[Ordinance C-48-22 Approve the Rezoning of 5.32+^ acres located at 5873 Haughn Road from Rural to IND-1 (Light Industrial). Second reading and public hearing.]

YOU. FIRST ORDINANCES C 48 22 AN ORDINANCE FOR THE REZONING OF 5.32 PLUS REMINDED ACRES LOCATED AT 58 73 CON ROAD FROM RURAL DRYING THE ONE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THE ANNEXATION ON JULY. 5TH APPLICATION IS SET FOR 30 DAYS IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. MISS KELLY. THEY'VE BEEN PUBLIC COMMENT, SIR. OKAY THANK YOU. QUESTIONS FROM THE COUNCIL. ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. GORDON SAID HIS SECOND REPUBLIC HERE IN THE MOVEMENT TO APPROVE

[00:05:06]

SECOND. MR SIEGERIST? YES VERY NO. MR HOLT. YES? YES. SHOT KEY. THANK YOU. MOVING ON. ORDINANCE

[Ordinance C-53-22 Accept the Plat of Autumn Grove, Section 5 located at Rishel St. & Belle Apple Dr. Second reading and public hearing.]

C 53 22 IN ORDER TO ACCEPT THE PLAN OF AUTUMN GROOVE SECTION FIVE. LOCATED ON RACIAL STREET AND BILL APPLE DRIVE SECTION FIVE. CONTAINS LOTS 1 64 THROUGH TO 17 INCLUSIVE AND RESERVES. F N G. ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL. SORTING HAS HAD A SECOND READING IN PUBLIC HEARING A MOVEMENT BE APPROVED. SECOND. MR BARRY? YES, YES. YES MR SHOCKEY? YES YES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MOVING ON,

[Ordinance C-58-22 Repeal Ordinance C-12-21 an ordinance to approve a Special Use Permit for an Automotive Dealership for Gibby's Auto Exchange located at 3422 Mill St. First reading.]

UM, ORDINANCE C 58 22 AN ORDINANCE TO REPEAL ORDINANCE C 12 21. AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR AN AUTOMOTIVE DEALER SHIP FORGIVING AUTO EXCHANGE, LOCATED AT YEAH.

43 22 MILL STREET. THIS ORDINANCE HAS FIRST READING ON HERE. AT THE REQUEST OF PERMIT HOLDER THE SECOND READING, PUBLIC CARING THEY ASKED TO BE POSTPONED UNTIL OCTOBER, 17TH.

ON THEIR, UM. I'M GOING TO MOVE SO AH, SO THAT WE CAN HAVE DISCUSSION MOVE. SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS. I WOULDN'T ENCOURAGE COUNSELOR NOT TO POSTPONE IT RIGHT TONIGHT. TO HAVE AVAILABLE FOR THE NEXT MEETING. SIMPLY BECAUSE WE'VE WORKED FOR THIS INDIVIDUAL FOR MONTHS AND, UM. THERE CONTINUES TO BE VIOLATIONS, AND WE KNOW THAT THERE HAS BEEN EVER MADE, BUT I WOULD I SUGGEST YOU WAIT UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING, TOO. TO POSTPONE IT THAT WE KNOW WHAT PROGRESS HAS BEEN. ANY QUESTIONS , COMMENTS MISHAP MR HOCKEY. I WOULD HAPPEN TO AGREE WITH THAT . I THINK THAT THE CONTEXT THAT WE WERE PROVIDED OF THAT HISTORY , WHEREAS WE REALLY HAD INFORMATION ABOUT THE CURRENT VIOLATION THAT WAS PREVENT PRESENTED TO US. PRIOR TO RECEIVING, UM, THIS ORDINANCE IN IN ITS FIRST READING FORM, AND I WOULD SAY WE LOSE NOTHING BY, UM PROCEEDING AS THOUGH OUR SECOND READING WOULD BE ON SEPTEMBER 19TH. WE COULD ALWAYS MAKE THAT DECISION WHEN WE'RE TOGETHER THE NEXT TIME. THAT'S THE FEELING OF MORE THAN A COUPLE OF COUNSEL OR COUNSEL. THERE'S A MOTION ON THE FLORIDA MOVE IT TO OCTOBER 17TH AND, UM AND IF THAT IS, UM IF THAT IS DEFEATED, THEN WE WOULD GO BACK TO OUR NORMAL SEPTEMBER 19TH. THE SECOND READING ON THERE. SO CLARK, IF YOU CALL THE ROLL ON THIS ONE, BUT WE HAVEN'T WE'RE GONNA BRING IT UP FOR A LITTLE GREAT AND THAT WE HAVEN'T WE HAD THE ISLAND. CAN YOU SECOND WE HAVE? YES SIR. WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO POSTPONES C 58 22 TO OCTOBER 17TH. I GUESS FOR THE PUBLIC RECORD. I WILL SAY THAT THE OWNER OF THE BUSINESS REQUESTED THE POSTPONEMENT. BECAUSE HE HAE ASKED FOR A 60 DAY. WAIT IN ORDER FOR HIM TO TAKE POSSESSION OF HIS NEW PLACE AND GET THINGS MOVED. SO THAT WAS THE REASON BEHIND THE REQUEST THAT WAS RECEIVED. AND I WILL CALL THE VOTE. FOR THIS MOTION. MR HOLT. SO THIS IS ON POSTPONEMENT. POSTPONING ONLY 17. YES, OCTOBER 17TH. NO. MS SELK. NO MR SHOCKEY ? YES, MR SIEGRIST. MR BERRY. OKAY ALRIGHT. MOTION IS DEFEATED HERE THAN, UH, I DON'T BELIEVE WE WOULD NEED A MOTION FOR THE SECOND READING ON THIS AND START NORMAL SECOND READING, THEN SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE ON SEPTEMBER 19TH. IF I COULD HAVE MR SHOCKEY? YES. GIVE A LITTLE BIT MORE CLARITY THIS BY POSTPONING UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING. YOU ARE NECESSARY, GIVEN THE PERSON ANOTHER 15 DAYS. PLUS THE ORDINANCE WOULD NOT BE EFFECTIVE FOR 30 DAYS, SO BY NOT DOING ANYTHING, IT'S AUTOMATICALLY 45 DAYS. IT'S

[00:10:05]

DELAYED SO GREAT. YEP, I WAS JUST, UH BURNED TO HONOR THE GENTLEMAN'S REQUEST, AS WE HAVE FOR OTHER PARTITIONS, PRACTITIONERS ON THE RESOLUTION CR 48 22 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BUILD RIGHT PROPERTIES LLC, LOCATED AT 58 7300. THE ORDINANCE WAS POSTPONED FROM AUGUST 15TH NEW ELEVATION DRAWINGS DATED 8 30 HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. AND ALL OF COUNCIL RECEIVED THERE. YEAH, AND IF WE COULD PUT THAT UP ON THE SCREEN I MOVED THAT THEY REPLACED THE ORIGINALS AND THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE NEW ELEVATION DRAWING STATED 8 30 22. I CAN. MRS. HELP? YES. MR SHOCKLEY? YES, YES, YES. YES THANK YOU. UM THIS MR ROSS,

[Resolution CR-48-22 Approve the Development Plan for Builtrite Properties LLC located at 5873 Haughn Rd.]

COULD YOU COME UP AND THIS WAS THERE WAS SOME THINGS WHEN WE HAD THE LAST MEETING THAT WE WANTED TO DISCUSS. AND I KNOW THAT MR YOU AND MR NORWOOD'S HAD SOME CONVERSATIONS. SO IF YOU COULD KICK IT OFF, AND THEN WE'LL BRING HIM UP IN A MINUTE. SURE THANK YOU, MR SHOCKEY. UM JUST REMIND EVERYONE THIS IS I'M CURIOUS FROM LAST COUNCIL MEETING. THIS PROJECT INVOLVED THE CONSTRUCTION OF 14,000 SQUARE FOOT, A NEW BUILDING ON HORN ROAD. HALF OF THE BUILDING WOULD BE RETAINED BY THE DEVELOPER WHO'S ACTUALLY LOCATE THEIR COMPANY IN THIS BUILDING THE OTHER HALF WHEN WOULD BE SUBDIVIDED TO ALLOW FOR THREE ADDITIONAL TENANT SPACES? IN ADDITION TO THAT THEY DESIGNED A SITE IN A MANNER TOO LOUD FOR A FUTURE BUILDING. IN A SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE OF ALL THINGS GOES ACCORDING TO PLAN. UH, BUT THE LAST COUNCIL. THERE ARE A COUPLE OF ISSUES THAT WERE RAISED PRIMARILY REGARDING THE ARCHITECTURE AS WELL AS THE GRAVEL IN THE PARKING LOT. SO UH , OVER THE LAST TWO WEEKS, WE MET WITH THE APPLICANT TO WORK THROUGH THE ARCHITECTURAL ISSUES AND WHAT WE CAME TO RESOLUTION ON WAS TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL WINDOW ON THAT USED ELEVATION YOU CAN SEE ON THE SECOND SECOND FROM THE TOP VISION. IN ADDITION , THEY'VE ADDED SOME ADDITIONAL MASONRY ALONG THE CORNERS OF THE BUILDING. SO THE ETHOS ORIGINALLY WAS 71% OF THE BUILDING. NOW IT'S DOWN TO 63% SO IN ADDITION, STONE PREMIER WENT FROM 20% TO 26% IN THE GLASS WENT FROM 7 TO 11% ON THE EAST ELEVATION, SO THEY DID, UH , STAFF'S OPINION COMPLY WITH THE ORIGINAL STIPULATION PLACED ON MY PLAN COMMISSION AT THE POINT COMMISSION MEETING, SO WE FELT PRETTY COMFORTABLE WITH SUPPORTING THIS. THIS REVISED PLANS TO MEET THE STIPULATION, SOMEBODY POINTING COMMISSION PREVIOUSLY AND THEN UH, THE OTHER STIPULATION THAT WAS ORIGINALLY PLACED ON THIS. APPLICATION AT THE LAST POINT LAST COUNCIL MEETING. ENTAILED THE DISCUSSION ON THE GRAVEL PARKING LOT AND JUST MAKE SURE COUNCILS ALL WHERE THE GRAVEL PARKING LOT. THAT ASPECT OF THE GRAVEL WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IS APPROXIMATELY 860 FT. OFF THE RIGHT AWAY. SO THE GRAVEL IS A BASICALLY ONE LANE ACCESS ROAD BACK TO THE STORAGE BUILDING, AND I BELIEVE IT IS ALSO A CELL TOWER BACK THERE. SO REALLY, THIS IS THE ACCESS ROAD DO YOU GET TO THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY SO LOOKING AT OTHER PROJECTS THAT COUNSELOR CALLS TRIALING STORAGE WAS APPROVED BACK IN 2019 2020. AND THAT WAS ALSO THERE WAS A SIGHT TO THE SOUTH OF THIS PROJECT. I BELIEVE AND WE ALLOWED THEM TO RETAIN HALF OF THEIR SITE BEING GRAVEL. SO WHEN WE LOOK AT THE DISTANCE FROM THE FROM THE ROAD TO THE IMPROVEMENTS AS WELL AS LOOKING AT OTHER SURROUNDING THRILLING USES. WE FELT PRETTY COMFORTABLE WITH UH, MAINTAINING THAT WE REALLY COULD BE. THEY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO MAINTAIN THE EARTH.

RETAIN THE GRAVEL BUT THAT WILL BE SUBJECT TO BE EASY. A HEARING IN A REQUEST BUT AGAINST YOUR QUESTIONS IN MY HEAD. MR ROSS, THIS IS A THIS IS THE FIRST BUILDING THAT'S IN THE NEW C R A. N C. A PROPERTIES WILL BE. WE'VE HAD DISCUSSIONS WITH SOME OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS WITH BUILDING ASPECTS, BUT THIS IS THE FIRST PROJECT THIS FAR ALONG AND THIS, UM THIS IS ALREADY THIS IS AN I N D ONE BUILDING. COULD YOU EXPLAIN THE COUNCIL? JUST WHAT I INDEED ONE CUP CLASSIFICATION IS JUST FOR KNOWLEDGE. WE HAVE TO ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS. I E. 1 92. I NEED TO AS MUCH MORE INTENSIVE MUCH MORE ON THE MANUFACTURING SIDE. THIS IS A MORE LOGISTICS OF SMALLER OPERATIONS. LOVE FLEX SPACE SORT OF COMBINATION OF WAREHOUSE STORAGE OR LIGHT MANUFACTURING BACK OFFICE IN THE FRONT. SO THE LOCATION THAT LOCATION IS SITE IN RESPECT TO OUR FUTURE LANES, PLANES GOING FORWARD WITH THE OVERPASS AND TRYING TO KIND OF PIN. THOSE

[00:15:04]

LINKS IS DOWN AS WE TRANSITION TO THE NORTH. THESE TEXT PLACES TECH FLEX USES WILL FADE AWAY AND GO MORE TO THE OFFICE. BUT ON THIS SIDE OF THE SOUTHWEST. EVERY PLANE. WE ENVISION THESE TYPES OF FLUX USES TO REALLY PROVIDE A GAP TO THE INDUSTRIAL USES. WE'RE MISSING RIGHT NOW AND LOOK AT OUR COMMUNITY. WE HAVE A LOT OF LARGER BUILDINGS. WE HAD A LOT OF REALLY SMALL BUILDINGS, BUT WE DON'T HAVE A LOT OF BUILDINGS ALLOW PEOPLE TO GROW IN SO THIS WILL BE A FACILITY THAT WOULD ALLOW US TO HAVE THE SMALLER USES GROW INTO THE INTO THE SPACE. SO IF I WAS, UM DEVELOPING COMPANY AND I WANTED TO BUILD WIDGETS. UH, AND ASSEMBLE THE WIDGETS. THIS WOULD BE THE TYPE OF BUILDING I WOULD GO INTO. IT COULD BE. YES YES. I MEAN, NORMALLY WHAT WE SEE IN THE I D TO ZONING DISTRICT IS A HIGHER, HIGHER CEILING. HIGHER CLEAR CEILING. SO THIS IS I BELIEVE IT'S 24 FT. SO IT'S NOT REALLY MEANT TO STORE AND HOW STUFF AND STACK STUFF IS MEANT MORE FOR THE FLEX. TYPES OF OFFICES AND THERE ARE NO UH. LOADING DOORS, LOADING DOCKS. I SHOULD SAY THERE'S NO DOUBT AT ALL THAT THERE'S SOME BAY DOORS, BUT NO DOCS, RIGHT, BUT NO ACTUAL LOADING DOCKS, PERCENT. QUESTIONS FROM COUNSEL FOR MR ROGERS. MR NORWOOD. DID YOU WANT TO SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THIS? OR IF YOU WOULD JUST PROVIDE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. JIM NORWOOD 5200 FISHER ROAD. OHIO. JUST WHAT KYLE SAID . WE'RE NOT LOOKING TO GET HUGE MANUFACTURING, AND THEY'RE LIKE THE T SHIRT SHOP. THE REAL ESTATE OFFICE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT SOME SMALL SMALL BUSINESSES IN THERE AND GET THEM STARTED THERE, AND ONCE THEY GROW, THEY CAN MOVE TO ANOTHER ONE. RIGHT BUT WE'RE JUST LOOKING FOR STARTUP COMPANIES, PROBABLY IN THE THREE STIPULATIONS. YOU'RE WITH THOSE KIND OF SOLVED THE ONE BUT WE'RE STILL STILL THERE WILL BE FINE. GOOD. ANY QUESTIONS? MR SHOCKING, MR MAYOR POSSIBLE OF THE AERIAL SO THAT WE KNOW WHERE THAT'S LOCATED ON HARMONY. YES, SO THIS THIS IS JUST NORTH OF THE YOUTH STORAGE.

THERE'S TWO OF THEM THERE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF IT'S NOT. IT'S NOT IN OUR NEW MEDICAL. DESIGNATED AREA REALLY CONSIDERED AN INFILL . THAT WOULD BE THE PROPER TERM AND INFO, UM, INDUSTRIAL AREA THERE. SO. I THINK IT LOOKS BETTER THAN MOST EXISTING STRUCTURES OVER THERE, TOO. SO AND WE'RE HOPING THAT'S THE CASE. ALL RIGHT, GOOD. WE'RE GOING TO BE IN THERE, TOO. SO IT'S GONNA BE NICE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. THAT'S RIGHT. I JUST HAVE ONE QUESTION. SURE TYPES OF VEHICLES FOR THE BUSINESS THAT USE THAT YOU KNOW OF TODAY GOING IN AND OUT FOR OUR BUSINESS. WE'VE GOT THREE PICKUP TRUCKS. BUT RIGHT OF SUVS. SMALLER CARS . THANK YOU. NOTHING WE HAVE NO USE TRACKS. THAT ROAD KIND OF CONCERNS ME IN TERMS OF POTENTIAL FOR TRAFFIC GOING IN AND OUT SO GOOD TO HEAR WILL SOMETIMES HAVE TRUCKS COME AND DROP OFF MATERIAL. LIKE FEDEX AND STUFF LIKE THAT, BUT THAT'S ABOUT ALL WE GET. THANK YOU.

OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL. THIS RESOLUTION SAID IT'S READING PUBLIC HEARING THE MOVEMENT BE APPROVED. SECOND. MR SHOT KEY? YES YES, MR BARRY. KNOW HOLT? YES, YES. PRESIDENT

[Ordinance C-56-22 Authorize the City Administrator to enter into an Agreement with Jackson Township for Fire Hydrant Maintenance. Second reading and public hearing.]

THAT'S ALL I HAVE THIS EVENING MISHANDLED. THE PURPOSES OF THE SERVICE COMMITTEE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS EVENING. I HAVE ORDINANCE SEE 56 22 IN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH JACKSON TOWNSHIP FOR FIRE UM , FROM PUBLIC'S KNOWLEDGE YOU CAN SEE IN THE TEXT OF THE AGREEMENT ITSELF WITH THE CITY WILL SOON RESPONSIBILITY FOR AS WELL AS THE TOWNSHIP RESPONSIBILITIES GOING FORWARD AND PRIOR TO THE TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITY. MR BARROSO, IF YOU'D LIKE TO TOUCH ON THE OVERVIEW FOR ME. MY KNOWLEDGE. WE'VE NEVER HAD A FORMAL AGREEMENT. AH TO THE CULMINATION OF THOSE DISCUSSIONS, RESULTING THIS AGREEMENT IN WHICH IT'S A 25 YEAR AGREEMENT. THE TOWNSHIP OVER BE RESPONSIBLE FOR YEARLY FLUSHING THE HYDRANTS, PAINTING THE HYDRANTS AND BRINGING ALL HYDRANTS THAT ARE NON OPERABLE INTEROPERABLE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE CITY OF GROWTH CITY TAKEN

[00:20:02]

OVER RESPONSIBILITY. SO I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS. ANY QUESTIONS, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. IF WE COULD MANAGER? YES, SIR. COUPLE MORE COMMENT. I'VE BEEN INVOLVED IN SAYING NUMBER OF YEARS AND, UH, THE DISCUSSIONS WITH THE TOWNSHIP GOES OVER DECADES. ABOUT SERVICING AND PAINTING AND PARTICULARLY THE FIRE HYDRANTS, AND I'M VERY, VERY MUCH IN FAVOR OF THIS PARTICULAR PIECE OF LEGISLATION BECAUSE IT DOES. CERTAINLY CLARIFIED, BUT I DON'T WANT TO GET LOST IN THE SHUFFLE. OF DISCUSSION. THE AMOUNT OF FUNDING. THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS OF THE SEED GROWS CITY. BUSINESSES AND INDIVIDUALS CONTRIBUTE TO THE TOWNSHIP. NON FIRE AND I HAVE TO SIZE. NON FIRE. THAT FOR THE YEAR 2022 ARE PROPERTY OWNERS WILL CONTRIBUTE 2,000,236 HOURS. I'M SORRY, A MILLION $483,000. TO THE TOWNSHIP ROAD PROGRAM AND TO THEIR OPERATING BUDGET. AND WE'RE TAKING OVER THIS SERVICING SIMPLY BECAUSE, UH, THEY WANTED THE TRUCK. AND ONE OF SOME OTHER THINGS THAT BENEFIT THE $1000 A YEAR. AND WE SAID NO, THIS.

LET'S CLARIFY THIS. WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND TAKE IT OVER. YOU STILL HAVE TO PAINT THEM.

AND FLUSH THEM THE ONLY LAST PIECE THAT IS YET TO CULMINATE IS THE BRINGING UP TO DATE AND THE SERVICING OF THE FIRE HYDRANTS THAT ARE NOT FULLY OF THE WHAT THEY SHOULD BE.

INCLUDING ONE ON SHELDON PLACE THAT WE WANT REPAIRED. BUT THIS IS THE RIGHT LEGISLATION. AND IT'S THE RIGHT THING TO DO. BUT I JUST EMPHASIZE THAT OUR TAXPAYERS NON FIRE. CONTRIBUTE A MILLION FOREIGN $83,000 A YEAR. THANK YOU, MAYOR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. SORRY. QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. ONE OTHER INTERESTING POINT OUT AS THE MAYOR ADDRESSED A AN INDIVIDUAL FIRE HYDRANT, BUT ALL FIRE HYDRANTS. PART OF THE TEXT OF THIS AGREEMENT ARE TO BE IN SERVICE AND REPAIRS COMPLETED BEFORE THE TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITY, IMPORTANT FOR THE PUBLIC TO BE AWARE OF THAT, AND THE COUNCIL IS WEIGHING IN ON THIS AGREEMENT, BECAUSE IT IS FOR A PERIOD OF LONGER THAN 12 MONTHS. SIGNIFICANTLY LONGER AS IT GOES UNTIL DECEMBER. 31ST OF 2047 UNLESS TERMINATED BY EITHER PARTY. SO UM, JUST WANTED TO POINT THOSE ITEMS OUT AND WITHOUT THIS ORDINANCE, YES. I JUST WANTED TO POINT OUT, MADAM CHAIRMAN. MY BIGGEST ISSUE IS WE'RE BASICALLY COMMITTING OTHER COUNCILS. UM, WAY WAY INTO THE FUTURE. ONE OF THE AGREEMENT.

ALL I WANT TO SAY. BLESSING TERMINATED BY TERMINATION BY EITHER PARTY. THAT'S THE IMPORTANT PART OF THAT ONE LINER. ALRIGHT UM AT THIS TIME, THIS ORDINANCE HAS HAD ITS SECOND READING IN PUBLIC HEARING AND I MOVED IT TO BE APPROVED. SECOND. MR SEGERS? YES VERY MR HOLT. YES? THIS IS HOW? YES, MR SHOCKEY. THANK YOU. ALL I HAVE THIS EVENING, PRESIDENT BARRY.

YOU STARTED, MR HOLTZMAN. AND WEREN'T GREEN TODAY. FINANCE GROUP CITY GREEN. WE HAVE LOTS OF FINANCE THINGS RIGHT HERE. UM ALRIGHT. ORDINANCE C 57 22 IN ORDINANCE LEVY IN SPECIAL

[Ordinance C-57-22 Levying Special Assessments for the Construction of Various Sidewalks in the City of Grove City. Second reading and public hearing.]

ASSESSMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF VARIOUS SIDEWALKS AND THE CITY OF GROVE CITY. SO THIS IS THE SIDEWALK WORK THAT WAS DONE LAST YEAR TO THE SIDEWALKS, AND THIS IS THE ASSESSMENT THAT GOES ON THE TAX BILL FOR THE IDENTIFIED PROPERTIES. THERE HAS BEEN AT LEAST ONE CHANGE TO THOSE IDENTIFIED PROPERTIES AND LET'S GET THAT OUT OF THE WAY FIRST YEAR SO UM I MOVED TO A MANNED EXHIBIT A TO SHOW 34 87 ROAD IS PAID. MR BARRY? YES WHOLE YES. SHOT KEY, MR CIGARETTES? YES. OKAY, SO THE LIST THEN IS IT DOES NOT INCLUDE DEVON ROAD. MHM AND, UM.

COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL. MINISTER STEVE IF I MAY. THANK YOU, MR HOLDER. I JUST WOULD LIKE THE RECORD TO REFLECT THAT WE DID RECEIVE ONE APPEAL WHICH COUNCIL WAS MADE AWARE OF, UM AND WE PREPARED A RESPONSE FOR THAT APPEAL. THEREFORE, YOU'VE SATISFIED YOUR OBLIGATIONS WITH REGARD TO THAT. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANY OTHER COUNCIL COMMENTS? OKAY? MR WEAVER,

[00:25:08]

YOU'VE SIGNED UP FOR 57 22. I'M EXCITED TO HEAR YOUR COMMENTS ABOUT THIS LEGISLATION. YEAH THANK YOU, MR MR. HOLT UM, MY NAME PLAN, WEAVER. UM BEFORE WE PROCEED WITH SIDEWALKS THAT LIKE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COUNSELING GOOD CITY MINISTRATIONS, ESPECIALLY LAW DIRECTOR STEVEN SMITH QUESTIONED OUR SIDEWALK BUILDING INFORMATION BACK IN FEBRUARY AND APRIL AND NUMEROUS TIMES. AND I NEVER RECEIVED ANY DOCUMENTATION OF PUBLIC RECORDS REGARDING SIDEWALK IN THE 80 EVENING UPS. UM FOR THE 76 65, SO WE NEED TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE GOOD RECORD KEEPING COULD AT THE FORMER I T SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR FOR CITY OF CLIFF CITY. MR BOTHA, WHO? THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CHUCK BOTH THE HOUTHIS BROTHER. WE'RE PULLING OUT OF DELETING, UH, BUILDING PERMIT AND BUILDING PLAN. INFORMATION IN THAT MAY BE A REASON WHY I'M NOT ABLE TO GET THE INFORMATION ON REQUESTING DO YOU GO TO THE WEBSITE? MAKE GOOD . SEE HOW THAT GOT AND MAKE GOOD CITY GREAT DOT COM. YOU'LL SEE VIDEOS AND RECORDS SO I'D APPRECIATE IT IF WE CAN KEEP OUR RECORDS. MR WEAVER. THIS IS ON LOVING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. IF YOU WANT TO DO YOUR ADVERTISEMENT FOR YOUR WEBSITE, YOU CAN DO THAT. UNDER PUBLIC COMMENT AT THE END OF THIS THIS IS FOR A SPECIFIC PIECE OF LEGISLATION, WHICH YOU HAVE YET TO MENTION. SO LEGISLATION REQUIRES, UM SIDEWALK PUBLIC RECORDS, SO I WANNA MAKE SURE YOU GUYS ARE KEEPING GOOD RECORDS BECAUSE ONE OF THE THINGS THAT MR HOLT BROUGHT UP IN THE BEGINNING OF THE THING WAS A P O IN APPEAR WOULD BE A PUBLIC RECORD, RIGHT? SO IF WE CAN PROVIDE PUBLIC CRACKER, THEN, UH I WOULD HOLD OFF ON DOING THAT PEOPLE INVESTIGATION IS DONE BY CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION SYSTEMS REGARDING THE CITY OF GOOD CITY. NOT BEING TRUTHFUL, INCLUDING TRUCK, BOTH ON MIKE BOTO AND THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT RECORDS BEING DELETED AND DO AN INVESTIGATION ON WHY THE 88 RING UP SCAN UP BE PROVIDED. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR WEAVER. ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT. OKAY? MM. THIS ORDINANCE CITED SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING AND MOVED TO BE APPROVED. SECOND MR HOPE? YES YES, MR SHOT KEY? YES, AS AMENDED. MR SEACREST? YES, MR BARRY? YES? BUT MR HOLT. THE MAYOR. JUST AN OBSERVATION. WE NOW HAVE BEEN DOING THIS. SIX YEARS, SEVEN YEARS. PROBABLY AT LEAST SIX. AND I THINK THE FACT THAT WE HAD ONE PERSON ASK FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ONE OTHER PERSON PAID FOR THEIR OWN REPAIRS, AND I THINK TWO OF THEM I ACTUALLY DID THEIR OWN REPAIRS, RIGHT? SO. MY OBLIGATION IS THIS PROGRAM IS WORKING AND WORKING VERY EFFECTIVELY AND APPRECIATE COUNSEL WITH THEIR ENDORSEMENT OF THIS PARTICULAR LEGISLATION. MR HOLT. MR RUBY SHARK IS THE MAYOR HAS SAID I WOULD HOPE AND I MENTIONED THIS BEFORE THAT WE WHEN WE CAUGHT UP TO THE NEW BUDGET YEAR WE HAVE COLLECTED IN THE IN EXCESS OF 3.5 MILLION IN ADDITIONAL REVENUE FOR INCOME TAX. I WOULD HOPE WE WOULD DOUBLE THE SIZE OF THIS PROGRAM COST WISE FOR NEXT YEAR, AS WELL AS THE GRINDING PROGRAM, SO HOPEFULLY WE CAN DO THAT BECAUSE IT'S A GREAT PROGRAM AND WE DESPERATELY NEED THOSE SIDEWALKS FIXED. UH AND IT'S A GREAT PARTNERSHIP WITH THE INDIVIDUAL OWNERS. HONEY ELSE. OKAY? MOVING

[Ordinance C-59-22 Authorize the City Administrator to enter into Contracts with Quadient for Postage Machines. First reading.]

ON C 59 22. AN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS WITH PARTING IT FOR THE POSTAGE MACHINES. THIS IS THE FIRST READING. SECOND READING IN PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE 9 19. SEPTEMBER 19TH. ORDINANCE, SEE 60 22. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND

[Ordinance C-60-22 Amend Section 121.01 of the Codified Ordinances titled Council Salary. First reading.]

SECTION 1 21.1 OF THE CODIFIED ORDINANCE IS TITLED COUNCIL SALARY. THIS IS THE FIRST READING. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SEPTEMBER 19TH. C 61 22. AN ORDINANCE TO

[Ordinance C-61-22 Amend Section 161.11 of the Codified Ordinances titled Tuition Reimbursement Program. First reading.]

MAKE AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 1 61.11 OF THE CODIFIED ORDINANCE TITLED TUITION REIMBURSEMENT

[00:30:01]

PROGRAM. THIS IS THE FIRST READING SECOND READING IN PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE 9 19. MOVING ON

[Resolution CR-52-22 Authorize the City Administrator to submit an application to Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission for attributable funding for the Southwest Area Interchange Project.]

TO ORDINANCES. ORDINANCE CR 50 TO 22. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO MIDDLE OHIO REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION. FOR ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDING FOR THE SOUTHWEST AREA OVERPASS PROJECT. THIS READING IS AS THIS RESOLUTION HAS HAD ITS FIRST READING, AND I BELIEVE I HAVE SOMEONE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK FOR THIS. IS THAT TRUE? CR 52? MR WEAVER, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK AGAIN? WE HAVE ANY NEW MATERIAL THIS TIME? THANK YOU, MR HOLT.

MY NAME'S BRIAN WEAVER. FORMER IT SYSTEM ILLUSTRATED FOR SAFEGUARDS CITY. YOU JUST SAW MR HURLEY WALK IN THE ROOM HERE, THE I T DIRECTOR. HE'S FULLY AWARE OF THE 88 POULIOT WHERE THEY'RE BUILDING DEPARTMENTS, PLEASE. WHAT'S THAT ABOUT THE ORDINANCE, PLEASE? THE AUDIENCE , SO THIS ORDINANCES REGARDING THE SOUTHWEST AREA OVER PAST WHICH REQUIRED NO DOUBT BETTER OFF FUNDING IN ORDER EVERYTHING THAT FUNDING YOU HAD TO REPLACE THE 88 RAMP. SOME 71 6 65 AGAIN . STEPHEN SMITH WENT UP. PROVIDE THE RECORDS. UM IS IT NOT TRUE THAT THERE'S MR WEAVER? THERE'S NO 80 A RAMPS ON THE FREEWAY. I APPRECIATE YOU. CAN YOU HAVE A SEAT, PLEASE? 80 AREA FROM 71 6 65, RIGHT? I 71 THERE'S NO 88 RAMS. CAN YOU HAVE A SEAT, PLEASE? 6 55, SIR. OKAY. CAN YOU HAVE A SEAT? PLEASE? WE'VE ALREADY HEARD THIS. WE'RE MOVING ONTO THE NEXT THING. THE NEXT RECEIVING BETTER LISTEN TO ME CAREFULLY. THE NEXT TIME YOU STAND UP, HAVE YOUR COMMENTS PERTAIN EXACTLY TO THE ORDINANCE . THAT'S BEFORE US, PLEASE. OKAY, THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

ROGER HASN'T THINGS ROGER YOU'RE ALSO ON HERE. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND FULL ADDRESS FOR THE AUDIENCE, PLEASE ROGER BURKETT. I DON'T KNOW. FIVE GRASSLEY ROAD. LONDON, OHIO. UM. SEEMS LIKE WE GOT ONE CUBIC MONEY PROJECT AFTER ANOTHER. WHAT'S WRONG WITH LEGAL AT FARMLAND? I WAS TOLD AS FARMLAND NOW. WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER OVERPASS BETWEEN STRING TOWN AND 6 65. I WOULD SUGGEST WE JUST TRASH CAN THIS WHOLE IDEA RIGHT NOW, BUT I KNOW THAT IS NOT LIKELY TO HAPPEN. UM. I WOULD SUGGEST THAT THIS SHOULD BE PRESENTED TO THE VOTERS. THE PEOPLE THAT ELECTED YOU ALL. I DON'T THINK YOU'RE GONNA GET YES VOTE. FROM THE VOTERS. I'M SURE YOU'RE NOT NO IT, UM. SHOULD BE PRESENTED TO THE VOTERS AS. BY ITSELF, ISSUE NOT HIDDEN UNDER SOMETHING ELSE.

IT SHOULD BE PRESENTED TO THE VOTERS TELLING THEM HOW MUCH IT'S GONNA COST. AND WE ALL KNOW IT'S THE BEST GUESS RIGHT NOW IS 35 MILLION. 45 OR 50, YOU WILL BE CLOSER. IT WILL BE CLOSER. UM THIS IS NOT. MR BIRKETT? YES JUST FOR CLARIFICATION. SO YOU KNOW, THIS IS THIS RESOLUTION AUTHORIZES THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION. UM TO THE MIDDLE.

HOW REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FUNDING. SO WE'RE ASKING. WE'RE ASKING AN ORGANIZATION FOR FUNDING IS WHAT WE'RE DOING IN THIS ONE. BUT, UM BY JUST ASKING FOR FUNDING MANGER INTENDING TO DO IT. YES WE ARE INTENDING TO DO IT, BUT AT THE SAME POINT IN TIME, THIS APPLICATION IS SIMPLY GIVING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR OF 42 AT TO DO AN APPLICATION. I'M AWARE OF THAT. UM OKAY, WELL, I THINK IT SHOULD BE. DUMPED IN THE TRASH. I GUESS THAT'S ABOUT ALL I GOT THAT'S SAY TO ME.

THANK YOU, MR BURKETT. IF I COULD MR. LIKE STAGE. MHM. THAT'S SENDING. WOULD YOU MIND

[00:35:06]

GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS SO THAT THE PUBLIC IS AWARE OF HOW THIS WORKS, AND BY THE WAY HAD WE NOT TAKEN THE SAME PROCESS, MR BURKETT 6 65 BRIDGE WOULD NOT BE THERE. IT WOULD BE A STILL TWO LANE BRIDGE RUNNING ACROSS I SEND THE ONE SO SHE COULD EXPLAIN WHY WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS. YES SO, UM , THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION WHILE LA LA US TO SUBMIT FOR ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDS AND ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDS THROUGH MORE IS A PROGRAM THAT IS A VERY COMPETITIVE PROGRAM. IT'S A COST ACROSS THE ENTIRE MPO THE ENTIRE REGION. UM, AND IT BRINGS UM.

SEVERAL DIFFERENT CATEGORIES. SO THERE'S MAJOR WIDENING. THERE'S MINOR WIDENING. THERE'S PEDESTRIAN AND THEN THERE, UM, ARE BETTERMENT PROJECTS, AND SO THIS WOULD OBVIOUSLY BE IN AN EXPANSION TYPE APPLICATION AGAIN . UM IT HAS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REGIONAL M. T. P S OR THE 20 YEAR PLAN, AS WELL AS THE FOUR YEAR TIP PLAN. AND SO WE HAVE, UM, INCLUDED THIS PROJECT AS AN APPLICANT, AND THEN IT'LL GO THROUGH. IT'LL BE SCORED AND SCORED ON A WIDE VARIETY OF CATEGORIES AND ALSO, UM THEN COMPARED TO OTHER PROJECTS IN THE SAME CATEGORY BEFORE IT'S DECIDED. BY THAT COMMITTEE, WHICH PROJECTS ARE RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING. UM I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S ANY OTHER DETAILS THAT YOU'RE WANTING ME TO SHARE MAYOR. BUT IT'S UM WELL, THERE'S THE POINT IS, THERE IS A STEP BY STEP PROCESS. AND WITH THE BIPARTISAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDS , WHICH ARE IN THE BILLIONS IF WE DON'T GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS AND WE DON'T FOLLOW THOSE STEPS WERE OUT OF AND SO WE WANT TO PROTECT AND THAT'S JUST THE TAXPAYERS MONEY. RIGHT AHEAD AND COOLING OURSELVES UP AT THE MONEY BECOMES AVAILABLE, AT LEAST WERE QUEUED UP TO BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS TYPE OF PROJECT ISN'T INCLUDED ON BOTH OF THOSE LONG RANGE PLANS.

YOU'RE NEVER ELIGIBLE FOR NOT ONLY THIS PART OF FUNDING, BUT OTHER PARTS OF FUNDING THAT ARE GOING TO COME DOWN THE LINE WITH THE, UM INFRASTRUCTURE BILL THAT YOU MENTIONED COURSE. THANK YOU, MR HOLMES. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS, COUNSEL, MR. JUST ONE COMMENT. THE REASON WE'RE DOING THIS ULTIMATELY IS TO PRODUCE JOBS. AND THAT'S WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT. IT'S A JOBS PRODUCER , AND WE ALL THOSE PEOPLE THAT ARE COMING OUT OF SCHOOL COMING OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL COMING OUT OF COLLEGE COMING ON TRADE SCHOOLS IN THERE, THEY DON'T NEED JOBS, AND WE WANT THEM TO BE ABLE TO WORK HERE IN GROVE CITY, AND THAT'S WHAT THIS DEVELOPMENT IS ALL ABOUT. AND THAT'S WHAT THIS THIS, UH BRIDGES AND CONNECTING LAND TOGETHER. AND WE'VE GOT, YOU KNOW. YEAH WE'RE TAKING A LITTLE LAND OUT OF AGRICULTURE ON THERE, BUT WE'RE PLANNING FOR IT WERE PREPARING THE FUTURE FOR OUR YOUNGER FOLKS, NOT THE FOLKS THAT ARE SITTING UP HERE. BUT THE FOLKS WHO ARE GOING TO STAY IN GROUPS CITY WHO ARE GOING TO WORK IN GROUPS CITY RAISE THEIR FAMILIES AND GROUPS CITY AND WE'RE GOING TO PROSPER THOSE WHO ARE GOING TO PROSPER IN GROVE CITY, AND THAT'S THE REAL REASON WHY YOU DO DEVELOPMENTS LIKE THIS ON THERE. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES I DO WANT TO TOUCH ON KIND OF CONNECTING MR BURKE. IT'S COMMENTS WITH THE INFORMATION PRESENTED BY MR FITZPATRICK. IN TERMS OF OUR RESIDENTS AND THEIR PERCEPTION NUMBER ONE. UH I WANT THEM TO HAVE THE CONFIDENCE THAT WE ARE WORKING ON ANY FUNDING SOURCE THAT COULD HELP US COMPLETE THIS VISION ONE AND NUMBER TWO, UM BY UNDERTAKING AN EXERCISE WITH THE MID OHIO REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION AND ATTRIBUTABLE FUNDS. WE'RE PUTTING OTHER PEOPLE'S EYES ON THE IDEA. SO IF WE BELIEVE THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE AN ECONOMIC DRIVER AND OPEN UP AN ENTIRE CORRIDOR TO JOB CREATION, UM IT'LL BE INTERESTING TO SEE IF THE MIDDLE HIGHER REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION AGREES WITH US. SO JUST WANTED TO PUT THAT OUT THERE. OKAY? YOU KNOW? ALRIGHT THIS RESOLUTION SAID IT'S READING AND PUBLIC HEARING AND I MOVED TO BE APPROVED SECOND.

THIS IS HOPE, MR SHOT KEY? YES YES, YES. CR 53 22 RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT THE BIDS FROM THE VILLA

[Resolution CR-53-22 Accept the Bids for the Beulah Park Phase 2 Structures and Waive the Provisions of Section 153.12 of the Ohio Revised Code.]

PARK. PHASE TWO STRUCTURES AND WAIVE THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1 53.12 OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE. AND MR BOZO WANTED TO EXPLAIN THAT PIECE OF CODE FOR US EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE WAVING.

YES THANK YOU. UH, JUST, UH FROM A HISTORICAL APPROACH TO THIS PARTICULAR LEGISLATION, COUNCIL

[00:40:05]

HAS APPROPRIATED $10 MILLION FOR THE NEW PARK AT VIOLA. UH WITHIN THERE ARE A NUMBER OF ELEMENTS, INCLUDING THREE STRUCTURES. ONE IS SIMILAR TO THE EAGLE PAVILION AT CAN'T I MEAN FRIAR PARK. THE OTHER TWO ARE SHELTER HOUSES. WE TOOK BIDS ON THOSE PARTICULAR STRUCTURES ON AUGUST 9TH. UH THE BID ESTIMATE WAS $2.1 MILLION. THE RESULT OF THAT DID WE RECEIVED ONE BID? THE BID WAS $1.3 MILLION OVER THE ESTIMATE. UNDER STATE STATUTE OF THE BID IS 10% OVER THE ESTIMATED CAUSED IT CANNOT BE AWARDED UNLESS UNDER HOME RULE POWER THAT WE HAVE COUNSEL WOULD WAIVE THAT PARTICULAR PROVISION. SO IN ANALYZING THE BIDDING CLIMATE, AS WELL AS SUPPLY CHAINS FOR THE NEAR FUTURE, WE BELIEVE IT'S PRUDENT TO AWARD THIS CONTRACT AT THIS TIME BECAUSE IT WOULD APPEAR THAT PRICES ONLY GO UP. AND AGAIN THIS. THESE PARTICULAR STRUCTURES ARE STILL WITH WITHIN THE $10 MILLION APPROPRIATED BY COUNSEL. SO AGAIN, WE WOULD ASK YOUR SUPPORT. HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU, MR BOZO. QUESTIONS THROUGH COUNCIL. I HOPE. YEAH I JUST WANT TO TOUCH ON AND I GUESS I'M REALLY GRAPPLING WITH THIS IN TERMS OF, UM YOU KNOW IN WHEN THE PRIVATE SECTOR IS FACED WITH SIMILAR SET OF DECISIONS, UM, IN THIS IN THIS CURRENT ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT THERE, UH, NORMALLY DECIDING, IT MIGHT BE OF BENEFIT TO THEM TO WRITE IT OUT FOR A BIT. SO I GUESS I'M LOOKING FOR THE COMPELLING CASE FOR UM AND I KNOW GOVERNMENT MAKES DECISIONS IN A DIFFERENT FASHION, BUT IN IN TALKING WITH PEOPLE IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, THEY'RE PUTTING OFF THE CAPITAL PROJECT BECAUSE OF THE UNCERTAINTY THAT IS TIED TO THE COST OF THE FACT THAT IT IS, UM YOU KNOW, AND YOU GAVE US MANY EXAMPLES, AND WE WE'VE WATCHED THEM PLAY OUT IN OTHER COMMUNITIES IN CENTRAL OHIO. WHERE THE PROJECT THAT THEY THOUGHT WAS GOING TO BE A CERTAIN PRICE TAG IS SIGNIFICANTLY LARGER. SO IN THIS CASE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, YOU KNOW. OVER 1.53 TIMES, 1.82 TIMES 1.94 TIMES HIGHER THAN WAS PROJECTED SO SIGNIFICANTLY BEYOND THAT 10% THRESHOLD. UM AND THEN THE OTHER PIECE THAT I'M SORT OF GRAPPLING WITH IS WHEN YOU READ THE TEXT OF THE EXPLANATION, AND THE SUBS ARE NOT, UM, EVEN REALLY INTERESTED BECAUSE THEY'RE SPREAD TOO THIN. AND UM AND I THINK THERE'S A BALANCING ACT THAT IS OCCURRING RIGHT NOW ON ALL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE GOING TO GET THE QUALITY THAT THE PRICE TAG IS WHAT INDICATE SO, UM, I'M JUST PUTTING THAT OUT THERE. THERE IS DEFINITELY INTERESTED THE PROJECT WOULD BE REBID AND, UM, THAT WAS EXPRESSED IN IN YOUR COMMUNICATION, MR BARROSO AND UM AND I GUESS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION . IS THERE IS THERE ANYTHING TRULY COMPELLING THAT SAYS THIS IS ON FIRE? WE REALLY SHOULD DO THIS. NOW, UM AND DO WE REALLY KNOW THAT THIS WOULD ONLY GET WORSE AND POTENTIALLY NOT STABILIZE IF WE WAIT UNTIL MORE ADVANTAGEOUS TIME? AGAIN, UH, AND ANALYZING THE BIDDING CLIMATE WITH ALL THE CONSTRUCTION JOBS THAT ARE OUT THERE NOW, AND MOST OF THEM WERE DELAYED BECAUSE OF COVID 19 YOU LOOK AT INTEL, UH, CONSTRUCTION COMING UP AND THE AVAILABILITY OF CONSTRUCTION WORKERS. IT WOULD APPEAR TO ME IF WE WERE GOING TO WAIT. WE HAVE TO WAIT TWO OR THREE YEARS NOW, WITH WAITING THAT THAT PARTICULAR LONG PERIOD. AND NOT HAVING THOSE FACILITIES FOR THE RESIDENTS OF GROVE CITY. I THINK IT WAS THE COMPELLING REASON THAT WE THOUGHT IN TERMS OF COMPLETING THE PARK THAT THEY COULD USE THESE FACILITIES. THAT'S ALL. AND AGAIN I I'M NOT DISAGREEING WITH WITH YOUR YOUR COMMENTS. CERTAINLY THAT'S A THAT'S AN APPROACH TO IT, BUT AGAIN AFTER ANALYZING AGAIN THE BIDDING SITUATION AND, UH I SENT OUT A MEMO OR AN EMAIL TO COUNCIL ON AUGUST 30TH. AND FOR JUST FOR AN EXAMPLE OF THE UPPER ARLINGTON RECREATION CENTER.

THEY ESTIMATED THAT COST $50 MILLION. A FEW MONTHS AGO. NOW THAT COSTS THEIR ESTIMATED $80 MILLION, SO I DON'T KNOW IF LIKE I SAY, CERTAINLY THAT'S AN APPROACH IF WE IF WE WANT TO DELAY THE AWARD, AND, UH, IT WOULD CERTAINLY AGAIN THE RESIDENTS OF THAT AREA WOULD NOT BE HAVE NOT WOULD NOT HAVE THE AVAILABILITY OF THOSE FACILITIES, WHICH AGAIN. WE

[00:45:06]

WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THIS LEGISLATION PASSED IN ORDER TO, UH HOW THOSE FACILITIES IN THAT PLACE FOR THE RESIDENTS OF GROWTH CITY IN A TIMELY MANNER. THANK YOU. PROMINENCE ANYBODY ELSE? ALL RIGHT. THIS IS RESOLUTION CR 53 22 MR. RESOLUTION IS HEADED READING PUBLIC HEARING AND I MOVED TO BE APPROVED. SECOND THANK YOU. MR SHOCKEY? YES, YES, YES. NO. CR

[Resolution CR-54-22 Authorize the City Administrator to Seek Financial Assistance from the State Capital Improvement Program/Local Transportation Improvement Program for funding of the Columbus Street Improvements Project.]

54 22 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO SEEK FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE STATE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, LOCAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. FOR FUNDING OF THE COLUMBUS STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT. WHICH IS A PRETTY BROAD TOPIC HERE WHO CAN EXPLAIN AND MAYBE JUST IN AN OVERVIEW OF WHAT THAT IS INDIE OR ANYBODY ELSE. ONE PARTICULAR PROJECT AGAIN IS WITH TALKED ABOUT FOR A WHILE, IT'S IN TERMS OF RELATED TO THE SEWER RELIEF PROGRAM, THE FLOODING IN THIS AREA SO THAT PARTICULAR PROJECT ESTIMATED $8 MILLION. WE'LL SEEK FUNDING THROUGH THE. UM LET'S THE STATE CAPITAL FUNDS. TO HELP WITH THAT PROJECT AGAIN. IT'S $8 MILLION AND WILL FORMULATE A PLAN AND TO GET THE BEST THE MULTIPLE POINTS WE CAN. SOME OF THAT MAY BE IN THE FORM OF A LOAN, NO INTEREST LOAN, AND SOME WILL BE IN THE FORM OF A GRANT.

SO ANY FUNDS WE RECEIVE WILL CERTAINLY BE A BLESSING TO THAT PROJECT. THANK YOU. SO THIS IS THE AUTHORIZATION TO APPLY FOR FUNDING? THAT'S ALL? YES. UM. ACCORDING TO THIS, MR WEAVER, YOU'VE SIGNED UP FOR CR 54 22. THANKS. THANK YOU, MR HOGAN. DO YOU HAVE GOOD COMMENTS FOR THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION? YEAH, THIS IS REGARDING THERE WITH MR MAYOR . I REQUEST STATING ABOUT FLOODING. UH, IN THIS, THIS, UH THIS, UH, PWC PUBLIC WORK COMMISSION NEED FUNDING BILL TO ELIMINATE FLOODING ENGLISH CITY . BUT BEFORE WE DO THAT, I THINK WE NEED TO HAVE A BUILDING INSPECTION RECORDS PAID BY THAT THEY'RE IN THE SYSTEM. BUT DEALING WITH COLUMBUS COLUMBUS STREET. MAKE SURE THAT CHUCK BOTH MIKE BODO ARE HAVING OUR BUILDING INSPECTION RECORDS APPROPRIATELY RETAINED AND GROW AND GROW CITY NOT DELETED. UM SO IN ORDER TO GET FUNDING FOR THIS SOUND REVOLUTION, WE NEED TO BE ACCURATE AND THE DOCUMENTATION AND ACCURATE AND PUBLIC RECORDS AND I'D LIKE TO ASK AN INVESTIGATION TO BE OPEN AND CHUCKED POSER. HAVE A SEAT, PLEASE. THANK YOU. OKAY, RESOLUTION CR 54 22 APPLICATION TO SEEK FUNDING FOR THE COLUMBUS STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. THIS RESOLUTION SAID IT'S READING AND PUBLIC HEARING AND I MOVED TO BE APPROVED. SECOND MR CIGARETTES, MR. BERRY YES, MR HOLT. MRS. HELP SHARP KEY. MR BARRY THAT CONCLUDES THE FINANCE SECTION OF THIS MEETING. THANK YOU, MR HOLT. THIS IS A PORTION OF THE

[Call for New Business]

MEETING WHERE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ABOUT NEW BUSINESS ITEMS CAN DO. SO AT THIS TIME WE HAD, UM HEY, CHRIS MOORE. CHRIS MOORE. YOU PRESENT. THAT'S HOW ARE YOU? HI, I'M FINE. THANKS FOR LETTING ME TALK. I AM WROTE MY NOTES SO HOPEFULLY CAN READ THEM. UM, I'M HERE BECAUSE I LIKE BACK IN JUNE WHEN THEY HAD PROMOTE MENTAL HEALTH. SO WHAT I'M JUST GOING TO SPEAK ABOUT IS, UM, BRIEFLY THIS WEEK IS SUICIDE PREVENTION LIMP, SO SEPTEMBER 4 3/11 IS REALLY A CONCERN FOR ME COME AND THE HEALTH CARE FIELD. AND ALSO WORKED OVER THE YEARS WITH TRAUMA HARMLESS AND DIFFERENT THINGS. AND NOW I'M A CERTIFIED MENTAL HEALTH AIDE SO I CAN WORK IN DIFFERENT SCHOOLS AND BESIDES THEM THERE HOSPITALS AND ANYWAYS , SO SUICIDE PREVENTION MONTH AND EVERYONE PEOPLE THAT REALLY CHOOSE LIFE, TRUTH AND RELATIONSHIP AND BECAUSE I'M A FAKE BELIEVER, I WANT PEOPLE TO CHOOSE IT FOR GOD, BUT ALSO I ALWAYS COME THIS MEETING BECAUSE I'M CONCERNED ACTIVITIES IN GROSS CITY IN COLUMBUS IN OHIO AND IN AMERICA THAT I BELONG TO IF THEY'RE GOING TO HELP THE PEOPLE HELP THEM WITH THEIR FINANCES HELPED HIM WITH

[00:50:02]

GRADUATE FROM SCHOOL. LIKE THE DIVERSITY GROUPS AND THINGS WERE STARTING. SO ANYWAYS, I'M HERE TO PRAY FOR THE LEADERSHIP HERE BECAUSE YOU GUYS HAVE A HARD DECISION WHEN WE COME IN HERE AND YOU HAVE ISSUES IN THE US COMING AND ASKING QUESTIONS AND STUFF. SO I'M JUST SAYING, IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO PRAY FOR LEADERSHIPS HERE, SO I'M JUST GOING TO PRAY FOR THE LORD TO PROTECT YOU PERSONALLY PROTECT YOUR FAMILIES BECAUSE YOU'RE ALWAYS HEARING PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT. THEY'RE COMING AFTER YOU FOR DIFFERENT THINGS YOU'RE DOING IN THE MEDICAL FIELD. SO I PRAY FOR YOUR SPIRIT, YOUR SOUL, YOUR BODY'S YOU'RE MENTALLY RELATIONSHIP WISE TO YOU, ASSOCIATE WITH FINANCIALLY. THINGS AREN'T TAKEN FROM YOU. BUT I'M PRAYING FOR WISDOM AND DISCERNMENT. WITH EVERY DECISION YOU MAKE. YOU'RE IN GROSS CITY THAT'S GOING TO AFFECT US IN THE FUTURE GENERATIONS AFTER ME, AND AFTER YOU SO I PRAY FOR GOLLY, DECISION MAKING AND ALL THE AREAS THAT INFLUENCE THAT YOU HAVE WILL BE GOD HONORING NOT SELFISH, NOT ME, AND THAT YOU CAN HEAR SO I PRAY THE LORD PROTECTS YOU FROM ALL EVIL INFLUENCES. I PRAY THAT YOU BRING, UM, WISE COUNSEL TO YOU BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH PEOPLE HAVE EVIL COUNSEL AND THAT WAS DIRECT PEOPLE DOWN THE WRONG PATH. SO I PRAYED FOR YOU. YOU'RE STRONG, YOU'RE REFRESHED.

THAT YOU SLEEP WELL AND THAT YOU KNOW THAT THE LOVE OF GOD IS WITH EACH OF YOU. I PRAY THAT BUT ALSO THE CONVICT YOU WHEN SOMETHING IS WRONG FOR SPENDING MONEY, OR HAVING THE WRONG BUSINESSES IN EUROPE, WHATEVER THAT CONVICTION WOULD COME AND YOU DO IT RIGHT. I THANK YOU FOR FOLLOWING GOD'S PRECEPTS AND NOT DO DO FROM THEM. SO LET THE BIBLE LET YOUR HEART LEAD YOU.

ALL OF THE BASIC 10 COMMANDMENTS . WHEN YOU GROW UP AND THEN LET THAT BE YOUR PLUMB LINE OVER THERE, EVERY DECISION AND EVERY ACTIVITY OR GROUP OR EVEN HELD AND DEVELOPMENTS WHAT YOU BRING IN HERE AND IF HE THINKS FARMLAND EVER THINKS IS IMPORTANT JUST FOR THE FAMILY.

THAT'S WHY MORE BUSINESSES WILL HAVE A LAKES AND PONDS STILL HAVE TWO PEOPLE RELAX INSTEAD OF FEEL LIKE THEY'RE JUST OVERWHELMED WITH LIFE IN GENERAL. AND THAT'S WHAT THIS MENTAL HEALTH IS ABOUT SO. SO I JUST CAME FROM MY NOSE NOW. EVERY PERSON HAS SIGNIFICANCE.

AND THAT'S WHAT I DEAL WITH. WITH PEOPLE IN CRISIS THEY NEED TO KNOW THAT THEY CAN FIND A PLACE AND A PURPOSE IN LIFE. I'M SORRY. YOU'RE ONLY ALLOWED THREE MINUTES. OKAY I'LL COME BACK ANOTHER TIME AROUND THE REST. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COMING HERE. YOU'RE ALWAYS AN INSPIRATION. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY OTHER COMMENTS AND COUNCILS. OKAY, MARY, YOUR REPORT, SIR. THANK YOU. YES. GO AHEAD. YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. WHICH IS YEAH. MR WEAVER. MR WEAVER. IF YOU'RE GOING TO PLAY THE SAME RECORDING, YOU HAVE THE LAST FOUR TIMES. LET ME SAVE YOU SOME TIME AND NOT DO IT BECAUSE THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GROWTH CITY. THEY SHOULDN'T DO BUSINESS. CORRECT IT'S NEW BUSINESS ABOUT ANYTHING. YOU CAN SPEAK ABOUT ANYTHING. YOU WISH YOU AWARE OF THE SULLIVAN VERSION OF NEW YORK TIMES 1964 SUPREME COURT CASE. YOU CAN DIFFER WITH STEPHEN SMITH. IF YOU'D LIKE TO I HAVE PERMISSION TO PLAY PUBLIC RECORDS PROVIDED TO ME. GO AHEAD. THANK YOU. WE'LL CLARIFY WHAT YOU'RE PLAYING AFTER YOU PLAYED IT.

OKAY? MY NAME'S BRIAN WEAVER. I'M FORMER ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR CITY OF GOOD CITY. I'M ALSO A DISABILITY ADVOCATE, ATTEMPTED TO SPEAK ABOUT 80 ISSUED WITH 88 RAMPS HERE, IN WHICH CITY STEPHEN SMITH WILL NOT PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS. THEY LIKELY ARE WE DELETED BY MR BOZO IN THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, TED BERRY AND MR HAWK REFUSED TO ALLOW ME TO SPEAK ABOUT THE 88 PROJECT. BUT I'M WITH REFERENCE TO SING TO DISABILITY AWARENESS AND DIVERSITY IN A DIVERSITY TEAM THAT MR CHRISTINE HAWK HAD FORMED. UM 12 MEMBERS ON THAT NO ONE ON THAT DIVERSITY TEAM IS A BASE LEADER, UM OR DISABILITY OR ANY OTHER ADVOCACY GROUPS HERE AND GO AND CITY THAT'S BEEN DENIED MOSTLY HAD THE L G B T Q AGENDA. I BELIEVE THAT'S BEING PROMOTED, AND I THINK WE NEED TO HAVE ACCOUNTABILITY IN OUR GOVERNMENT LEADERS AND HOW THEY SPEAK ABOUT PLAY A RECORDING HERE. LOOK AT THOSE. OH, WE HAVEN'T DON'T MARK THE WORKING GUY REPORTED STAGE ARE MURPHY. YOU HEARD THAT STATEMENT MADE THEM YES. HOW ABOUT THE NEXT CONFIDENT I'M GONNA GO INTO THIS? HEY, DEAF GUY EVER HEARD. SO THESE COMMENTS WERE MADE BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AND GOVERNMENT LEADERS, AND I ALSO NEED TO, UH, I GOT PUBLIC CRACKERS STATING THAT A FEMALE COUNCIL HAS A GRANT, A CITY EMPLOYEE AND ABOUT TALKS AND I'M NOT, UH, THE ONLY FEMALE I SEE IN FRONT OF ME BE CHRISTINE HAWKS. SO I'M CURIOUS WHY THIS DIVERSITY GROUP

[00:55:04]