[Ordinance C-63-22 Approve the Rezoning of 144.27+^ acres located north of S.R. 665 and east of S.R. 104 from SF-1 to PUD-R with zoning text. Second reading and public hearing.]

SHARES DON'T HAVE ANY CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA WILL MOVE DIRECTLY UNDER LANDS WITH CHAIRMAN SHOCKEY. MICROPHONE ON HERE. THANK YOU, MR PRESIDENT. ORDINANCE C 63 22 IN ORDINANCE FOR THE REZONING OF 144.27 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF STATE ROAD, 6 65 AND EASTERN STATE ROUTE 104 FROM S F 12 P U. D R WITH ZONING TEXT SPORT DISORDER HAS BEEN POSTPONED SEVERAL TIMES FROM DECEMBER. 19TH I DON'T KNOW WHETHER I SHOULD CALL ON THIS SHIELDS FIRST OR MR KELLER LOOKS LIKE THE SHIELD SAYING MR KELLER. MR KELLER. THANK YOU HAVE A REPORT FOR US. I'M HERE. LET ME PREFACE THIS WHILE HE'S COMING TO THE STAND ON THEIR, UM ONE OF THE THINGS THAT FOLKS ASK US TO DO WAS TO BE PROACTIVE AND WORKING ON INFRASTRUCTURE BEFORE ADDITIONAL, UH UM. DEVELOPMENTS ALONG THAT 6 65 AND ONE OH FOUR CORRIDOR ARE ARE APPROVED. AND

[00:30:04]

SO THIS IS PART OF THAT IS FIXED AT, UH AND HE'S GOING TO BE TALKING ABOUT THE ABOUT THE FIX THAT'S COMING UP BEFORE ANYTHING GETS STARTED ON ANYTHING, ANY OTHER DEVELOPMENT THERE AND THE STATE ROUTE 6 65 AND ONE OF FOUR INTERSECTION AND JUST TO REFRESH EVERYBODY'S MEMORY. UM THIS IS NOT A GROVE CITY INTERSECTION. THIS IS A STATE OF OHIO AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING WELL AS WITH THE STATE OF OHIO DISTRICT, 60 DOT JACKSON TOWNSHIP CITY OF GROWTH CITY AND THE DEVELOPER ON HERE, PULTE HOMES. SO MR KELLER, WHO'S OUR CITY ENGINEER? I'LL LEAVE IT TO YOU. DO WE HAVE THIS FOR THE VIDEO. THIS BACKSIDE. IT'S JUST AN EXHIBIT OF WHAT THAT INTERSECTION AT LEAST WE HAVE THIS AND ECONOMIC FOR TWO THAT. IF YOU GO TO THAT PREVIOUS EXHIBIT, YEAH. OH, GOOD ONE.

YEAH. THERE YOU GO. YES THANK YOU. MEMBERS OF COUNCIL JUST WANTED TO BE ABLE TO UPDATE, YOU KNOW, UM KARL ROSS GAVE AN UPDATE LAST WEEK A LITTLE BIT ON THE STATUS, BUT THE PROJECT HAS BEEN MOVING FORWARD. UM AS YOU CAN SEE WHAT THE EXHIBIT THAT'S SHOWN ON THE SCREEN. THERE ARE FOUR ACCESS POINTS TO THE SUBDIVISION, UM ONE ALONG 104 AND THEN THREE ON 6 65. IN ADDITION TO THAT THERE IS THE IMPROVEMENT THAT'S BEEN IDENTIFIED AT THE INTERSECTION OF 6 65 AND ONE IN FOUR AT THAT INTERSECTION. WHICH ISN'T FOR THE ACCESS, BUT IT'S AN IMPROVEMENT THAT WAS IDENTIFIED UNDER THE ORIGINAL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AS FUTURE NEED, UM , I THINK THE DEVELOPMENT WAS CONTRIBUTING ABOUT 8% OF TRAFFIC, BUT THEY WANTED TO IDENTIFY IT. UM AS AN IMPROVEMENT AND PARTICIPATE IN GETTING THAT ADDRESSED FROM WHAT THEY HEARD FROM THE COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATION IN THE PUBLIC ON THAT UM TO THAT POINT, THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN A CATALYST WITH THIS ADMINISTRATION WHERE WE'RE ABLE TO LEVERAGE THIS PROJECT.

UM AND GET AN AUDIENCE WITH OH, DOT UM, THE TOWNSHIP, THE CITY, THE DEVELOPER TO REALLY LOOK AT WHAT WAS DONE BY THE DEVELOPER UNDER THEIR TRAFFIC IMPACT, STUDY. AND LOOK AT WHAT? THAT UM ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENT SHOULD BE. SO IF WE'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT JUNCTION THAT DEVELOPMENT HOW TO WE WORK WITH THE DEVELOPER DO THEIR ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS BUT ALSO IMPROVE THAT INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT. UM. THROUGHOUT JANUARY AND FEBRUARY, THERE WAS TWO MEETINGS. WITH THE DEVELOPER OF THE CITY. OH, 0.1 OF THE MEETINGS. THE TOWNSHIP ALSO ATTENDED. TO KIND OF GO OVER THE TRAFFIC IN THIS AREA, NOT SPECIFIC TO THIS DEVELOPMENT BEFORE THE REGIONAL GROWTH. UM IN CONJUNCTION WITH THOSE DISCUSSIONS, YOU KNOW, DOT IDENTIFIED AND KIND OF LAID OUT WHAT THEIR REGIONAL IMPROVEMENTS ARE KIND OF WHAT MORRISSEY IS WORKING ON, WHICH IS KIND OF MORSI HAS WHAT THEY CALL THE RICKENBACKER ACCESS PLANS, SO THE GOAL IS TO DO IMPROVEMENTS ON 23 ON. 7 62 TO GET TRAFFIC RELATIVE THE SOUTH ALONG 70 62 OR 23 AROUND RICKENBACKER. I THINK THIS YEAR BE MOVING AHEAD WITH A 2 70 23 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TO IMPROVE THAT CAPACITY AGAIN UNDERSTANDING THAT THE GROWTH UM, THAT'S OCCURRING. THAT'S REALLY AFFECTING THIS INTERSECTION ISN'T JUST THIS DEVELOPMENT. IT'S A REGIONAL ISSUE. WHICH WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICAN BOXER TO THE TO THE EAST, AND ALSO TO THE SOUTH AND COMMERCIAL POINT AND HOW THE TRAFFIC IS COMING THROUGH. SO IN THE COORDINATION WITH OH, DOT OH, DOT AGREED TO DO A TRAFFIC STUDY ALONG THE ONE OF 46 65 STUDY THAT WE COULD BUILD UPON WHAT PULTE PROVIDED FOR THE TERRIFIC TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. AND WHAT THEIR STATE THEY LOOKED AT A 10 YEAR HORIZON. SO WHETHER 10 YEAR HORIZON LOOK AND PROJECTING TRAFFIC OVER 10 YEARS, REALLY THE ONLY IMPROVEMENT THAT WAS IDENTIFIED WAS ON 6 65 AND EASTBOUND, RIGHT, TURNLEY. UM AND THAT'S WHAT WAS SHOWN ON THIS EXHIBIT. IN COORDINATING WITH OH, DOT WE, WE JUST ADMINISTRATION IN THE IN THE DEVELOPER ASKED, WHAT'S THE ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENT? LET'S EVALUATE THAT, SO IF WE'RE GOING TO BE OUT THERE DOING THESE IMPROVEMENTS, LET'S DO IT ONCE.

UM IN CONJUNCTION WITH THOSE DISCUSSIONS. YOU KNOW WHAT? OH DOT HAS PROVIDED BACK, UM TO THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM INTO THE CITY. WAS THEY PROVIDED SOME TRAFFIC AND, UH, INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. FOR US TO EVALUATE GEOMETRICALLY TO SEE HOW IT WOULD FIT. SO WHAT? WHAT THEY EVALUATED WAS IN ADDITION TO THAT. THAT EASTBOUND 6 65 RIGHT. TURN LANE SOUTH UNDER 104. THAT THERE SHOULD ALSO BE A WESTBOUND. UM LEFT TURN LANE ON 6 65. SO IN CONJUNCTION WITH THAT AS YOU'RE AS YOU'RE GOING WESTBOUND. THERE. IT LINES UP THAT YOU HAVE TO SHIP THE ROAD FOR THE TURNING MOVEMENTS SO THAT WOULD FACILITATE ALSO EASTBOUND ON 6 65 A LEFT TURN

[00:35:04]

MOVEMENT. SO IF YOU THINK ABOUT 6 65 IF YOU'RE HEADING TO THE TO THE EAST. YOU'LL HAVE A THROUGH LANE. A LEFT TURN LANE IN A RIGHT TURN LANE SO THAT, UH, EVERYONE IS FOUND THEN, UH, FROM THE GOING WEST DOWN, YOU HAVE A THROUGH AND THEN YOU'LL HAVE A RIGHT TURN LANE TO SOUTH BEND, ONE OF FOUR. UM ADDITIONALLY, WHAT WAS IDENTIFIED ON THOSE FUTURE CONDITIONS WAS THAT SOUTH BONG ON ONE OF FOUR THAT THERE SHOULD BE A RIGHT TURN LANE, UM ONTO 6 65. HEADING TOWARDS THE WEST. SO UM, WHAT WE PROVIDED COUNSEL TO LOOK AT AND WHAT? WHAT UH, THE POLTI HAS PROVIDED OH DOT TO KIND OF GIVE THEIR FINAL FEEDBACK. WE HAD A MEETING LAST WEEK WITH BODI, WHERE THE DEVELOPER IN THE CITY KIND OF LAID OUT HEY, BASED ON THE INFORMATION YOU PROVIDED. HERE'S THE GEOMETRICS WHAT WE SAW. TRYING TO DEFINE WHAT THE PROJECT WOULD BE, UM, NO PAVEMENT WIDENING TO FACILITATE THOSE LANES ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST TO MAKE SURE THE WAY WE WERE PROPOSING THE WIDENING WE WEREN'T ON A FULL RECONSTRUCTION. WE'RE JUST GOING TO WIDENING OF THE PAVEMENT, FACILITATE THE TURN LANES. THAT THAT WAS ACCEPTABLE TO OH DOT UM , THEY GAVE US THE VERBAL. YEAH, THAT LOOKS GREAT. COST. TESTAMENT LOOKS WELL, UM, THE STACKING LENGTHS. EVERYTHING THAT WE PROVIDED ON THAT EXHIBIT IS EXCESSIVE ACCEPTABLE. THEY WERE JUST RUNNING IT THROUGH FINAL APPROVAL THROUGH THE DISTRICT SIX THAT WE'RE WAITING FOR, AND FROM THERE, WE CAN MOVE FORWARD. WITH THAT IMPROVEMENT. UM. MORE COST ESTIMATE WAS ABOUT $2.8 MILLION IN TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS ON THAT PROJECT. UM WITH THAT. YOU KNOW, THE CHALLENGE IS HOW DOES THE PROJECT FUNDED? UM IT IS OUTSIDE THAT INTERSECTIONS OUTSIDE OF GROUP CITY CITY LIMITS. IT'S AN O DOT JURISDICTION. UM. SIMILAR PROJECTS LIKE THIS THAT THE CITY HAS LED, YOU KNOW, WE WE'VE DONE IT AS A LOCAL PROJECT AND JUST GOT A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT WITHIN. NO, NOT RIGHT AWAY. UM SO THERE WAS SOME OPTIONS ON THE TABLE THAT THE DEVELOPER IN THE CITY ADMINISTRATION ARE DISCUSSING ON HOW THE PROJECT PROCEEDS, BUT FROM A COST SIDE, WE'VE IDENTIFIED WHAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD BE FROM A REGIONAL STANDPOINT THAT DEGREES . YOU KNOW THE CITY'S ADMINISTRATION. HE MAKES TO LOOK AT IT, WE, IT SUPPORTS THE TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS AND THEN I THINK THE DEVELOPER THROUGH. THE RAPPERS IDENTIFY THAT THAT ALSO WORKS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THEIR DEVELOPMENT. UM TIMING OF IMPROVEMENT IS AND I THINK THAT THE IMPORTANT THING THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS THAT INTER INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT.

INTERACT A LITTLE BIT WITH THAT FIRST, UM, ACCESS POINT ON 6 65 JUST EAST OF 104. SO IDENTIFYING THAT AND TRYING TO COORDINATE THOSE PROJECTS THAT THAT THOSE IMPROVEMENTS CAN BE DONE CONCURRENTLY IS SOMETHING THAT WE, THE ADMINISTRATION AND THE DEVELOPER OF TALKING ABOUT UM, TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT OF THE TRAFFIC TO THE TO THE TRAVELING TRAFFIC, THE MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC AND IT, UM, ELIMINATE ANY OPPORTUNITIES WHERE WE MIGHT INSTALL SOME PAYMENT AND JUST BE REMOVED BY THE NEXT PROJECT SO AGAIN FROM A VALUE ENGINEERING COST CONSIDERATION. IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S BEING EVALUATED. SO WHERE WE STAND RIGHT NOW? WE ANTICIPATE THIS WEEK GETTING FINAL FEEDBACK FROM OH, DOT WE DON'T ANTICIPATE ANY CHANGES FROM WHAT WAS PRESENTED.

AT THAT POINT. THAT DOCUMENT WILL BE OFFICIALLY SUBMITTED TO THE CITY PROBABLY MEMORANDUM IDENTIFYING WHAT WAS LOOKED AT WHAT THE DESIGN CRITERIA WAS. AND THEN WHAT DOES IMPROVEMENTS IN COST WERE MHM SUBSEQUENT TO THAT THE ADMINISTRATION HAD DISCUSSION LAST WEEK JUST REGARDING SOME OF THE COST CONSIDERATIONS. YOU KNOW, LIKE MR BARROSO, IF YOU WANT TO GIVE AN UPDATE ON ON THAT THOSE DISCUSSIONS SURE. THANKS, MIKE. UM IN TERMS OF A PROJECT OF THIS MAGNITUDE. CERTAINLY THE LARGEST CHALLENGES FUNDING THE PROJECT, AS INDICATED PROJECTS APPROXIMATELY $3 MILLION FOR A PROJECT THAT IS NOT WITHIN OUR JURISDICTION. SO WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING AT THIS POINT, AND IT'S STILL IN THE DRAFT STAGES IS TO, UH, ESTABLISHED TIP, TEXT INCREMENT FINANCING, AND WHAT THAT DOES IS REDIRECT SOME PROPERTY TAXES FROM VARIOUS JURISDICTIONS TO THE PROJECT AREA. THE PROPOSAL NOW IS A NON SCHOOL TIP THEY WOULD NOT BE AFFECTED. THE ONLY ONES THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED THE CITY THAT COUNTY AND THE TOWNSHIP WITHIN THE COUNTY AND THE TOWNSHIP THERE ARE PROTECTED LEVIES. FOR EXAMPLE, CERTAIN FIRE LEVIES ARE PROTECTED SO WE WOULDN'T RECEIVE THAT MONEY. SO IN TERMS OF GETTING THAT REVENUE TO PAY FOR THE PROJECT. AND WE'RE LOOKING AT TOTAL BUILD OUT OF THE PROJECT. APPROXIMATELY 360 UNITS IF WE TAKE AN AVERAGE COST FOR EACH OF THOSE UNITS, APPROXIMATELY $400,000 THAT NEW CONSTRUCTION IS APPROXIMATELY $162 MILLION. YOUR TAX ON 35% OF THAT VALUE. SO USING A RULE OF THUMB RIGHT NOW, THE FULL TAX ON THE RESIDENTIAL HOME IS APPROXIMATELY 68 MILLS TAKING

[00:40:01]

OUT THE SCHOOL TAKING OUT PROTECTIVE LEVEES LEAVES APPROXIMATELY 25 MILLS TO BE COLLECTED. WHEN THAT DEVELOPMENT IS BUILT OUT, IN TOTAL, IT WOULD GENERATE $1.4 MILLION A YEAR FOR IMPROVEMENTS. POTENTIALLY NOT ONLY DID THE INTERSECTION AS WE JUST SPOKE ABOUT THAT IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ADDITIONAL AREAS OF 6 65. SO, UM I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT FULL TIER STEPPED UP AND IN TERMS OF THE FINANCING OF IT. THEY'VE AGREED TENTATIVELY. TO PUT UP UP FRONT $229,000 FOR THE INITIAL ENGINEERING. $100,000 FOR THE RIGHT OF WAY AND EACH PURCHASE.

IN $750,000 TOWARDS ROAD CONSTRUCTION AND AGAIN, IT'S MIKE IDENTIFIED THEY WEREN'T REQUIRED TO DO ANY IMPROVEMENTS UNDER THEIR TRAFFIC STUDY, EXCEPT I BELIEVE IT WAS 9% OF THE TURN LANE EASTBOUND. ON 6 65. SO THEIR TOTAL COMP CONTRIBUTION UP FRONT WOULD BE $1,079,000. NOW WITH THAT TIVE UH, THEY WOULD BE REIMBURSED TOTAL OF $861,000 DUE TO THE SUMMIT OF THE REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE NECESSARY FOR THEIR DEVELOPMENT. THE CITY WOULD THEN, UH, PORTION WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY $2.3 MILLION. AND WE WOULD BE, UH, REIMBURSED FROM THE TIP FOR THAT FUNDING, SO THAT'S THE PROPOSAL THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT NOW IN TERMS OF HOW DO WE GET THIS? UH, PROJECT FUNDED, SO WE HAVE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. BEFORE WE GO ON. LET ME ASK A FEW QUESTIONS HERE TO HELP CLARIFY THINGS. UM SINCE MR BOZO WAS JUST TALKING ABOUT THE TIP COUNCIL, THIS IS SOMEWHAT THIS IS VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT WE DID WITH BROWN'S FARM AND ORDERS ROAD. ON THE TIPS THEY'RE USING USING THAT TIFF TO IMPROVE THE REST OF ORDERS ROAD AS THINGS START TO DEVELOP THEIR IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, IN FACT, THE TIFF AGREEMENT ITSELF. I THINK YOU USED THAT AS A SKELETON FORM FOR THIS ON HERE AND JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS, UM, ON HERE FOR MR KELLER. UM IN THE ORIGINAL TRAFFIC STUDY, IF NOTHING IS DONE TO THIS INTERSECTION AT ALL, AND NO HOMES ARE BUILT. ON ANY PART OF THIS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT OR ANYTHING ELSE IN IN. HOW MUCH DO YOU REMEMBER HOW MANY YEARS THE TRAFFIC STUDY THAT THE TRAFFIC WILL INCREASE? IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY ABOUT 25 OR 26% WITHOUT ANY CHANGES IN ANY DEVELOPMENT? REMEMBER 20 YEAR HORIZON 20 YEAR HORIZON ON THERE, SO FOCUS, NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS IF NOTHING HAPPENS HERE AT ALL THE TRAFFIC WILL BOUND TO INCREASE AND THERE WILL BE NO IMPROVEMENTS AT 6 65 AND ONE OH, FOUR BECAUSE THE STATE IS NOT PLANNING TO DO THAT THEY'RE PUTTING THEIR IMPROVEMENTS DOWN AT COMMERCIAL 40.7 62 BECAUSE OF THE 10, PLUS MILLION SQUARE FEET OF WAREHOUSES DOWN THERE.

THEY'RE PUTTING IT OVER AT 71 TO 70 AND 23 THAT SO THEY'RE PUTTING THAT THERE AND THEN THE OTHER THING. MR COLOR ON HERE IS THAT ARE WE GOING TO BE DOING THIS? WITH THE THEORETICALLY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION START BEFORE ANY HOMES OR EVER BUILT INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT? THAT'S THE CURRENT PLAN. I MEAN, IT DEPENDS ON HOW FAST THIS PAST PASSES THEM. I THINK AS THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THIS LEGISLATION COMES FORWARD, THEY CAN SPEAK MORE TO THAT. BUT THE GOAL IS TO HAVE THE IMPROVEMENTS AT THIS INTERSECTION AND ON LONG 6 65 CONSTRUCTIVE SO WE'RE KIND OF WE'RE KIND OF IN THE IF YOU LOOK AT THIS PROJECT NOW WE'RE PAST THE CONCEPTUAL STATE AND NOW WE'RE MOVING INTO MORE OF THE EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE DOING THE COST. AND THE TIMING AND THINGS LIKE THAT, AND THAT PART OF THE PROJECT ON THERE, SO WE'RE A LITTLE BIT BEYOND THE CONCEPTUAL STAGE. CORRECT THE CONCEPT OF WHAT WHAT TURNING MOVEMENTS AND INTERSECTION. IMPROVEMENTS ARE REQUIRED BOTH FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS INTERSECTION OF HAVE BEEN DEFINED ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE GEOMETRICS OF THE LENGTH OF THE TURN LANES. UM, SO THE NEXT STEP WOULD BE ADVANCING TO IT. DETAILED ENGINEERING ON THAT DID THE STATE OF OHIO ONE LAST QUESTION. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO COUNSEL DID THE STATE. UH OH DOT RECOMMENDED A ROUNDABOUT THERE? NO, THEY DIDN'T BECAUSE OF THE LAND ACQUISITION AND OTHER OTHER IMPACTS AT THAT THAT WOULD BE OCCURRED. ONE THING I DID HERE IN THE MEETING IS DON'T OVER ENGINEER THE PROJECT AND UM , BEING IN CIVIL ENGINEER, UM, ON THERE, YOU KNOW THAT IF YOU MAKE THE PROJECT EVEN BETTER THAN THE BEST ON THERE, YOU'RE GOING TO BE ASKING PEOPLE YOU'RE GONNA PEOPLE ARE GOING TO COME AND GO THROUGH THERE BECAUSE IT'S A BETTER AREA THAN GOING THROUGH. UM TO 70 AND 23 THINGS LIKE THAT. SO IS THAT PART OF

[00:45:07]

THE CONCEPT DON'T EVER DON'T OVER ENGINEERING SO YOU DON'T PUT IN TOO MANY IMPROVEMENTS ON THEIR DEFINITELY IF YOU WOULD OVERSIZE AND IMPROVEMENT MAKE IT FEEL FOR EXAMPLE, TOOTHPASTE SAFE THE DESIGN SPEEDS. OTHER ISSUES BECOME ISSUES. UM OF HOW PEOPLE ACTUALLY DRIVING NAVIGATE THAT INTERCEPTION. TRADITIONAL SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION FUNCTIONS THAT MAINTAINS THAT LEVEL OF SERVICE. UM WHERE THAT SIGNALS OPERATING, WHICH IS WHAT YOU KNOW THAT WAS LOOKING AT WITH HIS FUTURE GROWTH. UH UM. SO IT'S THE RIGHT SIZE IMPROVEMENT FOR WHAT'S OUT THERE, AND IT MINIMIZES. IF YOU START LOOKING AT THOSE LARGER IMPROVEMENTS, YOU START GETTING INTO POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF STRUCTURES, AND THAT'S ONE THING THAT WE KIND OF IDENTIFIED AS A RED FLAG ON THE ANALYSIS THAT WE DIDN'T WANT TO IMPACT ANY STRUCTURES TO HISTORICAL HOMES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NORTH SIDE THERE, AND SO QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL. MR HOLT. YES I JUST WANT TO THIS IS WHAT I WOULD CALL THIS. SECOND PROJECT. IS THAT RIGHT? I MEAN, MR HART, YOU STILL HAVE AS PART OF YOUR DEVELOPMENT $3 MILLION WORTH OF OTHER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ALONG 6 65 HERE IN DIFFERENT PLACES. SO ALL TOGETHER WE'RE DOING AROUND NUMBER $6 MILLION WORTH OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ALL ALL IN THEN. OKAY I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THERE WERE TWO SEPARATE KIND OF THINGS THERE. WE WEREN'T YOU'RE MY PERSPECTIVE HAS BEEN WHAT'S THE CITY'S INVESTMENT WITH THE DEVELOPER HAS TO DO FOR HIS ACCESS, AND WE KIND OF THAT'S THEIR THAT'S THEIR BUCKET. BUT YES, THERE'S A PICTURE OF SIX CORRECT IMPROVEMENTS ON THOSE ROADS. SO THAT'S WHAT YOU SEE ON THIS WHERE THE DOTS ARE ON THE ON THE OVERHEAD. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL. THAT'S TRULY YES. 11 POINT ABOUT MR HOLTZ. A STATEMENT IN TERMS OF THAT ADDITIONAL PROJECT THAT PAUL T IS REQUIRED TO DO. THERE IS NO REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE TIFF FOR THOSE IMPROVEMENTS THAT'S ON THERE. THEY'RE DYING. KILLER THANK YOU, MR WEAVER. LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS. DID YOU WANT TO SPEAK TO THE TO THE TO THE ORDINANCE HERE. I KNOW THIS IS A ZONING, BUT WE'RE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO HOW TO GET THIS. SOLD DOWN HERE. DID YOU ALSO WANT TO SPEAK ABOUT THE ONE? OH 46 65 INTERSECTIONS. SO IF MR WEAVER AND GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE MHM. UH MY NAME'S BRIAN WEAVER. UM, ADDRESS IS 4350 BEACH GROWTH. UM I HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT, UM 6 65 1 OF FOREIGN AREA AS MR KELLER, UM STATED THAT NOT ONLY WILL THIS AFFECT JUST THIS PARTICULAR AREA, BUT THE TRAFFIC WILL ALSO AFFECT 6 65. I WAS WONDERING YOU BASE YOUR DECISION ON PUBLIC RECORDS, BUILDING PERMITS AND STUFF TOUCHING THAT. AND I'VE SENT EMAIL REGARDING THE CYBERSECURITY ISSUE, DELETING BUILDING DEPARTMENT OF OCCURS AND WITH VECTORS BEING DELETED AS MICHAEL TURNER'S FULLY AWARE THAT WE NEED TO JUST TALK ABOUT THIS INTERSECTION OR TALK ABOUT THE ZONING, BUT WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET INTO RECORDS RIGHT NOW AND DELETIONS IN THAT THAT'S FOR THAT'S FOR WHEN WE HAVE NEW BUSINESS ON THERE HAS TO DO WITH THIS CIRCUIT OF AFTER A PUBLIC GARDEN AND THIS THIS SECTION OF THE ROAD AND HAVEN'T RECEIVED IT YET, AND I WANTED TO BE DELETED IN THE MANSON WERE ATTACKED CITIES NOW. I THINK THE I T AND YOU CAN HAVE THE I T DIRECTOR CONFIRM AND THAT MIGHT TURN TO CONFIRM THAT PEOPLE HAVE BEEN CONTACTED THROWING US AND WE HAVE TO PAY FOR THAT. SO I HAVE THEM CONTACT YOU INDIVIDUALLY ON HERE, BUT WE'RE NOT GOING TO DISCUSS THAT DECISION ACCOUNTABLE. YOU'LL RESPOND TO MY EMAIL THAT I'VE SENT REGARDING CYBERSECURITY BILLION BUILDING. PUBLISHERS DO THAT. WE'LL ASK. THE ADMINISTRATION SENT EMAIL FOR PATH TO, YOU KNOW, BE SPARSE. OKAY I UNDERSTAND. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MR WEAVER. OKAY? OKAY BECAUSE WE'RE IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS PROJECT ON HERE BY REQUESTING PETITIONER TO ALLOW MORE TIME TO COMPLETE THIS 6 65 1 OF FOUR INTERSECTION PROJECT I MOVED THIS ORDINANCE BE POSTPONED UNTIL APRIL 3RD THANK YOU. MR SHOT. OH I'M SORRY, MR SHOT DIGRESSED. MR BARRY? YES, MR SHORT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR KELLER. UNDER A I VERY BRIEFLY. INTERJECT SOMETHING. YES, SIR. FOR THOSE OF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN HERE BEFORE. MR WEAVER SHOWS UP A LOT TO DISCUSS ISSUES WITH US. THE CITY OF GROSS CITY HAS NEVER LOST A PENNY TO A

[00:50:01]

RANSOMWARE ATTACK EVER. WE'VE TOLD HIM THAT HE CONTINUES TO PERSIST. CLAIM THAT WE HAVE THE CITY HAS NEVER DELETED RECORDS OUTSIDE OF OUR RETENTION PERIOD AS REQUIRED BY LAW. WE HAVE TOLD HIM THAT, BUT HE CONTINUES TO STAND UP AND SAY THIS SO I JUST DON'T WANT ANYONE HERE TO LEAVE WITH THE MISS WITH THE MISUNDERSTANDING IN TERMS OF THE CITY COMPLIES WITH ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER BOTH THE PUBLIC RECORDS LAW AND WITH OUR CYBER SECURITY AND ALL THE ALLEGATIONS THAT ARE MADE. I HAVE PROVIDED MR WEAVER THESE RECORDS. I WILL GIVE THEM TO ANYBODY IN HERE. WHO WANTS THEM? UP AND I WILL BE HAPPY TO SHARE THOSE RESULTS WITH YOUTUBE. SO IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, PLEASE SEE ME. THANK YOU, MR SMITH. THANKS FOR CLARIFYING THAT.

[Ordinance C-04-23 Approve the Plat of Holton Run, Section 4 located S of Demorest Dr. & N of Chancellor Dr. Second reading and public hearing.]

ORDINANCE C 04 23 IN ORDER TO ACCEPT THE PLAN OF HOLDING RUN SECTION FOUR, LOCATED SOUTH OF DEMAREST ROAD. SECTION FOUR CONTAINS LOTS 1 63 1 81 INCLUSIVE ON THERE. MR TOLBERT SIGNED UP. MR. TOLBERT. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS? IF YOU NAME AN ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. YES. HELLO MY NAME IS TOM TOLBERT HOME INC ADDRESSES 24890 RUDE OR IN OHIO 43146. I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU GUYS MIGHT HAVE ON BOTH ORDINANCE SUPPORT. ROUND SECTION FOUR IS ACTUALLY FIVE FLIGHTS. ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL AND THIS IS JUST. NORMAL HOUSEKEEPING OF DOING A PLAN. I SEE NONE ON HERE. ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. ORDINANCE SAYS SECOND REPUBLIC HERE AND BE APPROVED. THANK YOU. MR BARRY? YES, MR HOLT? YES MR SHOCKEY.

[Ordinance C-05-23 Approve the Plat of Holton Run, Section 5 located S of Demorest Dr. & N of Chancellor Dr. Second reading and public hearing.]

THANK YOU. MOVING ON C 05 23 IN ORDER TO ACCEPT THE PLAN OF HOLDING AROUND SECTION FIVE.

LOCATED SOFTWARE DEMOREST ROAD SECTION FIVE. CONTAINS LOTS 1 82 THROUGH 1 98 INCLUSIVE UNDER.

YOU HEARD MR HILBERT IF HE NEEDED ANY QUESTIONS ANSWERED. ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. DISORDERS SAID HIS SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING A MOVEMENT BE APPROVED. I CAN MR HOLT? YES YES, YES. YES, YES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MOVING

[Ordinance C-06-23 Approve a Special Use Permit for a Day Care for Daystarz Child Care LLC located at 5968 Hoover Road. Second reading and public hearing.]

THROUGH ORDINANCE C 06 23 AND ORDINANCE TO APPROVE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A DAYCARE FOR DAY STARS CHILDCARE LLC, LOCATED AT 59 68, HOOVER WROTE. FEBRUARY 7TH PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SPECIAL USE PERMIT ON HERE. ON THEIR CALL HIM MISS SHIELDS. HMM CARE TO COMMENT ON THIS BECAUSE THERE'S BEEN A COUPLE OF LITTLE THINGS THAT HAVE CHANGED SINCE THE PLANNING COMMISSION. YES THANK YOU, MR HOCKEY, JUST AS A QUICK OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL FOR THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT THEY STARS. CHILDCARE IS AN ESTABLISHED BUSINESS HERE IN GROWTH CITY.

THEY'VE EXPANDED AND RELOCATED A COUPLE OF TIMES HERE IN OUR TOWN CENTER. THEY'RE CURRENTLY AT 33 23 CLEVELAND AVENUE. THIS PROPOSAL WOULD RELOCATE THEM TO HOOVER ROAD AND THE FORMER KEYBANK BUILDING IN THE BOOK. I GREW UP SHOPPING CENTER. THE SITE PLAN THAT YOU HAVE DISPLAYED ON THE SLIDES RIGHT NOW IS WHAT WAS REVIEWED AT PLANNING COMMISSION. IT SHOWS THAT COVERED PLAY AREA IN THE FORMER DRIVE THROUGH FOR THE KEY BANK WITH A SEPARATE FENCE AREA PLAY AREA JUST TO THE EAST, AND THE FENCING IS PROPOSED TO BE THE SAME AS WHAT THEIR LOCATION CURRENTLY HAS. NOW A SIX FT TALL , BLACK DECORATIVE ALUMINUM FENCE. UM AND BOLLARDS ARE ALSO PROPOSED TO CLOSE OFF THE DRIVE, I'LL SO THAT THERE WOULD BE NO VEHICULAR INTERACTION WITH THAT PLAY AREA. THERE IS EXISTING MOUNDING. I APOLOGIZE FOR MY VOICE. HOPEFULLY IT LASTS THROUGH THE NIGHT. UM THERE IS EXISTING SCREENING, MOUNTING AND LANDSCAPING ALONG THE EAST SIDE , WHICH WILL REMAIN, UM IT WAS INSTALLED WITH THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT OF THAT KEY BANK TO PROVIDE SCREENING BETWEEN THE BUSINESS AND THE RESIDENTIAL AREA TO THE EAST. IN RESPONSE TO SOME CONCERNS THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED REGARDING PARKING. THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CLARIFY THEIR OPERATIONS PRIMARILY REGARDING THEIR PEAK PICK UP AND DROP OFF TIMES IN THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES AT ANY GIVEN TIME. I'LL LEAVE IT TO THE APPLICANT TO ELABORATE MORE IF COUNCIL WISHES, BUT I DO JUST WANT TO ALSO NOTE THAT THE APPLICANT PROVIDED A REVISED SITE PLAN CLARIFYING THEIR SITE IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH INCLUDED EXPANDING THE FENCED IN AREA TO INCLUDE THE AREA UNDER THE COVERED CANADA. BE SO THE DIMENSIONS I THINK INCREASED TO 70 BY 37 INSTEAD OF 35 BY 37. GENERALLY STAFF BELIEVES THAT THIS IS AN APPROPRIATE USE FOR THE SITE. UM IT'S A GOOD TRANSITION FROM THE COMMERCIAL AREA TO THE RESIDENTIAL TO THE EAST, AND THAT THE TRAFFIC IS ANTICIPATED TO BE LESS THAN WHAT WAS PREVIOUSLY GENERATED BY THE BANK DRIVE THROUGH COUNCIL REFERENCE THIS PAGE RIGHT HERE

[00:55:08]

AND DATED TODAY'S DATE IF YOU WOULD ON THERE BECAUSE WE'RE GOING TO NEED TO SUBSTITUTE THE PLAY AREA HAS BEEN EXPANDED ON THAT WE'RE GOING TO USE IT TONIGHT AS THE PLAYING SHEET DATED 36 23. SO I MOVED TO REPLACE THE PLAN SHEET DATED 36 23 INTO THE PACKET. SECOND.

SORRY. I GOT A QUESTION OVER HERE. MS. SURE. WE'RE REPLACING THE PAGE. YES, YES, WE ARE PLAYING STREET. YES MR SHOT. KEY WRIST, BARRY. ALL RIGHT NOW WE'VE GOT THAT HOUSEKEEPING ON THERE. UM WE HAVE THERE. WE HAVE THE OWNER OF IT RIGHT HERE. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK THIS EVENING OR ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS? RIGHT JUST GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.

DANIELLE DUNLAP, 3333323 CLEVELAND AVENUE. CURRENTLY COUNSEL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? BECAUSE THIS IS, UH UM USING IT AS EXISTING BUILDING, MODIFYING IT INTO A DAYCARE AT THAT SITE.

ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL FOR HER? OKAY, SEE? NONE. THANK YOU. WE HAVE A COUPLE OF PEOPLE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THERE. THIS HAWK. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. MY NAME IS DAPHNE HAWK AND I LOVE IT. 24 32 LANDINGS WAY IN THE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO THIS, UM , PROPOSED SPECIAL USE PERMIT. FIRST I AM TRULY SORRY THAT DAY STARS WILL SOON LOSE THEIR CURRENT LOCATION DUE TO THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND I UNDERSTAND THERE QUICKLY TRYING TO FIND A NEW LOCATION. SADLY I DON'T AGREE THAT THE FORMER KEYBANK IS INADEQUATE LOCATION FOR THIS BUSINESS FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS. UM MY FIRST ITEM WAS PARKING, AND I'M NOT GOING TO ADDRESS THAT. SINCE THERE HAVE BEEN SOME CHANGES MADE. UM BUT MY THE NEXT ITEM I HAVE IS THE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT HOOVER AND BUCKEYE GROVE.

THERE HAVE BEEN NUMEROUS ACCIDENTS AT THIS INTERSECTION, INCLUDING SEVERAL TAKING OUT A LIGHT POST, AND IT IS ESPECIALLY CHALLENGING TO MAKE ANY LEFT HAND TURNS FROM ANY DIRECTION.

THIS IS EVEN MORE SO AT THE PEAK PICK UP AND DROP OFF TIMES FOR DAYCARE. THE PREVIOUS BANK ACTIVITY WAS IN ALL DAY TRICKLING OF CARS IN AND OUT AND RARELY POSED A PROBLEM. A DAYCARE BUSINESS WOULD INCREASE THE CHANCES OF ACCIDENTS AND TRAFFIC TIE UPS BECAUSE OF THEIR PEAK PICK UP AND DROP OFF TIMES, COINCIDING WITH THE TYPICAL MORNING AND AFTERNOON RUSH.

SHOWER TIMES. THE TEMPTATION AND OPPORTUNITY FOR CUT THROUGHS IS THE NEXT ISSUE FOR ME. THIS RAISES TWO ISSUES. FIRST OUR STREETS ARE NOT MAINTAINED BY THE CITY BUT BY THE ASSOCIATION AND WHILE THERE ARE SIGNS POSTED , SAYING IT'S A PRIVATE ROAD AND THROUGH TRAFFIC IS NOT PERMITTED. WE HAVE NO WAY OF POLICING IT. THE RESIDENTS BEAR THE COST OF REPAIRS OR IMPROVEMENTS TO THESE ROADS, AND IT IS NOT RIGHT TO SETTLE ELDERLY RESIDENTS, MANY OF WHOM ARE ON A FIXED INCOME. I KNOW I PROBABLY DON'T LOOK LIKE I QUALIFY AS ELDERLY YET, BUT I'M I'VE BEEN LIVING IN THERE TWO YEARS. UM BUT MY PRIMARY CONCERN AND THIS IS WHY I CAME HERE TO SPEAK TONIGHT IS THE GREATEST CONCERN IS SIMPLY FOR THE SAFETY OF THE RESIDENTS. WASTE MY TIME UP. OKAY BECAUSE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD HAS NO SIDEWALKS. THEY MUST WALK IN THE STREET.

MANY OF THEM WALK THEIR DOGS WHILE IT IS DARK, WHETHER IT IS IN THE MORNING OR IN THE EVENING, WE ALSO HAVE TWO YOUNG BOYS WHO CATCH THE BUS IN THE MORNING. WHILE IT'S STILL DARK, IF ANY PARENT ELECTS TO TAKE A SHORTCUT THROUGH OUR DEVELOPMENT, IT POSES A VERY SERIOUS DANGER TO RESIDENTS WALKING IN THE STREET. HAVING BEEN A WORKING PARENT OF SMALL CHILDREN MANY YEARS AGO. I KNOW THE PRESSURE OF RUSHING TO DROP OFF OR PICK UP CHILDREN AT DAYCARE. THIS PRESSURE COULD AND LIKELY WOULD ENCOURAGE PARENTS TO TAKE SHORTCUTS AND NOT BE AS CAREFUL AS THEY SHOULD. WHILE DOING SO, FOR THESE REASONS, AS WELL AS THOSE MR MILLS WILL PRESENT, WE RESPECTFULLY ASK YOU TO DENY THIS SPECIAL USE PERMIT. THANK YOU. MR MILLS. MY NAME IS STEVE MILLS. I'M ALSO A RESIDENT AT 25 68 LANDINGS WAY. UM. AND JUST WANT TO REITERATE WHAT SHE WOULD. DAPHNE WAS SAYING. WE HAVE TWO ISSUES. ONE IS WITH PARKING. UM ACCORDING TO, UH

[01:00:05]

WHAT INFORMATION WAS GIVEN TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THERE IS A STAFF OF 12 TO 15 PEOPLE THAT WORK THERE. AND THEIR LICENSE TO ACCOMMODATE UP TO 70 TO 80 75 TO 80 CHILDREN DAILY.

UM THEY HAVE PROVIDED APPARENTLY 16 PARKING SPOTS FOR THAT. I DON'T KNOW IF ANY TRAFFIC STUDY HAS BEEN DONE, ANY PARKING STUDY HAS BEEN DONE. I HEARD SOMEBODY SAY THERE. INFORMATION THAT THE BANK CREATED MORE TRAFFIC THAT I HIGHLY DOUBT AT LEAST NOT DURING THE RUSH HOUR TIMES THAT THERE DROP OFF AND PICK UP IS WHICH IS 6 TO 9 IN THE MORNING 3 TO 6 IN THE AFTERNOON. UM. SO I THINK PARKING NEEDS TO BE REDONE. THEY'RE CUTTING OFF THE ENTIRE BACK AREA WHERE YOU COULD PARK.

AH TO CREATE THE EXPANDED AREA AND SO FORTH. UM THE SECOND ISSUE IS ALSO WHAT DAPHNE BROUGHT UP THAT. YOU CAN'T GET OUT. I DON'T KNOW WHETHER ANY OF YOU LIVE OVER THERE OR COME OVER AND DRIVE DOWN QUAIL CREEK. UM THE EXIT THE ONLY INGRESS EGRESS THEY HAVE FROM HOOVER ROAD. IF YOU TRY TO GO OUT THERE AND TAKE A LEFT, THERE'S NO LIGHT. THERE WAS TRAFFIC COMING OUT OF KROGER ACROSS HOOVER ROAD AT YOU. AND HERE YOU'VE GOT TO DODGE THE LIGHTS AT THE END OF OUR CONDOMINIUM AND IT'S 6 65 TO TRY TO GET OUT THERE. UM AND AS DAPHNE SAID, THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL ACCIDENTS. SO UM, THE I THINK THE OPTION FOR PEOPLE ONCE THEY DISCOVER YOU CAN'T GET OUT.

IS TO GO BACK THROUGH OUR CONDOMINIUM. WE HAVE THE YOU KNOW, TO GET UP TO THE ROAD TO THE NORTH OF US AND TAKE THE LIGHT OUT AT HOOVER ROAD THERE. UM WE ALSO HAVE A BRIDGE, DECORATIVE BRIDGE OR THAT WAS DRIVABLE BRIDGE AT THE END OF OUR PROJECT THAT THEY EVERYBODY WOULD BE GOING OVER. WHICH IS SMALL, NARROW, AND WE HAVE TO MAINTAIN IT MORE THAN THE ROADWAYS FROM TRAFFIC IS SO, UH , IN CONCLUSION, I GUESS SINCE MY LIGHT IS UP, UM THE, UH. THE REGULATIONS THAT I READ ON THE. WEBSITE INDICATE THAT WHEN YOU SEEK A SPECIAL USE PERMIT UM, IT CAN ONLY BE A STATUTE GIVEN AND APPROVED IF IT WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE USE OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. OR IF IT SHALL IMPOSE A SIGNIFICANT OR DIFFERENT TRAFFIC IMPACT. DUE TO THE ANTICIPATED USE THE PROPERTY AS DAPHNE SAID, WE NEED DAYCARES IN IN, UH, IN OUR LARGE CITY.

ABSOLUTELY. I DON'T THINK THIS IS THE RIGHT PLACE TO PUT THAT DAYCARE. UH AND, YOU KNOW, I THINK IT'S GONNA DEEPLY AFFECT US. I THINK IT'S GOING TO AFFECT THE PEOPLE THAT USE THE DAYCARE AS THEY GET FRUSTRATED OR TRYING TO GET BACK OUT TO HOOVER ROAD. SO I'M NOW READ. I QUIT. WE HAD A DISCUSSION AND A LITTLE BIT OF THIS INFORMATION BECAUSE OF REPLACING THIS PLAN SHEET. WE STARTED TALKING ABOUT THAT VERY ISSUE OF ON THERE. SO MR MAYOR, DID YOU WANNA JUST AN OBSERVATION? MR. MILLS APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE AND ALL THOSE FROM THE LANDING BECAUSE IT IT IS IMPORTANT. THAT'S BEEN A KEEP INVOLVEMENT ON THAT CORNER, SPEND THEIR SEVERAL YEARS AND YEARS WELL MAINTAINED, AND I CAN CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND YOUR CONCERN. AH REGARDLESS OF THE DAYCARE, END OF THE DAY CARE OUT I WAS THERE SATURDAY AT THAT INTERSECTION.

YOU'RE SPEAKING OF MR MILL. AND THIS IS THE PICTURE. I TALK COMING OUT OF KRUGER. AND WHAT'S YOUR SUGGESTING AS TO HOW DO WE GET PEOPLE CUTTING THROUGH OUR DEVELOPMENT? WELL, THERE IS ONE OF THE PRIMARY CULPRITS. BECAUSE YOU CAN SEE CLEARLY THERE IS A THROUGH ARROW THERE GOES ON ACROSS YES, SIR. THERE IS IT'S THERE. YEAH, RIGHT. EXACTLY. AND SO THERE'S SOME. THERE'S SOME THINGS THAT WE'VE GOT TO DO ON OUR SIDE. BUT I SAY ALSO ON THE, UH, CONDO SIGN THIS AGAIN IS REGARDLESS WITH THE DAYCARE GOES IN OR NOT ONE OF THEM IS THAT WE SHOULD ERECT SOME SIGNS. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT IT INTERNALLY AT THE STOP SIGN OR BEFORE THE STOP SIGN THAT SAYS THAT THAT AREA WAS NOT FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC. NOW YOU CAN GO INTO THE DOCTOR'S OFFICE AND SO FORTH. BUT THE OTHER ONE ON YOUR END. I MEAN, I WOULD SERIOUSLY CONSIDER OF SPEED TABLE. ON THE PROPERTY

[01:05:04]

LINE, AND IT ALSO CAN SERIOUSLY CONSIDER MAKING THE SIGN YOU GOTTA YOU GOTTA SIGN ABOUT LIKE THIS. IT SAYS PRIVATE PROPERTY AND NO THROUGH TRAFFIC, BUT IT NEEDS TO BE EXPANDED AND MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE DO CLEARLY UNDERSTAND THAT'S NOT THROUGH AREA BUT THAT INTERSECTION IN THE WAY THAT SMART IS ONE OF THE CHIEF CULPRITS OF WINE IN THE WORLD. PEOPLE COULDN'T FIGURE IT OUT. UH WHEN PEOPLE ARE TELLING ME IT WAS PEOPLE COMING THROUGH ARE THE LANDINGS. WHY? WELL, THAT'S ONE REASON YOU GOT A BIG ARROW THAT POINTS IN THAT WAY. SO UH, JUST AGAIN, REGARDLESS OF WHAT HAPPENS WITH THE DAYCARE, WE WE'VE GOT PROBLEMS AND WE WANT TO WORK WITH YOU AND TRYING TO MAKE THAT SO THAT WE CAN SHUT DOWN SOME OF THAT TRAFFIC COMING THROUGH THERE. THANK YOU.

CHAIRMAN YES, THE SO IT MIGHT UNDERSTAND THAT THE LANDINGS PROPERTY STARTS HERE. IT GOES BACK PAST THE BANK BUILDING. SO WHEN DOES THE ROAD TURNED INTO THE LANDINGS ABOUT PROBABLY 100 YARDS FROM. WITH THE BANK PARKING LOT OR DRIVEWAY, AND MAYBE 50. RIGHT AROUND THAT AREA . OKAY THAT'S WHERE THE STREET NARROWS. IS THERE A WAY TO PUT UM AND I KNOW YOU'RE AGAINST HIM, BUT PUT A BUMP. THEY'RE GOING INTO THEIR WELL WHAT I'M SUGGESTING IS YOU DO A SPEED TABLE. WHAT IS THE SPEED TABLE? IT'S ABOUT A SIX OR SEVEN FT STRIP OF RIGHT. HIGHER ELEVATION CURB. AND WHAT IT DOES. IT'S MORE OF A CALMING THAN SPEED, BOB SPEED, BOB. THEY GO OVER AND THEN THEY GO. SEE HOW FAST YOU CAN GET OVER LIKE A PLATEAU. YEAH. YEP BUT SO THAT'S AN AUTHORIZATION AGAIN, REGARDLESS OF WHAT GOES ON IN THE DAYCARE THAT WE GOTTA WORK AS PARTNERS AND TRYING TO GET THIS THING STRAIGHTENED OUT GOING THROUGH YOUR YOUR DEVELOPMENT, MR. PERRY, MR CHAIRMAN, SO IF WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS DEVICE, AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT MAKING, I DON'T KNOW FOR THE LACK OF A BETTER TERM. ENTRY CAUTION INTO INTO THE LANDINGS LIKE SAYS PRIVATE PROPERTY OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. UM, AN ENTRY FEATURE THERE. SHOULDN'T WE WAIT TO PASS THIS UNTIL WE UNTIL WE COME UP WITH A PLAN FOR THAT. MY SUGGESTION WOULD BE THAT WE WORK ON THAT ALMOST IMMEDIATELY BECAUSE AGAIN WHETHER THE DAYCARE GOES IN OR NOT. THIS IS AN EXISTING PROBLEM THAT'S BEEN THERE, IT'S BEEN REVOLVED, EVOLVING. AND OBVIOUSLY IT'S BEEN AN ANNOYANCE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND IT'S SOMETHING THAT IT'S NOT GOING TO FIX IT ENTIRELY, BUT AT LEAST WE COULD DO SOME THINGS TO TRY TO RE MEDIATE. AND THEN THE SUGGESTION I MIGHT HAVE HERE IS THAT, UM ENTRANCE AND EXIT OF THE OF THIS PROPOSED DAYCARE CURRENT BANK.

WOULDN'T IT BE PRUDENT TO PUT A RIGHT TURN ONLY SIGN COMING OUT OF THERE. BECAUSE THEN THAT WOULD DIRECT THE TRAFFIC BACK UP TO HOOVER WROTE. OH, NO. AND THAT'S RIGHT. TURN ONLY GOING OUT THERE. YOU SEE WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT? RIGHT DOWN HERE. RIGHT I THINK THAT'S A GOOD IDEA . I THINK THE BUT I WHATEVER WE DO, WHERE THEIR PROPERTY STARTS THAT IT NEEDS TO BE VERY WELL.

NATE YOU KNOW THERE HAS TO BE SOMETHING THERE THAT SAYS THIS IS PRIVATE PROPERTY. AND OTHERS CAN BE OTHERS CAN BE PICKED UP. IF WE'RE USING IT AS A KIND, I DON'T KNOW WHAT BUT I MEAN, THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE TO DEAL WITH THIS, OKAY? GOT A COUPLE OTHER PEOPLE THAT WANT TO SPEAK ON HERE. MR WEAVER. I KNOW YOU'RE SIGNED UP. NO, WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT. CORRECT WE'RE NOT GOING TO TALK ABOUT RECORDS WERE NOT GOING TO TALK ABOUT. CYBER ANYTHING CYBER WE'RE ONLY GOING TO TALK ABOUT SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE DAYCARE, CORRECT. THANK YOU. I LIKE TO MAKE COMMENTS TO, UM I THINK IT DISRESPECTFUL MAYOR TO CALL, UM, FILLED WITH THE DISABILITY ONE HANDED PHOTOGRAPHER, SO I THINK, MY COMMENT STEPHEN SMITH ACTIVISTS AND HE SAID THERE WAS NO PUBLIC RECORDS AND TWO MONTHS LATER THAT HE PROVIDED COCKBURN OKAY? ALL RIGHT. LET ME START WITH THE DAYCARE. SO REGARDING DAYCARE, UM, CONSTANT CURRENT. I HAD UM, IT WAS GOING ALONG WITH THE DISCRIMINATION. UM UM, I BELIEVE , UM, TAKE TAKE DISCRIMINATION.

NO CYBER. NO NOTHING. SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR DAYCARE. THIS IS DAYCARE, RIGHT IN DAYCARE. HAD CHILDREN, RIGHT? CORRECT YOUR HEAD, TEACHERS AND STAFF, RIGHT? YES I JUST WANT TO LET THAT GOOD GOOD CITY RESIDENTS KNOW THAT GROWS. CITY DISPATCHER, WHICH INVESTED IN GOLD CITY. THAT'S THAT'S NOT A LINE. PLEASE HAVE A SEAT. MR WEAVER. IT'S ABOUT A DAYCARE WITH GROVE CITY DISPATCHER AND FORMER DAYCARE WORKER HERE. SIT DOWN, PLEASE. THANK YOU, MR WEAVER. OKAY? MR

[01:10:03]

WARD. THEIR COUNCIL MEMBERS. MY NAME IS MICHAEL WARD. I AM THE ON THE BOARD FOR THE LANDINGS EQUIPPED QUICK CONDO ASSOCIATION , AND HERE'S ALSO ADDRESSED THE ISSUE OF THE DAY CARE CENTER.

AND I HAD TO SOME OF THE COMMENTS THAT'S ALREADY BEEN MADE ABOUT IT, WHICH WERE VERY VALID COMMENTS AND BEFORE I START THE IDEA OF PUTTING A TURN , LANE ONLY DOESN'T HELP THE RESIDENTS LIVE IN LAND NEEDS TO GO TO KROGER AND WANT TO GO ACROSS THE STREET. SO THAT WAS NOT THAT'S A BAD IDEA. NO, IT'S COMING OUT OF THE DAYCARE. THE SAME RIGHT COMING OUT OF THE DAYCARE DRIVEWAY. OH, OKAY. YEAH GOOD LUCK WITH THAT, TOO, BECAUSE IT'S A IT'S A VERY GETTING OUT OF THERE. ESPECIALLY DURING RUSH HOUR. AH, I WOULDN'T HAD. THAT THIS DOES FACE. YOU DON'T SEE IT THERE, BUT THE GRASS AREA YOU SEE TO THE EAST THERE WHERE THEY'RE PUT INTO PLAY CENTER. UH THERE'S APPROXIMATELY 16 RESIDENTS WHO LIVE ALONG THAT SIDE WHO WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE NOISE COMING FROM UM, THE CHILDREN PLAYING OUT THERE? I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'VE EVER BEEN TO CVS. THERE'S A DAY CARE CENTER NEXT TO CBS PICK UP AND I'M OVER THERE, PICKING UP A PRESCRIPTION. YEAH IT'S LOUD. I MEAN, IT'S REALLY LOUD KIDS THAT STOPPED HER LUNGS. AND AS A FATHER OF EIGHT AND 22 GRANDCHILDREN. I DON'T THINK ANYBODY WOULD APPRECIATE THEM SCREAMING OUTSIDE THEIR HOUSE DAY AFTER DAY. THEY ARE ALSO, UM THE. RESIDENTS THAT LIVED THERE. PAY A GOOD PRICE FOR THOSE CONDOS AS YOU WELL KNOW. AND I THINK HAVING A DAYCARE CENTER THERE. WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT RESALE OF THEIR CONDOS, BECAUSE I DON'T THINK ANYBODY WOULD WANT TO BUY A KIND OF THAT'S ADJACENT TO UH, DAYCARE CENTER WHERE THERE'S A BUNCH OF KIDS SCREAMING DAY AFTER DAY. SO AND. I THINK THAT THERE WASN'T ONE OTHER COMMENT THAT SINCE MY TIME IS RUNNING OUT, I THINK YOU CAN APPRECIATE OUR SITUATION. OKAY, IT'S A PRIVATE IT'S A PRIVATE COMMUNITY. IT HAS ONE STREET TWO STREETS, ACTUALLY, BUT IT'S IN A CIRCLE LANDINGS POND AND LANNY'S WAY. I'M ON THE LANDINGS POND SIDE, WHICH FACES THE DAYCARE AND THEY'RE UP 16 RESIDENTS OR SO ON THAT SIDE. AND I THINK YOU SHOULD GIVE SERIOUS CONSIDERATION TO DENYING THE PERMIT FOR THAT DAYCARE CENTER. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL OF THIS. YES YEAH. IF I MAY, MR SHOCKEY REALLY JUST WANT TO TOUCH ON YOU KNOW, I HAVE THE SAME CONCERNS AS HAVE BEEN EXPRESSED. AND KIND OF WANT TO GO TO THIS WHOLE CONVERSATION OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. UM THIS SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUIRED BECAUSE IT IS NOT PERMITTED NEWS. AND THIS IS OUR OPPORTUNITY TO WAIVE THE IMPACTS ON THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY. UM . PARKING IS CONTINUES TO BE CONCERNED 16 SPACES AND I WENT IN OVER THE WEEKEND TO TRY TO DIG FOR WHAT ALL OF OUR CHILDCARE FACILITIES HAVE IN THE WAY OF PARKING. AND THEY'RE ALL OVER THE MAP, SO THERE'S NO THERE'S NO FAST RULE ABOUT THAT HOW MUCH PARKING NEEDS TO BE AVAILABLE, BUT I AM CONCERNED ABOUT UM, YOU KNOW, DO YOU HAVE ENOUGH FOR THE PEOPLE THAT ARE WORKING THERE AND THE PEOPLE THAT ARE DELIVERING THEIR CHILDREN? HE TIMES OF THE DAY? UM IT IS VERY DIFFERENT THAN THE KIND OF SLOW TRICKLE OF TRAFFIC THAT WAS APPLICABLE AND BANKING ENVIRONMENT THAT'S VERY TRANSACTIONAL, AND THEY'RE THEY'RE IN AND OUT, UM, DEPENDING ON THEIR SCHEDULED ALL THROUGH THE COURSE OF THE BUSINESS DAY, UM, SPECIAL EVENTS AT A CHILDCARE FACILITY THERE, YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE MAY BE YOUR IDEAL PARKING SITUATION. AND THEN WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU HAVE OTHER ACTIVITIES? WHERE ARE THOSE PEOPLE GOING TO PARK? AND REALLY THERE IN THE VICINITY. IN THAT KIND OF TIGHT CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION, THERE IS NO OTHER ACCESSIBLE PLACE TO PARK. TRAFFIC FLOW. AT THAT INTERSECTION IS VERY DIFFICULT. I HAVE RECEIVED CALLS FROM RESIDENTS COUNTLESS TIMES OVER THE COURSE OF THE TIME THAT I HAVE SERVED ON COUNCIL REALLY ASKING, IS THERE ANYTHING THAT COULD BE DONE TO IMPROVE UPON IT , AND IT'S TOUGH BECAUSE IT'S NOT A PLACE FOR ANOTHER SIGNAL.

THERE'S A SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION WHERE YOU ENTER AT KROGER. AND THERE IS A SIGNAL OBVIOUSLY AT 6 65, BUT WHEN YOU'RE SITTING THERE TO PULL OUT, IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO

[01:15:02]

GAUGE WHAT TRAFFIC IS DOING ON THE OTHER SIDE AND OBVIOUSLY AN INCREASING VOLUME OF TRAFFIC GOING IN BOTH DIRECTIONS ON HOOVER ROAD. AND UM AND THEN I DO BELIEVE THAT IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE CONSIDER THE COPS CIMINI TO THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD OF A PLAYGROUND AREA. UM, YOU KNOW, IN ALL FAIRNESS, UM, YOU KNOW, I'D LOVE TO SAY THAT THE SOUND OF CHILDREN IS MUSIC TO MY EARS AT ALL TIMES, BUT LET'S FACE IT. IF IT'S YOUR EVERYDAY REALITY, I DROVE OVER THERE JUST TO KIND OF STAND AND GET A SENSE. YOU KNOW WHEN YOU'RE DRIVING BY, IT'S LIKE, WELL, THERE'S TREES AS A BARRIER, BUT IT IS VERY CLOSE TO THE REAR OF THOSE HOMES AND, UM AND HAVING THE PLAYGROUND LOCATED SO CLOSE TO THAT THAT PROPERTY LINE I AM VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THAT. SO I JUST WANT TO RAISE THOSE THREE ISSUES. AND I DO THINK THAT THIS PARTICULAR USE IMPACTS. UM THE SAFETY OF MOVEMENT IN THE CORRIDOR AND THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.

NO, NO, NO. HANG ON. SO. WHAT IS THIS CURRENTLY ZONED AT CHUCK? COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL SO BASICALLY ANY ANY COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CAN GO ON THE SPOT. SO I MEAN, I GUESS I GUESS WHERE I'M AT WITH THIS AS WELL, AS IS THE ISSUE OF YOU KNOW, WHEN THESE PEOPLE MOVED IN, THEY KNEW THAT THERE WAS A BANK THERE. THEY DIDN'T KNOW THAT THERE WAS A DAYCARE FACILITY THERE. UM AND SO, THEREFORE YOU KNOW, IT'S YOU KNOW, GOING BACK TO THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT. AND THE REASON WHY THESE FOLKS ARE HERE IS BECAUSE THEY DON'T THEY DON'T FEEL THAT A DAYCARE FACILITY SHOULD BE IN THIS AREA. SO IT'S ONE OF THOSE THINGS WHERE WE HAVE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT PROCESS TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT YOU KNOW THE RESIDENTS IN AN AREA WOULD WANT TO, UM WOULD WANT WOULD WANT THIS TO BE THEIR NEIGHBORS. SO UM, THAT'S KIND OF WHERE I AM WITH THIS. MR HOPE TO HIS, UM IT WAS MY TURN. MY TURN. KIM JUST REMIND ME. WE, UH DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. APPROVED THIS RIGHT? IN SOME FASHION WITH THE LATEST THINGS CORRECT, CORRECT. WE INITIALLY MADE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION ALSO MADE A UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL. THANK YOU. JUST FOR MY OPINION OF DONE SOME DISCUSSIONS IN I UNDERSTAND THERE'S ONLY 12 FAMILIES WILL BE UTILIZING THIS DAYCARE TODAY.

AND I UNDERSTAND THAT THAT COULD EXPAND, BUT THAT AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC AND DROP OFF DOES NOT CONCERN ME. EVEN IF IT EXPANDS. I BELIEVE THE TRAFFIC WON'T BE MUCH NEAR WHERE THE BANK ALREADY WAS. UM YES, IT IS NEXT TO PRIVATE. IT IS ZONE COMMERCIAL. I DON'T KNOW WHAT OTHER BETTER NEIGHBOR YOU MIGHT WANT. OTHER THAN A DAYCARE FACILITYMEAN , GROCERY STORE COULD GO IN THERE TODAY WITHOUT A DIFFERENT APPROVAL PROCESS WITHOUT ANYTHING COMING TO COUNCIL. AND SO I'M JUST NOT WILLING TO STRAND THIS PROPERTY FOR PURPOSES OF THE DAYCARE. AND WITH LIMITED IMPROVEMENT AND LIMITED PROBLEMS FOR TRAFFIC THAT ARE ALREADY A PROBLEM TODAY. SO THAT'S WHERE I'LL BE. HIM YOU COME BACK TO THE PODIUM. I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.

ORIGINALLY IT WAS SPOKEN PROPOSED TO DEATH. THE UM PLAY AREA WAS UP IN THIS TRIANGULAR AREA HERE. YEAH I THINK WHEN YOU HAD DISCUSSIONS, UM WITH THE WITH THE KIND OF WHERE THE EXES ARE, I GUESS THERE UM WHEN YOU HAD DISCUSSIONS ORIGINALLY ON THEIR, UM, WAS THERE SOME REASON WHY THAT GOT MOVED FROM THERE BECAUSE THAT WOULD PUSH THE PLAYGROUND AREA UP AND OVER A LITTLE BIT FROM MY UNDERSTANDING . IT WAS TAKEN OUT DUE TO PHASING. WE TALKED ABOUT THE POTENTIAL TO COME BACK IN THE FUTURE TO EXPAND THE PLAY AREA TO INCLUDE THOSE ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES BUT FOR THE CURRENT NEEDS OF DAY STARS THAT WAS NOT FELT TO BE NECESSARY.

AND SO THAT'S WHY IT WAS CROSSED OUT ON THAT SITE PLAN PRESENTED TO PLANNING COMMISSION. UM IF YOU COULD COME BACK. AGAIN. JUST GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AGAIN FOR THE DONE YET DONE THAT 3323 CLEVELAND AVENUE. THANK YOU. YOU'VE CHANGED YOUR MIND ABOUT WHERE THERE BECAUSE THAT POSSIBILITY THAT THAT PLAYGROUND COULD BE MOVED UP OVER THERE. IT WILL BE. THAT'S PHASE ONE JUST TO GET THE CENTER RELOCATED WITH THE TIME LIMIT THAT WE HAVE TO MOVE FROM THE DOWNTOWN AREA.

OKAY, I'LL SUBMIT AGAIN. AND THEN THAT WON'T BE A PLAY AREA WHEN WE DO RENOVATIONS, BUT THE

[01:20:04]

NEW AREA WHERE WE SAW THE RECTANGLE WITH PLAYERS WILL BE SO THAT WILL BE UP IN THE TOP OF THEIR WHEN DO YOU ANTICIPATE THAT? IN ON HOW CONSTRUCTION GIRLS YOU KNOW THEY CAN GET US IN 3 TO 6 MONTHS AND WEATHER PERMITTING. IT'LL BE WITHIN 12 MONTHS WE'LL HAVE RELOCATED THAT PLAYGROUND THAT WAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THEN ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. OKAY SORTING, HAS HAD HIS SECOND REINING IN PUBLIC HERE IN A MOVE THAT IT BE APPROVED. THANK YOU. MR SHARKEY.

YES, I THINK WE NEED TO TAKE CARE OF MR SIEGRIST. MR BARRY. MR HOLT? YES. THIS IS HOW. HMM.

[Resolution CR-56-22 Approve the Development Plan for Communities at Plum Run located north of * S.R. 665 and east of S.R. 104.]

HERE. WOULD BE NINE. RESOLUTION CR 56 22 RESOLUTION APPROVED THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR COMMUNITIES AND PLUM RUN LOCATED NORTH OF STATE ROAD, 6 65 AND EAST OF ST ROUND 104. THIS IS THE SAME AS WHAT WE HAD BEFORE THERE WERE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PROJECT ON FOR 6 65 AND ONE OF FOUR BY THE QUESTION OF PETITIONER TO ALLOW MORE TIME TO COMPLETE 26 65 1 OF 400 SECTION PROJECT. REMOVE THIS ORDINANCE BE POSTPONED UNTIL APRIL 3RD. SECOND. MR SIEGERIST . MR BARRY? YES MR. HOLT, MR.

[Resolution CR-07-23 Approve the Development Plan for Courtyards at Mulberry Run located N & S of White Road.]

SHARKEY. OKAY, THANK YOU. ALRIGHT AND OUR LAST ONE ON OUR AGENDA FOR LANDS TODAY RESOLUTION CR 07. RESOLUTION APPROVED THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR COURTYARDS OF MULBERRY RUN LOCATED NORTH AND SOUTH OF WHITE ROAD. FEBRUARY 7TH PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAS TWO STIPULATIONS ON THERE. WE HAVE THE STIPULATIONS BY CHANCE, OKAY, ALRIGHT. LAST WEEK, I MET WITH MR RHODES AND HIS TEAM ABOUT ABOUT THIS PROJECT ON HERE. AND WE JUST MIGHT CONCERN WAS WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE THIS IS NOT THE THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT SLIDE. WE NEED C R 07. AND THERE WE ALREADY POSTPONED 56 C R 07 ON HERE, UM THE MY CONCERN WAS THIS STREETS THE STREETS ON THE NORTH UP HERE? AND LET'S SEE IF I CAN GET THAT UP IN THIS AREA.

OOPS. GET THE RIGHT TOOL HERE. THE STREETS RIGHT UP IN HERE. THE STREET HERE. UM BEING VERY STRAIGHT ON THERE, AND WE DISCUSSED THE UM YOU KNOW? OTHER PARTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS. THEY HAVE SOME SORT OF TURNING OF THE ROAD DOING SOMETHING TO CHANGE THE LOOKS OF THE PROJECT AND INSTEAD OF HAVING IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN ORDER THERE, SIX OR SHOCKING? YES MISS. HOW WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST I FORGOT. MR SMITH FORGOT THAT YOU'VE FORGOTTEN. I FORGOT. OH, I APOLOGIZE. UM ANYBODY EVER WRITTEN? I SPOKE WITH MS JALC EARLIER THIS WEEK, AND SHE DISCUSSED THE POTENTIAL CONFLICT WITH ME ON THIS MATTER . AFTER SPEAKING WITH HER. I ADVISED HER NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS. SO AT THIS TIME, I WOULD ASK COUNSEL TO EXCUSE MISS HOUSE FROM THE DISCUSSION AND I WOULD ASK MISS HELP TO LEAVE THE ROOM PLACE. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THAT MOTION SECOND. I'M SORRY. YES. MR HOLT. YES, YES. YEAH. MR SHOCKEY. OKAY? THANK YOU. I EVEN HAD IT WRITTEN DOWN. APOLOGIZE. I MISSED IT TOO, SIR. SO I MET WITH THE AFRICAN PEOPLE WERE DISCUSSING THAT THE ROAD THERE. I HAD SOME SUGGESTIONS AND WE AND THEY HAD SOME SUGGESTIONS, AND IN FACT, THEY WERE BETTER SUGGESTIONS THAN THE ONES I BECAUSE THEY WERE LOOKING AT SOME WAY TO CHANGE THE ALIGNMENT SO THAT THE HOMES ARE NOT ALL ALIGNED IN A LONG ROW OF 16 PROPERTIES. I THINK IT IS AND THEY'RE ALL IN A ROW, AND WHEN YOU DRIVE DOWN THERE, AND WE TALKED ABOUT WHAT'S THIS GOING TO LOOK LIKE IN 25 30 YEARS AND THINGS LIKE THAT, SO PART OF THIS ON HERE IS THAT, UM I HAD I HAVE A PROPOSED STIPULATION ON HERE THAT ADDITIONAL STIPULATION

[01:25:08]

SO LET ME I DON'T THINK WE HAVE IT ON THE SCREEN, BUT BECAUSE THEY'RE BECAUSE THEY'RE JUST WORKED THROUGH THAT THE OTHER DAY. SO I PROPOSE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ADD UNDER SECTION ONE.

I'M HERE. AH! THE FOLLOWING STIPULATION. FEATURES SUCH AND YOU HAVE THIS ON YOUR REVISED RESOLUTION. FOLKS ON CONSOLE FEATURES SUCH AS CURB BUMP OUTS , ROAD CURVATURE. I GUESS FOR ANOTHER TOUR ROAD CURVATURE IS ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING AND BURIED BUILDING SETBACKS SHALL BE ADDED TO LYNN DRIVE. THAT'S THE ONE THAT I HAD ON THERE. AND LINE DRIVE BETWEEN LIVES FOUR AND 18 TO ADD VISUAL INTEREST TO THE ROADWAY ON THERE, SO I'M I MOVE THAT WE HAD THAT STIPULATION TO SECTION ONE. SECOND. MR HOLT. YES. MR SHOCKEY, CRIST. WHICH BARRY OKAY . THANK YOU. SO THERE ARE NOW THREE STIPULATIONS ON MISS SHIELDS. WOULD YOU COME TO THE PODIUM ON DISCUSS THIS A LITTLE BIT. THERE'S ALSO ANOTHER MAJOR CHANGE IN THIS BETWEEN WHAT WAS PROPOSED ORIGINALLY IN THE IN THE PRELIMINARY REGARDING PEOPLE CROSSING CROSSING CORRECT. UM, SO GENERALLY JUST TO TAKE A STEP BACK. THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS FOR AN OWNER OCCUPIED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY AND IT WILL BE LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF WHITE ROAD WEST OF I 71 EAST OF MCDOWELL. THE NORTH HALF IS PROPOSED TO HAVE 40 UNITS, THE SOUTH 34 UNITS EACH WOULD HAVE ONE POINT OF ACCESS OFF THE PUBLIC ROADWAY. MCDOWELL AND WHITE AS WELL AS AN ADDITIONAL EMERGENCY ACCESS THROUGH EXISTING PUBLICLY DEDICATED RIGHTS OF WAY THERE WOULD BE BLOCKED OFF WITH BOLLARDS BUT ACCESSIBLE FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES. AMENITIES ARE PROPOSED IN BOTH THE NORTH AND HALF NORTH AND SOUTH HALVES OF THE DEVELOPMENT. AND AS MR SHARKEY SAID, THERE HAS BEEN CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION ON THE BEST WAY TO CONNECT THOSE TWO HALVES OF THE DEVELOPMENT TO ACCESS THESE AMENITIES. BASED ON THE FEEDBACK FROM CITY COUNCIL AND RESIDENTS, THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED TO REMOVE THE PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED LANDSCAPED MEDIAN AND CROSSWALK OVER WHITE ROAD AND INSTEAD EXTEND THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF WHITE ROAD AND UTILIZE THE EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AT MCDOWELL AND WHITE ROAD. THIS DOESN'T RECITATIVE DEVIATION FROM THE ZONING TEXT, AND THIS WAS INCLUDED AS PART OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. BUT GENERALLY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT MEETS THE STANDARDS OUTLINED IN THE APPROVED ZONING TEXT WITH THE ONE ADDITIONAL STIPULATION THAT CLARIFIES THE SCREENING ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE, AND INSTEAD OF HAVING A CROSSING ONCE AGAIN, WHAT IS GOING TO BE WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE USING THE EXISTING TRAFFIC LIGHT AT MACDOWELL CORRECT RUNS DOWN ALMOST. THE SIDEWALK EXTENDS ALMOST THE ENTIRE WAY ON THIS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WHITE. UM, BUT THEY WILL BE, UM, EXTENDING IT ALONG THEIR PROPERTY LINE WHERE IT CURRENTLY TERMINATES JUST TO THE WEST. THE HOUSE ON THAT'S IN THE TOWNSHIP. THE LAST HOUSE HAS NO SIDEWALK. THERE IS HALF OF IT. THAT CORRECT DOES NOT CONNECT OVER TO THE TO THE PROPERTY. SO HOW ARE WE GOING TO DO THAT? I'LL THE APPLICANT STATE THAT IN THE NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. GOOD EVENING. MIKE REEVES, CIVIL ENGINEER WITH KIMBERLY HORN, 7965 NORTH HIGH STREET. COLUMBUS, OHIO. UM SO THE CITY WHEN THEY WIDENED WHITE ROAD TOOK RIGHT AWAY TO ALLOW FOR A FUTURE SIDEWALK EXTENSION. SO THE CITY CONTROLS HOW THAT RIGHT AWAY, SO WE'RE EXTENDING THE SIDEWALK WITHIN CITY ON RIGHT AWAY ACROSS THAT PROPERTY AND THEN TO THE ENTRANCE OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. WILL THE SIDEWALK CONVERT? YOU KNOW THE BRIDGE THAT'S THERE WITH THE VERY SUBSTANTIAL BARRIER THERE.

THERE'S WHERE YOU HAVE TO MOVE THAT TO SOMEWHAT TO GET THE SIDEWALK IN THERE OR WHAT WE WILL NOT. WE HAVE ALREADY PREPARED FINAL ENGINEERING STUDY ON THAT SIDEWALK. THERE IS SUFFICIENT SPACE FROM THE CURB TO THE FACE OF THE BARRIER. THERE'S A LITTLE OVER FIVE FT.

AND SO THAT WILL FAIRLY FIVE FIRST SIDEWALK. KIND OF MATCH. THE CURVATURE IN PLACEMENT OF THE TRAIL, CERTAINLY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WHITE ROAD. QUESTIONS FOR MR REEVES. DON'T HERE. NO, OKAY. THANK YOU. MR WEAVER. YOU'RE SIGNED UP TO TALK ABOUT THIS, BUT WE'RE NOT. WE'RE

[01:30:02]

TALKING ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. CORRECT NO RECORDS. NO CYBER NO. ANYTHING ELSE? WANT TO TRY THIS. THIS IS THE WHITE ROAD, RIGHT? YES, QUITE READY. BRYAN WEAVER, FORMER I T S STAFF FOR THE CITY OF BIRTH CITY. UM I LIKE TO, UM. I LIKE THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY MEET SEEMED TO BE FORGETFUL. HE UH, NOT ABLE TO PROVIDE RECORDS. BY MOMENT. SURE RECORD BEING PROVIDED RECORDING SIGHT LOSS. OKAY THANK YOU, MR WEAVER. ALL RIGHT. VERY CLEVER. UM QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL ON THIS AT ALL. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THEY WOULD RECORD NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. STANLEY RAY, I LIVE AT 2048 MICHELLE DRIVE GROUPS IN THE OHIO I'M JUST A LOT OF PEOPLE IN NEIGHBORHOOD TO NEIGHBORHOOD ARE GONNA ASK ME, UM, FROM MICHELLE.

TO THE NEW DEVELOPMENT. COULD YOU REFRESH MY MEMORY ON? ARE THERE ANY PLANS FOR SITE RELIEF? ONE TIME THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT MAYBE OFFENSE OR LARGER HILL OR . OH I THINK MISS SHIELDS. YOU WANT TO ADDRESS THAT? THANK YOU. THANKS MR RIGHT. IT'S NUMBER TWO ON THE STIPULATIONS. IS THAT CORRECT? CORRECT, AND THERE WAS DISCUSSION AT THIS AT THE ZONING HEARING BECAUSE THERE WAS QUESTION ON THE MOST APPROPRIATE MANNER TO SCREEN ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, WHETHER IT BE THROUGH FENCING OR MOUNTING. AND ZONING TEXT WAS AMENDED THROUGH STIPULATION OF THE ZONING TO REQUIRE LANDSCAPING INSTEAD OF THE FENCING AND THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT WAS PROPOSED SHOWED THE OPTION WHERE A RESIDENT COULD CHOOSE WHICH TREATMENT THEY WANTED EITHER OFFENSE OR MOUNTING. AND SO THAT'S WHY WE RECOMMEND IT AND PLANNING COMMISSION AFFIRMED THE STIPULATION TO REQUIRE ONE CONSISTENT FORM OF SCREENING ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE.

OKAY? VERY MUCH. OKAY? THIS RESOLUTION SAYS. OH, YES. I'M SORRY. YES, UH EARLIER TODAY, I HAD A DISCUSSION WITH THEIR KIND GROUP ABOUT THE RURAL FENCING. WE HAVE A LONG WHITE ROAD. AH! THAT'S. LET'S PUT UP THERE BECAUSE PART OF THAT WAS ACCOUNTED PROJECT AND THAT'S THE KIND OF FENCING THAT THEY MAY SUGGEST. AND I AM SPEAKING WITH CON. THEY HAVE AGREED TO REMOVE THAT RURAL FENCING AND PUT UP A MORE DECORATIVE FENCING ALONG WHITE ROAD. IS THAT A CORRECT STATEMENT? MR RHODES? SO I'D ASKED THAT WE HAD A THIRD STIPULATION TO INCLUDE DECORATIVE FENCE ALONG WHITE ROAD AND THE REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING ROLE FENCE. MR SMITH.

FOUR STIPULATION. SECOND STIPULATION UNDER SECTION ONE. YOU GOT IT. ONLY RESTATED. UM, YOU IS YOUR. MOTION TO AMEND SECTION ONE. TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL STIPULATION THAT THE RURAL FENCING ALONG WHITE ROAD WILL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A DECORATIVE FENCE. YES, SIR. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. MOVE. MR SHOT. KEY ARREST, MR BARRY? YES? YES. AH THAT LOOKS LIKE HOW DID WE DO WE DO WE HAVE NOT DONE. THE APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION, RIGHT, OKAY. THIS RESOLUTION SETS READING PUBLIC HERE AND A MOVEMENT BE APPROVED AS AMENDED. OKAY? MR SEACREST.

MR BARRY? YES. MR HOLT? YES. MR SHOT KEY. OKAY ALL RIGHT, MR PRESIDENT. THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

WE'LL WAIT TILL MISS OUT. BACK IN THE ROOM. AND. MISS HELP WITH YOU BEING SEEDED. WE WILL NOW DO

[Resolution CR-12-23 Declaring the necessity of constructing certain sidewalks on Addison Dr., Angela Dr., Eleanor Ave., Haughn Rd., Kingston Ave., Parlin Dr. and Reaver Ave. and requiring that abutting property owners construct same.]

THE SERVICE COMMITTEE. ACH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, PRESIDENT BARRY TONIGHT UNDER TWO FAR THERE WITH ME TONIGHT UNDER SERVICE. I HAVE RESOLUTION CR 12 23, A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE

[01:35:06]

NECESSITY OF CONSTRUCTING CERTAIN SIDEWALKS. ON ADDISON, DR ANGELA DR ELEANOR AVENUE ON ROAD, KINGSTON AVENUE OF PARLIAMENT DRIVE AND RIVER AVENUE AND REQUIRING THAT ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS CONSTRUCT, SAYING THIS AS WE DISCUSSED IN CAUCUS IS STEP TWO OF THE SIDEWALK PROGRAM FOR THE YEAR ONCE THIS RESOLUTION IS APPROVED. THE PROPERTY OWNERS, WHICH YOU CAN SEE THE INDIVIDUAL PARCELS HIGHLIGHTED. ON THE MAP HERE THAT IS ON THE OVERHEAD.

THEY WILL RECEIVE NOTICE OF THE IMPROVEMENT AND THE CONSCIOUS OF THAT IMPROVEMENT, AND THEY HAVE BASICALLY THREE PAST THEY CAN FOLLOW. THEY CAN MAKE THE IMPROVEMENT THEMSELVES. THEY CAN WAIT UNTIL THE CITY MAKES THE IMPROVEMENT AND THAT COST THEN WOULD BE SHARED. AND THAT IS THE VERY DEFINITION OF OUR SIDEWALK PROGRAM THAT WE SPLIT THE COST WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER. AND SHOULD THEY AT THAT TIME I WISH TO PAY THEIR HALF A FRONT. THEY STILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO. OTHERWISE THERE HAVE GETS MOVED TO THEIR REAL ESTATE TAX BILL OVER PAY FOR IT OVER 20 YEARS. SO ALWAYS A GOOD REVIEW. BUT THIS IS JUST A STEP TOO, IN THAT FORMAL PROCESS. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS BY COUNSEL? JUST ONE COMMENT. UM. I HATE TO PUT YOU ON THE SPOTS AND THE, UM HOW MANY YEARS WITH THE SPACE. I WANT TO SAY. SEVEN. LOW LOW. 2013 WAS OUR FIRST SIDEWALK PROGRAM, SO THIS WILL BE THE AND THIS IS PROBABLY ONE OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL HEALTH, WELFARE AND SAFETY TYPE PROJECTS THAT WE THAT WE HAVE DONE IN THE CITY. BESIDES DOING THE BIKE TRAIL, SO WE'VE GOT AN EXTREMELY SUCCESSFUL TRACK AND I'D ASK COUNCIL TO APPROVE THIS.

RESOLUTION. THANK YOU, MAYOR. ANYTHING ELSE? ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. ALRIGHT THIS RESOLUTION HAS HAD ITS READING AND PUBLIC HEARING AND I MOVED TO BE APPROVED. SECOND MR BERRY ? YES, YES. YES MR SHARKEY. YES YES. AND THAT IS ALL I HAVE. THIS EVENING, PRESIDENT BARRY MR

[Ordinance C-07-23 Provide for the Issuance and Sale of Bonds in the maximum principal amount of $9,000,000.00 for the purpose of paying the costs of improving the City's Parks & Recreational facilities by constructing the Beulah Community Park to include, among other improvements, various utility, roadway and pedestrian related improvements, fitness areas together with related equipment, a splash pad, various structures, landscaping, street lighting, signage and parking, together with all other necessary appurtenances thereto. Second reading and public hearing.]

HOLT. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. THANK YOU, MR BERRY. ORDINANCE C 7 TO 3. AND THE ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF BONDS AND THE MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $9 MILLION FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAIN THAT COST OF IMPROVING THE CITY'S PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES BY CONSTRUCTING THE BILL OF COMMUNITY PARK TO INCLUDE, AMONG OTHER IMPROVEMENTS, VARIOUS UTILITY ROADWAY AND PEDESTRIAN RELATED IMPROVEMENTS FITNESS AREA TOGETHER WITH RELATED EQUIPMENT. A SPLASH PAD, VARIOUS STRUCTURES , LANDSCAPING, STREET LIGHTING, SIGNAGE AND PARKING TOGETHER WITH ALL OTHER NECESSARY APPURTENANCES THERE, TOO. THAT IS ORDINANCE SEE 7 TO 3, WHICH IS A LONG WAY OF SAYING WE'RE TAKING THE NOTES THAT WE IMPROVE FOR VIOLA PARK ABOUT A YEAR AGO AND TURNING THEM INTO BONDS. CORRECT, MR TURNER. ALRIGHT. ANY COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL PUBLIC. I DO HAVE AH, UM NOT ON THIS ONE. MHM ALRIGHT. THIS ISSUE IS THAT THIS ORDINANCE HAS HAD ITS SECOND READING IN PUBLIC HEARING AND EYE MOVEMENT BE APPROVED.

SECOND. MR HOLT? YES YES, MR SHARKEY STICKERS. YES, YES. SORRY. ORDINANCE 0823 AND NO

[Ordinance C-08-23 Make amendments to Section 161.10 of the Codified Ordinances titled Employee Status, Number of Employees per Department, Pay Grades. First reading.]

ORDINANCE TO MAKE AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 1 61.10 OF THE QUANTIFIED ORDINANCES TITLE EMPLOYEE STATUS NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES PER DEPARTMENT AND PAY GRADES. THIS IS THE FIRST READING THE SECOND READING WILL BE 3 2023. ORDINANCE C 0923. NO ORDNANCE TO APPROPRIATE EIGHT

[Ordinance C-09-23 Appropriate $8,450,000.00 from the Pinnacle Tax Increment Financing Fund for the Current Expense of Improvements to Holton Road. First reading.]

MILLION. IT'S THE FIRST READING. AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE 8,450,000 FROM THE PINNACLE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FUND FOR THE CURRENT EXPENSIVE IMPROVEMENTS TO HOLDEN ROAD. THIS IS THE FIRST READING THE SECOND READING IN PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE MARCH 2023. WITH THAT, MR BARRY ON

[Call for New Business]

YOUR COMPLETE. AT THIS POINT IN TIME WE ARE IN THE NEW BUSINESS SECTION OF OUR MEETING. HMM AND

[01:40:07]

WE HAVE ONE PERSON, MR WEAVER THAT SIGNED UP. THANK YOU. MY NAME BUYING WEAVER. I'M A FORMER I T STAFF FOR CITY OF GLOBE CITY. UM WE DON'T LIKE TO TALK ABOUT CONCERNS I'VE SEEN HAPPENING IN OUR COMMUNITY. REGARDING, UM, CHILD SEX KIND. COVER UP REGARDING CYBERSECURITY ISSUES. THE GOVERNMENT HARASSMENT HAPPENING INSIDE THE CITY OF GOOD CITY THAT WE JUST SAW HER ASS MINT IN MY OPINION TO STEPHEN SMITH WAS A ONE HANDED HAVE A SEAT. MAYOR YOUR REPORT? SORRY WAS WHAT? I HAVE A SEAT. WE'VE BEEN OVER THIS BEFORE.

HAVE A SEAT. STRONG ARE YOU GOING TO ARGUE WITH ME? YOU'RE GONNA BE REMOVED, WHICH ONE? WAS THAT YOU WANT TO BE REMOVED? I'M ASKING. DO YOU WANT TO BE REMOVED? NOT UNDERSTANDING WHY I CAN HAVE A SEAT. YOU EXPLAIN WHY I CAN'T SPEAK, SIR, SIR. PLEASE REMOVE HIM. MAYOR YOUR REPORT.

[Call for Dept. Reports & Closing Comments]

THANK YOU. PRESIDENT BARRY I DO HAVE A MAJOR SCORE. REPORT. AH $53,176.50 AND FIND AND FORESTERS, WHICH I'LL SHARE WITH COUNSEL AND I ASK THAT YOU APPROVE IT AS PRESENTED. DO YOU ACCEPT? SECOND. MRS HAWKE? YES. MR SHOCKEY? YES MR BARRY? YES YES. COULD A FEW OTHER THINGS HERE LAST THURSDAY, WE HAD A GROUP CALLED THE SUNSHINE GANG. UH THEY HAD CROCHET. UH, CHILDREN, BLANKETS. FOR OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT TO HAVE IN THE POLICE CRUISERS. THAT WAS PRESENTED TO US AND CHIEF AMBRO . VERY VERY NICE. UM SOME THINGS ARE GOING ON IN THE STATE LEGISLATURE. THERE'S A BILL CALLED HOUSE BILL ONE. AH! SEEMS SOMEWHAT INNOCENT. FROM THE STANDPOINT THAT EMOTION INVOLVED PROPERTY TAXES ABOUT IT'S A VERY SOPHISTICATED PIECE OF LEGISLATION. IT DOES AFFECT TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT LIBRARIES, AND BECAUSE WE DO HAVE PROPERTY TAXES, SO WE'LL BE WATCHING THAT THIS IS RED CROSS MONTH. AND WE'VE BEEN DOING RED CROSS HERE AND ROAST CITY. AS A PUBLIC SERVICE SINCE 1989 REMEMBER CORRECTLY AND, UH, COUNCILOR MEMBER MARKS OF FATHER WAS PART OF THAT TINY MCCOMB AND BEEN VERY, VERY SUCCESSFUL EFFORT. IT'S THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE MASONIC LODGE. AND MR BARRY. THANK YOU FOR DOING THE PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTING IT TO HIM. UM. LAST NIGHT, THERE WAS A BASKETBALL GAME ON LADIES BASKETBALL GAME. ONE OF THE TEAMS WAS U C L A AND WE HAD A GROSS CITY STUDENT.

GRADUATE. STARTING GUARD AT U C L. A HER NAME IS JENNA, UH, COUNTY. AND I THINK SHE WAS THE GROCERY GRADUATE 2017. INCREDIBLE YEAH. SO WE YEAH. BIG TIME. UH SADLY, WE LOST JIMMY TOLLS. AH JIMMY WAS A FIXTURE AROUND HERE FOR MANY, MANY YEARS. AND WE, UH. ART IN THE CENTER OR SOMETHING TO THE FAMILY. THE SISTERS VIRGINIA COTTON HAD PASSED AWAY. AND THEN THE LAST ONE IS A FORMER CITY COUNCIL MEMBER RON MAR JELLO. I THINK HE WAS COUNCIL MEMBER, I WOULD SAY IN THE EIGHTIES LATE SEVENTIES, EARLY EIGHTIES, YES. YEAH. I WOULD TAKE ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL. LIKE YOU. THANKS. MR BOZO? NOTHING ADDITIONAL. THANK YOU, MR TURNER. NOT TONIGHT. THANK YOU, PRESIDENT. VERY MR SMITH? YES, SIR. I WOULD REQUEST WHEN WE'VE CONCLUDED BUSINESS. I NEED A SHORT EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS AN ONGOING LEGAL MATTER, SIR. IT WILL COME BACK TO YOU, MR KELLY. I HAVE NOTHING FURTHER. THANK YOU, SIR. ANY DEPARTMENT HEADS HAVE ANYTHING TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF COUNCIL. MHM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. WE ARE IN THE FINAL STAGES OF SELECTING AND DETERMINING THE SCOPE OF WORK. TO REDO OUR CITY WEBSITE, SO WE HAVE SELECTED A VENDOR. THIS VENDOR HAS BEEN IN BUSINESS FOR 20 YEARS AND AS A WHOLE 12,000 CITIES ACROSS THE UNITED STATES AS CLIENTS. THIS PROJECT. WE HAVE OVER 400 PAGES ON OUR

[01:45:04]