLY, STAFF POINT OF VIEW ON THIS IS THAT PRES. I'LL THINK SHE MISCHARACTERIZED ANYTHING. THE EFFECT OF IT IS THE SAME THAT EITHER IT STAYS WITH AS IT IS NOW, IF THE ENGINEERS AGREE WITH IT AND THINK IT'S SAFE. OR THEY GET TO DO IT. I JUST THINK THE LATE HOUR OF IT STAFF IS SAYING ESSENTIALLY THINK THEY JUST HAVE TO COME BACK WITH AMENDMENT PLAN ANYWAY FOR THE OTHER FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DON'T THEY JUST AMENDED AT THE SAME TIME, PRESUMING THE ENGINEER AGREES. WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO ADDRESS THAT LAST POINT BECAUSE THAT SOUNDED PRETTY REASONABLE. IF WE WERE TO JUST GO FORWARD WITH THIS PLAN, AS IS AND ALSO GO TO CITY COUNCIL HEARING WITH THIS PLAN, AS IS WITHOUT THE STIPULATION. AND I THINK THAT WE'RE GOING TO NOW FILE RIGHT AFTERWARDS AND AMENDED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. WE'RE SPENDING A LOT MORE MONEY, AND WE CAN'T RELY UPON THE PLAN UNTIL IT'S COMPLETE. WE CAN'T GET TENANTS TO SECURE CONTRACTS FOR THE PROPERTY AND THE TENANT SPACES. IT WILL HAVE A HUGE IMPACT ON COST AND TIME AND SCHEDULE DELAYS. WE ARE CLIENT HAS WORKED EXTENSIVELY ON THIS PROJECT INTERNALLY AND WITH THE CITY AND THROUGH MODIFICATIONS OVER TIME SO MUCH THAT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT STANDPOINT IN THE SCHEDULE EVEN THOUGH THAT THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF EFFORT BACK AND FORTH WITH STAFF AND DEVELOPER IS GOING TO CAUSE IT MORE DELIGHT, MORE DELAY AND MORE, UM, SCHEDULED PROBLEM FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR RELIANCE ON PLANS FOR TENANTS, CONTRACTS, MANY, MANY THINGS FINANCING. SO FOR THAT REASON WE WOULD NOT WANT TO GO THROUGH THAT STEP. WE FIND THAT TO BE AN UNNECESSARY COST BURDEN. IF I MAY ADD, IT'S MORE THAN JUST THE COST. IT'S REALLY TIME. WE STARTED THIS PROCESS. PROBABLY 16 MONTHS AGO, WE CAME IN WITH A FULL PERMITS THAT ARE PLANS.
THAT SHOWED THIS CURB CUT FULL ACCESS ON COLUMBUS STREET. SO IT'S NOT SOMETHING NEW WERE THROWN ON YOU UNTIL LAST MINUTE. I DISCUSSED IT WITH THE SERVICE DEEPEN WITH CHUCK THOSE SO AND WE TALKED ABOUT STACKING AT SOME OF THOSE ISSUES. RECOGNIZING IT HAS TO BE APPROVED BY YOUR ENGINEER. AND IF IT DOESN'T WORK, IT DOESN'T WORK. BUT. WE TOTALLY SHIFTED GEARS TO COME UP WITH A PLAN BEFORE YOU TODAY THAT'S VERY ATTRACTIVE. THAT FITS IN WELL WITH THE VILLA PARK , THE ORIENTATIONS ALONG COLUMBUS STREET. AND IT. IT BRINGS PEOPLE INTO BUELL APART THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT BUT ALSO LOOKS NICE FROM SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. KEEP IN MIND. WE HAVE INDUSTRIAL THAT'S ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD SO WE'VE WORKED VERY HARD TO GET THIS PLAN WHERE IT'S AT. IF ANYONE'S TO BLAME FOR THIS UNIT TO LAST MINUTE, IT'S ME BECAUSE OVERSIGHT I THOUGHT WE WERE STILL UNDER THE OLD PLANE OF THE FULL. CURB CUT THAT WOULD UTILIZE THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL, WHICH MAKES PERFECT SENSE. SO THAT'S THE REASON WE'RE ASKING FOR SOMETHING THAT'S MAYBE A LITTLE. BEYOND THE NORM, BUT CERTAINLY WITHIN THE LEGAL ABOUT THANK YOU. WANT TO MAKE A COMMENT. SO IT IS RATHER LAST MINUTE, UM, FOR US TO BE TAKING IN THIS INFORMATION, AND THERE IS A LOT OF CHANGES THAT I WOULDN'T WOULD COME WITH IT OBVIOUSLY. UM. JUST THINKING KIND OF TRYING TO THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX, RIGHT? ONE OF ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT COMES TO MIND IS WE COULD POSTPONE THIS AND THEN YOU KNOW, THAT COULD BE ADDED, AND WE COULD LOOK AT IT AGAIN. UM ANOTHER ITEM AND I DON'T KNOW. I JUST, YOU KNOW, KIND OF TABLE THIS AND KIND OF ASKING THE CITY BUT YOU KNOW, WE COULD LOOK AT IT FOR THIS, YOU KNOW?
[00:30:06]
WHAT WE HAVE HERE IN FRONT OF US AND THEN PERHAPS I DON'T KNOW IF THIS COULD BE REDONE IN TIME FOR CITY COUNCIL. WITH YOUR, YOU KNOW. YOU KNOW YOUR CHANGES COULD BE VIEWED AND HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE INFORMATION. UM YES. IF I COULD. I MEAN, OUR GOAL IS NOT TO DELAY THE PROJECT. WE CERTAINLY RESPECT THE TIMELINE OF THE DEVELOPER AND WE WANT TO SEE THIS PROJECT BE DEVELOPED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME LINE. THAT WAS WHY OUR SUGGESTION WAS TO PROCEED WITH THIS PLAN SO THAT PERMITS COULD START TO BE REVIEWED AND WHATNOT, UM, TO PREVENT DELAY.BUT THEN TO ALLOW US AS STAFF TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE TIME TO PROPERLY REVIEW WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED. I DON'T I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK OUT OF HER, BUT I DON'T SEE, UM COST BURDEN IN TERMS OF THIS REQUEST, BECAUSE WE WOULD ESSENTIALLY BE REVIEWING WHAT YOU HAD ALREADY STATED. YOU WOULD BE PROPOSING OR SUBMITTING AS PART OF THE STIPULATION THAT'S DRAFTED. IN TERMS OF THE ACCESS STUDY AND THOSE MATERIALS , SO WE WERE CERTAINLY WILLING TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT IN TERMS OF YOU KNOW WHAT? WHAT SPECIFICALLY WOULD BE REQUIRED. WE WOULDN'T NEED TO SEE LANDSCAPING, A LOT OF THE OTHER THINGS THAT ARE GENERALLY REQUIRED AS PART OF AN AMENDMENT BECAUSE THE ONLY THING THAT WE WOULD BE REVIEWING AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT WOULD BE THE ACCESS SO, ESSENTIALLY WHAT WE'LL BE REVIEWING IS WHAT YOU HAVE ALREADY STATED. YOU WOULD BE SUBMITTING AS PART OF THE STIPULATION. SO AGAIN, WE WANT TO SHOW OUR GOOD FAITH OF THE KEEPING THIS PROJECT MOVING FORWARD BY ACTING ON IT TODAY BUT ALSO GIVING THE CITY THE DUE TIME TO PROPERLY REVIEW THIS REQUEST TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT UM, APPROVING SOMETHING THAT IS NOT WHAT'S IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CITY. MAY I ASK A QUESTION ABOUT PROCEDURE, AND I DON'T KNOW IF IT GOES TO THE BORDER OR TO STUFF, BUT, UM SAY IT'S NOT AN AMENDED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, BUT MORE OF A REVISED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND WE JUST PROVIDE THE SHEETS THAT ARE AFFECTED BY A FULL CURB CUT ACCESS. NO PAYMENT OF ANOTHER FEE. I'M NOT HAVING TO PROVIDE ALL OF THE PLANNED SHEETS FOR A FINAL. IS THAT OKAY? JUST IT'S A REVISED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND IT CAN STILL MARCH ON TWO JUNE SIX CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND WE HAVE A COUPLE OF WEEKS. TO IRON OUT THE REVISED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
I THINK WE WOULD BE CERTAINLY WILLING TO WORK IN TERMS OF THE FEE PAYMENT. TO BE REASONABLE ON THE TIMELINE MAKES ME A LITTLE NERVOUS TO KEEP IT ON SCHEDULE FOR COUNCIL FOR THIS AMENDMENT BECAUSE THEN IT DOESN'T GIVE PLANNING COMMISSION THE CHANCE TO ACT AND REVIEW IT AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL. WHICH IS GENERALLY THE PROCESS BY WHICH A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT WOULD FOLLOW. THAT'S NOT TO SAY I THINK WE COULD PROBABLY GET IT ON FOR THE REGULAR JUNE PLANNING COMMISSION, WHICH WOULD ONLY FOLLOW TWO WEEKS AFTER THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN WOULD GO FORWARD. SO THEN YOU WOULD BE COMING FORWARD WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AT THE FOLLOWING CITY COUNCIL MEETING. FOR JUST THOSE SHEETS.
MAY I HOLD A RECESS WITH OUR CLIENT IN THE HALLWAY AND COME RIGHT BACK? COULD ABSOLUTELY I'M SORRY, MR SURE COMMENTS BEFORE THE RECESS ABSOLUTELY WITH THEM IN THE PROCESS. OKAY? UH, THE SHOPS LOOK LIKE A GREAT ADDITION. TO THE DEVELOPMENT. I THINK IT'S A REAL BONUS. THE ONLY. THINGS THAT I THINK THE TRACKS IS IT'S A PROMINENT CORNER. OHIO HEALTH HAS MADE A SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENT. WE'RE TALKING MILLIONS AND MILLIONS I JUST HATE THE IDEA OF THE POND BEING OUT IN FRONT IN YOUR SHOTS PUSHED BACK. YOUR ORIGINAL PLAN THAT YOU BROUGHT FORTH. MADE ITS APPEARANCE BOOK ENDS AT THE ENTRANCE COMING OFF THE SOUTHWEST. I THINK BOUNCED REAL NICE. UH, I KNOW THE STORM WATER. RETAIN MINT WAS SOME CONCERNS OF MOVING THE POND THERE. BUT WHEN I LOOK AT THE TOPOGRAPHY ELEVATIONS ON THE SITE HAS DRAWN ON THIS EVEN WITH THE FIND OUT ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER. THE SITE REALLY ONLY BERRIES ABOUT TWO FT. FROM THE TOP ROOM AROUND THE PONDS, 1 58. YOUR NORTHWEST CORNERS 1 57, WHICH IS ACTUALLY LOWER THAN WHERE THE BOND IS. IN YOUR HIGH POINTS LIKE 1 58. PLUS SO YOU'VE GOT ABOUT THIS MUCH ELEVATION CHANGE. IN THIS DESIGN A COUPLE OF FEET PLUS OVER. THE DIAGONAL DIMENSION IS PROBABLY 400 PLUS FEET ACROSS THERE. TALKING TO SIZE OF SEVERAL FOOTBALL FIELDS. YOU KNOW POSITION TO MAKE THIS LARGE PERSON. SO I JUST. LOVE THE ORIGINAL PLAN, HAVING THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE SHOPS
[00:35:02]
PUSHED OUT TO BALANCE OHIO HEALTH. YEAH I REALLY THINK IT'S POSSIBLE. I'M NOT AN ENGINEER AT THIS POINT, BUT THE STORM WATER RETENTION. CAN EITHER BE MOVED. NORTHWEST AND SHARED WITH THE PERSONAL TO THE WEST. BECAUSE IN YOUR DETAIL, YOU TALK ABOUT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOR JOINING PROPERTIES, SO I HATE TO HAVE A SITUATION WHERE WE'RE DRAINING A PROPERTY. THAT'S FOOTBALL FIELD AND A HALF AWAY TO THE WEST, BRINGING IT ALL THE WAY ACROSS OR UNDER THIS SHOP DEVELOPMENT.TO GET THE PART. SO I JUST THINE TO PUT SOME RETENTION OR TAKE THE SIZE OF THE RETENTION AND ONLY MAKE IT MANAGE THIS SITE BECAUSE YOU'RE TALKING. I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH IS ENGINEERED FOR THE JOINING SITE TO THE WEST THAT YOU'RE GOING TO PAPER ALL THE WAY OVER TO THE EAST TO GO INTO A POND. IT'S ON THE MOST PROMINENT CORNER. IT JUST DOESN'T I DON'T SEE, THE REASONING IS. AND OR MAYBE EVEN SOME RETENTION UNDER A PARKING LOT AND REDUCE THE SIZE OF THE POND. MAKE THE PART OF FEATURE WHERE IT'S GOT TWO DIFFERENT ELEVATIONS. KIND OF. THERE'S A COUPLE OF PONDS AT THE PINNACLE. THE RELATIVE ACTIVE THAT HAVE WATER CONTINUALLY FLOWING. OVER A STEP IN THE POND JUST SOMETHING MORE ATTRACTIVE THAN ARE WET RETENTION POND RIGHT ON THE CORNER. SO I AGREE WITH YOU AND I DON'T LIKE I WOULD REALLY NOT HAVE UPON THERE, WHICH IS WHY WE LOOKED AT AND EVERY ALTERNATIVE. AND STAFF TOLD US THAT WE HAD TO PLAN FOR DETENTION FOR THIS SITE. AND A LIGHT KIND SITE, SO THAT'D BE 3.5 ACRES TO THE WEST. AND THAT'S THE REASON YOU HAVE THIS POND THERE. WE'VE LOOKED AT IT IN THE NORTHWEST. WE LOOKED AT IT IN THE SOUTHWEST. WE LOOKED AT EVERY ALTERNATIVE AND WE ARE LOSING WATER IN OUR PARKING LOT.
SO BELIEVE ME, SHARE YOUR GOAL IF WE COULD DO IT ELSEWHERE. YOU AND I ARE THE BIGGEST ADVOCATES OF THAT, BUT IT'S WE'VE JUST IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THIS WAS THE LOGICAL SPOT AND I'M ASSURED BY THE. THE LANDSCAPER AND THE ENGINEER THAT WE CAN MAKE THIS LOOK ATTRACTIVE. SO THAT'S NOT A UGLY LOOKING POND, BUT WE WILL EXPLORE THAT TO PETER. AND I THINK THAT'S A GREAT IDEA, MAYBE REDUCING THE SIZE TAKES CARE OF THIS RETENTION BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT WORKS. WHEN YOU HAVE TO PROPERTY OWNERS AND YOU SELL THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE WEST. BUT YOU'RE GUARANTEEING TO MANAGE ALL THEIR ROCKS ANNIE'S LIPS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTY OWNERS OR MORE, AND THEN WE'RE SHIPPING ALL THAT WATER TO THE MOST PROMINENT CORNER. THE ENTRANCE INTO THE WHOLE DEVELOP. SO I DON'T KNOW. SOME CREATIVE ENGINEER BEING THAT THERE'S ONLY TWO FOOTED DIFFERENCE ON THIS WHOLE SITE FROM THIS TOPOGRAPHY. CAN CREATE SOMETHING. I'M SURE. YES SEVERAL TIMES SO I CAN SPEAK TO WHAT? YOU GUYS ARE LOOKING AT THE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR TIME JEFF SHETLER WITH SITE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS. AND THE WAY WE LOOK AT FIRST WAS WAS TO THE WEST AND WE HAVE THE PAD THE BUILDING PAD MUCH HIGHER TO GET WATER TO DRAIN THAT DIRECTION AND THEN INTO THIS DREAM, ANOTHER ISSUE IS THE ELEVATION OF THE STREAM IS HIGHER THERE THAN IT IS DOWN AT THE EAST SIDE. THAT PLAYED INTO AS WELL.
SO ANOTHER COMMENT, UH, IN THE REVIEW PROCESS WAS, CAN YOU LOWER THE PAD TO BE MORE CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA? SO TO DO THAT? IT I COULDN'T GET IT TO FLOW TO THE TO THE LEFT. THAT'S WHY WE YOU KNOW, ALONG WITH THEIR IT'S REALLY THAT'S THE LOGICAL PLACE TO PUT IT, BECAUSE THAT'S THE WAY IT FLOWS. SO IS THERE ANY CHANCE TO LOWERING THE BOTTOM OF THE POND? WHICH IS GOING TO GIVE YOU MORE FALL IN YOUR DREAM IS COMING TO THAT. THE PROBLEM IS, YOU KNOW 10 4. THAT IS YOURS. JUST WARREN POINTS AND YOU REALLY DON'T HAVE A STORAGE. YOU KNOW ABOUT THAT, SO YOU CAN'T. I CAN'T GET INTO THAT STREAM AND THE LOWER THAN IT IS. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? YEAH BUT YOUR STORM OUTLET COULD PARALLEL SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND GO TO THE EAST UNTIL IT REACHES THE PROPER FOR THAT. THEY COULD DO THAT ACROSS THE PROPER ELEVATION TO EXIT.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO EXIT TO THE NORTH. RIGHT WHERE? THE MINISTER BECAUSE YOU'RE ALREADY TRUCKING THE WATER THROUGH PIPES THIS WAY YOU CAN TRUCK YOUR OUTLET. I MEAN, YOU HAVE TO BE LOWER THE PROPER ELEVATION. NOW HOW MUCH OF THAT POND WOULD BE NECESSARY JUST TO DRAIN THIS SITE TO HANDLE THE IT'S REALLY THE SAME DOUBLED, ESSENTIALLY CUT. KHAN COULD BE HALF THE SIZE. HAVE A NICE WATER FEATURE TO TEARS. CAN BE REDUCED INSIDE AND POSSIBLY PUSH. YOUR BUILDINGS BACK OVER TO MORE PROMINENT, GET SMALLER. I DON'T KNOW. TO MAKE SENSE THAT ON BEHALF OF THE SIDE THAT'S A
[00:40:06]
CONSIDERATION AND YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE EASEMENTS ON STRANGE AND YOU'RE NOT TRYING TO CALCULATE DRAINING SOMETHING THAT YOU HAVE NO IDEA OF WHAT THE REQUIREMENTS ARE LESS W. THAT'S JUST I JUST.THAT'S MY COMMENTS SENSE. I JUST THINK SOMETHING CAN BE DONE THIS QUITE ATTRACTIVE. BY REDUCING THAT SIZE OR MOVING OKAY, WE CAN . IF YOU DON'T MIND. COULD WE AGAIN RENEW THE REQUEST THEM ON IT FOR A COUPLE OF MINUTES. WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK. THANK YOU.
YOU HAVE A MINUTE. THANK YOU. SO MUCH FOR THE RECESS APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE TABLING OF THIS MATTER. AND COULD WE ASK FOR MORE OF YOUR COMMENTS, FEEDBACK OR QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ENTIRETY OF THE PROJECT SO WE CAN OBTAIN THAT FEEDBACK FOR THE NEXT MEETING? SO WHEN YOU'RE ASKING FOR A TABLE OF THIS MATTER, ARE YOU ASKING FOR THOSE TWO ITEMS THAT WERE BROUGHT UP THE, UM, NUMBER NINE AND NUMBER 10? TO BE, YOU KNOW, RIGHT NOW WE CAN LOOK AT WHAT WE HAVE ONE THROUGH NINE. AND IT CAN MOVE FORWARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL. OR YOU ASKING FOR POSTPONE POSTPONEMENT. OKAY YES, THANK YOU, BUT WE WOULD LOVE TO HEAR ANY MORE FEEDBACK. THE BOARD HAS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. ABSOLUTELY. DO SOME FEEDBACK, SN OF THE POND A BIT, UM, COUNTING ON THE WORDS TIER ONE POND, IMPLYING THAT IT WILL BE A HIGH QUALITY AND ATTRACTIVE BE FITTING THE DEVELOPMENT THAT THAT WERE PLANNED HERE. WE REALLY DON'T NEED A SORT OF A RETENTION POND WITH CATTAILS GROWING OUT OF IT. THAT DOESN'T
[00:45:04]
SERVE ANYBODY. I ALSO HAD SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PATIO IN THE BACK. I ASSUME THE PATIO OUT FRONT IS GOING TO BE MORE IF THE TENANT TURNS OUT TO BE A RESTAURANT AND BE A WAITING AREA TO GET INTO RESTAURANT. THAT THE PATIOS OUTBACK WILL IT BE BOLLARDS AND SO FORTH TO PROTECT THE PATRONS FROM THE PARKING SPOTS? YEAH THERE ARE DEVICES THAT ARE REQUIRED BY CODE TO PROTECT A PATIO AND THEY COULD BE BOLLARDS OR OTHER DEVICES. I COULD LET OUR ARCHITECTS SPEAK TO THE DESIGN OF THE PATIOS IF THAT IS KNOWN AT THIS TIME. BECAUSE THAT WILL ACTUALLY BE PART OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION WHEN THE PATIO DESIGN IS MORE DETAILED AND SPECIFIC, BUT WE CAN ASK THE ARCHITECT TO SEE. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS RON MCINNIS WITH FORD ARCHITECTS 1500. WEST FIRST AVENUE. GRAMMY, OHIO. TO SPEAK TO THE PATIO OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER THERE WITH YOU CAN SEE ON THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING WERE SHOWING DASH LINES FOR ACTUALLY TO OVERHEAD GARAGE DOORS. SO WE DON'T. WE'RE TRYING TO LEAVE AS MUCH FLEXIBILITY AS POSSIBLE, BUT I ALWAYS ENVISIONED THE MAIN ENTRANCE EITHER TO BE OFF OF THE EAST ELEVATION OR THE NORTH ELEVATION AND THEN THE CORNER WOULD JUST BE MAINLY PROCEEDING AREA. A NICE SPILL OUT. WE HAVE A FEW. WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO GO TO OUR ELEVATIONS BY CHANCE? WE'RE SHOWING A NICE VERY IF YOU COULD LOOK ON THE BEFORE A PLANE RIGHT HERE WE HAVE ROUGHLY AN EIGHT FT TALL BRICK BASE WITH, UM WOOD COLUMNS AND THE NICE WOOD TRELLIS ABOVE, SO I ALWAYS ENVISION THAT AS A SEATING AREA SO THAT DETAILED AREA THAT'S ROUGHLY ABOUT 24 BY 25, THEN ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER. WE'RE TAKING THE SAME DETAILS IN CASE ANOTHER RESTAURANT WANTS TO COME OUT. OR EVEN A BUSINESS USE JUST WANTS TO PROVIDE AN ICEBREAKER AREA. FOR THEIR FUTURE EMPLOYEES. SO YOU KNOW, IT'S AT THIS STAGE OF THE SHELL DEVELOPMENT PLANE. I DON'T LIKE TO SHOW A GUARDRAIL. OR HANDRAILS OR ANY GATES UNTIL WE KNOW FOR SURE RESTAURANTS COMING IN IF THEY'RE SERVING ALCOHOL OR ANYTHING ELSE, AND WE LIKE TO LEAVE THAT UP TO THE END USER.KNOWING THAT THEY HAVE TO COME BACK IN. FOR THEIR SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND THEIR 10 IMPROVEMENT PACKAGE. BUT THIS IS, UM, REALLY USED TO HELP. ENTICE, UM POTENTIAL FUTURE TENANTS WHO WOULD REALLY WANT TO COME AND HAVE THAT NICE CORNER ON IT. STICK THAT THAT'S PART OF THE BUILDING. BUT THERE'S A TON OF PATIO SPACE, POTENTIALLY ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THERE THAT'S CLOSE TO THE RESIDENTIAL AREA THAT. WILL WORK CLOSELY WITH THE TENANTS AS THEY COME IN. TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S A NICE, ATTRACTIVE SPACE. FATHERS AND OTHER SAFETY DEVICES WILL BE PART OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT. IF THAT TURNED OUT TO BE A RESTAURANT OR A BAR PATIO. OKAY, SO THE BRICK PIERS THAT WE HAVE HAVE A BIT OF PROTECTION. BUT YOU KNOW, EVERY FIVE FT OR SO WE HAVE TO COME BACK IN. WITH THE ICE ATTRACTIVE, BOTHERED. A SOLID FENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERN BORDERS, SO THAT NOISE FROM THE PATIO AND CARS WOULD BE SHIELDED TO SOME DEGREE FROM THOSE RESIDENTS. YES I BELIEVE THAT'S WHAT WE'VE ADDED IT. SIX POINT. IT'S A SIX FT. PRIVACY ALL THE WAY EVENTUALLY WILL BORDER ALL THE COMMERCIAL ALONG THEIR LITTLE START BY BORDERING THIS SITE. WILL BE SUPPLEMENTED WITH THE LANDSCAPE. BUT YOU'LL HELP MY FAULT. SOME OF THE SOUND RIGHT NOW, WHEN YOU'RE STAYING IN FRONT OF THIS ONE SOUTHWEST TO REALLY GET NOISE FROM THE TRUCKS. THAT'S WHY WE'VE TRIED TO CREATE THIS. SEATING AREA IN THE BACK. AND REALLY, TO MAKE THIS PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY. ON ALL SIDES, EXCEPT THAT WEST ENDERS WELL WITH THE PATIOS THERE, TOO, SO IT JUST PLAYS IN ALL THE WALK ABILITY, YOU KNOW, AND KEEP THE OUTDOORS FEELING. BUT PEOPLE WALK HERE AND LET'S BEEN A CHALLENGE TO CREATE THAT WITH THE ARCHITECTS HAVE DONE A GOOD JOB. COUPLE OTHER COMMENTS I WOULD MAKE. I'M REALLY THRILLED WITH THE IDEA. IT LOOKS LIKE A TOUGH NOTCH. USE OF THE SPACE. I THINK IT'S A BETTER USE THAN TEXT FLEX. I THINK WE HAVE A NEED FOR THIS KIND OF STUFF, AND IT WILL SERVE ALL OF YOU WILL PARK OLIVE GROVE CITY. VERY WELL. SO I'M VERY HAPPY WITH ALL OF THAT. UM I AM CONCERNED. YEAH. SPRINKLING ISSUE THAT
[00:50:09]
IRRIGATION ISSUE IF WE'RE BUILDING A COMMERCIAL. REAL ESTATE OR COMMERCIAL OFFERING. I WOULD WOULD LIVE UP TO THAT LEVEL OF IRRIGATION SO I WOULD SUPPORT LATER MIGHT NINE THAT IS CURRENTLY IN THE AMENDMENT. AS FAR AS THE TURNING OR THE RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT. THAT'S A REALLY TOUGH ONE, BECAUSE I'LL PROBABLY BE THE GUY SITTING IN THAT MINE WISHING I COULD TURN LEFT TO GET BACK OUT TO SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. ON THE OTHER HAND, IT MAY NOT BE SAFE. SO I DO THINK WE NEED TO BE PRUDENT AND HERE WITH THE SAFETY EXPERTS HAVE TO SAY. AND I'M GLAD TO HEAR THAT. YOU'LL TABLE. IT GIVEN YOU HAVE EVERYBODY AT THE TIME TO GET IT DONE, RIGHT? AND HOPEFULLY COME BACK WITH A SAFE AND IN GOOD PLAN. OTHER COMMENTS FROM PLANNING COMMISSION COUPLE, UM SO IF WE'RE GONNA ALLOW RETAIL TO GO HERE, WHICH I THINK IS A GREAT PROJECT AS WELL, WE I THINK WE NEED TO LOOK AT IT TO BE SUCCESSFUL. SO I DO THINK THAT MEDIA SHOULD BE CUT. DO YOU THINK THERE SHOULD BE A CURB OR A LEFT? TURN INTO THEIR I'M NOT I DON'T THINK WE CAN ALLOW. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE SAFETY EXPERTS WILL SAY TO TURN NORTH. OUT OF THERE, TURN LEFT. ON THE COLUMBUS STREET THAT SEEMS LIKE IT'S TOO MUCH INTERACTION BUT KEEPING THE RIGHT TURN IN RIGHT TURNOUT, BUT ALSO ALLOWING CARS GOING NORTH TO TURN WEST INTO THE SITE. I THINK CUTTING THE MEDIA AND THEN ALLOWING LEFT HAND TURNING IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THE SUCCESS OF THE PRODUCT.QUITE FRANKLY, WOULD NOT GO AND JOCKEY AROUND AND TRY TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO GET INTO THE SIDE OF COMING NORTH, SO I THINK THE CITY SHOULD TAKE THAT UNDER CONSIDERATION AS LONG AS A DECORATIVE AND YOU KNOW SO ON AND SO FORTH, AND NOT TRAFFIC CONCERNS. I DO HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE PARKING AS WELL. TRYING TO USE THIS LITTLE PIN FEATURE. YOU'LL KNOW IF I'M GONNA DO THIS RIGHT OR NOT, BUT THIS THIS AREA WAS PRETTY THICK. CAN YOU SEE THAT? YES. ARE RACIST. NOW LET'S SEE RACE. UM SO THAT AREA THERE WITH THE TRAFFIC KIND OF TURNING TO GO PARK. IT SEEMS LIKE CARS BACKING UP. THERE JUST SEEMS LIKE THERE'S GONNA BE A LOT OF INTERACTION. CARS FOR THOSE FOUR SPOTS, OR AT LEAST THOSE THREE TO THE FIVE SPOTS, I GUESS. I'M NOT AN ENGINEER, THOUGH. IT JUST SEEMS LIKE A FUNKY TYPES OF LAYOUT IF WE HAVE ENOUGH PARKING OR IF THERE'S A CONCERN WE CAN ADDRESS THAT SOMEWHERE, MAKE IT DEEPER. SOMEHOW SOME WAY TO, YOU KNOW, PREVENT. I DON'T KNOW. IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THERE'S A LOT OF INTERACTION CARS COMING IN AND OUT, ESPECIALLY IF IT'S GOING TO BE THE LEFT HAND TURN IN. JUST SEEMED LIKE SO THERE'S A CONCERN, MAN. GREAT. WELL, LOOK AT THAT. AND THEN THE LAST QUESTION, I ASSUME TRY THIS AGAIN. RIGHT HERE. WELL. ARE GOING TO CONTINUE TO THE WEST. THERE JUST LIKE IT IS UP HERE AT THE NORTH WILL CONTINUE WEST IS THAT THE CONNECTION POINT FOR THE PARCEL OF THE WEST FOR THE PARKING OR IS THAT JUST NOT KNOWN? NO. IF IT'S KNOWN THERE DEFINITELY IS THAT STUBBED TO THEM TO THE ONE TO THE NORTH. YOU'RE RIGHT THAT JETS OVER TO THE WEST AND THAT IS A SHARED DRIVE. I'LL THAT IS A COMMON ACCESS DRIVE ON THE STRADDLE BOTTOM LINE. AND SO THOSE PARKING SPACES AND DR ISLES WILL BE UNDER EASEMENT. BUT LET'S FIND OUT IF THE ENGINEER CAN ADDRESS OH, ROB, I'M SORRY, ROB. SO WE DID LOOK AT THIS ENTIRE PERSONAL AND WE'VE LOOKED AT THIS SPECIFIC SITE AND WHEN WE FIRST LAID IT OUT, WE HAVE THE ONE THAT RUNS ALL ALONG THE NORTH SIDE, THEN YES, THAT ONE IN THE SOUTH. WE DO HAVE THE INTENTION TO BRING IT ALL THE WAY TO THE SOUTH AS WELL. HENSCHEL FOR ANOTHER. THREE. COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS AS IT EXTENDED WEST REASON I BROUGHT UP IT SEEMS LIKE IT WAS TWO PARKING. LOTS OF THE WEST OF WHAT I THINK IS THE DUMPSTER AREA. IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THOSE WOULD BE VERY DIFFICULT TO GET IN AND OUT OF YES, AND SO ONE OF THE COMMENTS WAS LANDSCAPING THAT'S NEEDED AROUND THE DUMPSTER. SO THAT DUMPSTER IT'S THE SAME MATERIALS THAT WE HAVE IN THE BUILDING. SO WE HAVE A NICE BRICK BASE AND THEN VERTICAL BOARD AND BATTEN WITH METAL COPING PIECE. SO WE WERE ORIGINALLY ONLY SCREENING THE SOUTH SIDE TO THE PRESIDENTIAL, BUT TO ADDRESS THAT COMMENT. WE WOULD ULTIMATELY. REMOVE THOSE TWO PARKING STALLS RIGHT NEXT TO IT, AND THEN ADD SOME LANDSCAPING THERE. AND AT THAT POINT THAT THAT FINAL PARKING SPOT WOULD GO AWAY. VERY NICE PROJECT. OTHER QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. IT'S MY COMMENT ON THE CURB CUTS AND DR STUFF. AT ONE TIME TO GET IT RIGHT. SO WE LOOK AT LOT 29. AND YOU SEE THE VERY NORTH MOST
[00:55:11]
POINT MOST CORNER OF IT. YEAH. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT REALLY ADDS MUCH VALUE TO THAT LOT IF THAT NORTH CORNER WAS CLIPPED OFF THAT LOT THAT POINT IN YOUR ACCESS DRIVERS DROP STRAIGHT. IN AND OUT. GET MORE STACKING COMING IN OFFICE, SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. IT WOULD GET THAT.CROSS OVER THERE FARTHER AWAY FROM YOU KNOW THE INTERSECTION OF COLUMBUS AND SOUTHWEST. YOU KNOW, I THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT FOR PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO TURN LEFT IN THERE WHEN THEY'RE COMING FROM. DOWN TOWN GROVE CITY IN COLUMBUS STREET BECAUSE IF IT'S NOT A LEFT IN AND YOU'RE COMING UP COLUMBUS STREET. MM YOU GOTTA GO OUT ON THE SOUTHWEST WESTERN SOUTHWEST.
THROUGH A MEDIUM AND BACK IN ON THIS QUARTER. I JUST DON'T THINK THAT BENEFITS DOWNTOWN. WHEN YOU'RE ON BICYCLE OR WHETHER YOU'RE IN A MOTOR VEHICLE. I JUST THINK IF YOU COULD CLIP A LITTLE CORNER OFF THE LOT 29 BRING IT A LITTLE STRAIGHTER AND DEFINITELY HAVE THAT FULL ACCESS. ENTRANCE IN AND OUT LEFT AND RIGHT, EVERY WHICH WAY. GREAT POINT. WE WISH WE COULD, BUT THIS HAS BEEN PLOTTED RECORDED SO THOSE LOTS HAVE TO REMAIN AS IS CLIP OFF OF THE CORNER ROOM. NO. DOES. THE ACREAGE IS DETERMINED ON THE PLATTE OF THOSE LIKE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE LOTS. HAS ALREADY PLANTED AND RECORDING. IT'S NOT SOLD. YOU PROBABLY GOT THE CAPABILITY, WE COULD REPLY. IT'S AN IDEA. IT'S NOT SOLD AND YOU STILL OWN IT. POSSIBLE. MM HMM. JUST GET THAT APRON FARTHER AWAY FROM THE BIG INTERSECTION. IT'S IMPORTANT TO BE ABLE TO TURN LEFT INTO THEIR WHEN YOU'RE COMING FROM DOWNTOWN GROUP CITY. WE WENT TO ALL THIS TROUBLE TO GET. A NICE CONNECTION. IS THAT'S JUST. YEAH. YOU GOTTA PASS THE SITE. YOU GOTTA NEGOTIATE ALL THE TRAFFIC SOUTHWEST. YOU GOTTA GO WEST. THAT COMEBACK AGAINST LIKE, PEOPLE WON'T DO THAT WHAT THEY'LL DO BUT GO TO THE END OF THE MEDIUM ON COLUMBUS STREET.
AND MAKE AN AWKWARD YOU TURN BEFORE GETTING ON SOUTHWEST TO GET BACK TO YOUR SHOPS. YOU KNOW? SO THAT'S MY INPUT ON CURB CUTS. AND THEN THE DRAINAGE THING AGAIN. LOOKING AT THE TOPOL ON THE BOTTOM OF THE STREAM OUT IN FRONT THERE ON THAT BROWN RUN. IT'S ONLY GAINING TWO FT FROM THE WEST. MOST POINT TO THE EAST. MOST POINT ON THE FRONTAGE ALONG THERE. SO THAT POND CAN EASILY BE OVERCOME THE WEST ON THE PROPERTY LINES SPLIT ON BOTH PARCELS, POSSIBLY RUN YOUR OUTLET BACK. HE USED TO PICK UP THAT TWO FT. BECAUSE THE BOTTOM OF YOUR PONDS A COUPLE OF FEET LOWER. IT'S PROBABLY WORKABLE. I SEE HIS WHEELS TURNING OUT THERE. YEAH. BUT EVEN AS MUCH AS REDUCING UPON BY HALF AND ONLY TAKING CARE OF THAT SITE AND MAKING A FEATURE OUT OF IT COULD HELP AND LET YOU GET CLOSER. THAT'S MY INPUT. THAT'S TWO THINGS. BUT ANYONE ELSE FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION. FIRE DEPARTMENT. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK? YOU COME UP WITH, LIKE. FIRST TIME HERE, ACTUALLY, WHAT YOU GUYS ARE TALKING ABOUT RIGHT NOW WITH THAT RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT. IF YOU GUYS WERE ABLE TO CUT INTO THAT MEDIUM THERE THAT WOULD FIX OUR ISSUE BECAUSE IT'S TOO SMALL FOR OUR TRUCKS TO GET THROUGH. CURRENTLY WITH THE WAY IT'S DESIGNED SO, UM, YEAH. IF YOU GUYS GET THAT TAKEN CARE OF THAT WILL MEET THE FIRE CODE FOR US AND ALLEVIATE ANY ISSUE WE HAVE WITH THAT SITUATION. GOOD. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK? RIGHT MODEL LOOKED LIKE YOU WERE GETTING READY TO SAY SOMETHING. SO I JUST THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR ALL THE FEEDBACK IN COMMENTS. WE'VE TAKEN ALL OF THE NOTES. WE'RE GOING TO TAKE IT ALL UNDER ADVISEMENT AND SEE WHAT ADJUSTMENTS WE CAN MAKE TO MEET YOUR COMMENTS AND CERTAINLY WORK THROUGH THE ACCESS POINT IN THE IRRIGATION ISSUE. SO THANKS SO MUCH FOR THIS SPECIAL MEETING. WE KNOW YOU ENTERTAINED THIS MEETING AND CONSIDERED OUR REQUEST FOR THIS APPLICATION AS THE ONLY ITEM ON YOUR AGENDA AND TOOK TIME, SO THANKS SO MUCH. WE APPRECIATE IT AND WE'LL SEE YOU SOON. THANK YOU. RIGHT. WE'RE READY FOR A MOTION TO POSTPONE OYSTER. I POST MOVE THAT WE POSTPONE ITEM NUMBER ONE SHOPS
[01:00:08]
AT FUEL OF FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. TO THE NEXT REGULARLY AT LEAST COUNT. SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MR LINDER? YES. MR ROCK? YES OYSTER? YES, MR FREE? YES. WITH THAT BEING THE LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA, THE