[00:00:09]
GOOD AFTERNOON, EVERYONE HAPPY NEW YEAR AND WELCOME TO THE GROVE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
[A. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL]
MEETING. I CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER AND WE'LL START WITH REAL CALL. MR ROCK HERE. MR FREE HERE, OYSTER. MR FARNSWORTH HERE, MR TITUS. AND IF YOU JOIN ME IN STANDING FOR A MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER, FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.[C. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES]
PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS HAVE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE MEETING MINUTES FOR DECEMBER. 6TH WHETHER IT BE ANY DISCUSSION ON THOSE MEETING MINUTES. MHM HEARING NONE. WE CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH THE MOTION. MAKE MOTIONS. WE ACCEPT THE MEETING MINUTES FROM THE PRIOR MONTH. A SECOND. BROKE ALS OYSTER BURNS WORTH MR TITUS? YES. AND BEFORE WE GET INTO THE AGENDA, WE HAVE JUST A COUPLE ITEMS. UM FIRST OF ALL. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO AMEND THE AGENDA TO POSTPONE ITEM NUMBER 31 31 BROADWAY. ITEMS TWO THROUGH FIVE ON THE AGENDA UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING. OKAY? OKAY MR ROCK? YES MR FREE OYSTER. MR FARNSWORTH. YES, MR TITUS. AND JUST A NOTE FOR THE RECORD THAT WAS AT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST. AND THEN ONE OTHER UM. ITEM OF[Additional Item]
BUSINESS IS WE NEED TO VOTE AND NOMINATE. THIS YEAR'S PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSION VICE CHAIR AT THIS TIME, WE'LL TAKE ANY NOMINATIONS.MANY YOU AND DAVID IS CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR AGAIN. A SECOND. MR ROCK? YES. MR FREE? YES. CHAIR OYSTER. YES, MR FARNSWORTH. MR TITUS. GREAT. THANK YOU. MOVING FORWARD TO OUR AGENDA. WE HAVE
[1. APPLICATION: Season’s Grove – Final Development Plan]
ONE ITEM TODAY, WHICH IS SEASONS GROVE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. FOR THE APPLICANT. PLEASE STOP TO THE PODIUM. WE'LL JUST NEED YOU TO STATE YOUR NAME AS WELL AS YOUR ADDRESS.I THINK WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOUR MIKES ON IT LOOKS LIKE THE BUTTON IS CLOSEST TO US ON THE BACK SIDE BACK SIDE RIGHT THROUGH THE MICROPHONE IS GO DOWN THERE. BUTTON. THERE YOU GO. THERE YOU GO. THANK YOU. TESTING GOOD. THANK YOU. YOU KNOW ERIC WALSH COURT WITH ENGINEERING 16 50 WATERMARK DRIVE COLUMBUS, OHIO. THANK YOU. YOU HAVE TO FINISH REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A NEW 82 UNIT AGE RESTRICTED SENIOR LIVING FACILITY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LAMPLIGHTER DRIVE ON A 4.14 ACRE SITE ACROSS THE WAVE GLIDER SENIOR VILLAGE A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SITE WAS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL IN JUNE OF 2021. THE REZONING OF THE SITE TO P UT ARE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT. RESIDENTIAL WITH
[00:05:03]
THE ZONING TEXT WAS APPROVED IN SEPTEMBER OF 2021. ACCESS TO THE SITE IS SUPPOSED TO BE FROM TO CURB CUTS OFF OF LAMPLIGHTER DRIVE. ONE CURB CUT IS LOCATED TOWARDS THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE PROPERTY, AND THE SECOND IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 200 FT. FURTHER EAST NEAR THE CURRENT BULB ON LAMPLIGHTER DRIVE. PARKING IS LOCATED ON THE FRONT PORTION OF THE SITE BETWEEN ONE PLAYER DRIVING POST BUILDING. WITH 72 SPACES PROVIDED MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING TEXT. ALL DR ISLES ARE SHOWN TO BE 24 FT IN WIDTH, AND THE SITE WILL BE TWO WAY TRAFFIC FLOW EXCEPT FOR THE DRIVER FILE AT THE ENTRANCE CANOPY. 24 FT WIDTH MATCHES WHAT WAS SHOWN ON THE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND EXCEEDS THE 22 REQUIRED IN THE ZONING TEXT. THE BUILDING IS LOCATED TO THE NORTH OF THE PARKING AREA. SIX FT. WIDE SIDEWALKS ARE SHOWING AROUND THE BUILDING AND A CONNECTION IS SHOWN TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF LAMPLIGHTER DRIVE. APART WILL BE LOCATED TO THE REAR OF THE BUILDING AND INCLUDES A PATHWAY AROUND THE PERIMETER. THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS THREE STORIES IN HEIGHT AND HAS AN OVERALL GROWTH AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 84,000 SQUARE FEET. THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING WILL BE 50 FT AT THE ROOF PEEK AND 32 FT AT THE EAVES MATCHING THE HEIGHTS APPROVED THE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN. AND AS PERMITTED PER THE ZONING TEXT. THE BUILDING IS PROPOSED TO CONTAIN 82 UNITS TOTAL, WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM OF 76 UNITS ESTABLISHED IN THE ZONING TEXT.HOWEVER AS THE FOOTPRINT AND HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING WHERE WE REMAIN UNCHANGED FROM THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN. WITH THE ADDITION OF THE EXTRA SIX UNITS STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF GRANTING A DEVIATION FROM THE ZONING TEXT TO ALLOW FOR THE PROPOSED 82 UNITS. THE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THAT THE INCREASE IN UNITS AS BEING ACCOMPLISHED INTERNALLY BY REDUCING COMMON AREAS WITHOUT CHANGING THE OVERALL FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING. AND THE CHANGES NECESSARY DUE TO MARKET CONDITIONS IN RECENT CONSTRUCTION COST INCREASE. GIVEN THE AGE RESTRICTED USE PROPOSED AND THE LOW LEVEL OF TRAFFIC ANTICIPATED GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STAFF DOES NOT BELIEVE THE INCREASE IN UNITS WILL NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE AREA. EACH WING OF THE BUILDING IS SUPPOSED TO HAVE A DIFFERENT APPEARANCE WITH VARYING COLORS AND FINISHED MATERIALS. THE APPROVED ZONING TAX REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 40% OF THE ELEVATIONS FRONTING AND LAMPLIGHTER DRIVE FINISHED IN MASONRY CLADDING, AND THIS REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN MET. THE EAST ELEVATION IS TO BE PRIMARILY FINISHED IN WHITE BRICK VENEER WITH VERTICAL HARDY PLANK, CITING THE WEST WING WILL BE FINISHED WITH STONE AND HERE ON THE FIRST FLOOR WITH HEARTY LAP SIDING ACCENTS. THE ARCHITECTURE OF BUMP POUNDS WILL BE FINISHED WITH HEARTY LAP SIDING, WHICH IS THE SAME SHADE OF BLUE USED ON THE EAST ELEVATION. THE REAR ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGS, WHICH WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FOR LAMPLIGHTER DRIVE. FINISHED PRIMARILY WITH HEARTY LAP SIDING WITH STONE VIDEO ACCENTS. THE PRIMARY ROOF LINE WITH UTILIZE ASPHALT SHINGLES WITH METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF OVER THE COVER DRIVE CANOPY AT THE BUILDING'S ENTRANCE. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED IN THE ZONING TEXT, INCLUDING THE BUILDING, PERIMETER PLANTINGS, PARKING LOT AND LANDSCAPING. PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING AND PARKING LOT SCREEN. AND PLANS SHOW THE MAJORITY OF TREES ALONG THE NORTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINES BEING PRESERVED. FURTHER ZONING TEXAS SIZE REQUIRED THROUGH FIVE APPROXIMATELY 2.46 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE AND IF YOU'LL NEED TO BE PAID IN LIEU OF ANY OPEN SPACE ACREAGE THAT CANNOT BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS. THE PROPOSED STORMWATER, BASED ON SITE WILL BE DESIGNED TO MEET THE PLANTING REQUIREMENTS FOR CHEER TO BASIN PER THE CITY STORE MONITOR DESIGN MANUAL. INCLUDING ALL PLANTING REQUIREMENTS. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING THIS WAIL ALONG LAMPLIGHTER DRIVE YOU CAN BASED ON MARKET TO THE REAR OF THE SITE, WHICH WILL INCLUDE PLANTING AND STONE OUTCROPPINGS FOR AESTHETICS. STAFF IS REPORTEDLY WAS SUPPORTIVE OF THE SWELL PROVIDED THAT IT IS DESIGNED TO CONVEY STORMWATER FOR THE CITY'S STORM WARNING SIGN, DANIEL. NOTING THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN MEETS ALL CRITERIA OUTLINING CODE FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.
ANALYSIS. INMATES ARE CAN MEET ALL GROWTH CITY 2050 GUIDING PRINCIPLES. AFTER VIEWING CONSIDERATION. THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS PLANNING COMMISSION MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATION. A DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED ZONING TAX SHALL BE GRANTED TO SEE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS PERMITTED ON THE PROPERTY BY SIX, RESULTING IN A TOTAL OF 82 UNITS. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS. CHRISTIANS ARE PLANNING COMMISSION. I HAVE A QUESTION. THIS IS MORE JUST
[00:10:03]
INFORMATIONAL. UM THIS IS BUILT AS A SENIOR LIVING FACILITY. WOULD YOU CALL IT CONSIDER IT INDEPENDENT ASSISTED NURSING CARE, MEMORY CARE ANYTHING, SPEND THEM INDEPENDENT. OKAY? AND. IN CHANGING THE FOOTPRINT, ADDING THE EXTRA UNITS. UM YEAR NOT TAKING IT FROM ANY OF THE EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR RESIDENTS. IT'S ALL COMING FROM. SHIP COMMON SPACE. CORRECT SO WE KIND OF NARROWED THE CORRIDORS. WE THERE WERE A LOT OF UNASSIGNED SPACE IN THE INITIAL STAGES OF THE DESIGN WAS DONE, SO WE KIND OF USE SOME OF THOSE SPACES. WE HAD NOT TAKEN SPACE IS ESSENTIAL SPECIES. AND WHAT IS THE APPROXIMATE COST OF THEIR RENT AND FACILITY? WELL WE CAN GET THAT TO YOU IS NOT WITH US, BUT WE CAN GET THAT INFORMATION TO YOU. THANK YOU. I SEE A CRITICAL NEED FOR THIS KIND OF HOUSING IN GROVE CITY AS OUR BABY BOOM GENERATION MOVES TO THE THIS ULTIMATE STAGE OF THE THEIR JOURNEY. IT'S NICE TO HAVE SOME NEW FACILITIES. WE ALREADY HAVE A NUMBER OF THEM IN GROVE CITY, BUT IT'S NICE TO ADD MORE TO THAT. QUESTIONS. THE PLANNING COMMISSION. I'VE GOT A COUPLE. UM YEAH, I KIND OF JUST ADD TO IT. YOU KNOW, DAVID SAID, I THINK IT'S GREAT. YOU KNOW THE PLANS AND SO FORTH. IT'S NICE FOR THE COMMUNITY. ONE THING I HAVE IS SYNTHESIS CAN BE AGED RESTRICTED. IS THERE A LOT OF 80 A COMPLIANCE THAT YOU HAVE TO MEET AS WELL? YEAH, BECAUSE IT'S A CONSTRUCTION WILL HAVE TO MEET WITH ALL YOU KNOW, 2010 80 REQUIREMENTS AND PRETTY OHIO BUILDING CODE. THE ANSI STANDARDS 2007, SO THOSE WILL BE MET IN THE EXPERIENCE OF THE BUILDING. AND THE SITE. YEAH. AND THEN ONE OF THE QUESTIONS ON THE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF UNITS JUST GONNA END UP DAVID'S COMMENTS THERE. UM YOU SAID THAT'S COMING OR I READ IN THE DETAILS THAT'S COMING FROM THE COMMON AREAS. YEAH, SO YEAH.WHAT'S WHAT'S THE LOSS IN THE COMMON AREAS? I MEAN, IS THERE LIKE ROOMS WHERE, YOU KNOW, KIND OF A AN OPEN ROOM WHERE PEOPLE WOULD BE THAT YOU'RE THAT THAT'S CUTTING DOWN THE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
WHAT HAPPENED WAS INITIALLY THAT WE HAD A LOT OF ROOMS THAT WERE UNASSIGNED BECAUSE THE PROGRAM WAS NOT TOTALLY THE PROGRAM FROM THE OWNER WAS NOT TOTALLY FINALIZED, SO THERE WAS A LOT OF SPACE THAT WAS ON A SIGN FOR ANY PARTICULAR SPACE. SO IN GOING THROUGH THE PROGRAMMING AGAIN.
COUPLED WITH THE INCREASING COST , YOU KNOW THERE WAS A NEED TO INCREASE THE UNIT SO WE WENT BACK. TO THE OWNER AND THE KIND OF BECAME OF THE PROGRAM AND WE KIND OF ALREADY USE, FOR INSTANCE. UM YOU KNOW, KIND OF EVEN SOME OF THOSE DIDN'T REDESIGN EVERYTHING BUT THEN MOSTLY REPURCHASING SOME OF THOSE ON UNASSIGNED COMMENTATORS IN THE INITIAL DESIGN. WAS HOW WE AND THE SIX STORIES ARE IN THREE FLOORS, SO IT'S TWO PER FLOOR. AND THE AVERAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THESE WE'RE GOING TO BE 700 BELIEVE. RIGHT THAT'S CORRECT. THERE'S A COUPLE TWO BEDROOM ROOM. A COUPLE OF OTHER QUESTIONS. I HAD, UM ONE IS ON THE OUTSIDE THE PERIMETER.
INSIST IT'S GOING TO BE AN AGE RESTRICTED. I DIDN'T SEE ANY FENCING OR ANY PROTECTION OR ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE AROUND. NOT SAYING IT NEEDS TO BE THERE. JUST YOU KNOW, QUESTIONING WHAT TYPE OF THINGS WOULD BE? YOU KNOW, AROUND THE PERIMETER, YOU KNOW THIS PROPERTY. THIS TIME DISCUSSED. I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF WELL, FOR ONE. THERE'S EXISTING TREES AND VEGETATION AS WELL. THAT KIND OF FORMS A BARRIER AROUND A LOT OF THE EAST AND THE NORTH SIDE. UM BUT I THINK ALSO ON LIKE THE WEST SIDE ROSSA GONNA GO BACK IN PUTS MORE VEGETATION BUT AT THIS TIME AND THEN ACTUAL FENCE HAS NOT BEEN DISCUSSED. QUESTIONS. IF I COULD JUST MAKE IT QUICK POINT OF CLARIFICATION, THE ORIGINAL SLIDES THAT WERE SHOWN, UM, WERE DISPLAYED AN ERROR THERE. IT DID NOT SHOW WHAT THE RECOMMENDED DEVIATION, BUT IT HAS BEEN POSTED. ALSO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL WITH THE ONE DEVIATION REGARDING THE NUMBER OF UNITS.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. THE PLANNING COMMISSION. IS THERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. GREAT. YES. LOOK MAN, UM, FIRE PARTNER JUST HAD ONE COMMENT ON REVIEWING THE
[00:15:06]
PLANS ON ACCESS AROUND THE BUILDING FOR OUR REQUIREMENTS. IT'S WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO ACCESS THE BUILDING WITHIN 150 FT. APPROXIMATELY IT'S OVER 400 FT ON THE BACK SIDE OF THAT BUILDING, SO WE'RE NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO STRETCH A HAND LINE AROUND THE BUILDING. SO IF THERE'S A WAY THAT THE ACCESS TO THE ONE ON THE LEFT SIDE THERE IT LOOKS LIKE THE PROPERTY AND IF THEY CAN BRING A ROAD AROUND TO THE BACK SO THAT WE CAN GET A HAND MY ACROSS LASER 200 FT. AND SO IF WE CAN GET WITHIN 150 FT, WE CAN BE ANYWHERE ON THE BACKSIDE OF BUILDING IF THEY REQUIRE BEING 55 OLDER AND THEN INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHEN YOU MAKE SURE WE'RE GONNA BE ABLE TO ACCESS THOSE PEOPLE APPROPRIATELY. VIEW IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU HAD CONSIDERED BEFORE? THANK YOU FOR THE COMMENT, BUT I JUST WANTED TO ASK USES THE BUILDING IS FULLY SPRINKLER. IS THAT REQUIREMENT FOR SPRINKLER BUILDINGS, EVEN WITH BEING SPRINKLER THAT IS REQUIRED JUST WITH US. WE WOULD WANT TO ASK FOR A VARIANCE. JUST BECAUSE OF THE NATURE. COULD I ASK THAT YOU WANT TO TALK TO THE MIC? SO WE HAVE IT ON RECORD, PLEASE. WHAT I WAS SAYING IS, EVEN THOUGH THE BUILDING SPRINKLERED WITH THE NATURE OF THE BUILDING BEING WITH DISABILITIES, PEOPLE ARE NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO SELF RESCUE, SO WE NEED TO HAVE ALL THE ACCESS THAT WE CAN IN ORDER FOR OUR CREWS TO GO IN AND HELP THESE INDIVIDUALS THAT MIGHT NOT BE ABLE MIGHT NOT BE AMBULATORY AND GET THEM OUT. SO YOU JUST BECAUSE OF THE YOUTH GROUP. I'VE SEEN HERE. EVEN WITHOUT THE USE GROUP. IT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD IF IT WAS A DIFFERENT USE GROUP WE MAY FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH IT'S A BUNCH OF 30 YEAR OLDS THAT ARE HEALTHY. IT WOULD MAKE MORE SENSE TO DEVIATE FROM THAT. BUT THE CODE STATES THAT WE NEED TO HAVE ACCESS WITHIN 100 AND 50 FT, SO WE'RE NOT GOING TO APPLY FOR A VARIANCE. WITH THIS TYPE OF STRUCTURE WHERE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING TO BE A HIGHER NEED GROUP. AND IT'S GOING TO PUT US AT A DISADVANTAGE OF THERE WERE A FIRE IN THEIR AROUND. I DON'T KNOW PATIO BACK THERE IF THERE ARE GONNA BE GRILLING OUT OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, IF YOU HAVE A FIRE BACK THERE, WE'RE GOING TO RUN A HAND LINE THROUGH THE BUILDING TO GET TO THE BACK INSTEAD OF GOING ON. THE BUILDING. THEN AGAIN, IF THERE'S ANYBODY AND HE'S RESCUED ON THE FIRST FLOOR OUR CREWS ARE GONNA BE ABLE TO ACCESS THAT QUICKLY OR GET A HAND LINE WITHIN 100 50 FT THAT WE NEED. COULD YOU JUST CLARIFY? UM YOU HAD MENTIONED WITHIN 100 AND 50 FT, BUT THEN YOU ALSO MENTIONED LIKE 200 FT.SO TRUCKS HAVE 200 FT. CROSSWAYS ACROSS LANES. THE HAND LINE THAT WE ACTUALLY TAKE INTO FIGHT FIRE WITH SO BY GETTING US WITHIN 150 FT THAT GIVES US 50 FT OF HOSE LEFT TO WORK WITH THAT'S WE'RE SAYING THAT IT WOULD BE IDEAL TO HAVE A ROOM ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING. BUT IF YOU CAN FIND A WAY TO BRING OUR ACCESS ROAD WITHIN 100 50 FT BASICALLY , DIVIDE THE BUILDING UP. SO YOU'RE 100 50 FT ON ONE SIDE 100 53 ON THE OTHER, MAYBE INTERNAL 300 FT. OPEN SPACE WITHOUT A ROAD BECAUSE YOU'RE DIVIDING IT 151 150. HOWEVER YOU CAN PRODUCE THAT ROAD SO WE CAN ACCESS IT AND STILL USE OUR HAND LINES IF NECESSARY. THAT WERE FOR FIREFIGHTING OPERATIONS. 26 FT IS WHAT OUR ACCESS IF YOU'RE GOING INTO LIKE A DEVELOPMENT 20 FT IN BUT ONCE WE'RE ACTUALLY FIREFIGHTING, 26 FT IS WHAT WE WOULD WANT TO CLEAR 26 FT. I SEE THAT YOU GUYS ARE 24 IS WHAT YOU HAVE RIGHT THERE. BUT THIS IS KIND OF TRYING TO WORK WITH YOU. SO CAN I CLARIFY JUST EXACTLY WHERE YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. HAVING THIS ACCESS. THERE'S A SIDE WALK THAT RUNS AROUND THE BACK FROM THE SOUTHEAST AND FROM THE NORTH. SO YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT LIKE WHERE THERE'S SIDEWALKS BEFORE THEY LOOP OUT AROUND THE POND. THE ACCESS NEEDS TO BE VEHICLE ACCESS. SO THE TRUCK'S GONNA UNDERSTAND THAT. WOULD THAT BE THE ROUGH APPROXIMATION OF WHERE THIS VEHICLE ACCESS WOULD BE? YES AROUND THE PERIMETER. BASICALLY WHERE THAT SIDEWALK IS, IF YOU CAN GO ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING THE PROPERTY THERE ON THE LEFT SIDE IS IT LOOKS LIKE THERE AT THE END OF THE PROPERTY, SO YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO GET TO THE RIGHT SIDE.
APPEARS TO BE PRECIOUS LITTLE OUTSIDE. CERTAINLY.
CORRECT YEAH, DEAD ENDS. WHENEVER YOU HAVE A DEAD END, THAT'S 150 FT OR BEYOND. SAID
[00:20:01]
THAT LEFT SIDE THERE. I THINK IT'S 115 ISSUED. BUT YOU'RE OBVIOUSLY GOING TO NEED TO TURN AROUND IF YOU GO AROUND THE RIGHT SIDE. IF I MAY. IS THIS A NEW REQUIREMENT OR THE FIRE CODE? IT'S NOT IS THERE. I GUESS I'M CONFUSED BECAUSE THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN GOING ON. SINCE 2020 AND FIRE DEPARTMENT HAS GIVEN US INPUT THE ENTIRE TIME. AND IT WASN'T UNTIL DECEMBER.20TH THIS ISSUE WAS RAISED. I'M JUST CURIOUS AS TO WHY I CAN'T SPEAK FOR THE PAST. I'VE BEEN IN THIS POSITION FOR A YEAR, AND THAT WAS JUST FIRST MADE NONE OF IT IN DECEMBER. THAT'S WHY THE COMMENTS CAME AT THE TIME THEY DID. AND IS THIS PROVISION THAT YOU'RE CITING 503.1 POINT. ONE THIS IS WHERE THEY DON'T HAVE READILY ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC. OR PRIVATE STREET, WHICH HERE WE HAVE BOTH THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREET. BUT YOU'RE SAYING THE BACK OF THE BUILDING. THAT SAID , IF YOU CAN'T ACCESS THE BACK OF THE BUILDING THE PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET, SOMETHING PRIVATE FIRE LANE IS GOING TO NEED TO BE PROVIDED WITHIN 150 FT. OF ALL PORTIONS OF THE EXTERIOR, THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING. AND DO YOU ENFORCE THIS REQUIREMENT ON EVERY BUILDING THAT'S BUILT IN THE TOWNSHIP. I DO. YOU DO? THE TOWNSHIP ISN'T CONSIDERING ANY PROJECTS RIGHT NOW, SUCH AS THE GYMNASIUM OR SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T HAVE ACCESS TO THE BACK OF THE BUILDING. AS THE FIRE COULD OFFICIAL IS MY RESPONSIBILITY AND FORCE THE SECOND ONLY SPEAK FOR WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED TO ME RIGHT NOW. OKAY BUT I'M ASKING ABOUT ANYTHING PENDING IN THE TOWNSHIP RIGHT NOW. THAT DOES NOT PROVIDE THE SAME ACCESS THAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR TODAY. NOT AWARE OF ANYTHING. THAT IS, IF THERE IS WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THE SAME ISSUE WHERE IT'S GOING TO HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED ENOUGH. IN FROM THE CITY'S PERSPECTIVE, WE HAVE THIS BODY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, THE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED BY COUNCIL UM , AT THIS POINT, YOU WERE JUDGING THIS FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN BASED ON THE CRITERIA OF OUR CODE. CERTAINLY. THE CONSIDERATION FROM THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IS IMPORTANT AND YOU KNOW, STAFF WILL WORK WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER TO DISCUSS THAT, BUT IN TERMS OF YOUR VOTE, IT'S BASED ON OUR CRITERIA IN THE CODE. WE HAD AN AMENDMENT OR A STIPULATION. THIS BE ADDRESSED.
YOU COULD. CERTAINLY IF YOU CHOSE TO. FOR ANYTHING MORE YOU'D LIKE TO MENTION OR THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION. NO. I THINK IT WAS MENTIONED BY THE LORD LORD RECOGNIZED. THIS WAS SUBMITTED. TWO YEARS AGO, AND THIS NEVER CAME OUT. SO YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY INTO DISTRICT WORK WITH ALL OF YOU AND THE DEPARTMENT TO GET RESOLVED. YOU DON'T HAVE ANY READY SOLUTIONS RIGHT NOW. BUT YOU KNOW, WE CAN BACK, BUT THEN ON THE WEST SIDE. I BELIEVE IN IT'S GONNA BE CHALLENGED. THANK YOU. THAT SOUNDS LIKE MAYBE YOU'LL BE WORKING WITH THE CITY TO FIGURE SOME THINGS OUT TOGETHER. I DON'T THINK THAT'S GONNA BE A STIPULATION ON THE FROM YOU, RIGHT? SO YEAH, YOU HAVE TO. YEAH. GREAT. THAT WE'RE READY FOR A MOTION. SURE I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE HAD A STIPULATION. THAT THE DEVELOPER APPLICANT WORK WITH OUR CITY AND FIRE DEPARTMENT TO RESOLVE THEIR CONCERNS FOR ACCESS. WE COOL. MR BURNS. EXCUSE ME, MR BURNS WORTH MR FREE? YES. MR TITUS. CHAIR.
OYSTER? YES. AND MR ROCK. YES. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THAT WAS JUST A VOTE ON THE STIPULATION. WE NEED TO VOTE ON THE ACTUAL ONE MORE SECOND. CHAIR. I WOULD MOVE WE APPROVED. DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS SUBMITTED WITH THE FIRST DEVIATION REGARDING THE NUMBER OF UNITS AND THE SECOND DEVIATION OR AMENDMENT STIPULATION THAT WAS JUST ADDED.
SECOND OH, COME. MR FARNSWORTH. MR FREE? YES. MR TITUS. CHAIR, ROYSTER. MR ROCK. YES. THANK YOU
[00:25:09]
SO MUCH WILL GO BEFORE. YEAH. WITHOUT BEING THE LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA MEANS THE TURN.THANKS, EVERY
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.