[00:00:03]
OKAE GROVE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION IS CALLED TO ORDER. LIKE TO CALL
[A. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL]
THE ROLL. MR ROCK. HERE, MR FRIEND HERE, CHAIR, OYSTER. MR LINDER. MR TITUS. APPLE STAND FOR A MOMENT OF SILENCE AND.THANK YOU ALL FOR COMING. PLEASE NOTE THAT EVERYONE EXCEPT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF WILL BE MUTED ON WHETHER X IF THERE IS COMMENTS FROM WHAT WEBEX LAST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. TO NOTIFY THE HOST THAT YOU WISH TO BEAT, WISH TO SPEAK. AND YOU MAY NEED TO PLACE YOUR THE ICON OF THE HAND HOVER OVER YOUR NAME ON THE PARTICIPANT LIST TO CLICK ON IF YOU DON'T HAVE A CAMERA MICROPHONE, YOU CAN ENTER YOUR QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS INTO THE CHAT FUNCTION. HEY WE HAVE FOUR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. FIRST ONE IS 31 20 PARK STREET CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS. SECOND ONE IS SHERWIN WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THIRD IS THE SHOPS AT VILLA PARK. AND THE FOURTH IS THE COMMUNITIES THAT PLUM RATHER REZONING REQUEST. IN THE PRESS. UM PROCEDURALLY. I'M NOT SURE THAT IT IT MATTERS JUST AS LONG
[4. APPLICATION: Communities at Plum Run – Rezoning (SF-1 to PUD-R)]
AS THERE IS SOME FORMAL ACTION TO MODIFY THE AGENDA. SO ITEM NUMBER FOUR COMMUNITIES THAT PLUM RUN HAS BEEN REQUESTED TO BE POSTPONED. UNTIL THE JOKE LIVE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. I HAVE EMOTION. STOMACH. MR CAISSE? YES MR FREE? YES, MR ROCK? YES. SO NOW WE[C. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES ]
WILL MOVE ON TO APPROVAL OF THE MEETING MINUTES FROM THE MAY 3RD REGULAR PLANNING MEETING, AS WELL AS THE MAY 17TH SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. WILL MOVE. SECOND. MR ROCK. YES, MR TITUS, MR FREE. YES. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL PROCEED TO THE FIRST ITEM. 31 20 PARK STREET.[1. APPLICATION: 3120 Park Street Rear Addition – Certificate of Appropriateness]
REAR ADDITION, CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS. IS THERE A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE APPLICANT HERE. MY COMING FORWARD. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS TO IDENTIFY YOURSELF, AND THEN WE'LL GO TO THE STAFF REPORT.APPLICANTS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION ON THE REAR OF 31 20 PARK STREET WITHIN THE HISTORICAL PRESERVATION AREA.
CITY COUNCIL APPROVED ORDINANCE SEE 70 86 TO CODIFY THE H P A TO MAINTAIN AND ENHANCE THE CHARACTERISTIC. OF THE ORDER SECTION OF THE CITY. THE PROPOSED EDITION IS A ONE IS ONE STORY IN HEIGHT TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 400 SQUARE FEET. THE ADDITION WILL BE FINISHED WITH GRAY SIDING AND WHITE TRIM SIMILAR TO THE EXISTING HOUSE WINDOWS SIMILAR TO THE EXISTING HOUSE WILL BE ADDED TO THE NORTH, EAST AND WEST. ELEVATIONS OF THE ADDITION. A NEW PRESSURE TREATED DECK WILL BE ATTACHED TO THE NORTH ELEVATION, PROVIDING ACCESS FROM THE PROPOSED EDITION TO THE BACKYARD. AFTER REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION. THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS PLANNING COMMISSION MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR INDUSTRY TICKET OF APPROPRIATENESS AS YEAH. WE CAN'T HAVE ANY INFORMATION YOU'D
[00:05:05]
LIKE TO PRESENT NO, SIR, EVERYTHING WAS PRETTY MUCH SAID JUST NOW. QUESTION FROM COMMISSION MEMBERS. BODY FROM THE PUBLIC HERE TO SPEAK TO THIS. AND LIKE THAT. HEARING NONE. THEN I'LL TAKE EMOTION. HERE. I MAKE THE MOTION. WE MAKE THE RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO OUR CITY COUNCIL. FOR APPLICATION NUMBER 1 31 20 PARK STREET EDITION. A SECOND. MR TITUS? YES, MR ROCK. MR FREE? YES. THANK YOU, GENERAL. ITEM NUMBER TWO IS THE SHERWIN[2. APPLICATION: Sherwin Williams – Development Plan]
WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT PLAN. IS THERE A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT HERE? YOU WOULD COME FORWARD AND. JUST TO INTRODUCE YOURSELF WITH YOUR ADDRESS. JOSH RODEMEYER. TRESSES 9754 OLD WARS AND ROAD. ST LOUIS, MISSOURI. I AM THE DEVELOPER. WE ALSO HAVE OUR CIVIL ENGINEER HERE TO ANSWER ANY MORE OF THE TECHNICAL QUESTIONS. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A NEW 10,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED SIDE IMPROVEMENTS FOR SHOWING WILLIAMS COMMERCIAL PAINT STORE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HOME ROAD IN TURNBERRY COURT. THE SITE WAS CREATED IN 2000 AND SIX AS PART OF A PLANT THAT CREATED THE FOUR LOTS ON TURNBERRY COURT, TWO OF WHICH HAVE ALREADY BEEN DEVELOPED. IS IF APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL, THE APPLICANT WILL WORK WITH THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF FINAL ENGINEERING REVIEW TO EXAMINE THE PROPOSED SITE ENGINEERING. THE PROPOSED SITE WILL BE ACCESSED OFF TURNBERRY COURT. PERKIN WILL BE LOCATED BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE ROAD FOR IMAGES. WHILE CODE REQUIRES 50 PARKING SPACES BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDING, A TOTAL OF 42 PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED. HOWEVER AS MOST OF THE BUILDINGS USED FOR STORAGE, AND IT'S FOR COMMERCIAL SALES INSTEAD OF PUBLIC RETAIL STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE PARKING REDUCTION AS IT WAS AS WAS APPROVED FOR COLUMBUS POWER SPORTS DEVELOPMENT PLAN. ACROSS HOME ROAD TO THE SOUTH. PLANS DO NOT CURRENTLY INCLUDED SIDEWALK ALONG THE SIDES. TURNBERRY COURT FRONTAGE TO CONNECT TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALKS ON HOME ROAD AND TO THE STUBBED BARK AT THE RANGE USA PROPERTY. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED THE CITY NOT REQUIRE A SIDEWALK LOCATION GIVEN ADJACENT USES, NOT ATTRACTING CUSTOMER FOOT TRAFFIC. HOWEVER NOTING THE GROUP CITY 2050 COMMUNITY PLAN PROMOTES A WELL CONNECTED DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS. THE FIVE FT. SIDEWALK ALONG THE HOME RUN FROM IT SHOULD BE EXTENDED LONG TERM, VERY COURT TO PROVIDE A CONNECTION TO THE STUFF THAT THE RANGE USA PROCESS. THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BE LOCATED TOWARDS THE EAST PROPERTY LINE ORIENTED ORIENTED WITH THE ENTRANCE TO THE RETAIL SPACE. FACING HOMEROOM. THE BUILDING IS SUPPOSED TO BE SET BACK. 20 FT FROM THE EAST PROPERTY LINE, WHICH IS LESS THAN THE TIP OF THE REQUIRED SETBACK OF 30 FT, NEXT TO NON RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. HOWEVER THE APPLICANT IS INSTALLING A DOUBLE ROW OF EVERGREEN TREES PER SECTION 11 35 12 D OF CITY CODE, WHICH ALLOWS FOR A REDUCED SETBACK, APPROPRIATE LANDSCAPING IS INSTALLED. THE PROPOSED THE PROPOSED BUILDING TUNNELS 10,000 SQUARE FEET. IT HAS TO BE FINISHED PRIMARILY WITH A COMBINATION OF TEXTURED STUCCO WALL PANELS AND SYNTHETIC LIST ON WALL PANELS. THE SOUTH ELEVATION, FACING HOME ROADS AND HOME ROAD INCLUDES A GLASS STOREFRONT AND METAL CANOPY SYSTEM. THE WEST ELEVATION FACING TURNBERRY COURT INCLUDES A 12 INCH BAND AND PILASTERS FINISHED WITH THE SYNTHETIC LEDGE STONE PANEL. DUE TO THE SITES, PROMINENCE. DUE TO THE PROMINENCE OF THE WEST FACADE ALONG TURNBERRY CODE COURT. AND NOTING THE SIGHTS LOCATION AT THE CITY'S NORTHERN GATEWAY.ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS SHOULD BE ADDED TO THIS ELEVATION, INCLUDING WINDOWS ADDITIONAL MASONRY. AN ADDITIONAL PARAPET VARIATIONS TO EXHIBIT A SIMILAR LEVEL OF DETAIL TO THE OTHER AREA DEVELOPMENTS, INCLUDING THE TURNBERRY RETAIL CENTER. AND ARRANGE USA. A LANDSCAPE PLAN WAS PROVIDED AND GENERALLY MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF CODE. TO BIO RETENTION BASINS ARE PROPOSED FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ON SITE WITH ONE BASIC PROPOSED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE. AT THE CURRENT HOME ROAD IN TURNBERRY COURT AND THE OTHER BASIN PROPOSALS OF NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE BEHIND THE PROPOSED BUILDING. FOR THE CITY'S STORMWATER DESIGN MANUAL BY OUR ATTENTION IS PERMITTED MEANS OF STRONG WIND MANAGEMENT.
PROVIDED THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OHIO EPA'S RAINWATER OF MINE DEVELOPMENT MANUAL. HOWEVER STAFF HAS CONCERNS RELATED TO THE AESTHETICS OF THESE BASINS, NOTING THE PROMINENCE OF THE SITE OF THE CITY'S NORTHERN GATEWAY. WELL THAT PROVIDED
[00:10:02]
LANDSCAPE PLAN LIST SOME SPECIES THAT WILL BE PLANTED IN THESE AREAS. NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON PLANT LOCATIONS IN QUANTITIES. IN ORDER TO ENSURE THESE PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTABLE.A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR BOTH BIO RETENTION BASINS WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. TO ENSURE THEIR FACES WILL HAVE A CONTINUED FUNCTIONALITY AND APPROPRIATE STUDIES GIVEN THEIR VISIBILITY FROM PUBLIC RIGHTS OF LIFE. WHILE THE BUILDING NEEDS ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL INTEREST ELEMENTS TO BREAK UP, MASSING AND ADD INTEREST. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CAN MEET ALL APPLICABLE GROUP CITY 2050 GUIDING PRINCIPLES. AND THEREFORE, AFTER REVIEWING CONSIDERATION, THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS PLANNING COMMISSION MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. WITH THE SIX STIPULATIONS NOTED. IS THE APPLICANT EVIDENT FOR THE FURTHER YOU'D LIKE TO ADD. WE PROBABLY WILL HAVE A COUPLE. SO MAYBE YOU COULD STEP FORWARD SO WE CAN HAVE YOU ON THE MICROPHONE. SO THERE ARE SIX STIPULATIONS AND THE PROPOSAL HERE, ARE YOU OKAY WITH ALL OF THEM. I THINK TO AN EXTENT. YES UM, OBVIOUSLY, I REMEMBER ONE BEING SOMEWHAT SUBJECTIVE, SO LONG AS IT'S WITHIN WITHIN REASON, I THINK IS WE LOOK AT ALL OF ALL SIX OF THOSE IN THIS OVERALL DEVELOPMENT. AS WE HAD MADE MODIFICATIONS ALONG THE WAY, I THINK WE REVISED IT. THREE OR FOUR TIMES. THE BIGGEST CHALLENGE THAT WE'VE GOT, AND IT'S NOT UNIQUE TO US IS THE COST RIGHT NOW ASSOCIATED WITH TRYING TO DEVELOP THAT IS GETTING TO THE POINT TOWARDS THOSE NOT EASILY. SO THAT WAS THE REASON WE TRIED TO GET AWAY FROM THE UNDERGROUND ATTENTION VERSUS THE ABOVE GROUND. YOU'RE LOOKING AT FOUR TIMES. THE COST IS WHAT WE'VE BEEN TOLD. IN THE LEAD TIMES. STRUCTURES ARE OUT FOR DEVELOPMENT. UM WE COULD ADD PARAPET VARIATIONS FOR ITEM ONE. I THINK WINDOWS WILL BE CHALLENGING. SO AS WE GO THROUGH THAT, AS LONG AS THERE'S SOME, I THINK FLEXIBILITY ON SPECIFICALLY WHAT THEY'RE LOOKING FOR THEN THEN, YES, WE CAN. WE CAN'T MEET THOSE THE STIPULATIONS. I GUESS THAT THE SIDEWALK WE'RE CERTAINLY OPEN TO IT ON ITEM TWO. I THINK IT DOES GET TO THE QUESTION OF WE ALWAYS PREFER TO ADD LESS ASPHALT OR LESS CONCRETE WHEN IN FACT IT'S NOT NEEDED. UM IF THE IF THE CITY AND STAFF SO THINKS THAT THAT WILL BE UTILIZED BETWEEN THE GUN RANGE AND THE SHERMAN WILLIAMS WE WOULD OBVIOUSLY BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO ACCOMMODATE THAT. IT JUST DIDN'T SEEM THAT THAT WOULD BE USED ALL THAT OFTEN, IF AT ALL, GIVEN THE NATURE OF THAT DEVELOPMENT. LANDSCAPE PLAN. WE WILL ABSOLUTELY DELIVER. IN AS MUCH DETAIL AS NEEDED. TO MEET CODE. UM ITEM FOUR. ABSOLUTELY WILL ADDRESS THE SCREENING CONTINUOUS HEDGE. ITEM FIVE WILL BE MET. IN ITEM SIX. ABSOLUTELY WILL BE MAP SO. OKAY WELL, UM I DO HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS I'D LIKE TO PUT OUT THERE. I, TOO, WAS TAKEN ABACK BY THE VAGUENESS OF THE NUMBER ONE THERE. THERE WILL BE ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS ADDED AND I'D LIKE TO DRIVE TO SOME MORE CLARITY OF WHAT THAT MEANS. I HEARD YOU SAY PARAPET. EDITIONS BUT NO WINDOWS, RIGHT? AND I AGREE WITH STAFF'S ASSESSMENT THAT THAT'S A PRETTY BLAND WEST FACADE THERE AND. FOURTH OUR BEST FACE. JEFF ANY COMMENTS ON IS THERE A WAY TO GO BACK TO THAT ELEVATION POSSIBLE? SO I THINK WHAT WHAT WE HAD IN MIND FOLLOWING THE REVIEW OF STAFF COMMENTS WOULD BE TO ACTUALLY TAKE THAT ONE PARAPET AND TURN IT INTO TWO. SO YOU WOULD HAVE IT BETWEEN COLUMN TWO AND THREE IN COLUMN FOUR AND FIVE THERE. THE REASON I SAY THAT ABOUT THE WINDOWS IS 90% OF THAT. FROM THE FRONT OF HOUSE ESSENTIALLY FROM THE DOORS. BACK. IS WAREHOUSE AND RACKING, SO WE WOULD BE REALLY CHALLENGED TO ADD WINDOWS. IN THAT PARTICULAR AREA. THE ONE THING THAT MIGHT MAKE SENSE, AS I BELIEVE I SAW WHEN I WAS DRIVING THROUGH TOWN WOULD ADD MAYBE FAUX SHUTTERS.
THAT'S WHERE IT LOOKS LIKE CLOSED WINDOWS, MAYBE WOULD BREAK UP THAT MASSING SOMEWHAT AND ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR THE ACTUAL BLAZING FOR THE WINDOW. UM. BEYOND THAT, WE. I THINK WE ADDED FROM FROM WHERE WE WERE, AT LEAST, UM OBVIOUSLY, THE WINDS COATING ON THE BOTTOM THREE. FT. WE COULD CERTAINLY RAISED THAT A LITTLE BIT MORE. UM. THE SOUTH. THE SOUTH AND MOST. 20% THAT FIRST SECTION ON THE FAR RIGHT THERE. THAT'S PART OF THAT'S PART OF THE RETAIL
[00:15:05]
STORE BEHIND SO IT WOULD HAVE SEEMED NATURAL TO HAVE WINDOWS IN THAT SECTION THERE. TO KIND OF FOCUS ATTENTION ON THAT CORNER. UM I'M GOING TO PUT A DOOR THERE OR PEOPLE WON'T GO AROUND TO THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING. FROM THE THAT THAT THEY HAVE WITH THEIR LOUD AS THEY UTILIZE THE WALLS. BUT FOR THE MAIN ENTRANCE FOR THEIR RACKING SO YOU HAVE RACKING.WITH MATERIAL IN FRONT OF THE WINDOW. IS THE CHALLENGE WE HAVE, AND IT'S NOT AGAIN UNIQUE TO THIS BUILDING. IT'S UNIQUE TO ALL OF THE SHERMAN WILLIAMS THAT WE'VE DONE, WHICH IS WHY WE TRY TO STAY AWAY FROM THE WINDOWS IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. POSSIBILITY OF DOING IT. INSET.
A WINDOW MIGHT HAVE BEEN THERE, YOU KNOW, WITH INSET AREA AND THEN SO SHUTTERS. BESIDES I'VE SEEN. OR MAYBE JUST A PHOTO INSECT WINDOW. IT LOOKS LIKE AT ONE TIME. IT MIGHT HAVE HAD A WINDOW THERE, BUT YOU'VE SEEN WHERE THE BREAK THEM UP. WRITE SOMETHING. IF YOU LIKE THAT. I KNOW WE'VE GOT WE DID IT ON A FIRESTORM. STATE ROUND 6 65 ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING.
PLAIN BRICK WALL. BUT. IN A TEAM OUT LOOKING QUITE NICE. THEY JUST RECESSED IN AREAS AND HAD A LIKE A FAKE LITTLE FAKE CELL. AND IT JUST INSECT, AND IT JUST BROKE UP. VASTNESS OF A SMOOTH WALL. WITHOUT YOU KNOW, HAVING TO HANG SHUTTERS OR ANYTHING. WHERE THAT'S BEEN DONE.
SOMETHING LIKE THAT. JUST A Q. MAYBE HALF A DOZEN OF THEM TOLD OR SOMETHING ON JUST EXPOSED.
MOVING ON TO THE SECOND ITEM. YOU MENTIONED THE SIDEWALK. I AM VERY MUCH IN FAVOR OF THE SIDEWALK THERE. WHILE YOU MAY BE RIGHT THAT THERE'S NOT A LOT OF TRAFFIC TO THE TO THE GUN RANGE BEHIND IT, THERE IS A ANOTHER PROPERTY AND DEVELOPED PROPERTY BACK THERE, AND IT WOULD SEEM NATURAL TO PUT ASIDE WALK AROUND THAT WHOLE LOOP. THERE'S QUITE A BIT OF RESIDENTIAL IN THIS AREA JUST TO THE SOUTH OF IT, AND A LOT OF GROUP SCENES LIKE TO GET OUT AND WALK, AND SO I COULD SEE THEM WALKING THAT LOOP. LOOKING AT YOUR AMAZING BUILDING AND THE OTHERS THAT ARE BACK THERE, AND THEY NEED THE SIDEWALK TO DO. COMMISSION OF ANY OTHER COMMENTS THEY LIKE TO MAKE. I HAVE ONE QUESTION. ASIDE FROM THE RECOMMENDATIONS THE STORM. RUN OFF OF YOUR PARKING LOT. I DON'T SEE CATCH BASINS. SO YOU'RE USING ALL SHEET DRAINING TO GET IT OVER TO CURB CUTS BASICALLY.
THE FUNNEL IT INTO YOUR RETENTION PONDS. THAT ONE SEEINI JUST ACTUALLY, I THINK IT'S GREAT IF YOU CAN DO AWAY WITH SOME CATCH BASINS, ACTUALLY, BECAUSE YOU END UP WITH A LOT OF PAYMENT FAILURES AND SETTLING AROUND THEM. BUT IT LOOKED TO ME AS IF THE WHOLE PARKING LOT SHEET DRAINS TO SOME CURB CUTS. THAT'S JUST WANTED TO COMPLIMENT YOU. I THINK THAT'S A NICE APPROACH TO DEALING WITH STORMWATER AND NOT HAVING THE PAVEMENT FAILURES AND BEING UNDULATIONS IN THE PARKING LOT. YOU KNOW, RUN THAT WATER. GOOD. THANK YOU. COMMENTS ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC FINE. AND I'D LIKE TO CALL FOR ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE PROPOSAL. I'D LIKE TO PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT TO THE FIRST STIPULATION. TO CHANGE THE WORDING FROM WORKERS WEST ELEVATION OF THE BUILDINGS SUCH AS WINDOWS TO, INCLUDING WINDOWS CHANGING, SUCH AS TOO, INCLUDING WINDOWS ADDITIONAL MASON ARYAN PARAPLEGIC PATIENT VARIATIONS. I DON'T UM. WELL I CAN TRY TO LIVE WITH. I GUESS I'M NOT THE ARCHITECT AND I DON'T KNOW THE DESIGN THAT GOES BEHIND THAT. I
[00:20:02]
JUST KNOW IT'S EXTREMELY CHALLENGING, GIVEN THE STRUCTURE IN THE BUILDING THAT WE'RE TRYING TO UTILIZE. UM. WITH FOUR WINDOW WILL BE MORE ACCEPTABLE, FRANKLY. WOULD BE, I THINK EVEN MORE EASILY ADDED TO IT BECAUSE IT DOESN'T IMPACT THE STRUCTURE PROPOSING, OKAY? I THINK WE NEED TO WORK PHOTO IN THERE BECAUSE WINDOWS WERE GOING DOWN. PATH OF THE WINDOW. I'M WORRYING, RACKING GOING THROUGH GLASS WINDOWS. I GUESS WHAT? I'M VISUAL WHO ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL OF THE WINDOW. ALWAYS A PHRASE THAT. LIKE TO COMMENT. YEAH IN, UM, LOOKING INTO THIS WINDOW. I KNOW. THEY SAID THEY DON'T WANT TO HAVE CLASS ON THE BUILDING BECAUSE OF WAREHOUSING. BUT THERE ARE OTHER EXAMPLES IN KIND OF MORE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL AREAS WHERE THEY'VE USED SPANIEL GLASS, WHICH CREATES THE ILLUSION OF THE WINDOW. BUT IT'S NOT ACTUALLY LIKE A TRANSPARENT KIND OF WINDOW. UM SO IF THEY COULD DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT, IT WOULD GIVE THE APPEARANCE OF A WINDOW WITHOUT ACTUALLY NECESSITY, AND THEY PUT ONE THROUGH THE WALL OF THE BUILDING. UM AND I THINK THAT WOULD THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING WE WOULD BE OPEN TO SEEING THEM DUE TO MEET THAT WINDOW REQUIREMENT. DIFFERENT THAN A FAUX WINDOW. IT'S DIFFERENT THAN A FULL WINDOW IN A SENSE THAT IT'S ACTUALLY GLASS, SO IT HAS THE APPEARANCE OF A WINDOW INSTEAD OF JUST BEING A RECTANGLE THAT HAS A DIFFERENT KIND OF MATERIAL AND SURROUNDING FACADE. TO BE INSTALLED, OR CAN IT BE A SOLID MASONRY WALL BEHIND? STRUCTURAL.CALLED. RESET. VERY WELL. I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW THE ARCHITECTURAL EXACTLY BEHIND IT, BUT I BELIEVE YOU CAN DO SCANDAL IN THAT WAY, WHERE YOU DON'T ACTUALLY HAVE TO DO IT AS A STRUCTURAL COMPONENT OF THE BUILDING. I'M HAPPY, LEAVING IT TO THE EXPERTS TO WORK OUT WHAT WINDOW MEANS. YEAH, SO, BUT I WOULD I WILL MOVE TO CHANGE STIPULATION NUMBER 12 ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS SHALL BE ADDED TO THE WEST ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING. INCLUDING WINDOWS , ADDITIONAL MASONRY AND PARAPET VARIATIONS.
THAT WE FAILED ON US TO RECEIVE . I GUESS WHAT? WE'RE KEEPING IT VAGUE. NO, THEY'RE WORKING OUT.
THE DETAILS OF DOING THIS IS SORT OF LIKE CHANGING IT FROM SUCH AS TOO, INCLUDING AND DATES THAT WINDOWS OF SOME SORT. PREFER TO HELP. CAN I ASK A QUESTION IS THE REASON THAT IT'S WINDOWS ARE MANDATED VERSUS SOME OTHER ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENT? IF THAT'S THE ONLY REAL THAT'S THE ONLY ITEM. TODAY THAT WE'VE TRIED TO LANDSCAPING, YOU NAME IT SIDEWALKS. YOU NAME IT. WE'RE WILLING TO ACCOMMODATE. REALLY ANYTHING FROM STAFFS PERSPECTIVE ? WHAT? WE'RE TRYING TO BREAK UP THE THOUGHT FACADE AND WHAT I'M HEARING IS DISCUSSIONS ON FULL WINDOWS. NO FILM WINDOWS, USING DIFFERENT TYPES OF MATERIALS PROVIDE THE PARENTS OF WINDOW. OUR INTENT AS A STAFF IS TO BRING UP THE FACADE AND THE MASS OF THAT STRUCTURE. THAT'S NOT WHAT WE DO WITH THE ETHOS BAND THAT WE ADDED, SINCE COMMENTS ARE BEING NO, IT DOES NOT. MAYBE WE NEED TO TAKE A MAYBE WE NEED TO POSTPONE THIS EVENT OR OR COME BACK AGAIN. THE NEXT NEXT MEETING WITH AN UPDATED UNDERSTANDING, SO WE TRULY REPRESENT WHAT THE BOTH SIDES OF THE APPLICANT AS WELL AS STAFF WOULD LIKE TO SEE ON THAT ON THAT SIDE. MIGHT BE BEST JUST TO KIND OF HOLD OFF. WELL, IF YOU'RE GOING TO REQUIRE WINDOWS, I JUST ASSUMED ADDED, AS IT STATED, SO WE'RE NOT DELAYED IN OUR ADDRESS THE COMMISSION MEMBERS CONCERNS WITH THE TERM BIGNESS. I MEAN, WE GO BACK AS 112 ENOUGH, IS IT? WHAT'S WHAT'S THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF WINDOWS OR FOLK WINDOWS OR ARCHITECTURAL HANDS? MINTS? NO MATTER WHAT WE DO HERE TODAY, AND IF WE'RE JUST USING WORDS THEY'RE STILL GOING TO A CERTAIN LEVEL OF VAGUENESS, BUT I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE COMMISSION MEMBERS. I JUST FEEL IT'S IMPORTANT IMPORTANT NOT TO BE A STRUCTURAL COMPONENT TO THE BUILDING AND INCREASE THE CAUSE. DUE TO BEING A WINDOW OPENING. I WOULD PREFER FOR IT TO BE PHONE TYPE OPENING OR THE SHUTTERS OR SOMETHING THAT LETS YOU HAVE YOUR STRUCTURAL WALL. THEIR IMPACT. WHETHER DESIGN ELEMENT THE OUTSIDE OF NOT NECESSARILY A FRAMED HIM. WE SHOULD PROBABLY
[00:25:06]
CALL POINT OF ORDER HERE. WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR AND IT HAS NOT RECEIVED THE SECOND YET, SO WE SHOULD DECIDE IF IT'S GOING TO BE SECONDED. NO. CAN MOVE ON. YURI NO. SECOND MY MOTION IS NOT PASSED. AND I WILL OPEN IT AGAIN TO ANY OTHER MOTIONS. THE COUNTER COMMISSION WOULD LIKE TO MAKE. GUILLOTINE ONE BECAUSE THE NEXT MONTH, I MEAN THAT YOU CAN SELECT THE IDEAL FROM OUR STANDPOINT BECAUSE WE'RE AT THE POINT TO WHERE WE'RE RUNNING OUT OF TIME TO DELIVER IT YET THIS YEAR FISCAL YEAR 22 THAT IS VERY MUCH SHARON WILLIAMS GOAL WOULD MAKE A MOTION ON RECOMMENDATION ONE. THAT. AN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ELEMENT TO THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. EITHER BE THE MASONRY TYPE PHOTO WINDOW. OR. CHEDDARS REPRESENTING, YOU KNOW, PHOTO TYPE OPENING. BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE WORKED OUT. WITH STAN. UM NO. RECOMMENDING ANYTHING IN THE WAY OF A TRUE HEAVY, THEN FRAMED IN OPENING, JUST PHONE TYPE EXTERIOR.ARCHITECTURAL Q. PRETTY LONG WORDED. WOULD BE APPROPRIATE. THE REFERENCE WHAT THE MOTION IS, AS I UNDERSTAND IT. ON THE MOTION ON THE FLOOR IS AN ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS SHALL BE ADDED TO THE WEST ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING. INCLUDING FOR WINDOW OF SOME VARIATION. ADDITIONAL MASONRY PARAPET VARIATIONS. I WOULD SAY THAT WOULD BE A GOOD MOTION SECOND. THE MOTION. THANK YOU, SIR. PROBABLY WRONG. MR FREED? YES MR ROCK, MR TITUS. THANK YOU APPRECIATE IT. THAT WAS ONLY THE MOTION TO MEN. WE STILL HAVE TO. OKAY SO ARE THERE ANY OTHER AMENDMENTS THAT WOULD LIKE TO BE OFFERED? THEORY, NONE. I'M OPEN TO EMOTION. HERE. I MAKE THE MOTION WHAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR CITY COUNCIL OF SIX STIPULATIONS. FOR SURE. WILLIAMS DEVELOPED A SECOND. MR TITUS? YES MR FREE? YES, MR ROCK? YES. AGAIN. MOVING ON NOW TO ITEM
[3. APPLICATION: The Shoppes at Beulah – Development Plan]
NUMBER THREE SHOPS AT ULA, THE FINAL DEVELOPED DEVELOPMENT PLAN.REBECCA WITH THE PLANK LAW FIRM OFFICE ADDRESS FOR 11 EAST TOWNE STREET. COLUMBUS, OHIO. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR APPROXIMATELY 1500 OR 15,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING. UMS APPLICATION THAT WAS POSTPONED AT A SPECIAL MEETING ON MAY 17TH. 22 DUE TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S CONCERNS OVER THE ACCESS AS WELL AS OTHER STIPULATIONS, AS IDENTIFIED BY STAFF. SINCE THE LAST MEETING THEIR REVISION REVISIONS, REVISIONS HAVE BEEN MADE TO ELIMINATE SOME OF THE LANDSCAPING TIPS STIPULATIONS. FIRST BEING THAT DUMPSTER SCREENING WAS ADDED TO THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. NEXT AND IRRIGATION PLAN WAS PROVIDED MEETING THE STANDARDS. IN SECTION 11 36. FINALLY A FENCE WAS ADDED ALONG THE PARKING LOT.
ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL. TO MEET THIS SCREENING REQUIREMENTS AS STATED AND VILLA PARK DEVELOPMENT. IN TEXT. THE PROPOSED BUILDING FACADE REMAINS THE SAME AS PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED WITH SECTIONS OF FLAT AND GABLED ROOF LINES. EXTERIOR FOR START WILL CONSIST OF BRICK VERTICAL BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING. WINDOWS AND STOREFRONTS. PRIMARY COLORS WILL CONSIST OF TAN'S BROWN'S CYPRUS AND ALABASTER. THE SITE PLAN. HAS PROPOSED ACCESS. FULL ACCESS ALONG COLUMBUS STREET.
[00:30:05]
WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLY RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT AND THE SPECIAL MEETING PLANS. THIS WOULD REQUIRE REVISIONS TO THE BUELL PARK PHASE ONE ROADWAY PLAN TO REMOVE THE MEDIAN ON COLUMBUS STREET. BASED ON COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE ENGINEER.STAFF RECOMMENDS A FULL AND WRITE OUT ACCESS DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF THE OHIO HEALTH ROSE LANE INTERSECTION AND THE COLUMBUS SOUTHWEST. YOUR SECTION. APPLICATION MEETS ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF THE EU DE ANALYSIS. AND THE GROWTH CITY 2050 GUIDING PRINCIPLES CRITERIA. AFTER REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION. THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. TWO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING EIGHT STIPULATIONS AS STATED. WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER COMMENTS TO MAKE? YES, THANK YOU. SO WE DID HAVE THIS SPECIAL MEETING OF THIS PLANNING COMMISSION RELATED TO SHOPS THAT PULA AND WE DID PROVIDE A LOT OF DETAIL AND A PRESENTATION AT THAT TIME. AT THAT MEETING, WE SAID THAT WE WOULD COME BACK WITH A REVISION TO THE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS SHOWING A FULL CURB CUT ACCESS TO COLUMBUS STREET. AND WE STILL REQUEST UM, FULL END FULL HOUR ACCESS. THERE THERE IS A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AT SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD NORTH OF COLUMBUS STREET. AND WE DO FEEL BASED UPON OUR TRAFFIC ACCESS MY MEMO AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AS WELL AS EXHIBITS THAT WERE PROVIDED FROM OUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER WHO ALSO DID THE ORIGINAL TRAFFIC STUDY FOR BUELL, A PARK IN 2018. BUT IT IS WARRANTED AND JUSTIFIED FOR THE FULL CURB CUT ACCESS IN AND OUT. FROM INTO THE SITE ON COLUMBUS STREET. AND AGAIN THAT IS A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AT SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND WE ALSO WANT TO AVOID TRAFFIC GOING RIGHT OUT AND NOT HAVING THE ABILITY TO GO LEFT OUT. SO THAT THOSE TRAFFIC ALL GOES RIGHT OUT AND DOWN TO THE RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT OF BULLA PARK TO THE SOUTH. SO THAT IS OUR REQUESTS, SO WE DO, APPROVE AND AGREE WITH ALL OF THE STIPULATIONS AND OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF EXCEPT NUMBER TWO. WE WERE JUST LIKE THAT TO STATE FULL IN FULL OUT ACCESS. AND OF COURSE WE DO HAVE A TRAFFIC ACCESS. MEMO SUPPORTING THAT DATED MAY 27 2022. AND I DO HAVE COPIES OF THAT EXHIBIT. THAT WAS PAGE NINE OF THAT MEMO. IF YOU'D LIKE TO SEE IT THAT'S OUR REQUEST. SO WE'RE HAVING TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. YES. 30 IN THE FULL IN OUR ACCESS. I, TOO BELIEVE THAT SENDING ALL THE TRAFFIC EXITING THE PROPERTY TO THE RIGHT DOWN INTO THIS DOWN INTERVIEW. THE PARK IS, UM NOT GOOD FOR THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AND PROBABLY NOT NECESSARY. AT THE LAST MEETING, IT BECAME APPARENT THAT WE WOULD NEED OF A CUT THROUGH THE MEDIAN IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE FIRE SERVICES. AND AT THIS POINT, HAVING DONE THAT I WOULD SUPPORT FULL AND PULL OUT ACCESS BUT DIRECTIONS. AND THE TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT. I READ EARLIER SAYS, BASED ON TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ANALYSIS, ACCEPTABLE CAPACITY AND OPERATIONS IS EXPECTED AT THE ACCESS POINT TO COLUMBUS STREET. FOR LEFT, TURN AND RIGHT TURN INGRESS AND EGRESS THAT SEEMS TO SUPPORT THE POSITION THAT WE SHOULD ALLOWED FULL ACCESS. I'M IN AGREEMENT WITH THAT, I THINK JUST FOR OUR SAFETY RESPONSE. VEHICLES THAT IT OUT SHOULD BE FULL ACCESS.
ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM COMMISSION. ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THAT. PERHAPS THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT. MR ROCKS RECOMMENDATION LAST TIME COVERS OUR CONCERNS TO GET IN AND OUT OF THERE, SO I THINK WE HAVE CONCLUDED THAT WORK FOR US. CREATE YOUR HELP. ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. HEARING NONE. THEN I WOULD MOVE THAT WE STRIKE STIPULATION NUMBER TWO, WHICH READS THE PROPOSED FULL ACCESS TO COLUMBUS STREET SHALL BE AMENDED TO A FULL END RIGHT OUT ACCESS. REPEAT THAT. I APOLOGIZE
[00:35:08]
. I MOVING THAT WE STRIKE STIPULATION NUMBER TWO. I BELIEVE THAT RETURNS US TO FOLD IN FULL OUT ACCESS AS SPECIFIED IN THE TOP OF THE REPORT. MY GETTING THAT RIGHT? THANK YOU.CORRECT BY STRIKING THAT STIPULATION BECAUSE THE SUBMITTED PLANS SHOWED FULL ACCESS. IT WOULD REMAIN AS SUBMITTED ON THE PLAIN SHEETS. THAT'S MY MOTION HAVE A SECOND.
MR ARC. YES, MR FREE. YES, MR TITUS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYBODY LIKE TO MOVE FOR APPROVAL. CERAMIC EMOTION THAT. WE RECOMMEND TO OUR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. WITH THE STIPULATION. ONE STIPULATION. THREE THROUGH EIGHT. OUR SECONDR TENNANT. THANK YOU. HER
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.