[Ordinance C-63-22 Approve the rezoning of 144.27 + acres located North of S.R. 665 and East of S.R. 104 from SF-1 (single-family residential) to PUD-R (planned unit development - residential) with Zoning Text. Second reading and public hearing.]

FOR THE REZONING OF 144.27 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF STATE ROAD, 6 65 IN EAST OF STATE ROUTE 104 FROM S F 12 P U D. R WITH ZONING TAXED. COORDINATES AS EVERYONE KNOWS, HAS BEEN POSTPONED SEVERAL TIMES FROM 2022 ON THERE. SO MR HILTS , WOULD YOU GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AS A DEVELOPER THERE? JIM HILL'S 4 75 METRO PLACE SOUTH DUBLIN, WHILE OKAY? I KNOW YOU HAVE SOME THINGS TO SHARE WITH US ON THERE. YES GO AHEAD. I'M I'M GONNA RUN QUICKLY, JUST WITH THE UPDATES TO THE SITE PLAN AND A FEW OTHER THINGS. GOOD EVENING, THANKS FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT THE COMMUNITIES OF PLAYING AROUND WITH MERE MATT CALLAHAN. TOM HART. GREAT CHILL LOG TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AS WE GO FORWARD. JUST REGARDING THE SITE OF THE ORIGINAL SITE PLAN THAT WE SUBMITTED HAD 399 LOTS THAT TASTES LIKE PLAYING HIS 360 LIVES. 266 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, SINGLE FAMILY, LOTS OF 94 PATIO HOMES. THAT'S A REDUCTION OF 41 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, AND THEN WE ADDED TWO PATIO HOMES. ALL THE SINGLE FAMILY. LOTS OF 70 FT.

MR. HILTON GONNA STOP YOU FOR A MINUTE? THIS IS THE ONE FOR THE ZONING. SO YOU HAVE THINGS ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. OKAY CAN WE HOLD THAT OFF TILL THE SURE I WAS OKAY. THIS IS JUST ZONING.

ALRIGHT, SO I'LL JUST GET INTO THE DENSITY WE HAVE HERE WHICH IS OUR DENSITY IS 2.5 UNITS AN ACRE. IT'S THE SAME DENSITY. IT'S TRUE OF YOU CAN FARMSTEAD. POLITICAL QUARRY. ALL OF THESE ARE IN THIS THIS QUARTER OR 2.9 UNITS PER ACRE. AND SIDE OF MATTERS TO THE NORTH, WHICH IS YOU GET TALKED ABOUT A LOT OF 3.9 UNITS AN ACRE. BUT IF WE PLOT APPLIED TO 3.9 UNITS, AN ACRE DENSITY FROM SOUTH MEADOWS TO THIS SITE IT WILL EQUATE TO 561 LOTS AND WE HAVE 3 60. FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES ARE GREEN SPACE AND OPEN SPACE AS 33% AGAIN. THAT'S ABOUT THE SAME.

IT'S PINNACLE QUARRY, FARMSTEAD AND TRAIL VIEW. UM WITH REGARD TO THE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS, UM, I WILL MAKE SURE THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS BUT A MINUTE BUT THE 2032 TRAFFIC WILL INCREASE SIGNIFICANTLY WITH OR WITHOUT PLUM RUN, WHICH WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THE GROWTH IN THE AREA. UM 24% AT THE 104 AND 666 65 INTERCHANGE BY 2032. WITHOUT PLUMBER RUN. ABOUT 33% WITH PLUM RUN AT BUILD OUT THAT WAS BASED ON 399 LOTS. THE TRAFFIC STUDY WAS NOT 3 60, SO IT'S OVERSTATED BY ABOUT 10. CODY WILL BE WILL BE REQUIRED TO INSTALL SEVEN TURN LEADS FOR THE PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS BASED ON THE TRAFFIC STUDY AND GROWTH CITY REQUIREMENTS. AND WALL STREET DEDICATED AT THAT CORNER FOR THE SOFTENING OF THE 6 65 CURVE. AND ALL THE PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT OFFSITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS THAT THAT I JUST MENTIONED WILL COST APPROXIMATELY $3 MILLION IS, KYLE SAID. WE SAID IN NOVEMBER THAT WE WANTED THE TRAFFIC SOLUTION. UM AND WE SAID THAT LEVERAGING OR $3 MILLION AS A WAY TO MOVE SOLUTIONS FORWARD. UM WE WORKED WITH THE CITY AND OH DOT IN THE TOWNSHIP TO DETERMINE THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS THAT THAT WOULD BEST SERVE. THIS INTERSECTION AND AS AS CARL MENTIONED THERE WILL BE A TIFF TO FUND THAT'S. I

[00:20:03]

DON'T WANT TO RUN BACK THROUGH. THERE ARE THE TWO LEFT TURN LANES ON 6 65 WEST AND EAST SOUTH BONG, RIGHT TURN LANE FROM ONE OH, 4 TO 6 65 WEST. AND THEN THERE'S ALSO THE RIGHT TURN LANE FROM 6 65 TO 1. OH, FOUR SOUTH. I BELIEVE I COVERED THEM ALL. CORRECT UM WHAT WASN'T MENTIONED WAS MULTI WILL ACT AS THE CONTRACTOR AND PUT THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN AT THE SAME TIME , WE'RE DOING THE PRIVATE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. SO THE THESE THESE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS WILL GO IN UP FRONT. NOT DOWN THE ROAD UPFRONT . UM BEFORE WE GET TO THE POINT WHERE THERE WAS A NUMBER OF HOUSES THAT ARE OCCUPIED, BUILT AND OCCUPIED. UM I THINK WITH THAT. YOU KNOW, THE ONLY THING I WOULD SAY IS WITHOUT THIS DEVELOPMENT IN THE $6 MILLION IN TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS THAT IT'S GENERATES. HOW DO YOU SOLVE FOR 24% INCREASE IN TRAFFIC? THE INTERSECTION OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS. UM WE'RE PROVIDING A SOLUTION. UM WE'RE THRILLED AND HONORED TO BE PART OF THE SOLUTION AT THE CENTER SECTION BECAUSE WE KNOW IT'S IMPORTANT AND WE'VE HEARD ABOUT IT CONTINUALLY. SO I GUESS WITH THAT I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS. I'VE GOT A QUESTION, MR MAYOR, MR HILL, STEAL I GOT RECALLING WHEN WE AND EXCESS PROPERTY AND AGAIN I KNOW PEOPLE HEARD ME SAY THIS BEFORE. IT WAS PRETTY MUCH DESTINED TO GO INTO COLUMBUS. THERE HAVE BEEN A HOOK DEVELOPED THAT WOULD HAVE EXTENDED INTO THE SIDE OF THE RIVER. AND DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE ORIGINALS LEARNING WAS AND HOW MANY UNITS WOULD HAVE BEEN IN THE ORIGINAL ZONING. MAYOR IT'S BEEN A WHILE SINCE WE LOOKED AT THAT, BUT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THAT EARLIER AND I BELIEVE IT WAS OVER. 400 UNITS FROM YOU KNOW FROM WHAT WE REMEMBER. I DON'T KNOW SPECIFICALLY WHAT IT WAS. BUT, YOU KNOW PRETTY SURE IT WAS OVER 400 UNITS. SO IF BECAUSE SEVEN MINUTES TO 1.7 UNITS TO THE ACRE I LOOKED AT IT THIS AFTERNOON. WHAT WAS THAT MUCH OPEN SPACE. IT HAD IT HAD.

OKAY, IF I COULD JUST MAKE ONE FURTHER CLARIFICATION. UH WHEN PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL REVIEWED THE POINT DEVELOPED PLAN, THEY REQUEST THE OLD COSBY 70. FT. AND WHEN IF YOU AGREE THEY'RE DOING TEXT. THERE'S A MINIMUM OF 8400 SQUARE FEET PER LOT. SO ESSENTIALLY WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT. IT'S OUR TWO STANDARDS, SO IT'S AS A MIRROR OF WHAT WAS APPROVED WITH INSIDER MEADOWS. AND THIS IS THE ZONING SPU D. R. PLAYING UNIT DEVELOPMENT. RESIDENTIAL UM, WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME THAT WE DID A BIG DEVELOPMENT WITH SF ONE OR SF? TWO? DESIGNATION ITSELF WITHOUT CALLED. THERE'S NO SUBDIVISION AND GROCERIES ZONE SF ONE. THAT REQUIRES ESSENTIALLY HAPPY FOR A LOT. WHO WE HAVE BEEN USING HIS P U. D R

[00:25:08]

DESIGNATION TO ALLOW, UM SOME VARIATIONS AND SOME. DESIGNATIONS THAT WOULD THAT WOULD NOT HAVE TO GO THEN, TOO. ZONING BUSY A AS PART OF HIS OWN PROCESS. WHEN IT COMES IN, WE TRY TO FIND MOST COMPARABLE ZONING CLASSIFICATION, MOST OF THEM THAT IS A SINGLE FAMILY, ONE DESIGNATION OR WHATEVER IS MORE CLOSELY. IT'S A LITTLE BIT TOWNSHIP. BUT YES, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL BEFORE I START TAKING PUBLIC TESTIMONY. DID YOU WANT TO ADD ANYTHING ELSE? I JUST WANTED TO ADD ONE MORE THING WITH REFERENCING THE PATIO HOMES, UM, FOR THE TRAFFIC STUDY, THEY WERE COUNTED AS SINGLE FAMILY HOMES BECAUSE THEY'RE DETACHED. IN REALITY.

THEY DON'T CREATE NEARLY THE TRAFFIC THAT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES CREATE SO THAT THAT WASN'T RECOGNIZED IN IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. THANK YOU, OKAY. FOLKS I'M GOING TO ASK. THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE SIGNED UP HERE, AND THEY JUST SAID PLUMBER ON LANDS. THEY DIDN'T SAY WHICH ONE ON HERE. I'M GONNA ASK YOU INDIVIDUALLY OR YOU COULD YOU WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK ABOUT THE ZONING? OR AND THEN IF YOU DON'T, THEN YOU'RE GOING TO BE SPEAKING ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON THERE. SO WE WANT TO HOLD THIS TO THE ZONING FEUD ER CHANGING IT FROM SF ONE. MR. ART DID YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT ZONING? YOU KNOW, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE ZONING ITSELF, NOT THE NOT THE PLANS. OKAY, CHANGE. 20 THOUSANDS FROM RIGHT. WOULD YOU GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD? 7 91 LONDON GROWTH PORTS ROADS. OKAY. CORN OHIO. IT'S IN JACKSON TOWNSHIP. OKAY ALSO WANT TO STATE THAT OVER 53% OF MY TAXES GO TO GROVE CITY. ACCORDING TO THE FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR. THEY GO TO SCHOOLS TO THE PUBLIC LIBRARY. AND TO THE PARKS. OKAY, OKAY. NOW. AS FAR AS IT'S ONLY IS CONCERNED ZONING RIGHT NOW. ALLOWS FOR HOUSES TO BE BUILT ON 20,000 SQUARE FEET.

LIGHTS RIGHT. THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN ACRE OKAY. YOU'RE PROPOSING TO HOUSES. 2.4 YOU SAY 2.5? ON THE CHART. EACH ACRE. OKAY, OKAY. THAT'S THAT'S BASICALLY OVER 20,000 BUT THOSE HOUSES OR ON THE LESSON THAT 20,000. YOU LOOK AT IT. I THINK THEY TOOK THAT TO THE TOTAL AREA THAT THEY COULD BUILD BURN. IT'S NOT THE LOTS ON OKAY? SO I THINK THE DENSITY OF THESE HOUSES ARE WAY TOO MUCH FOR THE EVEN WITH THE IMPROVEMENT. OKAY THAT YOU'RE GOING ON THE INTERSECTION AND SO FORTH. MOST OF THAT TRAFFIC COMES FROM RICKENBACKER AIR FORCE BASE. WELL, IT'S NOT AIRPORT. RECKON BLOCKER USED TO BE A LOT MORE IN AIRPORT SPACE. HEADING SOUTH. ON 71. THEY'RE USING 6 65. AND THE PEOPLE THERE ARE GOING INTO SILOED AND MEADOW. INDIAN TRAIL. BUT INTO YOUR DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS WHAT A WHAT A DEVELOPMENT YOU LIVE IN MR LIVIN THE LINKS. WELL MAYBE NOT THAT YOU LIVED IN THAT CHEMICAL EFFICIENT WITHIN PINNACLE. OKAY YOU USE BUCKEYE PARKWAY, RIGHT? YES. ANYWAY NOT ONLY THAT NONE OF THE PEOPLE INCLUDING IT THAT I TALKED, I SPENT TWO EVENINGS. OR NUMBER TWO WEEKS OF EVENINGS GOING DOOR TO DOOR. NOT TALKING TO PEOPLE THAT WERE HOME. SIGNING A PETITION NOT TO CHANGE ITS ONLY TO LEAVE IT THE WAY IT IS. OKAY? YOU KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE GOT REFUSED TO SIGN IT? TWO. OKAY AND THERE'S OVER 200 NAMES ON THAT PETITION. THERE'S ANOTHER PETITION FROM CHANGE DOT ORG THAT THE LAST TIME I LOOKED AT HAD 189 SIGNATURES ON IT. THEY DON'T WANT THESE. DENSITY AND THIS THEY CAN'T GET OUT OF THE DEVELOPMENTS AS IT IS. AND THE INTERSECTION JOB THAT'S GOING TO IMPROVE THAT'S GOING TO MAKE IT A LOT EASIER FOR PEOPLE TO COME DOWN THROUGH THERE. IT'S GOING TO MAKE IT A LOT EASIER. YOU'RE GONNA GET MORE TRAFFIC. YOU'VE ALREADY SAID 25% IS GOING TO INCREASE YOUR GONNA PREACH IT BY ANOTHER AT LEAST 700 PEOPLE. DURING RUSH HOUR TRAFFIC AND THAT'S A 55 MILE AN HOUR AND SONG. THANK YOU ABOUT TIME IS UP, OKAY? MR ALDER. DID YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT ZONING FOR ALL

[00:30:06]

RIGHT? THANK YOU, MR. ERIC HOLDER'S 6 75 LONDON GROUP COURT ROAD. UM I ACTUALLY HAVE SOME QUESTIONS. SO, UH, ABOUT THE MONEY. CONTRIBUTED PARTIES OFFERING $6 MILLION CONTRIBUTION. ACTUALLY THIS IS NOT ABOUT ZONING ITSELF. OKAY WE CAN HAVE THOSE QUESTIONS. SO WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF LOW DENSITY? MR RUSH. TO THE DEFINITION OF IDENTITY. UM. MR SHOCKING. WE DON'T HAVE A DEAD THING. DEFINITION BUT CITY COLUMBUS DEFINES IT AS ANY BETWEEN 2 TO 4 UNITS PER ACRE. AS A LITTLE DENSITY. OKAY? OKAY, WELL, UM. YOUR SANITARY ENGINEER PLAYING HERE FROM 2021. STATES THAT LOW DENSITY IS DEFINED AS, UH, TWO HOUSEHOLDS PER ACRE. UM . HMM AND I HAVE A CONTRACT HERE WITH THE CITY OF COLUMBUS AND BETWEEN CITY, COLUMBUS AND GROW CITY THAT STATES THAT, UH, THIS THIS LAND AND A LOT OF GROWTH. CITY IS NOT TO BE AH! MADE ANYTHING PAST LOVE DENSITY. SHALL BE LIMITED TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. WHICH ACCORDING TO THIS MASTER STEWARD, PLAN, SAYS TWO. AND YOU'RE PROPOSING 2.5. SO HAS THERE BEEN ANY DISCUSSION WITH COLUMBUS TOO? CHANGED ITS CONTRACT CANNOT SPEAK TO THAT. WELL THEN ALSO IN THIS, UM, SUPER MASTER PLAN, IT STATES THAT ANY CHANGES OR DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA WOULD NEED TO BE.

THE ENGINEERING REPORT WOULD HAVE TO CONFIRM THAT THE CAPACITY OF THE SEWER LINE CAN MANAGE AND HANDLE THAT CAPACITY AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THAT THERE HAS TO BE DONE. YES.

THIS IS ABOUT ZONING, THOUGH, BUT IT'S ABOUT DENSITY. SO YOU'RE YOU'RE JUST KIND OF MIXING UP. WHAT'S WHAT HAS TO DO WITH ZONING. WHAT HAS TO DO WITH PUTTING DEVELOPING BUT IT ALL HAS TO DO WITH DENSITY, WHICH HAS TO DO WITH ZONING. UM UH, THE. BASICALLY THE SANITATION LINE TO ANSWER. MY OWN QUESTION IS AT NEAR CAPACITY AND IT CANNOT HANDLE THE GOOD MORNING URINE EXPERT AT THIS, SIR. IT STATES IN YOUR ENGINEERING PLANETS ARE CITY ENGINEER HERE ON THERE, AND HE CAN TALK TO YOU AFTERWARDS ON THERE, BUT I WANTED TO BE KNOWN TO THE COUNCIL BEFORE THEY MAKE A DECISION WHERE IT STATES RIGHT HERE THAT THEY SHOULD BE INVESTIGATING THIS BEFORE MAKING A VOTE AND MAKING DECISIONS. PRIOR TO IT. UM LAST THING ON HERE YOUR TIME IS ALMOST DONE. OKAY WELL, I MEAN, THERE'S A LOT TO BE SAID IN A LOT OF IT BEING REPEATED, BUT, UM UH, I GUESS I WOULD DIGRESS AT THIS POINT, BUT THERE'S UH YOU DID GIVE ME MORE THAN THREE MINUTES AND YOU'RE NOT GIVING US MORE THAN THREE MINUTES, SO LET'S PLAY RIGHT FIND IT'S OFF. THANK YOU. MR NAPIER. DO YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT ZONING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN? HMM. MR WEAVER. KEEP IT ABOUT ZONING, PLEASE. MY NAME'S BRIAN RIVER. I'M PAULA I T SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR THEIR SYSTEM. I'M A FORMER GROVE CITY I T EMPLOYEE. AND I AGREE WITH THAT. MR ORDER THEIR TIME, PLEASE. THAT ADDRESS, PLEASE. I WISH TO GIVE HIS 43 50 BEACH GROUP. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND UM I AGREE WITH MR ALDER STATING THAT YOU DO PROVIDE DEVELOPERS AND OTHER PEOPLE MORE THAN THREE MINUTES. UM, AND I ALSO AGREE THAT THIS CITY SEEMS TO HAVE AN ISSUE. FOLLOWING POLICIES INCLUDING EMPLOYEE POLICY. 1 61 OSHA CYBERSECURITY POLICIES REGARDING THE ZONING I WANTED APPRECIATE YOU'RE ABLE TO PICK CLOSED CAPTIONING, AND I APPRECIATE YOU MOVING THE SEAT SHIP SO I CAN HAVE THE ABILITY TO READ LIPS. BECAUSE THE CLOTHES CAPTAIN OF THIS YOU BUT AGAIN, UM, IF YOU COULD WHEN YOU'RE SPEAKING, IF YOU CANNOT HAVE YOUR MOUTH, UM HANDED OUT OF YOUR MOUTH SO I CAN HAVE THE ABILITY OF IT PLEAD GAMES IN 2019 HAVE REQUESTED TO PROVIDE DISABILITY AWARENESS TRAINING TO HELP YOU WITH THAT, UM, WITH THE

[00:35:04]

POLICE ADMINISTRATION. SO REGARDING LOANING, UM ZONING THAT REQUIRE A DECISION MADE BY CITY PUBLIC RECORDS IN CITY BUILDING DEPARTMENT RECORDS. AND I, YOU GUYS THAT WERE DOCKET NUMBER H 20. 2200347 OF CYBERSECURITY INCIDENT, DELETING RECORDS AND THE CITY OF YOU BUILDING DEPARTMENT SYSTEM THAT WOULD AFFECT YOUR DECISION ON DROWNING. YOU'VE BEEN GIVEN A COPY OF THIS SEVERAL WEEKS AGO, AND I'VE NEVER GOTTEN ANY RESPONSE FROM ANYBODY WHICH CHRISTINE HAWK STAYED IN THE LAST MEETING THAT THERE'S ALWAYS A LACK OF RESPONSE FROM CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, AND I'M WONDERING IF THEY'RE THE INVESTIGATIONAL MAP BECAUSE ANOTHER I T EMPLOYEE HAVE RESIGNED IN MARCH THAT YOU SHOULD BE AWARE OF, UM AND ZONING, ZONING, PLEASE, IN ROMAN IN, UH, YOU MAKE YOUR DECISION BASED ON RECORDS AND DATA, AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU GUYS ARE USING ALL THE DATA AVAILABLE. AND NONE OF THAT I HAVE BEEN COMPROMISED, DELETED. UM AND ALSO I WANT TO MENTION, UM THIS AREA HAS BEEN RESEARCH OR STUDIES ON FLOODING IN THIS AREA OR ANY DATA RECORDS BEEN DELETED AND MISSING PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS THAT THEY DO, MR WEAVER. OKAY SO YOU'RE SURE THAT FLOODING HAD BEEN RESEARCH AND NO DATA HAD BEEN MISSING REGARDING FLOODING AND THE FAILURE TO THAT? WELL I ENCOURAGE YOU TO INVESTIGATE THAT BECAUSE I NUMEROUS HOUSES HAVE BEEN FLOODED DUE TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT RECORDS BEING DELETED. AND I WOULD LIKE YOU TO RESEARCH THE DOCKET. I PROVIDE YOU. DOCKET NUMBER TWO, THE 02 TO 03478 AND INQUIRED WHY ANOTHER I T STAFF HAVE RESIGNED IN MARCH AND WHY THERE'S A LOT OF CYBERSECURITY ISSUES AND MICHAEL TURNER FINANCE LIGHTHEADED CAME ALONG, BUT I THINK WE DEVIATE. FROM TONING ENOUGH ON HERE. OKAY I'LL STICK TO FLOODING AND SO FLOODING HAPPENED BECAUSE, UM PIPES. FOUNDATION PIPES HAVE NOT BEEN GLUED OR INSTALLED PROPERLY, AND THAT WOULD BE INVOLVED IN BUILDING PERMITS. CHECK AND MAKE SURE THAT HOUSES AREN'T FLOODING . SO PLEASE DO YOU DO CHILDREN TO INVESTIGATE DOCKET NUMBER 2022 003478 IN CHIEF, AMBER RESIGNED ABRUPTLY AFTER I READ THAT DOCUMENT, MR WEAVER. MR RILEY. DID YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN? OR DID YOU KIND OF LIVING LIVING TO ZONING? HI MY NAME IS JOHN RILEY. I LIVE AT 7 90 LONDON GROUP COURT ROAD AND LOCKED WARREN, OHIO. I GAVE MISS KELLY A COUPLE 100. MORE SIGNATURES FOR THE PETITION THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN TO HER A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO, WHICH DAVE SAID HAD SEVERAL 100. I THINK IT WAS LIKE 380 SIGNATURES OR SOMETHING. SO I THINK WE'RE OVER 500 SIGNATURES NOW OPPOSING THE ZONING CHANGE. MY HOME IS THE ONLY HOME COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. I GREW UP NEXT TO CIRCLE S FARMS ABOUT 10 MINUTES WEST OF HERE ON 6 65 DURING MY CHILDHOOD. MY DAD WAS A HELICOPTER MECHANIC FOR THE MOVIE MILITARY AT RICKENBACKER ABOUT 10 MINUTES EAST OF HERE ON 6 65. MY FIRST JOB WAS AT THE KROGER ON THE CORNER OF HOOVER AND 6 65 NOW LIVE ON 6 65. I HAVE COMPLETE CONFIDENCE THAT I KNOW JUST AS MUCH OR MORE ABOUT THIS AREA THAT ANYONE ELSE IN ALL OF GROVE CITY. I'M NOT GOING TO READ SOME WORDS SPOKEN BY GROVE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. QUOTE A COMMITTEE TO BRING INTERESTED PARTIES TOGETHER TO PROPOSE A STRATEGY FOR THE STATE ROUTE ONE AND FOUR CORRIDOR. THE PARTICIPANTS THE PARTICIPANTS COULD INCLUDE CITY OFFICIALS REPRESENT REPRESENTATIVES FROM OH DOT WARP. C DEVELOPERS AND RESIDENTS ARE SITUATION IS THAT WE ARE APPROVING DEVELOPMENTS AND WE HAVE NO IDEA WHAT A TOTAL STRATEGY IN THAT CORRIDOR SHOULD BE. THE FIRST STEP SHOULD INVOLVE COUNCIL AND THE ADMINISTRATION DECIDING ON A SHARED VISION OF WHAT ONE OF FOUR SHOULD BE. SHOULD IT BE A NATURAL HIGHWAY OR SCENIC? NATURAL SEEN BY WAY. WHAT SHOULD IT BE? WHAT SHOULD IT LOOK LIKE? WHAT TYPE OF ZONING DO WE SEE IN THE FUTURE? THE PROCESS COULD INVOLVE PREPARING TWO OR THREE OPTIONS, INVITING THE PUBLIC TO GIVE ITS FEEDBACK. YOU ALL KNEW THIS IS NOT YOUR WORDS. YOU ALL KNOW THAT TRAFFIC WAS A MAJOR ISSUE FOR YEARS. YET NOTHING WAS DONE IN. DESPITE YOU SAYING REPEATEDLY THAT THE PUBLIC SHOULD BE INVOLVED IN MEETINGS OF PUBLIC HAS NEVER BEEN ALLOWED TO PARTICIPATE, DESPITE REPEATED WRITTEN REQUEST TO HELP WE WERE ALWAYS DENIED BEING ALLOWED TO HELP IN ANY FORM. THE WORDS I READ PREVIOUSLY WERE FROM EARLY 2020. THERE HAVE BEEN AN ADDITIONAL 210 ACCIDENTS IN THIS AREA ALONG ONE OF FOUR AND 6 65 AND THREE FATAL ACCIDENTS SINCE THE START OF 2020. THESE ARE ONLY THE ACCIDENTS ON HIGHWAY PATROL HAS REPORTED AND DOES NOT INCLUDE THE NUMEROUS ACCIDENTS THAT HAVE GONE UNREPORTED DUE TO VARIOUS ISSUES, ONE OF WHICH BEING PATROLS ARE TOO BUSY HANDLING OTHER ISSUES TO COME TO THE ACCIDENT SCENE, WHICH IS A WHOLE SEPARATE ISSUE. I'M NOT EVEN SURE HOW THE TRAFFIC STUDY THAT IS BEING USED CAN BE CONSIDERED BALLOTS SINCE IT WAS CLEARLY STATED IN THE REPORT THAT DECREASE TRAFFIC DUE TO COVID WAS TO BE DISREGARDED. THIS LACK OF ACTIVITY REGARDING TRAFFIC IS A VERY PERSONAL ISSUE

[00:40:02]

TO ME. SINCE MY WIFE WAS REAR ENDED, JUST TRYING TO TURN INTO OUR OWN DRIVEWAY. I NEVER ASKED . IS THERE ANYONE HERE TONIGHT THAT SHARES A PROPERTY LINE WITH 11 CONDO UNITS? ANYONE IN GROSS CITY? WELL I'LL LEAVE YOU WITH THESE WORDS FROM A PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICIAL. MY VISION FOR GROWTH. CITY DOESN'T SEE US NEEDING ANY MORE OF THAT HOUSING STYLE. MY PREFERENCES FOR FOREVER HOMES FOR HOMES THAT WILL ACCOMMODATE MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS IN OUR HOSPITAL AND MEDTECH COMPLEX THAT ARE GOING IN, AND I DON'T BELIEVE THESE ARE THE KINDS OF HOMES THAT WILL ATTRACT THAT KIND OF TALENT. WHAT IS IMPORTANT IS THE QUALITY OF WHAT WE WILL BUILD AND THAT WE ATTRACT THE QUALITY OF COMMUNITY MEMBERS THAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR. THIS PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE AND PROPOSED THE DEVELOPMENT ARE WRONG FOR THE AREA. THANK YOU, MR RILEY. FOR THEM THE PUBLIC PART OF IT ON HERE. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNSEL, MR BARRY? I JUST WANTED TO AGAIN REITERATE WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE ON THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION. THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION BASICALLY CHANGES THE ZONING FROM SINGLE FAMILY, WHICH WOULD WHICH WOULD BRING IN 370 HOW MANY FRUITS 300 360 HOMES, UM INTO THE END OF THE AREA, AND WE WOULD NOT GET ANY GREEN SPACE AT ALL. UM THERE WOULDN'T BE ANY STREAM COURT OR , UM, AND THE AREAS THAT YOU SEE FOR PARKLAND AND THERE WOULD NOT EXIST. SO IF WE DO NOTHING, AND WE LET IT GO FOR THAT WE LOSE OUT ON PARKLAND. WE LOSE OUT ON THE INTERSECTION. WE LOSE OUT ON ALL THAT TYPE OF ON THAT TYPE OF THING. SO ANNEXATION, CHANGING THE ANNEXATION FROM UM, I'M FROM SF ONE TO WHAT IT IS NOW. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE DISCUSSING ON THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION. THE NEXT PIECE OF LEGISLATION OR WENT AWAY FROM IT IS THE ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WHICH IS THE HOW IT'S LAID OUT IN THAT TYPE OF THING. SO I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR ON WHAT WE'RE WHAT WE'RE VOTING ON RIGHT NOW. ANYONE ELSE ON COUNCIL. IF I COULD. GO AHEAD. I SAW YOU REACHING FOR THE MICROPHONE. THANK YOU. YOU KNOW, GO AHEAD IN THERE. UM. I JUST WANT TO COMMENT BRIEFLY AND I THIS IS FOR ME RELATED TO ZONING. I ALWAYS WANT TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THESE P U. D.

ZONING STYLES THAT THE ZONING IS VERY CLOSELY TIED TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. UM SO HOPEFULLY. MR SHOCK. YOU'LL BEAR WITH ME IF I TEETER ON DEVELOPMENT PLAN, BUT I JUST WANTED TO, UM AND I THINK I WAS STRUCK BY MR RALPH, STARTING OFF WITH PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN JUNE OF 2021 BECAUSE THAT'S KIND OF WHERE I WAS OVER THE WEEKEND, PULLING OUT EVERY RECORD THAT I HAD ON THIS CONVERSATION LEADING BACK TO JUNE OF 2021. AND UM, YOU KNOW IF THERE'S NOTHING THAT THIS JOB HAS MADE ME APPRECIATE, IT'S THAT THERE IS NO BLACK AND WHITE IN THE WORLD. THERE ARE ONLY SHADES OF GRAY AND SO REALLY LOOKING AT THIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF UM, YOU KNOW WHAT'S IN THE WHAT'S IN THE PRO COLUMN? WHAT'S IN THE CON COLUMN? UM I HAVE SPENT SO MUCH TIME ON ON THIS IN TERMS OF LITERALLY BEING UP AT NIGHT THINKING ABOUT IT. UM AND I WILL JUST GO TO THIS THAT THIS THIS LAND IS ZONED SINGLE FAMILY. UM AS OF ONE S F ONE, WHICH, UM, AND I THINK, UM PLUGGED IN FOR, UM PRESIDENT BARRY WAS AN INCORRECT NUMBER IN ITS CURRENT FORMAT. IT'S I THINK, A LITTLE OVER 200 HOUSES. UM, SO OBVIOUSLY, THERE'S A SHARP CONTRAST TO THE DENSITY WITH THIS, P U D R ZONING WHICH HAS THE 360. I BELIEVE UNITS THAT ARE PROPOSED. UM AND I HAVE CONTINUALLY POINTED TO THAT DENSITY AS THE STICKING POINT FOR ME AND THE DENSITY AS TIED TO THE DEMAND THAT IT PUTS ON EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS LACKING. UM, NOW WHAT I DO WANT TO POINT OUT AT THIS PARTICULAR POINT IN TIME IS THAT YOU KNOW, ALTHOUGH I'M REALLY AM. UM I'M A PROCESSED PERSON. I HAVEN'T LOVED EVERY MINUTE OF THIS PROCESS. I ACTUALLY CAN'T BELIEVE THAT HERE WE ARE IN APRIL OF 2023, BUT WHERE WE ARE TODAY IS AT A POINT WHERE WE CAN SAY THAT THE DEVELOPER HEARD WHAT THEY WERE TOLD ABOUT CONCERNS IN THE REGION THAT EXISTED AS OF THAT DAY. SO THIS WASN'T A TRADITIONAL CASE OF NOT IN MY BACKYARD. THIS WAS A CASE OF THERE ARE ISSUES THAT WE ARE CONCERNED WITH, AND THEY ARE NOT ADDRESSED. AND WE FEAR THAT THIS PROJECT WILL MAKE THOSE ISSUES WORSE. NOW, UM. DUE TO THE FACT THAT THEY CONTINUE TO WORK THROUGH THAT PROCESS. WE HAVE A

[00:45:09]

PROPOSAL BEFORE US. YOU'VE HEARD ABOUT THE TIFF THIS EVENING. YOU'VE HEARD ABOUT IMPROVEMENTS TO THE INTERSECTION. UM AND I WILL SAY THAT FOR ME, UM, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT BUT I LOOK AT IS AND THIS IS MY WARD SOON TO BE COUNCILMAN SHOCKEY'S WARD. OKAY CONNECTIVE, ITTY OPPORTUNITY THAT IS SO NEEDED. WE HAVE THE SIRE AMERICA'S COMMUNITY. WE HAVE THE HANNIGAN'S GROWTH COMMUNITY THAT SITS TO THE EAST OF ONE. OH, FOUR AND WE FOR THE FIRST TIME, I HAVE SOME REAL STRATEGIES THAT COULD START MAKING CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE WEST SIDE OF GROUPS CITY AND THIS FAR EAST SIDE OF THE CITY. HMM. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS, PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS AND, UM AND I THINK THAT IT'S SO IMPORTANT TO RECOGNIZE THAT OPPORTUNITY NOW THAT SAID UM, TO MR RILEY'S POINT, I STILL CONTEND THAT WE NEED A GLOBAL PLANNING DISCUSSION IN OUR COMMUNITY. WE NEED TO BRING RESIDENTS ALONG. WE'RE WE SHOULD NOT HAVE RESIDENTS THAT FEEL LIKE GROWTH IN DEVELOPMENT IS SOMETHING THAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM. IT SHOULD BE HAPPENING WITH THEM, AND WE HAVE NOT TAKEN THOSE OPPORTUNITIES TO REALLY TALK WITH. RESIDENTS OUTSIDE OF THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS BECAUSE IT'S EASY FOR EMOTIONS TO BE RUNNING HIGH. WHEN THESE BIG DECISIONS ARE BEING MADE. WE REALLY NEED TO DOUBLE DOWN ON HAVING SOME SOME SESSIONS WITH RESIDENTS ABOUT WHERE WE ARE AND IN THAT PARTICULAR CORRIDOR, ONE OF FOUR AND 60 65 WHERE WE WERE WHERE WE ARE WHERE WE'RE GOING. I THINK EVERYONE IN THIS ROOM WOULD FEEL BETTER IF THEY HAD THAT INFORMATION. AND THEN FINALLY, ALTHOUGH, UM, THROUGH THE WORK OF STAFF WHO WHO REALLY PUSHED THIS ALONG THE WORK OF THIS DEVELOPER, THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGAGED IN THIS CONVERSATION, WHICH ALLOWS US TO HAVE THIS PLAN FOR IMPROVEMENTS. BUT WE CANNOT FORGET. AND I KNOW, UM CHAIR SAKE HAS MENTIONED THIS SEVERAL TIMES THE JURISDICTION TO THE SOUTH PICKAWAY COUNTY, PARTICULARLY COMMERCIAL POINT AND RICKENBACKER. THEY NEED TO BE AT THIS TABLE BECAUSE THIS AREA IS AN ISSUE. IT'S NOT. IT'S BIGGER THAN JUST THIS INTERSECTION. IT'S AN ISSUE AND WE NEED TO KEEP WORKING ON IT. AND THAT IS ALL. MR MAYOR. JUST ONE COMMENT. UH, THE DESTINY ISSUE REGARDING THE WATER AND SEWER SERVICE. I HAD TO BE THE PERSON HELPED NEGOTIATE THAT. AND THE REASON THAT COMMENT WAS IN THERE ABOUT THE DENSITY WAS DUE TO SMELL. AND COLUMBUS HAD NOT COVERED OVER THE COMPOST AREA. AND THEY WERE AFRAID THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME IDENTITY IN THERE. SO THEY PUT THE CAVEAT IN THAT THEY DO NOT WANT TO HIGHER DENSITY AND IN ESSENCE, UNTIL THEY HAD TO SMELL REMEDY, WHICH I THINK PRETTY MUCH THEY HAVE COMPARED TO WHAT IT USED TO BE. SO THAT WAS NOT, UM, A QUESTION ABOUT HOW MANY HOUSES CONFEDERATE OF PROPERTIES MORE OF TRYING TO MITIGATE COMPLAINTS ON THE SMELL. RIGHT THANK YOU ANY MORE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL. SEE NONE SERGEANT SAID HIS SECOND RANGE IN PUBLIC HEARING A MOVIE BE APPROVED. SECOND. MR SEGRIST? YES. MR BARRY. MR HOLT. THIS IS HELP. YES. MR CHUTKI. ORDINANCE C 11 23 AN ORDINANCE TO IMPROVE HIS SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR

[Ordinance C-11-23 Approve a Special Use Permit for a Day Care for Daystarz Child Care LLC located at 5968 Hoover Road. First reading. ]

DAYCARE FOR DAY STARS CHILDCARE LLC, LOCATED AT 59 68 HOOVER ROAD. UH THIS MAY SOUND LIKE A LIKE A DEJA VU. I'M HERE. THEY'RE RESUBMITTED AND CHANGED SOME OF THEIR PLANS. SERGEANT STATUS. FIRST READING SECOND RATE OF PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE ON MARCH 17TH. MOVING ON

[Resolution CR-56-22 Approve the Development Plan for Communities at Plum Run located North of S.R. 665 and East of S.R. 104. ]

RESOLUTION CR 56 22 OF RESOLUTION APPROVED THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR COMMUNITIES LOCATED NORTH OF STATE ROAD 6 65 IN EASTERN STATE ROUND 104. THIS RESOLUTION BOTH POEMS SEVERAL TIMES. SEPTEMBER 6 22 PLANNING COMMISSION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH A STIPULATION. YOU KNOW, I BELIEVE WE HAVE THAT. DO WE HAVE THAT STIPULATION ON THE SCREEN? UM THERE AND IT'S REALLY ABOUT MOUNTING ON THERE ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. THIS IS A LONG LONDON BROKE GROUND, 6 65. GREEN TREES AND THAT ON THERE, SO, MR ROUSH, DID YOU WANT TO CONTINUE

[00:50:09]

YOUR COMMENTS? NO ON THERE. MR HILTS, CONTINUE YOURS, PLEASE. GOOD EVENING AGAIN, UM, WITH REGARD TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. I'LL JUST RUN THROUGH WHAT I SAID EARLIER, UM, VERY BRIEFLY.

ORIGINAL SITE PLANE HAD 399 LOTS. THIS HAS 360 TOTAL LOTS. 2066 SINGLE FAMILY IN 94 PATIO HOMES. WE REDUCED THE NUMBER OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES BY 41 ADDED TO PATIO HOMES. AS WAS MENTIONED. ALL OF THESE LOTS ARE 70 FT. WE INCREASED DEGREE IN OPEN SPACE LIKE THAT FIVE ACRES FROM THE ORIGINAL PLAN TO 48 TOTAL. THE SITE OFFERS PERMANENT PROTECTION OF THE PLUM RUN STREAM CORRIDOR. THAT WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY AND A REGIONAL PATH CROSSES THE STATE SITE AND EXTENDS TO THE NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST PROPERTY LINES. UM ALONG ONE OF FOUR AND THEN 6 65. WITH REGARD TO THE OPEN SPACE THAT INCLUDES, UH, PLAYGROUNDS, MOTOR USED, PASS AND LOOK OUT OVER PLUM RUN. UM WITHIN THE STAFF HAD. ONE OF THE COMMENTS WAS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE FORTIFIED THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY ADJACENT SOCIETY MEADOWS. SO WHERE THERE ARE GAPS IN NO TREES. WHAT WOULD BE WE WILL BE ADDING TREES WERE THERE IS ALSO A 20 FT. NO DISTURBED LINE ZONE AT THE PROPERTY LINE FOR THE PROPERTY THAT BORDERS TO MEADOWS. UM. THERE ARE SOME RENDERINGS OF THE SITE PLAN ITSELF. YEAH THERE YOU GO. UM, THIS IS KIND OF GOOD. IT'S KIND OF LOOKING FROM NORTHEAST AS YOU CAN SEE THE HOW THE SECOND IS OUT. AND THEN I THINK THE NEXT SLIDE OR THE ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS, WHICH WE WILL BE OFFERING FOUR DIFFERENT PRODUCTS IN THE COMMUNITY. SO WITH THAT. BE ABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, OKAY? QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL. MR HALSTON. DID YOU GET ALL YOUR SLIDES? BECAUSE I KNOW YOU PUT HIM. IS THAT ALL YOUR SLIDES FROM TODAY? OKAY. SECRETS CAN YOU JUST GIVE A ROUGH? ESTIMATE IS ROUGH ISSUE, YOU KNOW, DESIRE COMPANY WITH JUST TO THE HERE WE ARE 2023. WHAT WHAT? WHAT KIND OF RANGE? DO YOU SEE THE SALES PRICE OF KIND OF A MIDDLE MIDDLE LINE. OFFERING THAT YOU HAVE BOTH ON THE ON THE CARDIO HOME, BUT ALSO THE PATIO HOMES WERE WILL BE PROBABLY GRABBED 3 50 UP . THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WILL BE IN THE HALF MILLION DOLLAR RANGE. FOR AN AVERAGE NO PRICE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR US TO HELP. GO BACK TO OUR LESTER. MR NAPIER. YOU WANTED TO TALK ABOUT THE DUEL WITH. OKAY GOOD EVENING . MY ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. JENSEN NATURE LIVING 8 TO 3 STATE ROUTE. 6 65 YARDS, JACKSON TOWNSHIP. COLUMBUS FIREFIGHTER PARAMEDIC 26 YEARS AND SEEN NUMEROUS PROBLEMS. DEVELOPMENT LIKE THIS CAN CAUSE LET ALONE THE FACT THAT IT'S ON US 6 65 AND BUSY STATE HIGHWAY I'M HERE TO REITERATE MY PREVIOUS SAFETY CONCERNS. THIS WILL IMPACT THAT'S MORE THAN MOST. I STILL CANNOT UNDERSTAND HOW ONE ENTRANCE AND ONE EXIT WITH ALL THOSE CONDOS WILL NOT CAUSE A MAJOR SAFETY PROBLEM. FOR EXAMPLE. TRAFFIC INJECTION CONGESTION, ACCIDENTS, E. M S AND FIRE PROBLEM. MANY TIMES I HAVE BEEN TO SIMILAR NEIGHBORHOODS, ONES THAT HAVE SEVERAL INTERESTS AND EXITS. LIKE THE ONE THAT WILLIAMS ROAD AND I'M CREEPED DRY. THEY STILL HAVE MANY PROBLEMS. SEVERAL INSTANCES. AND ACCESS TO THEIR COMMUNITY. THE LADDER TRUCK HAS TO PARK OUT ON ALUM CREEK. WELL WILLIAMS WHILE THE ENGINE GOES IN TO INVESTIGATE THE SCENE DUE TO LADDER ISSUES. MOVING AROUND. SMALL AREAS LIKE THIS. MANY TIMES, NEIGHBORS HAD TO MOVE THEIR CARS FOR MEDIC OR ENGINE JUST TO BE ABLE TO REACH THE EMERGENCY SCENE. AND YOU TALK ABOUT THE GREEN SPACE THERE. THAT'S FLOODPLAIN. YOU CAN'T BUILD ON IT ANYWAY. CLOSING I ASKED FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION WITH THE SAFETY ISSUE. I ASK YOU TO CONSIDER THE IMPORTANCE OF SAFETY OVER REVENUE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR BAKER. HEY MR WEAVER IS SIGNED UP FOR THIS

[00:55:06]

ONE. THIS IS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SIR. MY NAME IS BRIAN WEAVER AGAIN AT THE STATED EARLIER AND FORMER I T FOR CITY OF GROVE CITY. UM, I WOULD LIKE TO, UM TAPPER ON WHAT THE FIREFIGHTERS SAID. UM AGAIN, YOU DETERMINE YOUR DECISION BASED ON DATA. AND MIKE BOZO WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR HAD NOT ATTENDED ANY COUNCIL MEETINGS AND 20 JUNE 2021. AND HE PART OF DEVELOPMENT IN PART OF BUILDING AND REGARDING TRAFFICS. WHAT HE SAID THAT TRAFFIC DRAMATICALLY INCREASE, IN ADDITION TO DATA DELETED ALL THE DATA PART OF 2021 THAT USED TO BE ON YOUR WEBSITE WEB STUDIO HOUSE DOT GOV. AND I WAS CURIOUS WHY YOU DELETED ALL THAT. THAT'S WHY ALL THAT DATA DELETED OR MISSING. WHEN IT USED TO PLOT ALL TRAFFIC. UM TWINED DRUG OPERATING SEX CRIME, INCLUDING CHILD SEX CRIME LEGO CITY CURRENTLY INVOLVED IN UM SO THERE IS WIDE AND DATA NO LONGER ON THE WEBSITE THAT WILL HELP MAKE YOUR DECISION ON WHAT'S HAPPENING IN OUR COMMUNITY, AND ESPECIALLY THIS AREA WHERE YOU CAN SELECT THE WARS THAT YOU ARE IN AND SEE IT DATA FOR THE PAST FIVE YEARS, BUT YOU CAN NO LONGER SEE THAT. SO I'D LIKE YOU TO HAVE A DISCUSSION WITH THE IT DIRECTOR CHUCK BOTH MIKE BOGO WHY THEM DATA WERE DELETED WITH THE CYBERSECURITY INCIDENT INDICATED DOCKET. 2022. THE OTHER 3478 AND I, T STAFF HAVE RESIGNED IN ENGLISH CITY IN MARCH AND JUST YOU CAN HAVE THAT DISCUSSION WITH THEM PRIVATELY, UM, NOT INTO COUNCIL MEETING. OKAY I STILL LIKE TO USE MY THREE MINUTES TO TALK ABOUT DEVELOPMENT. OKAY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, PLEASE. SO, YEAH, YOU COULD. IF YOU CAN PROVIDE THAT DATA OF EACH SEARCH FAT DOWN SO YOU CAN MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS , AND SO THE PUBLIC CAN BE INFORMED OF THE CLIMBED OUT OF IT, AND TRAFFIC IS REALLY HAPPENING IN OUR COMMUNITY.

YOU'VE NOTICED THAT CHEAP BAMBOO ANNOUNCING RECRUIT MISSION, OKAY, SO IF WE CAN HAVE THE DATA SURE DEVELOPMENT. UM. IS IN PLACE IN AN ALSO, UM CHRISTIAN HEART MADE A COMMENT STATING THAT THIS IS NOT REALLY AN ISSUE NOT IN MY BACKYARD. BUT IF IT'S MORE OF, UM. ADDRESSING THE ISSUE THAT WOULD COME FORWARD BY HAVING THIS PROJECT AND DEVELOPMENT AND AS I INDICATED EARLIER, UM THERE IS ISSUES REGARDING THAT IT'S GOING TO GET WORSE BECAUSE AGAIN YOU NEED TO BE AWARE OF THE DATA WILL NOT BE PROVIDED AND ALSO, UM, ALSO I WOULD LIKE TO RESEARCH THE DATA IN THE CITY VIEW SYSTEM, WHICH IS YOUR BUILDING DEPARTMENT, WHICH HAD YOUR DEVELOPMENT STUFF. I WAS TALKING ABOUT DEVELOPMENTS, SIR. NO, BUT WE'RE DONE. WHY AM I DONE, SIR? KEEP ME YOU DON'T WANT THE PUBLIC TO KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON WITH YOU TRYING TO HIDE. PLEASE SIT DOWN.

CAN I ASK WHY? BECAUSE YOU'RE MEANDERING FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND WE'RE NOW FINISHED. YOUR TIME IS UP. SO I CAN'T TALK ABOUT DEVELOPMENT. I HAVE OTHER PARTS TO TALK ABOUT. PLEASE SIT DOWN. THANK YOU. HMM. UM. MISS KELLY. YOU HAD SOME YOU HAD SOME CORRESPONDENCE ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT FIGHTING. YES SIR. COUNCIL MEMBERS AND MY OFFICE RECEIVED AN EMAIL TODAY FROM MR GREG WOLSKI. WHO LIVES IN CYO TOMATOES. HE SHARED HIS CONCERNS. ABOUT THIS PROJECT AND THE NEGATIVE. JUST TO SAY NEGATIVE PROGRESS REALIZED SO HE IS ASKING THE COUNCIL DENY THE ZONING AND THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. IS HE FEELS IT IS. AND OVERLY DENSE NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT DUMPS OUT ON TUESDAY, AND, UM, IT IS. I BELIEVE WE ALL RECEIVED THAT EMAIL. POLITICAL SOMEBODY HAS TO OKAY. I'M GONNA GO BACK TO THE LIST BECAUSE I'M SURE SOME OF YOU MAY WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON HERE AGAIN. MR ARTHUR, DO YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN? YOU HAVE TO STEP TO THE PODIUM, AND WE ALREADY HAVE YOUR NAME IN THAT ADDRESS. SO ONLY THING I WANT TO SAY ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT IS AMOUNTING. ALONG THE EAST SIDE. IN THE TREES ARE GONNA PUT BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO SEE SEMIS COMING THROUGH. FROM RICKENBACKER. AND THAT'S A 55 MILE AN HOUR ZONE. YOU NEED TO KNOW AND I DON'T CARE HOW WIDE THEY MAKE THAT TURN. IF THEY THAT'S A BLIND SIDE. DON'T STRUCTURES ARE GOING TO TAKE EVERY BIT OF THAT CURVE THAT CAN GET TO GET A 50 FT TRACTOR TRAILER AROUND THEM. IF YOU DON'T SEE IT, OR SOMEBODY DOESN'T SEE IT TRAVELING 55 MILES NOW SOMEBODY'S GONNA GET HURT BACK. LET ME ASK MR RALPH. SOMETHING'S THAT REFRESH MY MEMORY. WE'RE ALL AT THE

[01:00:07]

MEETING, MR RAUF. UM IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, THE O DOT DISTRICT SIX SAID THAT IF WE HAD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT THERE THAT THEY WOULD INCREASED SIGNAGE AND ALSO THE POTENTIAL OF LORRIES SPEED LIMIT BECAUSE OF THE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. DID I HEAR THAT CORRECTLY? I KNOW WHAT I WAS GONNA ENGAGED WITH A SPEECH STUDY, MR COLOR BE MORE UP TO DATE ON THAT, BUT THEY DID COMMIT TO DOING SIGNAGE. SO WE'RE HOPING THAT SO, MR ARTS. WE'RE HOPING THAT THAT WILL DECREASED ON THEIR FATHER. UH MR ALDER. DID YOU LIKE TO SPEAK? ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. OKAY SO, UM, STRAIGHT BACK TO THE FINANCIAL STUFF OF THE AREA. SO HOW MUCH IS PLANNING ON CONTRIBUTING TO THIS IMPROVEMENT? IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, IT'S OVER $3 MILLION AND THEN THEY ARE DOING THE UPFRONT COSTS. IF THIS PASSES TO THE ONE OH 46 65 CHANGES THERE FRONTING THAT COST AND THEN EVENTUALLY THROUGH THE TIFF FUNDING THEY WOULD BE REIMBURSED FOR THOSE COSTS, BUT I BELIEVE THEY HAVE TO DO 6. IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY BECAUSE OF THE I BELIEVE IT'S SIX, MAYBE EIGHT THAT CAN'T REMEMBER OFF HAND PERCENT OF THE ONE TURN LANE.

THE FUND WILL. THE INVESTMENT WILL PAY FOR IT FOR THE COMING OUT OF TAX DOLLARS. IT'S NOT 6 65 1 OF FOUR. YEAH THAT PART IS PAYING FOR THE TURN LANES TO GO INTO THE DEVELOPMENT OF DEVELOPERS, AND THAT'S IN ADDITION TO THE MONEY THAT THEY'RE CONTRIBUTING TO THE INTERSECTION AT ONE OF FOUR AND 6 65 CORRECT. OKAY, SO THAT SHOULD BE OVER $6 MILLION NO, IT'S NOT. IT'S NO. OKAY WELL, SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE MAKING A PUBLIC GOING TO ASK YOU TO WITH MR HELPS, OR MR RALPH TO GO OVER THE NUMBERS, SINCE I DON'T HAVE BEEN MAINLY SAYING IT TO THE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDS BECAUSE IT'S REALLY CONFUSING ABOUT WHERE THE MONEY IS COMING FROM, AND I DON'T THINK ANYBODY REALLY UNDERSTANDS. HERE'S WHAT I KNOW. OKAY, HERE'S WHAT I KNOW. OVER $3 MILLION IS COMING FROM THE DEVELOPER TO IMPROVE THE ACCESS TO THEIR DEVELOPMENT. OKAY, OKAY. THE OTHER $3 MILLION. IS THERE FRONTING THAT UP FRONT? TO ACTUALLY. TO WHAT PEOPLE HAVE REQUESTED. DO THE INFRASTRUCTURE FIRST. SO WE WILL START THAT AT THE SAME TIME AS THEY ARE DOING THEIR ENTRANCE TO THE TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND THAT'S $3 MILLION. HOWEVER THERE'S A SMALL COST THAT THEY THEY WILL HAVE. THAT THE OLD DOT SAID THAT THEY SHOULD ALREADY PUT INTO THE POT WHICH IS 68% OF THAT $3 MILLION. SO I'M THAT'S THE BEST I CAN DO OFF CUFF, MR BROWN. YOU CAN CORRECT ME IN SUCH SOME LIGHT ON THAT. JUST SO EVERYONE IS AWARE THE TOTAL INVESTMENT IN THE AREAS WHEN 6.5 MILLION THREE MILLION OF THAT IS DEVELOPER COSTS FOR THERE WAS REQUIRED TURN LANES OR WHY NOT? THE ADDITIONAL 3.43 POINT FIVE MILLION WILL BE PAID FOR BY THE TIFF PROCEEDS. AH! WILL BRING FORWARD THE TIP AGREEMENT NEXT MEETING FOR COUNCIL, BUT WE'RE STILL TRYING TO FINALIZE THE TERMS. RIGHT NOW, THE CITY WOULD CONTRIBUTE $2 MILLION. THE DEVELOPER WILL CONTRIBUTE THE ADDITIONAL $1 MILLION. THAT KIND OF MAKE UP THE COST OF THE MOVEMENTS IN BOTH THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPMENT. GET PAID BACK THROUGH THE TIP. PROCEED PROCEEDS. WE WANTED TO BE EQUITABLE BECAUSE WE UNDERSTAND THE DEVELOPERS NOT.

OVERBURDENING THE SYSTEM PER SE . IT'S A REGIONAL ISSUE, AND THE CITY HAS RESPONSIBLE THERE TOO.

SO WE THOUGHT $2 MILLION CITY MONEY WAS WAS FAIR TO THROW INTO THE POT FOR REIMBURSEMENT IF THEY THREW IN THE ADDITIONAL MILLION DOLLARS GRETEL YEARS. WE GET THE THREE POINTS FOR MR ROSS . THEY ARE THEY ARE DOING ALL OF THE CONSTRUCTION TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING.

OKAY? THUNDER WAS THAT HELP, SIR , IT'S BETTER. UM UH HUH. AND WHO IS PAYING FOR THE, UH, 65 SUPER EXTENSION? THAT ONE. TWO POINTS. BECAUSE, ACCORDING TO THE ENGINEER REPORT, IT WOULD BE REQUIRED. FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT TO BE DONE THAT THERE WOULD BE A SERIAL EXTENSION DONE ON THE PROPERTY, AND, ACCORDING TO THE ENGINEER REPORT, IT WOULD BE PAID BY THE DEVELOPER. AND THEN THAT'S THE CASE OF DEVELOPER PAYS FOR THE PARTS ON THEIR DEVELOPMENT. YES. OKAY EVERYONE SAYS FOR THE FOR THE SEWER EXTENSION, MR ROSS TALK TO STAND UP HERE BECAUSE THERE'S SOME

[01:05:04]

QUESTIONS HERE. I DON'T HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE AND INTERIOR COSTS OR BORN WITH US WITH THE DEVELOPER.

THEY WILL PAY FOR ALL THIS CENTURY COST. I GUESS THAT'S ALL I GOT FOR NOW. OKAY? THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT. UM, LET'S SEE. HERE THINK OF GOING THROUGH. MR RILEY, DID YOU WANT TO SPEAK ON THE ON THE DEVELOPMENT PARTNER, DID YOU? MY NAME IS JOHN RILEY. I LIVE AT 7 90 LEARNING REPORT ROAD. WELL, HI. PER POLICIES. FINANCIAL REPORTS THEY USUALLY MAKE ABOUT 14% PROFIT. SO IF I TAKE AN AVERAGE OF THE $500,000 RESIDENTIAL HOUSES AND THE $350,000 CONDOS. I'M GONNA SAY $450,000 TIMES 360. THAT'S ROUGHLY. $23 MILLION IN PROFITS. SO I JUST WENT NOBODY ELSE IN GROUPS. CITY HAS 11 CONDOS NEXT TO THEM. UM I HAVE A HARD TIME UNDERSTANDING WHY THE COMPANY NEEDS TO MAKE $23 MILLION AFTER THEY PAY. OTHER EXECUTIVES AFTER THAT PATTERN IS THAT THOSE PROFITS AFTER THEY PAID THAT'S REALLY NOT ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. YOU REALLY VENTURED OFF, OKAY? THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME COUNSELOR COMMENTS I JUST KIND OF ONE IS THAT WE HAVE A $3.5 BILLION BATTERY PLANT GOING IN 35 MINUTES SOUTH OF US. AND IF YOU WANT PEOPLE TO LIVE IN GROVE CITY AND YOU WANT PEOPLE TO HAVE GOOD JOBS. AND WHERE THEY'RE BUILDING. THIS IS THERE'S NOTHING DOWN THERE. AND THIS IS PART OF WHAT IT WAS IN THE PAPER ON SUNDAY IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY THAT THEY NEED IN THE AREA. 200 THEY BELIEVED IN THE LEAD. 227,000 MORE HOUSING UNITS IN THE FUTURE JUST TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROWTH THAT'S GOING IN WITH THE INTEL.

AND WITH THE HONDA HONDA HERE AND YOU CAN SEE. I DON'T KNOW. YOU PROBABLY DON'T SEE THE RECORDS WE SEE. BUT EACH YEAR OUR INCOME TAXES INCREASED BECAUSE WE HAVE PEOPLE LIVING HERE THAT HAVE JOBS AND GOOD PAYING JOBS, AND WE HAVE INDUSTRIES LIKE NITRILE. WE HAVE FORGED BIOLOGICS. WE HAVE TOAST, SO WE HAVE MANY, MANY GOOD PAINT JOBS HERE IN GROVE CITY. PEOPLE NEED A PLACE TO LIVE. AND IF YOU DON'T HAVE HOUSING, YOU DON'T GET JOBS. SO I KNOW THAT IT'S A CHANGE FOR PEOPLE IN JACKSON TOWNSHIP MOVED OUT THERE TO BE OUT IN THE MIDDLE WITH WITHOUT PEOPLE AROUND. AND I UNDERSTAND THAT. BUT WE ARE GROWING. MR RIGHT? MR. SHOCK IS YOU WANT TO KIND OF ADD ONE OTHER POINT IF I COULD, UM WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE IS TRYING TO DO A PARTNERSHIP WITH POLTI. I'VE LOOKED AT THE PRELIMINARY CALCULATIONS FROM THE TIP, AND IT LOOKS LIKE THAT.

IF ALL GOES WELL, THE TYPICAL GENERATION OF FUN FUNDS, UH WITHIN SIX OR SEVEN YEARS TO PAY OFF THE COST OF THEM PURPOSE TO THE INTERSECTION. UM BUT WHAT WE DON'T KNOW IS THE MARKET. IT'S WORTH ASSET DEVELOPER TAKE RISK WITH US TO SOLVE OUR PROBLEMS TODAY WITH A FUTURE REPAYMENTS, SO THEY REALLY ARE ENTERED INTO A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE CITY TO HELP US SOLVE TODAY'S PROBLEM.

UM BUT NOT GET REIMBURSED FOR A FEW YEARS, SIX YEARS. THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO ADD. BUT I DO LIVE NEXT TO CONDOS IF IT WANTS TO KNOW SHOOT. WE'VE HAD. WE'VE HAD PUBLIC TESTIMONY, PLEASE. MR. SURE I WILL SAY THAT, UM THESE PICTURES ARE RECEIVED RIGHT BEFORE THE MEETING BEGAN. THAT THEY WERE HANDED. THEY WERE HANDED TO ME, AND THEY'RE PICTURES OF THE S CURVE ON 6 65.

AND A LOT OF ACCIDENTS THAT HAVE OCCURRED SO MY TRUCKS AND CARS CRASHED RIGHT IN THAT AREA, SO OKAY WE'RE NOT UNFORTUNATELY, THE STATE OF OHIO HAS NOT SEEN FIT TO CHANGE THAT EXTRA. AND IT'S AND IF IT IS, IT'S WELL DONE. MR. BARRY, DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION? UM IF I COULD. UM MR HILL'S REMINDED ME AND YOU ARE CORRECT. I WAS NOT AROUND WHEN THIS WAS ANNEXED IN 2004, BUT BECAUSE I REFLECTED BACK THAT I DON'T THINK I VOTED. AND TAMMY WAS, UM FIND ME TO BE CORRECT IN THE SENSE THAT I HAVE NEVER VOTED FOR AN ANNEXATION NOVEL ONE OF FOUR AND 6 65 SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE OR DEVELOPMENT. THAT BEING SAID, UM ONE OF THE GOALS MY PERSONAL GOALS OUT OF THIS

[01:10:06]

DEVELOPMENT WAS THE SAFETY ISSUES WAS TRYING TO CREATE AND THAT MORE PARK SPACE IN THE AREA AND ALSO TO YOU KNOW, PROTECT THAT STREAM. THAT'S THAT'S THEIR, UM IT'S THERE RIGHT NOW AND EVERYTHING. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I ASKED MR HILL'S I IN AN EMAIL IS WHAT CAN WE DO TO CREATE A BETTER BUFFER? NOT A BETTER BUFFER. BETTER BETTER TRANSITION FROM 6 65 TO THE PROPERTY. AND I DROVE OUT THIS AFTERNOON. I NO, I WAS QUIET AND I DIDN'T RETURN YOUR EMAIL. BUT I DROVE OUT THERE AND I KEPT THINKING THAT THE YOU KNOW A LOT OF TIMES, YOU KNOW, RIGHT NOW IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WE'VE GOT THE ROLE OF PINE TREES ON THE TOP OF THE MOUNTAIN. THEN ANOTHER REAL FINE TREE OR A ROCK. UM SHRUBS OR WHATEVER BELOW IT TO SOUTH KOREA, THAT ONE THING THAT I THINK WOULD REALLY, REALLY HELP THE TRANSITION FROM THE PROPERTY FROM WHAT'S SOUTH TO THE NORTH WOULD BE ADDING SOME STAGGERED DECIDUOUS TREES TO WHAT YOU GUYS ALREADY HAVE PLANNED. UM OF COURSE DECISIONS MEANS LEAF TREES. UM AND THAT TYPE OF THING. I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT IN CASE PEOPLE DIDN'T KNOW, UM BUT YEAH, EVERYBODY GOOGLE IT.

UM, BUT MR HILL'S WOULD YOU AGREE, UM, TO DO YOUR BEST TO ADD SOME DECIDUOUS TREES, IN ADDITION TO WHAT YOU ALREADY HAVE IN THAT AREA OFF OF, UM AND I'M TALKING ABOUT 6 65 ON THE 6 66 6. 6 65 LINE THERE THAT HAD SOME DECIDUOUS TREES IN THERE BECAUSE THE REASON BEING IS IT CREATES HYPE, AND IT CREATES A TRANSITION TO LOOK UP INSTEAD OF WORKING AT ROOFTOPS AND THAT TYPE OF THING. SO, UM WOULD YOU GUYS AGREE TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT FOR US? SO WOULD YOU, MISS CALICA GENERAL THAT IN THE RECORD THAT THEY DID AGREE TO ADD JUST SITUATIONS TREES IN ADDITION TO WHAT'S ALREADY ADDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. I WOULD JUST LIKE A NOTE FOR THE RECORD GREAT SHOW ON THE EDGE GROUP NAME AND ADDRESS 31 SPRING STREET SUITE FROM 50. COLUMBUS, OHIO, 43215. ALONG THAT CORRIDOR. WHAT WE DO HAVE THERE. AS IF YOU DESCRIBE AS YOU DESCRIBE, UM DOUBLE ROOM OF EVERGREEN TREES. IN ADDITION, WE ALSO HAVE PROPOSED INDUSTRY IS EVERGREEN TREES, CITRUS TREES, SHADE TREES AS WELL AS ORNAMENTAL TREES, BUT WE ARE WILLING TO ADD A FEW MORE TREES ALONG THAT DECISIONS TREES ALONG THAT JUST TO BE CLEAR. I WAS OUT THERE FOR OVER AN HOUR TRYING TO MEASURE BECAUSE I LOVE TREES AND TREES. UM I'M LOOKING AT, YOU KNOW YOU'RE LOOKING AT ABOUT 60 TREES. IN ADDITION TO WHAT YOU HAVE ACTUALLY PARTED THEM OUT ON YOUR MAP. AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO SHARE THAT WITH YOU. BUT UM I'M TALKING ABOUT IT CONSIDERABLE ADDITIONAL TREES IN THAT AREA. JUST BECAUSE NOT ONLY DOES IT CREATE A BEAUTIFUL BARRIER AND KOREANS IS STILL A SCENIC ROUTE THROUGH THERE, IT ADDS. YOU KNOW, WE DON'T WE ALWAYS TALK ABOUT. WE ALWAYS TALK ABOUT THE CANOPY AND GROW CITY AND HOW WE HOW WE CONTINUE TO UM, CREATE A TREE CANOPY IN THE CITY AND EVERYTHING AND I JUST THINK THAT YOU KNOW, ADDING, ADDING, YOU KNOW, 50 TO 60 TREES WOULD DEFINITELY ADD TO THE CANOPY IN THAT AREA. INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY WILL DOUBLE THE TREE CANOPY THAT EXISTS ON THE SITE TODAY, UM, WILL HAVE ABOUT 25% TREE CANOPY COVERED OVER THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT. UM JUST TO BE HOLD WORSE, SO WE'RE NOT AS AS BIG IS THERE A NUMBER OF TREES THAT YOU ARE LOOKING TO ADD TO THIS AREA WHEN I WAS MEASURING IT OUT, AND I WAS OUT THERE? I'M LOOKING AT 50 TO 60 DECIDUOUS TREES ADDED IN WHAT I WAS LOOKING AT WHAT? WE CAN CERTAINLY ADD THERESE TO THAT. YOU KNOW WHAT? WHAT CALIBER THOUGH? ARE WE TALKING ABOUT WHEN WE PLANT THEM? WELL, I THINK THREE INCH CALIBER IS WHAT THE CITY TYPICALLY DOES. YEAH. I DON'T WELL MAKE. WE'LL MEET ANY MINIMUMS. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT WE WILL LOCATE THOSE APPROPRIATELY FOR GOOD HORTICULTURAL PRACTICES. YOU KNOW, SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE THESE GROWN TOGETHER IN SUCH A WAY THAT CAUSE ISSUES IN THE FUTURE. THAT'S WHAT THAT'S WHAT THEY PAY US TO DO WITH THE DESIGN A PROPERLY DESIGNED BUFFER, BUT WE WILL ADD. TO THAT . ALRIGHT AGAIN. I'M HAPPY TO SHARE MY MAP WITH YOU AFTER THE MEETING. SHOULD WE MAKE AN AMENDMENT? NAME ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. CALLAHAN WITH PULTE HOMES FOR 75 METRO PLACE. DUBLIN OHIO. I MIGHT SUGGEST THAT THE CONDITION BE SOMETHING ALONG THE LINES OF SATISFIED WITH WHAT MR BARRY SUGGESTING THAT WE WORK WITH THE CITY FOREST OR TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF DECIDUOUS TREES IN THE RANGE OF 50 TO 62 A HALF INCH TREES, BUT WE DO THAT IN CONSULTATION WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, THE CITY FORESTER TO COME UP WITH AN APPROPRIATE PLAYER TO ACHIEVE THAT. DESIRE POSITION. TREE CANOPY COVERED. ABSOLUTELY THIS

[01:15:02]

IS IN THE RECORD. DO YOU WANT IT? BECAUSE STIPULATION, MR BARRETT MISSKELLEY. WHAT'S YOUR OPINION? WE HAVE IT IN THE RECORD, MR MR SMITH. IF YOU HAVEN'T THE RECORD, IT'S ALL WELL AND GOOD. BUT WHEN PUSH COMES TO SHOVE, IT DOESN'T REALLY GIVE US ANYTHING TO ENFORCE. SO YOU PROBABLY WANT TO MAKE IT PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT. PLANNED RESOLUTION IF YOU WISH TO ACTUALLY HAVE SOMETHING WE CAN ENFORCE DOWN THE ROAD. I'LL MOVE TO AMEND, UM, STIPULATION ONE AND ADD SECTION ONE, SECTION ONE AND ADD, UM. THAT THE DEVELOPER AGREES TO WORK WITH THE CITY URBAN FORESTER TO ADD 50 TO 60 CONSTITUENTS, DECIDUOUS TREES TO THE. TO THE PROPERTY LINE ON 16 65. I SO MOVE. IS THAT YOUR 2ND 2ND 2ND? MR BARRY ? YES BOLT? YES. YES. MR SHOCKEY. CRIST? YES. LET ME JUST GET THIS ON HERE. SO WE NOW HAVE TWO STIPULATIONS ON THERE. MOM BEING IN ADDITIONAL TREES. OKAY? ARE WE READY TO VOTE? MR CHAIRMAN, AND I WOULD ASK THE QUESTION TO THROUGH YOU TO MR BOZO. DO WE NEED TO PUT ANY STIPULATION IN HERE THAT THIS IS PENDING THE APPROVAL OF THE TIP LEGISLATION? DO WE NEED TO DO THAT OR NOT? I'M NOT SURE IF IT CAN BE PART OF THE PROBLEM THAT YOUR LEGAL PLACE. YEAH I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU WOULD TIE THAT TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. I MEAN, THE TIP LEGISLATION, FRANKLY, IS GOING TO BE COMPLETELY IN YOUR COURT, SO YOU WOULD BE THE ONLY ONES WHO COULD TAKE THAT SO I'M NOT NECESSARILY SURE THAT IT'S NECESSARY. NOR DO I BELIEVE THAT TYING THAT TO A DEVELOPMENT PLAN WOULD BE APPROPRIATE, SIR.

ALRIGHT JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT HAPPENS, MR SMITH WERE ON TASKS TO DO THE ORDINANCE FOR THE TIFF NEXT WE'RE GETTING IT TOGETHER AS FAST AS WE CAN, SIR. UNFORTUNATELY THE TIPS STUFF TAKES MORE THAN JUST US. WE HAVE THE COUNTY INVOLVED RIGHT NOW. UM I KNOW THAT THE PEOPLE IN MY OFFICE ARE WORKING DILIGENTLY TO GET IT DONE AS QUICK AS POSSIBLE WITH MR ROUSH. SO WE WILL TRY TO HAVE IT FOR NEXT MEETING. I CAN'T SWEAR TO IT, BUT IT IS. IF IT ISN'T HERE. IT'S NOT BECAUSE WE'RE NOT PUSHING IT FORWARD AS FAST AS WE CAN. SIR DIDN'T TALK TO THE COUNTY ON FRIDAY. THAT MARK C AND THERE IT'S IN THEIR ADMINISTRATION RIGHT NOW. YEAH, DONE THERE. YEAH THERE'S JUST, UNFORTUNATELY, WHEN IT COMES TO TIPS AND OTHER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, THERE'S JUST A LOT OF STEPS THAT HAVE TO BE DONE AND ULTIMATELY, IT WILL BE SUCCESSFUL. THAT JUST TAKES TIME TO GET THROUGH THE PROCESSOR. MR SECRETS. SORRY. I'M A LITTLE LATE HERE, MR. SHOCKEY, UM IS THERE A COMMITMENT OR IS? IS IT REASONABLE? CERTAINLY WEIGH IN ON THIS ISSUE. I KNOW KIMBERLY'S SHIELDS WORKED ON THIS, TOO. IS THERE SOME COMMITMENT TO ANY OF THEIR REFORESTING OR REPLENISHING OF THE HABITAT TO A CERTAIN PERCENT OF NATIVE SPECIES? PLANTS OR VEGETATION.

AND IF NOT, I JUST LIKE TO SEE IF WE CAN HAVE SOME KIND OF STRETCH GOAL OR REPORT TO THAT EFFECT. I'M NOT AWARE OF ANY COMMITMENT OR GOAL, BUT WE CAN DEFINITELY WORK WITH THE DEVELOPER AS YOU MENTIONED THE CORRIDOR IN THE RIVER CORRIDOR OR SHARING PORT OR WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC SO WE COULD USE TO FUNDS TO BY TREES TO REFOREST OR THAN THE REPLANT NATIVE SPECIES TREES TO OFFSET. ANY OF THE WORK THAT YOU KNOW WHEN WE WHEN WE ADD SHOVEL YOUR TREES AT THE END, JUST THE EXTENT POSSIBLE WE CAN. I JUST WANT TO REITERATE WHAT'S ON OUR PLANS WILL PROBABLY FIND THAT MOST WOULD BE CATEGORIZED AS IN NATIVE TREE. THANK YOU. MR HOLT . MR. SHARKEY YES, I HAVE A QUESTION NOW THAT WE SPOKE ABOUT IT, BUT I AM CONNECTING THE TIFF TO THIS DEVELOPMENT PLANS, SO I UNDERSTAND THEIR SEPARATE BUT CAN THE DEVELOPMENT PLANARD WITN , IT CAN, BUT IT WON'T GET DONE. UNDERSTAND WHAT I'M. I MEAN, I CAN TELL YOU, SIR, ARE INTENT IS FOR THEM TO RUN TOGETHER, BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT THAT THEY WANT TO DO AT THE OUTSET. FRANKLY THEY NEED THE MONEY TO DO SO. OUR OUR

[01:20:03]

INTENT IS FOR THEM TO WORK TOGETHER. THE TIMING OBVIOUSLY HAS NOT WORKED AS OF YET, BUT THE TYPICAL CATCH UP TO THIS AND I SUPPOSE IF THE TIFF DID NOT GET APPROVED OR FALL THROUGH, ANYBODY WOULD BE HELD TO THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, REGARDLESS OF HOW THEY FUNDED IT. DID THAT POINT. THAT IS CORRECT, SIR. OKAY? HMM. RESOLUTION SENTENCE READING PUBLIC HEARING TO MOVE IT BE APPROVED. SECOND. MR VOTE? YES. THIS IS HOW. YOU SHOT KEY? YES, YES. OKAY? FOLKS THAT'S TAKEN THIS QUITE A LONG TIME TO DO, BUT I CAN TELL YOU THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A MUCH BETTER INTERCEPTION AND AREA. I'M SORRY. WHAT'S IT ALL GETS DONE? OKAY? MR PRESIDENT. THAT'S ALL I HAVE UNDER LANDS TODAY. LET'S SEE WHO WE HAVE NEXT. MISS HELP FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE SERVICE

[Ordinance C-12-23 Accept a Public Easement for a Shared Use Path from First Baptist Church of Grove City. First reading.]

COMMITTEE. THANK YOU, PRESIDENT BARRY. AND THIS EVENING UNDER SERVICE. I HAVE ORDINANCE C 12 23 AND ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT A PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR SHARED USE PATHS. FROM FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF GROVE CITY. AND. I WOULD HAVE REALLY CRUISED PAST THIS ENTIRELY AND REALLY SHOWING UP.

MR SHOCKEY, BUT THEY TOLD ME THAT I HAVE AN IMAGE HERE TO SHOW YOU. AND UNFORTUNATELY, IT'S NOT IN A IN A BOND THAT I CAN READILY, UM THANK YOU. WELL ONE JUST SAY, AND THE MAYOR CAN FIGURE BACK ON ME IF I'M NOT ADEQUATELY DESCRIBING THIS IS THIS IS A KEY PIECE OF CONNECTIVITY THAT WILL ULTIMATELY ALLOW YOU TO HAVE ACCESS AS YOU MOVED DOWN ORDERS ROAD TOWARDS THE Y WITHOUT BEING ON BORDERS ROAD ITSELF. MAYOR ANYTHING ELSE YOU'D LIKE TO ADD TO THAT. THANK YOU, MR. UH, THAT'S A PERFECT OBSERVATION, AND IT MAKES A INCREDIBLY SAFER SITUATION. FROM GETTING TOO FAR . I LOOK AT IT FROM THE HIGH SCHOOL TO FRIAR PARK. BY GOING OUT HOOVER AND THEN BEING ABLE TO TURN RIGHT ONTO ORDERED ROAD AND CONNECT ALL THE WAY OVER THE FIRE PART. SO THIS REALLY IS A KEY PIECE THAT WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS. SO WE GOT ALL THE PIECES TOGETHER AND WE'RE READY TO ROLL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND AS A MOM WHO HAS WITNESSED SOME YOUNG PEOPLE MAKING THAT TRIP ON THE SHOULDER OF THE ROAD, IT WILL BE FANTASTIC TO SEE THAT COME TO FRUITION. BUT THIS IS THE FIRST READING OF THIS ORDINANCE. SECOND READING IN PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE APRIL THE 17TH THE DAY BEFORE THE VERY BEST DAY OF THE YEAR. THAT IS ALL I HAVE VERY OH, THANK YOU, MR BARRY. WE HAVE

[Ordinance C-10-23 Authorize the City Administrator to enter into an Agreement with Adopt-A- Highway Litter Removal Service of America, Inc. Second reading and public hearing.]

ORDINANCE SEE 10 23 AN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ADMINISTRATED TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH ADOPT A HIGHWAY LITTER REMOVAL SERVICE OF AMERICA. AND CINDY, YOU'RE GOING TO GIVE US AN OVERVIEW. IS THAT WHY? YES SIR, APPROACHED. UM, SO THIS IS A PROGRAM OFFERED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH OH, DOT WHERE WE CAN SPONSOR SEGMENTS OF HIGHWAY AND SO WITH THIS LEGISLATION, WE WILL BE ENTERING INTO A MULTIYEAR CONTRACT THAT WILL ADOPT 71 FROM THE U. S 62 INTERCHANGE SOUTH OF TOWN ALL THE WAY UP TO STRING TOWN ROAD, ADOPTING BOTH SIDES OF THE HIGHWAY AND WITH THIS PROGRAM, THIS COMPANY WILL COLLECT LETTER ONCE A MONTH ON OUR BEHALF. I THINK THAT'S VERY POSITIVE MOVEMENT, CINDY. THANK YOU. MR MAYOR. THANK YOU. ANY COMMENT FROM PUBLIC. NO PUBLIC COMMENTS SIGNED UP ANYBODY FROM COUNCIL THANK YOU. THIS ORDINANCE HAS HAD ITS SECOND READING IN PUBLIC CARING AND I MOVED TO BE APPROVED. BUT. THIS IS HELP.

YES. MR SHOCKEY YES, YES, YES, YES. MOVING ON THE ORDINANCE, SEE 13 23 AN ORDINANCE TO

[Ordinance C-13.23 Appropriate $4,250,000.00 from the Pinnacle Tax Increment Financing Fund and $4,250,000.00 from the General Fund for the Current Expense of Improvements to Holton Road and declaring an emergency.]

APPROPRIATE 4,250,000 FROM THE PINNACLE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FUND. AND THE SAME AMOUNT 4,250,000 FROM THE GENERAL FUND FOR THE CURRENT EXPENSIVE IMPROVEMENTS TO HOULTON ROAD AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BUT YOU WANT TO SPEAK ABOUT THIS? YOU GUYS TALKED ABOUT THIS? THE LAST

[01:25:02]

MEETING ANYBODY WANT TO GIVE AN OVERVIEW? THANK YOU, MR HOLT. YES, WE, UM. WELL THIS IS A PROJECT PROJECT POINTED OUT AT THE LAST MEETING. I DON'T REMEMBER THE DATES OF THE STARTED THAT YOU WERE REFERRING TO, BUT IT'S BEEN ON OUR C I P FOR A LONG TIME. AND WHAT IT ENDED UP IS WHAT NUMBERS WILL MAKE THE PROJECT MOVES FORWARD. AND SPLITTING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT'S THEIR GENERAL FUND. AND IN THE TIFFANY FROM PINNACLE SEEM TO MAKE THE MOST SENSE IN ORDER TO GET THE PROJECT MOVING. WE ARE ASKING FOR IT TO BE DECLARED EMERGENCY SO WE CAN MOVE FORWARD. JUST FOR THE PUBLIC. THIS IS THE REPAVING , WIDENING AND IMPROVEMENT OF HOLDING ROAD FROM HOOVERED UP. OKAY? MR HOPE. MYSTERY SHOPPING. I BELIEVE THAT THE ENGINEERING IS ALSO COMPLETED. SHOVEL READY. UM YES, HOWEVER, IF COUNCIL WERE TO PASS THIS THIS EVENING NEXT MEETING, I WILL HAVE THE RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO TAKE SO WE CAN MOVE FORWARD THE LAND ACQUISITION. THIS PROJECT IS A LITTLE BIT UNIQUE IN THAT ALMOST EVERYTHING WE NEED ALREADY IS IN CURRENT RIGHT OF WAY. SO WE WON'T BE IMPACTING PEOPLE'S PROPERTY THAT MUCH WITH THIS PROJECT, BUT THAT WILL COME UP NEXT MEETING. IF YOU WERE TO PASS THIS TONIGHT, SIR. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, SO ANY OTHER COMMENTS. SO THE FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS THIS ORDINANCE HAS HAD ITS FIRST READING AND I LEARNED THE RULES OF COUNCIL V SUSPENDED AND THE WAITING PERIOD WAIVED. SECOND. MR SHARKEY? YES YES, YES. YES, YES. NOW I MOVE THIS ORDINANCE TO BE APPROVED AS AN EMERGENCY MEASURE. SECOND. MR SECRETS? YES. YES YES, MR SHOT, PLEASE. THANK YOU SO THAT WELL, WE DON'T HAVE THE 30 DAY WAITING PERIOD FOR ACTION HERE. WE CAN BEGIN IMMEDIATELY. EXTRA C 14 23

[Ordinance C-14-23 Appropriate $479,300.00 from the Local Fiscal Recovery Fund for the Current Expense of Engineering Services for the Columbus Street Wet Weather Sanitary Relief Sewer and Storm Relief Sewer. First reading.]

AND ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $479,300 FROM THE LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUND. FOR THE CURRENT EXPENSE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE COLUMBUS STREET. WHAT WEATHER, SANITARY RELIEF, SEWER AND STORM RELIEF SEWER UH, YOU WANT TO PUT THAT IN LAYMAN'S TERMS FOR THE PUBLIC? YES THANK YOU. YOU ALL KNOW WE'VE BEEN WORKING IN TERMS OF MITIGATING FLOOD SITUATIONS NOT ONLY IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA, BUT AS IT GOES UP TO HOOVER ROAD. UH COUNCIL HAS REALLY EARMARK. APPROXIMATELY $3 MILLION THAT WE RECEIVED FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FROM THE LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS FOR THIS PROJECT, WHICH SECURED OTHER FUNDING THROUGH THROUGHOUT THE STATE AGENCIES FOR APPROXIMATELY $8 MILLION PROJECT . SO WHAT THIS DOES IS GET THE ENGINEERING STARTED IN ORDER TO DO THAT PARTICULARLY DEVELOPMENT TO MAKE THE IMPROVEMENTS TO MITIGATE THE EXISTING STORM PROBLEMS THAT WE'VE HAD OVER THE YEARS AND THOSE WERE REALLY DEVELOPED. IN THE 19 FIFTIES.

WHEN WE DON'T WE DIDN'T HAVE THE REGULATIONS THAT WE PRESENTLY HAVE TODAY IN HER OUR DEVELOPMENT, SO BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. FOR PURPOSES OF LOCATION. I'LL JUST, UH THERE WILL BE IMPROVEMENTS TO SECURITY DRIVE LAROSA DRIVE KINGSTON AVENUE SAWYER COLOR. IN THAT AREA. IT'S A PRETTY MASSIVE STORM WATER PROJECT ANYWAY, UM.

THIS ORDINANCE IS NOW HAD ITS FIRST READING. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE 4 17.

[Ordinance C-15-23 Authorize the City Administrator to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding amending the current Agreement with the Fraternal Order of Police/Ohio Labor Council, Inc., Police Dispatchers. First reading.]

ORDINANCE C 15 23 AN ORDINANCE TO OFF TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO ENTER INTO A MEMORANDUM OF OWNER STANDING, AMENDING THE CURRENT AGREEMENT WITH THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE. SLASH OR HIGHER LEVEL COUNCIL. FOUR POLICE DISPATCHERS. ONCE AGAIN, CHUCK, WOULD YOU WANT TO PUT THIS IN LAYMAN'S TERMS, PLEASE? UH YES. THANK YOU, UH, OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, WE'VE LOST APPROXIMATELY THREE DISPATCHER COMMUNICATION SPECIALISTS, WHICH ARE REALLY VITAL TO THE OPERATION OF OUR SAFETY DEPARTMENT. NOT ONLY POLICE, BUT FIRE FOR NOT ONLY JACKSON TOWNSHIP TO OTHER, UH, JURISDICTIONS. AND WHAT WE FOUND OUT THAT THESE INDIVIDUALS LEAVING BECAUSE OF THE DISPARITY AND FUNDING ALL THREE OF THOSE WHO WANT TO DISPATCHING WITH THE

[01:30:01]

CITY OF DUBLIN'S, UH DISPATCHING CENTER. SO WHAT WE DID IS TRYING TO CORRECT THAT SITUATION.

LOSING GOOD PEOPLE. WE WERE APPROXIMATELY 8% 8.5 TO 9% LOWER THAN THEIR WAGES. SO WITH THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING DOES IF THE LEGISLATION PASSES, THE NEXT MEETING WILL INCREASE MIDTERM INCREASE FOR THOSE INDIVIDUALS OF 8.9. IN ADDITION TO THAT, THEY'VE AGREED THAT THE NEXT THREE YEARS OF THE CONTRACT WILL BE A 3% INCREASE WITH NO OTHER CHANGES TO THE EXISTING BURDEN UNIT CONTRACT. SO ANY OTHER QUESTIONS HAPPY TO ANSWER? JUST TO SUMMARIZE IT'S AN UPDATE TO THE CURRENT F O P CONTRACT MIDTERM OR THE DISPATCHER'S, IN ESSENCE, INCREASE THE STARTING SALARY OF THE DISPATCHER FROM APPROXIMATELY $49,000 53,000 DOLLARS. IN THE TOP SALARY AFTER APPROXIMATELY SIX YEARS WITH THE CITY OF THEIR CITY FROM 60,000 TO $74,000. THANK YOU, MR BARROSO. THIS ORDINANCE HAS HAD ITS FIRST READING SECOND READING IN PUBLIC HERE AND WILL BE 4 17.

MR BARRY THAT COMPLETES FINANCE. ALL RIGHT. UM THIS IS THE POINT IN TIME IN THE MEETING THAT WE

[Call for New Business]

ENTERTAIN NEW BUSINESS FROM THE AUDIENCE. ONLY ONE PERSON HAS SIGNED UP. AND THAT IS MR WEAVER. MR. WEAVER, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. THANK YOU, MR BERRY. MY NAME'S BRIAN WEAVER.

FORMER GROVE CITY I T STAND INDICATED MANY TIMES LIKE TO THE RESEARCH STATE OF OHIO DOCKET CASE H 202 TO DEATH 003. 478 THAT WERE DETERMINED IN THE TRAINING GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING ON FEBRUARY 21ST 2023. AND THE CHIEF JUST ANNOUNCING REGULATION LAST WEEK PER MAYOR. EX STAGE THEIR LIFE CALIFORNIA FROM MIKE STATE AFTER EVENT THIS BECAUSE IT INVOLVED HIM. AND THE BALL BEEN RECEIVED A COPY OF THAT HEARING IN ROLLING INCLUDE THAT IDENTIFIED THE CYBERSECURITY ISSUES AFFECTING YOUR COMMUNITY IN THIS CLUB CITY TAXPAYERS MONEY. YOU WERE RIGHT, MR RUBY, THE PUBLIC I DON'T SEE THE RECORDS YOU SEE. THE FORMER I T S I T STAFFING BRIDGE CITY. YOU ARE CORRECT. UM I BELIEVE, UM, DURING MY TIME I T I'VE SEEN RECORDS BEING EMITTED FROM THE PUBLIC. I'VE SEEN ANNOUNCED OVER THE YEARS THAT CLAIMED TRAFFIC DATA HAS BEEN DELETED FROM THE GROVE CITY .COM DOT GOV WEBSITE TRAFFIC DATA PART OF 2021. WHEN WE DISPLAYED FIVE YEARS AT LEAST FIVE YEARS WORTH OF DATA AND YOUR WORD CHRISTINE INSTEAD THAT YOU WILL BE HANDLING THE WORD FOR THE PARLIAMENT. SO DIFFERENT . THIS STATEMENT IS NOT ONLY FOR YOU, IT'S GONNA BE FOR EVERYONE AND IN COUNCIL, THE BLOOD WILL BE ON YOUR HANDS FOR NOT ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK THE PUBLIC TO THE PUBLIC AND THE TRUTH ON BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATA FLOODING DATA. UM AS CHUCK BOTO CITY ADMINISTRATOR SITTING THERE , BROTHER MIKE ABOUT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR HAS NOT ATTENDED ANY MEETINGS SINCE JUNE 2022 WHEN I STARTED MENTIONING CYBERSECURITY ISSUES REGARDING THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT SYSTEM IN THE SYSTEM BECAUSE CITY DEAL THE I T DIRECTOR WHO'S SITTING IN THE LOBBY. UM IT ALSO FULLY AWARE OF THIS, ALONG WITH MIKE TURNER, FULLY AWARE OF IT BECAUSE HE WAS CONTACTED FOR FUNDS TO PAY THE RINGING SOMEWHERE. AS YOU CLEAN IN THE NEWS RECENTLY, WHO HAD HAD A SIMILAR WAY SOMEWHERE, UH , PAYING $219,000 TO RECOVER THE DATA, AND I WOULD LIKE YOU TO LOOK AT THE INVESTIGATION, AND CHUCK ALSO MENTIONED THAT THERE'S A LOT OF DISPATCHERS HAVE RESIGNED, UM YOU ALSO HAVE NOT RELEASED VIDEO OR INVESTIGATION REPORT OF IT. UM A INCIDENT HAPPENED WHERE AN OFFICER ASSAULTED A FEMALE CIVILIAN POLICE WORKER INSIDE THE DISPATCHER ROOM AND, UH, YOU STILL HAVE MOVIES RELEASED VIDEOS. YOU GUYS MAY HAVE SEEN THE VIDEOS AND BOBY INDICATED YOU SEE RECORDS. WE DON'T SEE LIKE YOU TO INVESTIGATE. UH CHUCK BOLT IN ADMINISTRATION IN PLACE ADMINISTRATION WHY THEY'RE NOT RELEASING THAT VIDEO OF THE OFFICER OF SALTING THAT FEMALE WISHING ON THE FLOOR, BLEEDING WITH THE MOUTH IN FRONT OF MY OFFICE IN THE IT DEPARTMENT IN THE CITY OF CITY. UM ALSO, YOU'VE ALSO NOTICED A BUNCH OF OFFICERS HAVE RECENTLY DESIGNED . THANK YOU. WOULD YOU LIKE TO I WOULD THANK YOU SO MUCH. UM I BELIEVE THE INJURY HE IS TALKING ABOUT IS THE EMPLOYEE BENT DOWN TO PET. THE CANINE AND CANINE JUMPED UP AND THEY MET IN THE MIDDLE, SO WE DON'T HAVE A VIDEO OF IT. WE DON'T KEEP IT THAT LONG. SORRY, MR WEAVER. I'VE ONLY TOLD YOU THAT 57 TIMES, BUT YOU CAN KEEP ASKING. UM INTERESTINGLY, I PULLED UP THE CASE. MR WEAVER REFERS TO AND