Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

WE GOT ANY LETTERS ON IT. SO YEAH, RIGHT. OK UH, THERE YOU GOT YOURS TURNED UP, OK, I'D

[A. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL]

[00:00:09]

LIKE TO, UM, CALL THE MEETING OF THE, UH, GROVES CITY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS TO ORDER TODAY, WHICH IS FEBRUARY THE 26 AND. LIKE TO START WITH THE, UH, WITH THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. IF YOU STAND, PLEASE. PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. IN PUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE. LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. THANK YOU. AND UH UH, NEXT LIKE TO DO A ROLL CALL. MR BRANT. CHEERING MR HA! OK, GREAT. UM. THE OTHER THING IF ANYONE WISHES TO SPEAK, UH, AND ADDRESS US IF YOU WOULD SIGN IN AT THE PODIUM IF YOU'VE ALREADY SEEN AND THAT'S FINE, IF NOT ALL THOSE WHO WISH TO SPEAK. UM IF YOU COULD STAND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND WE'LL HAVE MISS SCOTT. UH, WHERE ARE YOU IN? YOU SOUNDLY SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE IS TRUE AND CORRECT AND THAT YOUR TESTIFYING OF YOUR OWN FREE WILL GREAT, OK, AND, UM. THE NEXT ITEM OF BUSINESS IS TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM OUR

[C.1. Approve the minutes from the January 22 meeting.]

JANUARY 22ND MEETING OF THE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION. WE DO THAT. I WILL. SECOND THAT MOTION, OK? WE ALL MAKE. OK? SINGA. YES, MR HOME. OK AND OUR GENDER HAS, UM, AN APPEAL FROM ATTORNEY PLANK LAW FIRM BUT THEY'RE NOT HERE YET. SO WE WILL START WITH, UH UH, ITEM NUMBER TWO. AND, UH, WE

[D.2. Hear the appeal of Parks Davis, A.I.S. Renovations for 5486 Carlisle Dr. (Parcel #040-017483) for a variance to Section (Table) 1135.14 – II: To encroach the rear yard setback of 25’ by 11’ for total rear yard setback of 14’, by installing a deck. ]

READ THAT AND IT'S THE, UH UH, HEAR THE APPEAL OF PARKS DAVIS A IS RENOVATIONS FOR 5486 CARLISLE DRIVE PARCEL NUMBER 040. DASH 017. UH 483 FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTION TABLE 11 35.14 DASH I TO ENCROACH THE REAR YARD SETBACK OF 25 FT BY 11 FT FOR A TOTAL YARD SETBACK OF 14 FT BY INSTALLING A DECK. OK UM, WOULD YOU LIKE TO PRESENT YOUR CASE? I GUESS IT'D BE JEFF BROWN. YOU CAN COME UP HERE. CARE ACTUALLY, THE, UM THE APPLICANT IS HERE. THAT'S PARKS DAVIS. OH, OK. I'M SORRY. I CAN HEAR YOU. MISTER BROWN IS HERE TO SPEAK ON IT. BUT OK, I'M SORRY. HE SIGNED YOUR FIRST I APOLOGIZE. COME ON UP. YEAH. I APOLOGIZE. THANK YOU. I I'M SEAN DAVIS WITH THE RENOVATIONS. WE ARE ASKING FOR A, UH SETBACK OF, UH 14 FT TO ACCOMMODATE A DECK ON THE BACK IF YOU CAN LOOK AT THE SLOPE IT NEEDS TO BE THAT MUCH BECAUSE OF THE OLDER, YOU KNOW, DISRESPECT OF THE OLDER FOLKS THAT WILL HAVE BETTER ACCESS INSTEAD OF LIKE A CONCRETE PORCH OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. WITH THAT, UM, GOING TO 14 FT. COMPARED TO 25. THERE'S NOT MUCH DECK FOR THEM. THAT'S WHY WE'RE ASKING FOR THE, UH 14 FT. OK, UM. OK, AND I I'VE REVIEWED ALL THIS, UM IF WE CONTACTED THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS, THIS GUY. YES, WE HAVE, UH, HAVE WE HAD ANY RESPONSES? YES THERE'S A GENTLEMAN HERE TONIGHT THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK THAT IS SIGNED IN, OK? THANK YOU. SO I. I GOT A QUESTION. I'M SORRY. SO THE DECK IS ACTUALLY ON HERE.

THE PROPOSED X YOU SAID YOU'RE SAYING THE SET BACK IN 14, BUT YOU'RE ASKING THE DECK TO BE 16 THE SETBACK. SET BACK. RIGHT SO DECK ITSELF WILL BE 16 CORRECT AS SET BACK AT 20, SO WE'RE TRYING TO GET 11 FT FOR A TOTAL REAR YARD SETBACK AT 14. I'M SORRY THAT I'M NOT MORE PREPARED. I APOLOGIZE. UM SO IN THE PICTURES THIS IS CORRECT, RIGHT? YES, ON HERE. I'M SORRY.

UM THIS WOODED LINE BEHIND HERE. THE EASEMENT IS THAT DOES YOUR PROPERTY GO BACK TO THAT? I'M

[00:05:01]

ASSUMING THAT'S WHERE THE PROPERTY LINE IS. AND YOU'RE THE GENTLEMAN WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY.

TO THE TO THE EAST, OK? OK, I WAS TRYING TO GET THE MY HEAD WRAPPED AROUND IT, OK? UM ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. OK, MISTER BROWN. WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADDRESS THE THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK. UH I'M JEFF BROWN. I OWN THE PROPERTY JUST TO THE IMMEDIATE EAST. UM TWO PROPERTIES THERE, THE ONE TO THE NORTH AS WELL. UH, SO. LITTLE BIT LITTLE BIT SOUTH OF SILVER LAWN ALL THE WAY UP TO WHERE THE POND IS, IS OUR PROPERTY AND, UH, I JUST HAVE, UH A FEW OBSERVATIONS AND A REQUEST REALLY? UH I RESPECT YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING HERE? UH FEW OF THE OBSERVATIONS ARE THERE'S ONLY FOUR HOUSES THAT ARE BUILT FROM SILVER LAW ON A THERE'S FIVE HOUSES THAT AREN'T BUILT YET, SO THERE'S NO NEIGHBORS THAT CAN YOU KNOW, CAN SAY ANYTHING. I'M REALLY THE ONLY ONE THAT CAN SAY ANYTHING RIGHT NOW. ONE HAS ALREADY BUILT THEIR CONCRETE AND THE OTHER THREE HAVE NO DECKS OR ANYTHING YET. AND UH, I WANNA BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR. I'VE BEEN A GOOD NEIGHBOR TO ROCKFORD AND I RESPECT THEM. THEY'RE GREAT BUILDER AND A GREAT DEVELOPER AND A GREAT NEIGHBOR AND THEY BUILD A NICE HOME. COUPLE OF OTHER OBSERVATIONS ARE YOU KNOW, AT FIRST I THOUGHT THIS HOUSE IS BUILT FARTHER AWAY FROM CARLISLE THAN THE REST. IT'S NOT THE FRONT OF IT IS IN LINE WITH THE OTHERS. SO THE FRONT YARD BUILD LINE IS RESPECTED. THE THEIR CLOSER TO MY LOT LINE. REALLY BECAUSE THEY ALREADY HAVE A COVERED PORCH AS A REAR YARD. UM LIVING SPACE. AND THERE IS A DEEP SWELL THERE. UH, MY, UH, YOU KNOW, MY CONCERNS ARE AND THEY'RE NOT REALLY CONCERNED, BUT I'VE BEEN TO A LOT OF THESE, AND I KNOW THAT ONCE YOU SAY YES TO ONE. IT'S HARD TO SAY NO TO THOSE PEOPLE THAT DON'T HAVE THEIR HOUSES BUILT AND DID NOT COME YET. IT'S HARD. IT'S GONNA BE HARDER TO SAY NO. AND I WOULDN'T WANT ALL OF THOSE HOUSES TO END UP 14 FT FROM MY LOT. YOU KNOW, I WOULDN'T. SO THAT'S MY CONCERN. NOW, THIS IS THE ONLY HOUSE THAT'S GOT A COVERED PORCH BUILT ON THE BACK, SO IT'S IT APPEARS TO BE FARTHER BACK. IT'S ONLY 5 FT. FROM THAT 25 FT BUILD LINE. THE OTHER ONES. UM OR, UH, YOU KNOW THEIR FARTHER AWAY. SO THE YOU KNOW MY CONCERN IS THAT I DON'T WANT. I WOULDN'T WANT ALL OF THEM TO BE 14 FT AWAY, AND I KNOW THAT IT'S GOING TO BE HARDER TO SAY NO.

ONCE YOU SAY YES. AND MY REQUEST IS IF YOU COULD MAKE A NOTE, I. I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE GONNA DO. BUT IF YOU AT AT LEAST LIKE TO SEE A NOTE WRITTEN SOMEWHERE SO THAT YOU GUYS LATER HAVE THE ABILITY TO SAY, WELL, THAT'S A DIFFERENT THAT'S A DIFFERENT LOT CONFIGURATION. A DIFFERENT HOUSE . IT WAS CLOSER TO THE TO THE, UH TO OUR LOT LINE. SO WHEN THE NEXT ONE ASKS FOR 14 FT BECAUSE THEY PROBABLY WILL ONCE THEY SEE THAT IT'S BEEN GIVEN, AND I JUST WANT YOU TO BE ABLE TO BE ABLE TO SAY NO, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT IT WOULD. I'D HATE TO SEE ALL OF THEM TURN INTO A 14 FT BUILD LINE, YOU KNOW. I WANNA BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR. BUT I WANT MY INTEREST PROTECTED AS WELL. SO ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME OR ONE OF THE ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT WE HAVE IN? I'LL ASK COUNCIL IF WE, UM IF WE, UM GRANT ONE. IT'S VERY DIFFICULT. BECAUSE SOMEONE WOULD USE THAT AS AN EXAMPLE LANDMARK CASE, SO I DON'T KNOW THAT WE COULD DO ANYTHING. UM, DOWN THE ROAD, BUT WELL, I WOULD TELL YOU THAT, UM PRECEDENT ISN'T ENTIRELY. IT ISN'T BINDING ON A VARIOUS APPLICATION FOR THE EXACT REASON THE GENTLEMAN MENTIONED THAT EVERY YARD AND PROPERTY IS DIFFERENT, AND THAT'S SORT OF THE POINT OF VARIANCE. AND SO I THINK OUR STAFF REPORT, WHICH IS ALWAYS REFERENCED IN FUTURE CASES. IF SOMEBODY COMES IN WITH A VARIANCE, WE SAY, HAS ANYTHING SIMILAR BEEN GRANTED, AND THAT WOULD INCLUDE THE FACT THAT THIS PROPERTY HAS IS CLOSER TO THE PROPERTY LINE THAN WHAT OTHER PROPERTIES WILL BE. SO THAT RIGHT? THERE WILL GIVE YOU ENOUGH OF A DISTINGUISHING FACTOR TO EXPLAIN WHY PERHAPS YOU GRANT VARIANCE IN THIS CASE, BUT NOT IN ANOTHER ONE, OK? OK SO THAT, UH, THAT'S THAT'S THE POTENTIAL TO DO THAT, UM. FROM AN OPINION STANDPOINT. NOT THAT WE GO WITH THAT. WHAT WOULD UH, WHAT DISTANCE WOULD BE AMENABLE TO YOU? WELL, II. I, UH. AGAIN I DON'T WANT TO STOP YOU FROM DOING ANYTHING. YEAH I. I WANNA

[00:10:12]

BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR. OK I JUST DON'T WANT THEM ALL TO END UP AT 14. AND IF YOU SHORTEN THAT UP, YOU KNOW THEY ALREADY HAVE A COVERED PORCH. THAT'S 6 TO 8. FT THERE'S NO IF YOU DO, 16, YOU'RE GOING TO END UP WITH 24 FT DEPTH AND A 14. FT LEFT, YOU KNOW, SO, UM. BUT IT'S A DEEP SWELL, YOU KNOW, REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU DO WHEN YOU COME OUT LEVEL, YOU'RE GONNA HAVE A 4 FT. DROP OR OR SO YOU SO I DON'T YOU KNOW, I DON'T WANT TO STOP THIS FROM HAPPENING . YOU'RE CONCERNED ABOUT THE FUTURE SITUATION. I'VE SEEN A LOT OF THESE AND IT'S HARD TO SAY NO, AND THEY WILL ASK BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY BEEN GRANTED. SO I WOULD ANYTHING THAT I CAN DO TO HELP PROTECT.

THAT IS WHAT I'D LIKE TO DO APPRECIATE WHAT YOU DO. THANK YOU, OK? OR IF THERE'S ANY COMPROMISE. OK? UM NOW I UNDERSTAND WHAT HE'S SAYING. I UNDERSTAND WHAT HE'S SAYING. UM.

SO AS OF RIGHT NOW? YEAH, YOU'RE THE ONLY PROPERTY OWNER. NO ONE ELSE TO RIGHT. RIGHT RIGHT. I DON'T THINK I DON'T THINK THEY GET THAT EITHER. YEAH I DON'T THINK THAT OK AND THERE'S BUT I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. ONCE WE SET THAT EVEN THOUGH AND NOW YOU SAY YOU IT COULD BE A REFERENCE. IT'S NOT SETTING THE STANDARD, BUT IT COULD BE A REFERENCE LATER. IT'S HARDER TO OK, THE, UM YOU INDICATED YOU HAVE THE ADJACENT FIVE LOTS. SO IT'S THERE'S A THERE'S FIVE MORE LOCKS THAN HAVE NOT BEEN BUILT. OK? AND MY PROPERTY IS. TO THE NORTH OF THE ERA, RIGHT? THAT'S POINTED, YOU'RE SAYING THE FIVE MORE LOTS TO THE NORTH. ONE HOUSE BUILT THERE SHOULD BE SIX MONTHS. MAYBE THERE'S MAYBE THERE'S I. I WAS COUNTING THE YEAH, FOUR. LOOKS LIKE FOUR. OK? SO YOU HAVE THE LAST ONE AT THE END. THAT GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE POND. IS THAT IF WE CAN WE SHRINK THAT DOWN A LITTLE BIT. UM THERE WE GO. THE HOUSE TOOK A IMMEDIATE SOUTH OF THE VILLAGE.

THAT'S THE ONE THAT HAS A CONCRETE IN THE BACKYARD. OK, THERE'S NO HOME. OK I BELIEVE THERE'S TWO OR THREE THAT'S NOT BEEN BUILT. OK THEN THERE'S A HOUSE THAT THERE'S A WHITE HOUSE THAT WAS BUILT. AND THEN AFTER THAT, PERFECT. THERE. THERE'S A TOTAL OF FIVE YET TO BE BUILT.

OK YEAH. YEAH, THAT'S THE ONE IN THIS PICTURE. THE WHITE HOUSE OF THE NORTH, OK? YEAH SO ALL THESE IN BETWEEN. AND THAT'S WOODS GOES ALL THE WAY BACK. IS THAT YEAH, THAT'S YOUR WOOD LINE ALL THE WAY DOWN, RIGHT? WELL TWO HOUSES TWO HOUSES, OK? OK? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSIONS OR ANYTHING? UM NOW. BUT I UNDERSTAND IS CONCERNED. IS, UH. IF WE ASK THAT THERE BE, UM YOU. PROBABLY IT'S NOT APPROPRIATE TO PUT A NOTE ON THIS APPROVAL. FOR FUTURE LOTS. NO BUT I THINK THAT I MEAN, AT LEAST IN MY EXPERIENCE WITH THESE. WE'VE ALWAYS PULLED SIMILAR REQUESTS IN THE SAME AREA OF DOWN THE LINE WHEN THEY HAPPEN, AND THEN WE GIVE AN EXPLAINER OF WHY THAT'D BE CORRECT, LAURA. YOU KNOW, WE'LL SAY THIS WAS A VARIANCE GRANTED ON THIS DATE WAS HERE WAS THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING, AND HERE'S WHY IT'S DIFFERENT. OK ALL RIGHTY. RELY ON THAT. I UNDERSTAND WHAT HE'S SAYING. OK, UM ALL RIGHTY.

SO I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE APPEAL OF PARKS DAVIS, A RENOVATIONS FOR 5486. CARLISLE DRIVE PARCEL NUMBER 040. DASH 017483. FOR VARIANCE DISSECTION TABLE 11 35.14 DASH I TO ENCROACH THE REAR REAR YARD SETBACK OF 25. FT BY 11 FT FOR A TOTAL OF REAR YARD SETBACK OF 14 FT BY INSTALLING A DECK. I'LL SECOND THAT. KALENA. YES, YES. OK, SO

[00:15:10]

YOUR APPEARANCE HAS BEEN APPROVED. AND, UM. WITH ONE STIPULATION THAT CONSTRUCTION UM UH, START WITHIN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS. AND, UM. OF EVERYTHING THAT WE DO, UH, STANDS FOR REVIEW WITH CITY COUNCIL. SO UH, THERE'S A 20. I WOULD RECOMMEND THE 21 DAY WAITING PERIOD TO MAKE SURE THEY DON'T REVERSE THE DECISION THAT IS RELATIVELY RARE . HOWEVER IT DOES HAPPEN. SO JUST AS A POINT OF INTEREST YOU CAN CHECK WITH BUILDING AND ZONING TO MAKE SURE THERE'S NO ISSUES. THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING. THANK YOU, MR BROWN FOR YOUR COMMENTS. OK? MHM. YOUR FALL BACK ON SOMETHING. I UNDERSTAND WHAT HE'S SAYING. YOU GONNA GIVE A WHOLE ROLE WITH PEOPLE WANT DE . THAT'S WHAT I'M I UNDERSTAND THAT WE DO HAVE THE APPLICANTS FOR, UM, ITEM NUMBER ONE AND ITEM NUMBER THREE. HERE NOW WE WILL NEED TO SWEAR THEM IN BEFORE WE OK? YES. I. ANYONE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK IF YOU WOULD COME AND SIGN THIS LIST, AND, UH THEN WE'LL SWEAR YOU IN.

RIGHT, OK. AND I'M SORRY I WAS DELAYED TODAY. IT'S ALL RIGHT. IT HAS OK, IT HAPPENS.

OK? OK? SHOULD WE DO? UM I THINK THREE IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE FAIRLY QUICK AND THAT WE CAN OK, THAT'S A GOOD IDEA. OK OK, SO, UH, ITEM NUMBER THREE. IS THAT APPEAL? WELL, LET'S LET'S WHERE THESE FOLKS IN FIRST THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OK, SO. UM THE SMART, MR BRADLEY AND MISS MOTT. UM RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU SOLEMNLY SWEAR THAT OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY? YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE US TRUE AND CORRECT AND THAT YOUR TESTIFYING OF YOUR OWN FREE WILL THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

[D.3. Hear the appeal of Chris Bradley, The Camber Company for 3679 Grove City Rd. (Parcel # 040-003263) for a variance to Section 1135.12-II: To exceed the maximum building height of 35’ by 2’-6” for an overall building height of 37’-6”.]

YOU CAN STAY AT THE PODIUM, SIR. OK UH, THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS TO HEAR THE APPEAL OF CHRIS BRADLEY. THE CHAMBER, A COMPANY FOR 3679 ROSE CITY ROAD. PARCEL NUMBER 040-00. FOR VARIANCE DISSECTION 11 35.12 DASH I TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 35. FEET BY 2 FT SIX INCHES FOR AN OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT OF 37 FT. SIX INCHES, MR BRADLEY, WOULD YOU LIKE TO EXPLAIN YOUR REQUEST. SURE THANK YOU. THAT'S CHRIS BRADLEY 67. WELL, I GUESS IN THIS CASE, UM 3679 GROVE CITY ROAD, SO WE HAVE, UH, BEEN THROUGH A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH CITY COUNCIL ON THIS FOR, UM, A DEVELOPMENT THAT'S BEEN APPROVED, AND OBVIOUSLY ONE OF THE CONDITIONS WAS THE VARIANCE FOR THE ROOF HEIGHT. UM APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION ON THIS. I THINK MAYBE A COUPLE OF THINGS JUST AS BACKGROUND. WE TRY TO BE, UM, VERY CONSIDERATE IN TERMS OF THE SCALE OF THIS PROJECT AND HOW WE'VE SET IT UP GIVEN THAT WE DO HAVE SOME RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORS BEHIND US, AND TO THAT END THERE'S A UH AS YOU KNOW A PART OF YOUR CODE WHEN IT'S A NON CONFORMING NEIGHBOR. SUCH AS INDUSTRIAL TWO, WHICH IS HEAVY INDUSTRY HERE IN IN RESIDENTIAL, THERE ARE CERTAIN SETBACKS THAT ARE REQUIRED, AND I WOULD JUST LIKE TO START BY POINTING OUT THAT, UM IT'S 30 FT. PROPERTY SET OR OR 30, FT. SET BACK 100 FT FOOT BUILDING SETBACK. WE HAVE GONE TO 50 FT FIVE INCHES ON THE PROPERTY SETBACK, AND 100 AND 25.5 FT VERSUS 100 FT. ON THE BUILDING SETBACK. IN ADDITION TO THE MOUNDING AND LANDSCAPING

[00:20:06]

THAT'S REQUIRED IN THOSE CASES, WHICH I BELIEVE WE'VE EXCEEDED. AND SO, UM, I'M HERE TO ASK FOR A VARIANCE. UM YOUR, UM, INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO CODE, UM, HAS A MAXIMUM ROOF HEIGHT OF 35 FT. I BROUGHT SOME STATISTICS THAT SHOW HOW THESE WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS ARE BEING BUILT IN TODAY'S DAY AND AGE, AND IT'S REALLY KIND OF ABOUT THE CLEAR HEIGHTS. UM A LOT OF THEM ARE NOW. 36 FT. UM, I THINK I READ A STAT WHERE, UM 86% OF THE GROWTH IN WAREHOUSES RIGHT NOW ARE 32 FT. CLEAR HEIGHTS. AND IN THIS CASE, UM WE WILL NOT QUITE BE THERE. THIS WILL GET US TO APPROXIMATELY AT THE LOWEST POINT, WHICH IS HOW CLEAR HEIGHTS ARE DEFINED IN IN THE MARKET. UM WILL GET US CLOSER TO 28 FT. AND SO, UM AND LOOKING AT THE DETAIL OF THIS REQUEST. UM THE MAJORITY OF THIS, SO IF WE LOOK AT THE FRONT ELEVATION, WE WERE ASKED TO TURN THIS BUILDING SO THAT THE OFFICE SIDE OF THE BUILDING FACED THE RESIDENTIAL UM IT'S A PRETTY DESOLATE AREA BACK THERE, BY THE WAY, JUST IN GENERAL, BUT WE DO HAVE SOME NEIGHBORS THAT WE'RE TRYING TO RESPECT AND ONE OF THE THINGS WE AGREED TO IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS TO DO A BIKE PEDESTRIAN TRAIL, UM, RUNNING NORTH AND SOUTH ON THE WEST SIDE. SO FROM THE PROPERTY LINE ON THE WEST BEHIND THE RESIDENCE, THEY WILL HAVE, UM THE 6 FT. MOUNTING THE PINE TREES SCATTERED ALL THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS A BIKE PEDESTRIAN TRAIL THAT WE'VE AGREED TO PUT IN AND FUND AND PROVIDE AN EASEMENT FOR SO WE'RE REALLY TRYING TO MAKE THAT AREA A NICE AREA THAT CONNECTS UP TO GROVE CITY ROAD AND THEN BACK TO THE BACK OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT'LL ULTIMATELY ALLOW YOU REALLY TO GET DOWNTOWN FROM THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. AS THAT BIKE PEDESTRIAN TRAIL CONTINUES EAST ON GROVE CITY ROAD. WHEN I LOOK AT THE WHEN WE LOOK AT THE DETAIL OF THE BUILDING, THIS IS A SINGLE SLOPE ROOF. AND SO THE TALLEST PART OF THE BUILDING IS ON THE WEST SIDE, WHICH IS THE OFFICE SIDE AND WE WERE ASKED TO TURN THE BUILDING THAT WAY SO WE DIDN'T HAVE TRUCK DOCKS FACING THE RESIDENTIAL. IT'S NONTRADITIONAL FOR US TO PUT IT THAT WAY. BUT NONETHELESS, WE DON'T THINK YOU KNOW, FROM A MARKET STANDPOINT, IT'S GONNA BE MAKE OR BREAK, SO WE WERE HAPPY TO MAKE THAT CONCESSION. AND SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE HEIGHT HERE UM THE ACTUAL ROOF HEIGHT OF THE FRONT OF THIS BUILDING, YOU KNOW THE MAIN ROOF THAT GOES ALONG? UH, THE BUILDING IS 36 FT. HI.

AND THEN WE HAVE PARAPETS AT FOUR DIFFERENT ENTRY POINTS. IF YOU HAVE THE GRAPHIC, AND SO THOSE ARE A FOOT AND A HALF, SO THAT'S 37 FT SIX INCHES. THAT'S THAT'S THE TALLEST PART AND KIND OF WHERE THE VARIANCE IS THE ROOF ON THE BACK. IS. FORGIVE ME. I HOPE I GAVE YOU A BIGGER DRAWING THAN I DID IN MY PACKET, I THINK IS AT 35. EXCUSE ME, 31 FT 10 INCHES 3110 SO. IT'S ONLY ON THE ONE SIDE OF THE BUILDING THAT WE'RE ASKING REALLY, FOR THIS VARIANCE AND WE FEEL LIKE WE HAVE KEPT THE SCALE OF THIS RELATIVE TO A TYPICAL IND TWO BUILDING, UM, REASONABLE AND JUST WOULD ASK YOUR CONSIDERATION FOR THIS, UM I WOULD SAY SLIGHT ADJUSTMENT IF THAT'S A FAIR TERM. MM OK. I HAVE NEW QUESTIONS. MR HUNT. DO YOU HAVE ANY. NOW I'M ASSUMING JUST BECAUSE ALL THE RACKING THAT'S WHY THE HEIGHTS THAT THEY . IT IS TYPICALLY ONE I'M IN.

THEY'RE JUST IT'S GONE. YEAH. YEAH, AND I YOU KNOW IF YOU DO THE RESEARCH ON KIND OF THE BULK BUILDINGS ARE LARGER THAN THIS RIGHT? THEY'RE IN AND THEY'RE TYPICALLY 32 TO 36 CLEAR. WE WOULD TYPICALLY BUILD AT LEAST 32 FT. CLEAR IN A SITUATION LIKE THIS, BUT SORT OF OUT OF RESPECT FOR WHAT'S GOING ON, UM YOU KNOW , WE AGREED TO DO SINGLE LOAD TRUCK ONLY, UM HAVE LESS THAN 32 FT. CLEAR AND WHAT THAT DOES IS JUST DRIVES A DIFFERENT USER. SO WE'RE NOT GONNA HAVE, UM, A BIG DISTRIBUTION COMPANY WOULD WANT DOCS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BUILDING AND RACK THE WHOLE THING. BUT EVEN WHAT WE FOUND IS EVEN COMPANIES THAT LET'S SAY ARE LIGHT MANUFACTURERS OR R AND D OR WHATEVER THEY DO, EVEN WHEN THEY JUST RACK A LITTLE BIT. THEY WANNA RACK HIGH SO EVEN IF THERE'S ONLY A FEW ROWS OF RACKING IN THE BUILDING, AND IT'S NOT ALL WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION JUST FROM AN EFFICIENCY STANDPOINT. THEY WANNA REDUCE THE FOOTPRINT OF RACKING IN THEIR BUILDING AS MUCH AS THEY CAN, AND THIS WILL HELP WITH THAT. GO UP. NO HAVE WE CONTACTED ANY OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS THAT WE HAD ANY RESPONSES? YES, WE DID. AND WE

[00:25:06]

HAVEN'T HAD ANY RESPONSES. OK, GREAT. MR CHAIR BEFORE THE, UH BEFORE WE MAKE A MOTION ON THIS, I JUST NOTE TO MAKE SURE WE READ BOTH STIPULATIONS IN OK, THE 12 MONTH, THE USUAL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN 12 MONTHS AND THEN ALSO THAT, UH, THE PARCELS NEED TO BE JOINED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING PERMITS BEING ISSUED SIX PARCELS OR SOMETHING. YEAH, WE WILL BE MAY I ASK ONE THING ON THAT? I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT THIS IS LIKELY GONNA BE DONE IN TWO PHASES BECAUSE THERE'S TWO BUILDINGS SO WE'RE WE HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH SAYING WE'LL START CONSTRUCTION ON PHASE ONE. IT'S A SISTER BUILDING NEXT TO IT. AND SO IT MAY BE LATER THAN 12 MONTHS FROM NOW. BUT WE'RE GOING TO START CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. IF YOU WILL, WITHIN 12 MONTHS. I THINK THAT'S THAT MEETS THE INTENT. THAT'S THE INTENT, OK? OK, WHERE ARE YOU? IN THE PROCESS OF COMBINING THE, UH, THE THERE'S TWO. THERE ARE TWO PROPERTIES. THE TWO PARCELS. I JUST HAVE 15 OR 65 OR SIX. OK SO WE WENT THROUGH A LONG PROCESS BECAUSE THE UM THREE M OWNED ALL THESE PARCELS AT ONE TIME, AND THEN THEY SOLD TWO OF THEM IN OUR NEIGHBORING BUILDING. OUR NEIGHBOR. UM, EDGE ADHESIVES IS IN ONE OF THE BUILDINGS DIDN'T DO A VERY GOOD JOB OF DIVIDING UP THE LAND. SO THERE WAS A 10 ACRE PIECE IN THE BACK THAT HAD NO RIGHT OF WAY. THE ONLY WAY TO ACCESS IT WAS AN EASEMENT THROUGH THAT PARKING LOT. AND SO, UM, THROUGH 6 TO 8 MONTHS WORTH OF WORK, UM, A GROUP OUT OF NEW YORK OWNS THOSE BUILDINGS AND, UM, WE WERE ABLE TO GET THEM TO SELL US A SMALL PIECE THAT MAKES THE WHOLE THING CONTIGUOUS. SO WE JUST CLOSED ON THE LAND. A COUPLE WEEKS AGO. UM WE JUST SUBMITTED OUR FINAL ENGINEERING. UM POST OUR OUR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND WE WILL NOW COMBINE ALL THOSE LOTS. WERE YOU AND EDGE. UM, SHARE ONE MAIN ROAD COMING BACK. SO WE JUST MET WITH EDGE LAST FRIDAY. IT'S A GREAT QUESTION. UM, CURIOUS. I HAVE. MAY I BRING YOU THIS THING? I WAS JUST CURIOUS HOW YOU WHAT I WOULD SAY IS, WE WILL SHARE AN INTRIGUE. SO THIS IS GROVE CITY ROAD. AND THIS WILL WE'RE GONNA NOW WE'RE GONNA HAVE TWO INJURIES. THAT'S MORE FOR VEHICLE AND THIS IS KIND OF MORE FOR THEM. AND THEN THE BACK OF OUR HOUSE, SO THEIR ACCESS ONCE YOU GET TO THE EXCLUSIVE ROAD, OK, IT WINDS BACK THERE NOW. YEAH, RIGHT NOW, IT ACTUALLY I SHOULD HAVE BROUGHT BUT IT KIND OF GOES LIKE THIS RIGHT NOW. AND SO WE JUST GOT TOGETHER WITH THEM ON THE STAGING OF THAT WE'RE GONNA TEAR THAT OUT. OBVIOUSLY TO BUILD OUR BUILDING, BUT GET THEM KIND OF THEIR OWN ACCESS BACK THAT WAY. AND THEY'VE BEEN VERY SUPPORTIVE OF RIGHT, OK. UM NO. NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. UM. SO UH, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE APPEAL OF CHRIS BRADLEY. UH, THE CANBERRA COMPANY. FOR 3679 GROVE CITY ROAD, PARCEL NUMBER 040-0.

FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTION 1 35.12 DASH I TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 35 FT BY 2 FT SIX INCHES FOR AN OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT OF 37 FT SIX INCHES. DO I NEED TO PUT WOULD YOU RECOMMEND PUTTING THE PARCEL OK THE SUBJECT TO SUBJECT TO TWO STIPULATIONS SUBJECT TO TWO STIPULATIONS THAT THE PARCELS BE COMBINED AND THAT CONSTRUCTION ON ONE OF THOSE, UM INITIATE WITHIN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS. THOSE ACCEPTABLE? YES, SIR. THANK YOU, OK? I'LL SECOND THAT. T. YES YES, OK, YOUR APPEAL HAS BEEN GRANTED. THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN. I APPRECIATE THAT. THE END OF CITY COUNCIL CAN REVERSE THE DECISION THAT WE MAKE. IT DOESN'T HAPPEN VERY OFTEN. BUT I WOULD RECOMMEND, UH, 20. THERE'S 21 DAY WAITING PERIOD AND YOU CAN KEEP IN CONTACT WITH BUILDING AND ZONING TO MAKE SURE THERE'S NO ISSUES IS THAT ALWAYS THE CASE. IN OTHER WORDS, THEY'VE APPROVED THE PLAN ALREADY, BUT THEY STILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK AT IT AGAIN. IT'S SOMEBODY ELSE TO APPEAL, AND I JUST OK, YEAH. YEAH, BUT THAT THAT'S YEAH.

THAT'S THE USUAL KEEP MY FINGERS CROSSED. OK, OK. THANK YOU. UH HUH. OK UH, THE NEXT ITEM ON THE

[D.1. Hear the appeal of Rebecca Mott, Attorney, Plank Law Firm, LPA representing 3400 Southwest LLC for 3400 Southwest Blvd. (Parcel #040-006747) for the following variances.]

AGENDA IS WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE FIRST. HERE ARE THE APPEAL OF REBECCA MOTT ATTORNEY PLANK LAW FIRM LP, A REPRESENTING 3400 , SOUTHWEST LLC FOR 3400, SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. PARCEL NUMBER 040-00. FOR THE FOLLOWING VARIANCES. UH, A. VARIOUS DIS SECTION 1136 A THREE TO REDUCE

[00:30:13]

THE REQUIRED 45 FT TRUCK PARKING SETBACK. THE 6 FT EARTHEN MOUND AND THREE STAGGERED ROWS OF EVERGREENS. TO A 20 FT TRUCK PARKING SETBACK WITH A 4 FT EARTHEN MOUND AND TO STAGGERED ROWS OF EVERGREENS AND B THE VARIANCE TO SECTION 136.16 B, REAR AND SIDE UH, SIDE YARDS ADJACENT TO, UH COMPATIBLE USE DISTRICTS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 20 FT PARKING SETBACK FROM 20 FT TO ZERO. THE NORTH AND THE 20 FT TO FIVE TO THE EAST TO PROVIDE NO PARKING LOT. PERIMETER PLANTINGS. UM TO THE NORTH AND TO RELOCATE THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT PERIMETER PLANTINGS FOR THE EAST TO SOUTHEAST PORTION OF THE SITE TO SCREEN THE STORAGE AREA FROM SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. SEE. A VARIANCE TO SECTION 136.06 D TO WAIVE THE REQUIREMENTS TO INSTALL INTERIOR VEHICULAR, UH, PALS, ISLANDS, ISLES AND ISLANDS AND PLANNING AREAS FOR LANDSCAPING DANCE SECTION 1 37.05 C TO ALLOW, UM, A 6 FT HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE. AND, UH, E A VARIANCE TO SECTION 1137.11 A TO ALLOW THE GRAVEL PARKING LOT TO REMAIN. YOU'D LIKE TO PRESENT YOUR CASE, PLEASE? YES YES. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 3400 SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. IT IS ZONED IN THE IN ND TWO DISTRICT.

THIS PROPERTY OWNER ALSO OWNS THE PROPERTY JUST TO THE NORTH OF THIS. IT'S ALSO ZONED INDUSTRIAL, BUT IT IS IN THE LEWIS CENTER JURISDICTION, AND THIS PROPERTY HAS ALWAYS HAD A GRAVEL OUTSIDE STORAGE AREA. I DO HAVE A SITE PLAN FROM 1988. I'D LIKE TO SHOW YOU. THIS IS A SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF GROVE CITY FOR THE SAME PARCEL. THE PINK HIGHLIGHTED AREA IS NOTED IN YELLOW THAT THAT IS A GRAVELED STORAGE AREA. IN ADDITION, IT HAD APPROVAL FOR A 6 FT HEIGHT CHAIN LINK FENCE, SO THOSE TWO ITEMS WERE IN THE 1988 VERSION OF A SITE PLAN SUBMITTED TO THE CITY LATER WHEN EXTRA BUILDINGS WERE BUILT ON THE PROPERTY THROUGH A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCESS, IT STILL WAS SHOWING THE PINK EXISTING GRAVEL. UM YOU DO SEE A PROPOSED BUILDING THAT IS THERE TODAY AND THEN AT THAT TIME THERE WAS EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT PARKING AREAS, DRY AISLES AND OTHER OFFICE BUILDINGS. THIS PERSON BACKGROUND THAT WAS IN 1999 PLAN. DID JUST GO THROUGH, UM, PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AGAIN FOR THE STORAGE YARD. EVEN THOUGH IT'S BEEN EXISTING A LEGAL NON. YOU COULD SAY THAT BECAUSE WE'RE EXPANDING IT A LITTLE BIT. WE NEEDED TO GET THAT SPECIAL PERMIT, BUT IT HAS BEEN THERE AS AN EXISTING LEGAL, NON CONFORMING CONDITION AND APPROVED UNDER SITE PLANS FROM 88 AND 99. SO WITH THAT OUR REQUESTS ARE VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU WOULD HAVE IF YOU HAD A GRAVEL OUTSIDE STORAGE YARD. FOR CRANES, EQUIPMENT, CONTAINERS, TRUCKS, MANEUVERING AND PARKING AREAS FOR TRUCKS. SO FOR EXAMPLE , UM, THE ONE THE FIRST ONE RELATES TO THE LANDSCAPING ALONG LEWIS CENTER WAY WE DO SO ON THE SITE PLAN AND THE SECOND PAGE OF OUR NEW SITE PLAN REFLECTS THE LANDSCAPE AREAS. UM MORE ZOOMED IN BUT WE ARE HAVING A SETBACK FROM LEWIS CENTER, WAY OF 20 FT INSTEAD OF 45, AND WE DO DO AMPLE EARTHEN MOUND OF 4 FT.

WITH UH, TWO ROWS OF THE 6 FT EVERGREEN TREE, SO IT ALMOST MEETS CODE. IT'S JUST NOT 45 FT SETBACK, AND IT'S NOT THE THREE STAGGERED ROWS. BUT THAT IS A VERY, VERY GOOD MOUND. VERY GOOD LANDSCAPING TREATMENT FOR THE LEWIS CENTER WAY RIGHT OF WAY FRONTAGE AND IN ADDITION, OUR NEIGHBOR UP HERE ON THIS SIDE OF THE PROPERTY HAD SUPPORTED OUR REQUEST THROUGH THE CITY COUNCIL . UM, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WROTE A VERY NICE LETTER THAT THIS WOULD BE A GREAT PROJECT AND THAT THIS LANDSCAPING IS SUITABLE. AND ALSO WE WILL BE ROUTING ALL OF OUR TRUCK TRAFFIC TO THE LEWIS CENTERWAY DRIVE A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, INSTEAD OF TAKING TRUCKS TO SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. WE ALSO HAVE A VARIANCE RELATED TO LANDSCAPING THAT RELATES TO THIS PROPERTY

[00:35:04]

LINE AND THIS EAST PROPERTY LINE SO NORTH AND EAST, THE AND WE HAVE THOSE VARIANTS VARIANCES REQUESTED IS BECAUSE WE OWN THIS LAW UP NORTH AND THIS WILL SOMEDAY AFTER A TWO YEAR PERIOD BECAUSE IT IS TEMPORARY BE MOVED TO THE LEWIS CENTER PROPERTY, AND WE DID WANT TO HAVE THE CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH A GATE HERE SO THAT THERE CAN BE MANEUVERING IN MOVEMENT OF EQUIPMENT TO THE NORTH PARCEL, WHICH AGAIN ALLOWS FOR THAT USE IN THE LEWIS SENATOR JURISDICTION, BUT WE WILL BE MOVING THIS ENTIRE LAY DOWN STORAGE AREA TO THIS SITE. IN THE TWO YEARS. SPECIAL PERMIT WAS ONLY GRANTED FOR TWO YEARS FOR THAT USE. BUT IN TERMS OF THAT, BECAUSE WE OWN THIS PROPERTY, AND WE HAVE THE FENCE, AND WE NEED MANEUVERING THROUGH, WE DIDN'T WANT TO PUT LANDSCAPING HERE, AND THAT'S WHAT THE CODE WOULD STRICTLY REQUIRE FOR COMPATIBLE USE DISTRICTS. SO WE ASKED FOR THE VARIANCE FOR THAT PROPERTY LINE TO DO NOTHING. AND THEN FOR THIS PROPERTY LINE NORMALLY YOU WOULD PUT IT ALL ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE AS A COMPATIBLE USE DISTRICT. BUT YOU CAN SEE THERE'S EXISTING EVERGREEN TREES ALL THE WAY DOWN THIS LINE THAT THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY HAS. AND WE'RE GOING TO CONCENTRATE THE STANDARD OF THE CODE ALONG THIS AREA, THE SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AREA SO THAT PEOPLE ON SOUTHWEST LOOKING INTO THE SITE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO HAVE A VIEW INTO THE STORAGE AREA. THERE IS ALREADY THIS ROUND OVAL AREA THAT HAS AN EXISTING 6 FT. MOUND WITH LANDSCAPING ON TOP OF IT, AND WE'RE PUTTING ADDITIONAL 5 FT. EVERGREEN TREES ALL THE WAY AROUND HERE WITH ORNAMENTAL BUSHES AND SHRUBS. WE DO THINK THAT'S A VERY ADEQUATE LANDSCAPING BUFF. FOR THIS THIS, UM, STORAGE YARD. UM, ALTHOUGH THIS ROAD IS FREQUENTLY TRAVELED INTO, YOU KNOW, A LITTLE HIGHER TRAFFIC. YOU'D HAVE TO ALMOST CRANK YOUR NECK AND LOOK IN RIGHT THERE TO SEE ANYTHING THAT'S NOT GONNA HAPPEN WHEN YOU'RE DRIVING AT LEAST 35 MPH OR MORE. UM SO AGAIN, LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ARE BEING PROVIDED. WE THINK WE'RE BEING RESPONSIBLE WITH THAT THE NEXT VARIANCE RELATED TO INTERIOR VEHICULAR PENINSULAS AND ISLANDS AND NOT HAVING PLANTINGS, AND THAT IS A VERY ROUTINE STANDARD VARIANCE FOR GRAVEL PARKING MANEUVERING AND STORAGE YARD AREAS BECAUSE THERE ARE NO STRIPED AND MARKED PARKING SPACES ANYWAY, SO YOU WOULD NOT HAVE END ISLANDS IN GRAVELED AREAS. UM WITH TREES. THE TRUCKS NEED ROOM FOR MANEUVERING. WE NEED TO MOVE EQUIPMENT AROUND, AND THAT'S A PRETTY STANDARD VARIANCE FOR AN INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY. IN ADDITION , NUMBER FOUR THE ITEM RELATED TO THE FENCE. WE DID HAVE APPROVAL FOR THE 6 FT HEIGHT CHAIN LINK FENCE IN THE PAST SINCE 1988. I DON'T KNOW IF ALL OF THAT OLD FENCE IS STILL THERE . PROBABLY NOT. BUT THE NEW FENCE WILL BE A NEW FENCE, AND IT IS AGAIN AN ENTITLEMENT THAT HAS BEEN ON THE PROPERTY SINCE 1988. THE CODE WOULD ALLOW A CHAIN LINK FENCE. IF IT WAS 5 FT. WE'RE JUST EXCEEDING THAT BY 1 FT. AND LASTLY, UM, THE GRAVEL STORAGE AREA HAS BEEN THERE. BUT THERE IS A CODE PROVISION RELATED TO PARKING AREAS SHOULD BE A CONCRETE SURFACE OR ASPHALT . WE WOULD LIKE THE GRAVEL STORAGE AREA TO REMAIN FOR AGAIN . THE TRUCK MANEUVERING THE STORAGE AREA FOR THE EQUIPMENT AND THE CRANES. SO THAT IS THE REQUEST AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. UM, I HAVE A QUESTION. UM INDICATE THAT IN THE NEXT TWO YEARS, UH YOU WANT, UH, WORK ON THE PROPERTY WHICH YOU CURRENTLY OWN THAT TIME, WHICH YOU? UH UH, CHANGED THE GRAVEL AREA. BLACK, TOP OR CONCRETE, OR WOULD IT REMAIN? UH GRAVEL. SO THE OUTSIDE STORAGE IS WHAT WAS PERMITTED UNDER THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT THIS VARIANCE APPLICATION BEFORE THIS BODY IS DEALING WITH THE GRAVEL PER SE. WHAT? I WILL TELL YOU THIS. ANOTHER CONDITION OF OUR SPECIAL PERMIT WAS THAT IF WE ARE GOING TO DO ANYTHING WITH THIS PROPERTY, WE'LL HAVE TO COME IN WITH A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AT THAT TIME, SO OUR CLIENT'S IDEA IS TO HAVE MORE BUILD BUILDABLE FOOTPRINT ON THIS PARCEL. FOUR BUILDINGS. I WOULD THINK THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A USER BY THEN. WITH THE WAY CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT IS GOING IN OUR CITY AND CENTRAL OHIO FOR YOU KNOW, A NICE RETAIL BUILDING UP FRONT RETAIL COMMERCIAL UPFRONT WITH ANOTHER WAREHOUSE BUILDING STRUCTURE IN THE REAR. THAT WILL BE MARKETABLE VALUABLE. SO, YES, IN CASES OF THAT WE WOULD WANT TO SHOW A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH IMPROVEMENTS LIKE PARKING AREAS DRIVE AISLES THAT ARE PAVED, UM WITH LANDSCAPING AND, OF COURSE, BUILDING GOING THROUGH. DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SO I DON'T KNOW THEIR FUTURE PLAN. BUT THAT IS OUR IDEA. YEAH, I WAS JUST MR HOJI. UM. NOW I MEAN , MY UNDERSTANDING IS THIS SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR TWO

[00:40:02]

YEARS, RIGHT RIGHT OR TO SEE 4923, BASED ON. RIGHT WHAT YOU'VE WENT THROUGH COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION. CORRECT? YES. I WOULD ALSO NOTE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT STAFF UNDER THEIR STAFF REPORTS ADDED THE STIPULATIONS RELATED TO THE VARIANCES THAT ARE BEFORE YOU TODAY AND THEY SUPPORT THE VARIANCES. SO ALSO PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL READ THROUGH THE VARIANCES THAT WE WOULD BE SEEKING HERE, AND THEY SUPPORTED THAT. SO THAT WAS ALL KIND OF PUT INTO THE RESOLUTION AT THE TIME OF SPECIAL PERMIT TO LET EVERYONE KNOW IN THE CITY THIS IS SUPPORTED, AND THESE ARE ALL OF THE ITEMS THAT ARE NEEDED AS LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS FOR THIS USE. UH HAVE, UH UH, MISS SCOTT, IF WE, UH, CONTACTED THE PROPERTY OWNERS? YOU MENTIONED THAT YOU HAD A POSITIVE LETTER FROM ONE TO THE EAST. I THINK UM, THAT MAY HAVE BEEN WHAT THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCESS, NOT THIS PROCESS. BUT YES, WE DID SEND OUT LETTERS AND I DID NOT RECEIVE ANYTHING. OK, THANK YOU. OK JUST NOTE THE ONE STIPULATION HERE IS TO OBTAIN OFFENSE PERMIT , OK? YES, I'VE GOT THAT HERE TWO YEARS. AND YOU'RE OK WITH THAT, RIGHT? YES, OK. OK UM NO.

NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. I'LL READ THIS ONCE AGAIN. AS THEY HEAR THE APPEAL. I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE GRANT THE APPEAL OF REBECCA MOTT ATTORNEY A PLANK LAW FIRM LP, A REPRESENTING 30,400, SOUTHWEST LLC FOR 3 400. SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. PARCEL NUMBER, 040-00. FOR THE FOLLOWING VARIANCES. UH A VARIANCE SECTION 11 36.06 A THREE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 45 FT TRUCK PARKING SETBACK, THE 6 FT EARTHEN MOUND AND THREE STAGGERED ROWS OF EVERGREENS TO A 20 FT. UH, TRUCK PARKING SETBACK WITH A 4 FT EARTHEN MOUND AND TWO STAGGERED ROWS OF EVERGREENS. BO SECTION 11 36.06 B. WE'RE INSIDE YARDS ADJACENT TO COMPATIBLE USE DISTRICTS TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 20 FT PARKING SETBACK FROM 20 FT TO ZERO TO THE NORTH AND 20 FT TO FIVE TO THE EAST TO PROVIDE NO PARKING PERIMETER PLANTINGS TO THE NORTH AND TO RELOCATE THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT PERIMETER PLANTINGS FOR THE EAST. TO THE SOUTH EAST PORTION OF THE SITE AND TO SCREEN THE STORAGE AREA FROM SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. I SEE A BEAR TO, UH, A VARIANCE TO SECTION 11 36.06 D TO WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT TO INSTALL INTERIOR VEHICULAR, UH, PENINSULAS ISLANDS, ISLES AND ISLANDS FOR PLANNING AREAS FOR LANDSCAPING. THE OVARIAN C SECTION 11 37.05 C TO ALLOW A 6 FT HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE AND E AVARI DISSECTION 11. 37.11 A TO ALLOW THE GRAVEL PARKING LOT IN THE AREA TO REMAIN WITH ONE STIPULATION THAT A FENCE PERMIT BE GRANTED. THE SECOND. OUR SECOND PINGA YES. MR H? YES, YOURS HAS BEEN GRANTED. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND AS WITH THE ONE STIPULATION OF THE FENCE , AND, UH UM. THE I ASSUME YOU'RE GOING TO INITIATE CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS AND AS USUAL CITY COUNCIL COULD ALWAYS REVERSE ONE OF OUR DECISIONS. SO THERE'S 21 WAITING, PERIOD. OK, GREAT. THANK YOU SO MUCH APPRECIATE IT.

HAVE A GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU, REBECCA WHILE WE'RE HERE, CAN WE, UH FORMALLY WITHDRAWN.

NUMBER FOUR, WE SAME YEAH. COULD I ASK YOU A QUESTION REAL QUICK. YEAR START. FOR THE SPECIAL PLAN. IT WOULD BE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE SPECIAL PERMIT, WHICH PROBABLY HAD A 30 DAY, EFFECTIVE PERIOD FROM THE DAY IT WAS DECEMBER. 5TH ON HERE, SO I DON'T KNOW THE EFFECT EFFECTIVE 22. EFFECTIVE TWO YEARS FROM FEBRUARY. OK OK, OK, OK AND THEN, UH THE NEXT ITEM ON THE

[D.4. Hear the appeal of Rebecca Mott, Plank Law Firm LPA for 5824 Quail Run Dr., (Parcel #040-009118), for the following variances. (Staff note: the applicant is appealing the Building Inspectors “Notice of Corrections” decision (Exhibit 2) in sequential order (see Exhibit A.) Staff has attempted to summarize each item as a variance appeal request for this agenda.)]

AGENDA IS THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL OF REBECCA MOTT FOR PLANK LAW FIRM LP A 4 58 24 QUAIL RUN

[00:45:01]

ROAD PARCEL NUMBER 0400091. FOR THE FOLLOWING VARIANCES AND NOTE THE STAFF. THE APPLICANT IS APPEALING THE BUILDING INSPECTORS NOTICE OF CORRECTIONS DECISION EXHIBIT. TO IN SEQUENCE ORDER C EXHIBIT A AND THE STAFF ATTEMPTED TO SUMMARIZE EACH OF THESE ITEM VARIANCES, UM, APPEAL AND REQUEST FOR THE AGENDA. SO WE DO I NEED TO READ ALL THESE OR JUST WITHDRAW. SO UH UH, MAKE A MOTION TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL REQUEST. I WILL. SECOND THAT. DO YOU HAVE ANY ISSUE WITH THAT? NO I WOULD JUST SAY IN CONSIDERATION THAT CITY STAFF IN THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT HAS ISSUED A NEW CORRECTIONS ORDER AND HAS WITHDRAWN THE FORMER ONE THAT WE APPEALED FROM IN THIS CASE, THAT IS THE PURPOSE AND REASON FOR OUR WITHDRAWAL OF THAT NOTICE OF CORRECTION. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. PINGA. MR. HAH! YES, OK, GREAT. THANK YOU. YES, SIR. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND IS THERE ANY NEW BUSINESS? NO, SIR. YES NO, SIR. OK SO I'D LIKE TO ADJOURN. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.